No Time To Die: Production Diary

18908918938958962563

Comments

  • MurdockMurdock Mr. 2000
    Posts: 16,116
    She could have found both films at Dollar General for 3 dollars each. That's where I got my copies of NSNA and CR67. What a waste of court time. This better not delay Bond 25.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited August 2017 Posts: 23,883
    I didn't read anywhere that it would disrupt production on B25. It's an independent matter and involves Fox Home Video as well.

    This is just about alleged false and misleading advertising. That's all.
  • MurdockMurdock Mr. 2000
    Posts: 16,116
    Given MGM's recent flops and other instability issues in the past this is the last thing the company needs.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 35,453
    bondjames wrote: »
    I didn't read anywhere that it would disrupt production on B25. It's an independent matter and involves Fox Home Video as well.

    This is just about alleged false and misleading advertising. That's all.

    This, definitely not something that will stall production.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    edited August 2017 Posts: 9,117
    bondjames wrote: »
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    Judge Rules MGM Must Face Lawsuit Over James Bond Box Set Missing Two Bond Films
    hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-mgms-bid-toss-lawsuit-james-bond-box-set-missing-two-bond-films-1026846

    Could this be the disruption that delays production, and leads to another soft reboot? Hehe unlikely, but it would be kinda funny if that happened.
    The plaintiff has a point in my view, strictly speaking. The judge made the right call.

    Absolutely. Say some granny buys the box set for her grandson's birthday and his favourite Bond film is NSNA (having been on here for so many years and experienced all manner of Bond lunacy out there I'm sure such a person exists) then the poor lad would have been mightily disappointed.

    The general public can't be expected to know the difference between an EON produced film and a Feldman or Mclory produced film. When it says 'all the Bond films' they quite reasonably can expect all the Bond films.

    Open and shut case frankly.

    The only grey area is where does the law stand on CR54 as that was a TV production so not strictly a film?
  • MurdockMurdock Mr. 2000
    Posts: 16,116
    The only grey area is where does the law stand on CR54 as that was a TV production so not strictly a film?

    It usually comes included with CR67 as a bonus feature.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    RC7 wrote: »
    Filming will begin late 2018

    OMG. Where? Link??

    Jesus calm down mate youre like Pavlov's dog hearing the dinner bell.

    The film is realeased in 2019 so you don't have to be Woodward and Bernstein to surmise it will be filmed late 2018 into early 2019.

    A few more scoops:

    Post production will be done in mid to late 2019.
    The teaser trailer will be released in early to mid 2019.
    The poster will be released in mid to late 2019.

    Fuck sake, can I be......excited and happy??? Man, want me to throw myself off a building?? If you say "Calm Down!" then the same goes for you. No reason to get irritated by someone's sincere excitement!

    Well if if this statement of the obvious excites you I worry for your health when they actually cast anyone or the trailer is released.

    You need to watch your blood pressure because I hear an announcement on who's doing the on set catering is due soon.
    With the result that was SP (which I was very excited about prior to the release), I think I'm going to approach B25 with much less excitement. Rather be positively surprised at the cinema. Still, following the production over the next two years is going to be interesting.

    Absolutely. The lowness of expectation after SP and with the knowledge P&W are back means going in one can only be pleasantly surprised.
    Can you refrain from being a twerp on this thread, starting about now? It seems that is the only type of posts you can make. Surely the mods have thought about banning you?

    Unlikely. It was before your time, but Wiz was once voted one of the top 5 c***** on the board. I have to say I was delighted to finish above him, although I'm not convinced it was entirely deserved. In context this is rather polite. The mods don't ban sarcasm. Cheer up, old boy.

    Can't remember who won, just the crushing disappointment that it was neither of us. Pretty sure that was underserved too.

    It was certainly a left field winner. Echoes of the Leicester title win, if Leicester had been shit.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 4,603
    He's far to artsy and serious for a franchise that ought to be a pleasure trip.

    Movies of The Dark Knight trilogy and Inception were exactly as serious as a great Bond movie should be.
    You mean confusing Rubik's Cube that tries to be a genius when it isn't.

    Yes, Nolan is overrated. And don't get me started on the endless Interstellar.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe Given the circumstances
    Posts: 7,331
    echo wrote: »
    He's far to artsy and serious for a franchise that ought to be a pleasure trip.

    Movies of The Dark Knight trilogy and Inception were exactly as serious as a great Bond movie should be.
    You mean confusing Rubik's Cube that tries to be a genius when it isn't.

    Yes, Nolan is overrated. And don't get me started on the endless Interstellar.

    Interstellar was the turning point. You'll notice how Nolan's films got longer and more ambitious over time, then suddenly shrunk back to under 2 hrs? He's had a realisation, and it forced him to innovate. I believe him when he says we have only scratched the surface of what cinema has to offer. Dunkirk proves it.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    echo wrote: »
    He's far to artsy and serious for a franchise that ought to be a pleasure trip.

    Movies of The Dark Knight trilogy and Inception were exactly as serious as a great Bond movie should be.
    You mean confusing Rubik's Cube that tries to be a genius when it isn't.

    Yes, Nolan is overrated. And don't get me started on the endless Interstellar.
    Thank you!
  • MurdockMurdock Mr. 2000
    Posts: 16,116
    This Nolan virus is spreading too fast. Come and get your dose of reality shots. ;)
    360742~nurse-holding-hypodermic-needle-posters.jpg
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Far, far, far, far, far, far, far away.
    Posts: 42,555
    Stop the whining and back on topic.
  • Posts: 3,045
    "Yann Demange spotted at EON HQ; B25 won't be based on Never Dream of Dying"

    So... how many pages do I need to scroll back to, to read up on this?
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Murdock wrote: »
    This Nolan virus is spreading too fast. Come and get your dose of reality shots. ;)
    360742~nurse-holding-hypodermic-needle-posters.jpg
    I can help trafficking some of the supplies.
  • Posts: 13,418
    Very skeptical about all these rumours. Although I'd like the idea of Shatterhand as the title. They seem to have a thing with titles of one word starting with S.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    This forums alone has been suggesting that title for some time. So, I wouldn't be surprised if it was lifted from here and strapped onto a fake news report.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 4,603
    Ultimately, the title matters little to the general audience, who can always ask to see "the new Bond." You could call it Flowers & Kisses and it would still sell tickets.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    echo wrote: »
    Ultimately, the title matters little to the general audience, who can always ask to see "the new Bond." You could call it Flowers & Kisses and it would still sell tickets.
    News Report:

    Flowers And Kisses, the new James Bond film title.

    Based on the novel Never Send Flowers by John Gardner. ;)

    Now, can I get my 15 minutes of fame? Haha!
  • JamesBondKenyaJamesBondKenya Danny Boyle laughs to himself
    Posts: 2,729
    Shatterhand just doesnt have a bond feel to it, it sounds more like a benson book or something. I doubt this will be the title
  • Filming will begin late 2018

    OMG. Where? Link??

    Jesus calm down mate youre like Pavlov's dog hearing the dinner bell.

    The film is realeased in 2019 so you don't have to be Woodward and Bernstein to surmise it will be filmed late 2018 into early 2019.

    A few more scoops:

    Post production will be done in mid to late 2019.
    The teaser trailer will be released in early to mid 2019.
    The poster will be released in mid to late 2019.

    Fuck sake, can I be......excited and happy??? Man, want me to throw myself off a building?? If you say "Calm Down!" then the same goes for you. No reason to get irritated by someone's sincere excitement!

    Well if if this statement of the obvious excites you I worry for your health when they actually cast anyone or the trailer is released.

    You need to watch your blood pressure because I hear an announcement on who's doing the on set catering is due soon.

    giphy.gif

    Am I the only one who finds it amusing that at this point it's easier to predict the director of Bond 26 than who will direct Bond 25?

    That is kind of mind-blowing and entirely true.

    bondjames wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I'm trying to remember when the title was announced last time. Was it about ten months prior?

    Announced Dec. 4, 2014.
    One of the biggest *yawn* moments in the franchise's illustrious history imho. Hoping for something a little more inspired next time out.

    "S P E C T R E"

    Hesitant applause.

    Mendes lethargically strolls out. "So there you have it...I couldn't possibly comment."

    Murdock wrote: »
    This Nolan virus is spreading too fast. Come and get your dose of reality shots. ;)
    360742~nurse-holding-hypodermic-needle-posters.jpg

    There are worse diseases going round than the West Nolan Virus.
  • MinionMinion Don't Hassle the Bond
    edited August 2017 Posts: 1,165
    echo wrote: »
    Ultimately, the title matters little to the general audience, who can always ask to see "the new Bond." You could call it Flowers & Kisses and it would still sell tickets.
    News Report:

    Flowers And Kisses, the new James Bond film title.

    Based on the novel Never Send Flowers by John Gardner. ;)

    Now, can I get my 15 minutes of fame? Haha!
    "Roses are red, violets are blue. He's got a license to kill, and he's coming for you!"
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Shatterhand just doesnt have a bond feel to it, it sounds more like a benson book or something. I doubt this will be the title
    More like a Gardner book (i.e. Brokenclaw).
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,571
    Zekidk wrote: »
    "Yann Demange spotted at EON HQ; B25 won't be based on Never Dream of Dying"

    So... how many pages do I need to scroll back to, to read up on this?
    Just go to page 1.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Far, far, far, far, far, far, far away.
    Posts: 42,555
    maxresdefault.jpg
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited August 2017 Posts: 23,883
    I can't see it being Shatterhand quite frankly, but then again if someone had told me they would call B24 Spectre I would have laughed in their face, so what do I know? Not much.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Good thing it wasn't called Sceptre, misspelled so Spectre became something else (cough Lies and Dies cough!).
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe Given the circumstances
    Posts: 7,331
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I still think SPECTRE is a great title. It carries weight history and it is sharp. Sounds great when said aloud too. What do you want? to go back to the days of DEATH, DIE, KILL, LOVE, EVERs, DAYs and TOMORROWs? I mean half of the Brosnan titles were awful because of sophomoric attempts at poetic depth.

    SP also has the double meaning, as M is looking on from beyond the grave.
  • edited August 2017 Posts: 4,622
    bondjames wrote: »
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    Judge Rules MGM Must Face Lawsuit Over James Bond Box Set Missing Two Bond Films
    hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-mgms-bid-toss-lawsuit-james-bond-box-set-missing-two-bond-films-1026846

    Could this be the disruption that delays production, and leads to another soft reboot? Hehe unlikely, but it would be kinda funny if that happened.
    The plaintiff has a point in my view, strictly speaking. The judge made the right call.

    I can't agree. The judge is only technically right. The plaintiff got what they paid for .
    This is a serious waste of court time.
    If I were to buy a "complete" set of say Dracula films, it would behoove me to research what I was actually getting, as I doubt the set would include all Dracula films.
    The judge need only instruct the seller to define clearer, what they are selling, so lazy buyers won't be inclined to waste court time.
    This is my IMO.
    The plaintiff strikes me as quite pathetic.

    Buyer could have done the Google search to see what might be not included.
    This should have been tossed.
    The two films missing, as any Bond fan knows, are not part of this set.
    The two films are peripheral, produced independently, and not associated with this set


  • Posts: 13,271
    timmer wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    Judge Rules MGM Must Face Lawsuit Over James Bond Box Set Missing Two Bond Films
    hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-mgms-bid-toss-lawsuit-james-bond-box-set-missing-two-bond-films-1026846

    Could this be the disruption that delays production, and leads to another soft reboot? Hehe unlikely, but it would be kinda funny if that happened.
    The plaintiff has a point in my view, strictly speaking. The judge made the right call.

    I can't agree. The judge is only technically right. The plaintiff got what they paid for .
    This is a serious waste of court time.
    If I were to buy a complete set of say Dracula films, it would behoove me to research what I was actually getting, as I doubt the set would include all Dracula films.
    Buyer could have done the Google search to see what might be not included.
    This should have been tossed.
    The two films missing, as any Bond fan knows, are not part of this set.
    The two films are peripheral, produced independently, and not associated with this set


    Good analogy. It's like buying a box set of the Hammer film Draculas that include seven with Christopher Lee, plus Brides of Dracula and Legend of the Seven Golden Vampires....then whining that the Coppola/Gary Oldman version isn't included in this set.
Sign In or Register to comment.