› › ›

No Time To Die: Production Diary

1…14451446144814501451…2507

Comments

  • noSolaceleftnoSolaceleft
    Posts: 1,162
    As I already told here once, to my neighbors son the Bond movies have become strictly a proposition for elder people. He likes some of the Moore and Connery though.
  • fjdinardofjdinardo
    edited April 2018 Posts: 1,965
    Cubby would never let any of these delays happen
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    I really think they should cut their losses with Craig now,he will be possibly even 5 years older than he was in SP.

    He drove off into the morning sun so it should end there like it was supposed to.

    We need a new Bond and a whole new re-think for B25.

    Not going to happen though.
    Same old shit.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,771
    First in terms of Bond multimedia we still got a lot this decade
    Two films (so far) with a third looking likely next year
    3 video games
    4 novels (I am including this years Forever and A Day)
    A bunch of comic books

    Where as say for a Macgyver fan in the I believe 22 year gap between the last TV movie and the premiere of the reboot show we got
    1 crappy mobile game
    1 series of comic books
    2 commercials
    And that is it

    (Oh yeah one horrible parody from snl which yeah let’s not talk about it)

    So I think Bond fans can learn a thing or two about patience
  • fjdinardofjdinardo
    Posts: 1,965
    I know I’m gonna get a lot of flack for this but if these delays are just gonna keep happening everytime between Bond films then a part of me wants the series to end. Go out in a high note. Maybe it is better if EON sells the franchise
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    Posts: 17,293
    barryt007 wrote: »
    I really think they should cut their losses with Craig now,he will be possibly even 5 years older than he was in SP.

    He drove off into the morning sun so it should end there like it was supposed to.

    We need a new Bond and a whole new re-think for B25.

    Not going to happen though.
    Same old shit.

    If they are so desperate for an older Bond, just bring Pierce back! He's still his cool self :))
    Pierce+Brosnan+UPCijnUmqm5m.jpg
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I'm willing to make a bet here. Bond will never end. It's too valuable a franchise. I do think it hasn't been managed very well of late, and there are many reasons for that as we know (I'm not laying blame at one person's door but we know who the suspects are).

    Eventually this will all get back on track. Business needs will drive it all. It always does.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited April 2018 Posts: 8,087
    barryt007 wrote: »
    I really think they should cut their losses with Craig now,he will be possibly even 5 years older than he was in SP.

    He drove off into the morning sun so it should end there like it was supposed to.

    We need a new Bond and a whole new re-think for B25.

    Not going to happen though.
    Same old shit.

    Yeah, since 2006. Can't see how anyone can justify it taking over 4 years to knock out a Bond romp, but am sure many will try. It's a joke how creatively in a rut the series is. Reaching unprecedented levels of complacency, IMO.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Kicking: Impossible
    edited April 2018 Posts: 6,733
    Regarding the delays, once again my hope is that whoever partners up with MGM will demand more frequent films.

    Marvel and Disney will hopefully force Bond to up its game.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    I really think they should cut their losses with Craig now,he will be possibly even 5 years older than he was in SP.

    He drove off into the morning sun so it should end there like it was supposed to.

    We need a new Bond and a whole new re-think for B25.

    Not going to happen though.
    Same old shit.

    If they are so desperate for an older Bond, just bring Pierce back! He's still his cool self :))
    Pierce+Brosnan+UPCijnUmqm5m.jpg

    He would be more entertaining too,after the last film !!


    mattjoes wrote: »
    Regarding the delays, once again my hope is that whoever partners up with MGM will demand more frequent films.

    Marvel and Disney will hopefully force Bond to up its game.

    It doesn't seem to be,but hopefully if WB or Universal step in,then they would definitely want more frequency on the films.

    Time is money to companies like WB,Universal,Disney,Marvel et al.

    Just not for the crumbling cobwebbed filled studios of MGM.

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    I really think they should cut their losses with Craig now,he will be possibly even 5 years older than he was in SP.

    He drove off into the morning sun so it should end there like it was supposed to.

    We need a new Bond and a whole new re-think for B25.

    Not going to happen though.
    Same old shit.

    If they are so desperate for an older Bond, just bring Pierce back! He's still his cool self :))
    Pierce+Brosnan+UPCijnUmqm5m.jpg
    He would be more entertaining too,after the last film !!
    As much as I'd love to see that, in this reality that will never happen. Not even if people stirred the solar system along with its planets in a 360 degree rotation. That's not happening with Eon.
  • fjdinardofjdinardo
    Posts: 1,965
    This is all Harry’s fault. If he would of just sold his half to Cubby
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    Posts: 17,293
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    I really think they should cut their losses with Craig now,he will be possibly even 5 years older than he was in SP.

    He drove off into the morning sun so it should end there like it was supposed to.

    We need a new Bond and a whole new re-think for B25.

    Not going to happen though.
    Same old shit.

    If they are so desperate for an older Bond, just bring Pierce back! He's still his cool self :))
    Pierce+Brosnan+UPCijnUmqm5m.jpg

    He would be more entertaining too,after the last film !!

    He most certainly would!
  • mattjoesmattjoes Kicking: Impossible
    Posts: 6,733
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    I really think they should cut their losses with Craig now,he will be possibly even 5 years older than he was in SP.

    He drove off into the morning sun so it should end there like it was supposed to.

    We need a new Bond and a whole new re-think for B25.

    Not going to happen though.
    Same old shit.

    If they are so desperate for an older Bond, just bring Pierce back! He's still his cool self :))
    Pierce+Brosnan+UPCijnUmqm5m.jpg
    He would be more entertaining too,after the last film !!
    As much as I'd love to see that, in this reality that will never happen. Not even if people stirred the solar system along with its planets in a 360 degree rotation. That's not happening with Eon.
    But it would be so exciting to see it happen... one can imagine!
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    mattjoes wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    I really think they should cut their losses with Craig now,he will be possibly even 5 years older than he was in SP.

    He drove off into the morning sun so it should end there like it was supposed to.

    We need a new Bond and a whole new re-think for B25.

    Not going to happen though.
    Same old shit.

    If they are so desperate for an older Bond, just bring Pierce back! He's still his cool self :))
    Pierce+Brosnan+UPCijnUmqm5m.jpg
    He would be more entertaining too,after the last film !!
    As much as I'd love to see that, in this reality that will never happen. Not even if people stirred the solar system along with its planets in a 360 degree rotation. That's not happening with Eon.
    But it would be so exciting to see it happen... one can imagine!
    It'd take a miracle. And I'd be purchasing all the tickets available.
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,533
    Well, all I can say is "ugh".
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Chaps it's important to keep in mind that as far as we know they are still on track for Nov 2019 with Boyle. Fingers crossed!
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    bondjames wrote: »
    Chaps it's important to keep in mind that as far as we know they are still on track for Nov 2019 with Boyle. Fingers crossed!
    Of course. I'd believe the otherwise when they announce it.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Kicking: Impossible
    Posts: 6,733
    Whatever happens, I bet Bond 25 opens with the gunbarrel and no text of any kind.
  • fjdinardofjdinardo
    Posts: 1,965
    mattjoes wrote: »
    Whatever happens, I bet Bond 25 opens with the gunbarrel and no text of any kind.

    This is a must.
  • AgentJamesBond007AgentJamesBond007 Vesper’s grave
    Posts: 2,630
    mattjoes wrote: »
    Whatever happens, I bet Bond 25 opens with the gunbarrel and no text of any kind.

    Hopefully...

  • Red_SnowRed_Snow Australia
    Posts: 2,496
    In an ideal world an October 2019 release date would be better. November 2019 is already heavy on box office competition, and I imagine they quite like the taste of $1 billion box office returns.

    - Nov 1: Wonder Woman 2
    - Nov 8: James Bond 25 // Death on the Nile
    - Nov 15: Sonic the Hedgehog // Margie Claus
    - Nov 22: Terminator 6 // Untitled Fox/Marvel Film 2
    - Nov 27: Frozen 2
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    In an ideal world an October 2019 release date would be better. November 2019 is already heavy on box office competition, and I imagine they quite like the taste of $1 billion box office returns.

    - Nov 1: Wonder Woman 2
    - Nov 8: James Bond 25 // Death on the Nile
    - Nov 15: Sonic the Hedgehog // Margie Claus
    - Nov 22: Terminator 6 // Untitled Fox/Marvel Film 2
    - Nov 27: Frozen 2
    Very true. We had speculated here a few months back that they were likely to move this date for that very reason and I think they will too. I just don't know if it's going to be earlier or later, and if the latter how much farther out.
  • Red_SnowRed_Snow Australia
    Posts: 2,496
    bondjames wrote: »
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    In an ideal world an October 2019 release date would be better. November 2019 is already heavy on box office competition, and I imagine they quite like the taste of $1 billion box office returns.

    - Nov 1: Wonder Woman 2
    - Nov 8: James Bond 25 // Death on the Nile
    - Nov 15: Sonic the Hedgehog // Margie Claus
    - Nov 22: Terminator 6 // Untitled Fox/Marvel Film 2
    - Nov 27: Frozen 2
    Very true. We had speculated here a few months back that they were likely to move this date for that very reason and I think they will too. I just don't know if it's going to be earlier or later, and if the latter how much farther out.

    If they need the time December could make sense. The only big release thus far is Star Wars, and the last one didn't do as well as expected, and Solo seems to be all over the map, so it's star power may be fading. There are just too many options for movie goers in Nov as opposed to Oct/Dec.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    edited April 2018 Posts: 4,554
    In the Variety story, did anyone catch the awkwardness of this sentence?

    MGM announced last summer that it would open Bond 25 on Nov. 8, 2019, but it’s unlikely to do so.

    Now, does this mean that MGM is unlikely to meet the November 8 due date? OR...does it mean that MGM is unlikely to the be the producer (it = MGM)?

    Furthermore, The Express is reporting that it is Boyle's work schedule and not MGM's problems that will cause the delay. Hmmm.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,474
    TripAces wrote: »
    In the Variety story, did anyone catch the awkwardness of this sentence?

    MGM announced last summer that it would open Bond 25 on Nov. 8, 2019, but it’s unlikely to do so.

    Now, does this mean that MGM is unlikely to meet the November 8 due date? OR...does it mean that MGM is unlikely to the be the producer (it = MGM)?

    Since they're discussing the dates regarding Bond 25 and Boyle's new musical/comedy, I'm assuming it's the former: unlikely to meet the previously announced date.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    In an ideal world an October 2019 release date would be better. November 2019 is already heavy on box office competition, and I imagine they quite like the taste of $1 billion box office returns.

    - Nov 1: Wonder Woman 2
    - Nov 8: James Bond 25 // Death on the Nile
    - Nov 15: Sonic the Hedgehog // Margie Claus
    - Nov 22: Terminator 6 // Untitled Fox/Marvel Film 2
    - Nov 27: Frozen 2
    Very true. We had speculated here a few months back that they were likely to move this date for that very reason and I think they will too. I just don't know if it's going to be earlier or later, and if the latter how much farther out.

    If they need the time December could make sense. The only big release thus far is Star Wars, and the last one didn't do as well as expected, and Solo seems to be all over the map, so it's star power may be fading. There are just too many options for movie goers in Nov as opposed to Oct/Dec.
    The trouble with that though is that Disney will lock down all IMAX theatres. They muscle their way in with the theatre chains. So inevitably that results in lost revenue for competitors.
    TripAces wrote: »
    In the Variety story, did anyone catch the awkwardness of this sentence?

    MGM announced last summer that it would open Bond 25 on Nov. 8, 2019, but it’s unlikely to do so.

    Now, does this mean that MGM is unlikely to meet the November 8 due date? OR...does it mean that MGM is unlikely to the be the producer (it = MGM)?
    I believe it is the former, because that will square with the THR article. So they mean that MGM is unlikely to meet the date.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    This is all Harry’s fault. If he would of just sold his half to Cubby

    I am pretty sure it s Putin s fault.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    This is all Harry’s fault. If he would of just sold his half to Cubby

    I am pretty sure it s Putin s fault.
    Or the other fella.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,554
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    TripAces wrote: »
    In the Variety story, did anyone catch the awkwardness of this sentence?

    MGM announced last summer that it would open Bond 25 on Nov. 8, 2019, but it’s unlikely to do so.

    Now, does this mean that MGM is unlikely to meet the November 8 due date? OR...does it mean that MGM is unlikely to the be the producer (it = MGM)?

    Since they're discussing the dates regarding Bond 25 and Boyle's new musical/comedy, I'm assuming it's the former: unlikely to meet the previously announced date.

    I get that. But what a bad sentence.
Sign In or Register to comment.