It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
He has not said that Craig will not be back.
His overall point is that he doesn't believe the final paperwork has been signed because a distributor is still not in place (based on what we know). That is a perfectly reasonable assumption at this stage based on information available in the public realm.
Thank you for trying to explain what should be obvious.
Inferno got so distracted by Bond jumping onto the Rolls Royce that he didn't pay attention to the road ahead.
?????
So you have been saying utter nonsense for the past 2 pages of this thread? Because my post re-uses word for word the argument you've been posting for the past few hours. If you can't even agree with your own opinion, then you're a lost cause (and a waste of time).
Craig's return was NOT a given (the type of contract they signed years ago about future Bond films does not guarantee anything), so it's perfectly fine for @noSolaceleft to want a confirmation from EON. What's not sane is claiming EON hasn't confirmed Craig yet, when in fact they have.
If you think I said Craig's return was a given, you have very bad reading & comprehension issues, as I never said that in any of my posts.
Check back on my earlier post about distributors - they will be on their knees with delight that Craig is back. And Eon has every right to sign their lead actor with or without a distributor's approval - even a low budget film has that power, although a lower budget independent film might jeopardise the distribution deal if the distribution company doesn't like their choice of lead actor/actress - but Bond is in the top league - everyone wants a piece of the pie. Craig is a lock. The wagon is already, very publicly, rolling -- with him onboard.
Don't think, just read my posts again. I never said that, so stop with that nonsense. I never claimed Craig's return was given or not given.
EDIT: Oh, I see, I forgot the 'not' in my last post. Don't lose your shit over a missing word.
His point about the paperwork possibly not being finalized is valid. He could be wrong, but I don't think it was necessary to have everyone jump on him for two plus pages attributing remarks to him which he did not in fairness make.
Daniel Craig is a criminal and should be put to jail for life, glad to know.
The whole god damn point I am making is Daniel Craig's statement on TV when he said he was doing Bond 25 makes his involvement official. Whether EON confirms or not, it's official. Craig cannot lie about doing Bond 25 if he wasn't under contract, that's call fraud. Either EON had said it before Craig, at the same time as Craig, after Craig or if they hadn't make any announcements at all is redundant the moment Craig openly gave his decision on TV.
What. On. Earth. Are. You. Talking. About? Seriously, has everyone gone completely mad today?
Yes, now we agree. @noSolaceleft is acting like Craig is a random actor going on TV and openly announcing he will be Bond in the next film. He is the current Bond actor, so unless EON confirm his contract/ties to the franchise is/are terminated, Craig's word are a factual confirmation.
Do you have any grasp in irony, or are you too simple-minded for you to process humour? I was over-exaggerating @noSolaceleft's claims, and you fell right in the trap in thinking I was serious. How many kids like you and noSolaceleft are there on MI6?
No distributor (unless insane) is going to turn down Craig as Bond - for what? It's a done deal unless Craig suddenly has second thoughts, but after such a public announcement, that seems highly unlikely. The t's in his contract may not yet be crossed and the i's not yet dotted, but it's happening, and both Craig and Eon have said so. Please, with due respect, can we end this waste of space discussion.
Can i requote myself from earlier ?
Just to clarify in this pointless and needless arguement.
We agree on the last part.
This debate shouldn't have even started in the first place. A complete waste of space.
If you still have no idea what I was trying to insinuate, shut up and move on. I explained my entire point in the very first reply I posted to @noSolaceleft on page 1074. We are now on page 1076, can you shut the hell up about this now? I made 1 reply to him saying he was talking nonsense, I didn't want waste 2 pages of discussion on his insanity only to have you still not understand a single shit I explained 2 pages ago.
No friggin wonder this thread has 1000+ posts when most members lose their shit over a single post, which I am guilty of concerning @noSolaceleft, so don't you go apeshit on what I'm saying on top of it. I tried to end his insane argumentation and not create god knows how many pages of random crap.
..and WHO started it? Maybe adress this to the right person.
Yes yes and yes !!
That is the main weakness for both films,but i still love SF.