› › ›

No Time To Die: Production Diary

1…3940424445…2507

Comments

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    It's not the capture concept that bothered some, including me, it was just... How it was executed. Now, in both of the leaked scripts, let's just say, it wasn't there. And I do believe they've added it the last minute which does seem wrong to an extent. No no, not a big problem. It was a good concept just in the wrong place... Because the capture and the break-free happened way too fast, like it was put there to attract the audience like how the hero is 'cool' to overpower his captors like that. They could have left that kind of screen trick for the next one.

    I liked his capture better when he was in Blofeld's lair.

    Anyways, I'd be waiting to hear from MGM and Eon for the next announcement.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    edited January 2016 Posts: 10,588
    Should we even consider taking this seriously, or not?

    http://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/jan/11/hugh-jackman-hints-at-james-bond-role-with-007-long-impression-on-twitter
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    No.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Not even in a million years.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,588
    My thoughts exactly.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,770
    Uh no we can however think about Jackman as a henchmen for Waltz's Blofeld.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Uh no we can however think about Jackman as a henchmen for Waltz's Blofeld.

    Mr Claws
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Jackman fits in for a role that pictures him as a heroic 00-agent whereas he actually is a mole within MI-6 working for Blofeld. You know, that "heroic superspy" who is beyond suspicion, leaving out Bond from that circle who does a digging into the man's background and secrets.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    A traitor within the MI6? Very interesting.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    A traitor within the MI6? Very interesting.
    They have people everywhere.
    tumblr_inline_mhm9w0GDqR1qz4rgp.gif
  • nikos78nikos78
    Posts: 150
    not a chance. his voice sounds very Dalton-ish though
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,770
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    A traitor within the MI6? Very interesting.
    yes and highly original ...

    if we aren't counting Live and Let Die (rosie Carver CIA but again) License to kill (ok he was DEA but the same logic applies) Goldeneye (006), Die Another Day (Miranda Frost) , Casino Royale (vesper Lynd), Quantum of Solace (M's Bodygaurd), Skyfall (silva), and Spectre (Max Denbeigh)

    I feel like I am missing a bond film And this is also not to include the amount of people who were supposedly friends and allies of bond but were villains for that list we would need to include

    You Only Live Twice, For Your Eyes Only, The Living Daylights and The World Is not Enough.



    but yes another traitor would be very interesting and original indeed.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,462
    That Jackman post was done solely in jest. Please don't start reading into it too much.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    I think it'd be really funny to have, Idris Elba, Damian Lewis, Clive Owen, Hugh jackman;etc to cameo as 00 agents
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    At least that would eliminate the chance of Elba ever being in the circle of the Bond casting criteria we see on the net every now and then.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,330
    They should cast all of us as Spectre agents. I think we could bring some menace with us. ;)
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Who's playing the cat?
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Some pussy actor
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    doubleoego wrote: »
    Some pussy actor
    Triple Entendre right there.
    :))
  • PropertyOfALadyPropertyOfALady Colders Federation CEO
    Posts: 3,675
    Murdock wrote: »
    They should cast all of us as Spectre agents. I think we could bring some menace with us. ;)

    I would probably be the first SPECTRE agent (minus Blofeld from FYEO) in a wheelchair.

  • bondboy007bondboy007
    Posts: 267
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    It's not the capture concept that bothered some, including me, it was just... How it was executed. Now, in both of the leaked scripts, let's just say, it wasn't there. And I do believe they've added it the last minute which does seem wrong to an extent. No no, not a big problem. It was a good concept just in the wrong place... Because the capture and the break-free happened way too fast, like it was put there to attract the audience like how the hero is 'cool' to overpower his captors like that. They could have left that kind of screen trick for the next one.

    I liked his capture better when he was in Blofeld's lair.

    Anyways, I'd be waiting to hear from MGM and Eon for the next announcement.

    It happened way too fast and felt kind of odd IMO. Bond voluntarily took a train to get picked up by a personal driver at an abandoned train station so that he could go to the SPECTRE base and be tortured.

    Then he gets there, is being tortured within 15 minutes, breaks out 5 minutes later, and is in the helicopter and gone 5 minutes after that. The whole script felt extremely forced, and this was the worst part of it. Extend that sequence, give the characters actual motivation to be there, and make that the ending of the film. Immediately makes the film better in my eyes. I didn't like a lot about SPECTRE, but everything after they got off the train were by far my least favorite parts of the film.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    bondboy007 wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    It's not the capture concept that bothered some, including me, it was just... How it was executed. Now, in both of the leaked scripts, let's just say, it wasn't there. And I do believe they've added it the last minute which does seem wrong to an extent. No no, not a big problem. It was a good concept just in the wrong place... Because the capture and the break-free happened way too fast, like it was put there to attract the audience like how the hero is 'cool' to overpower his captors like that. They could have left that kind of screen trick for the next one.

    I liked his capture better when he was in Blofeld's lair.

    Anyways, I'd be waiting to hear from MGM and Eon for the next announcement.

    It happened way too fast and felt kind of odd IMO. Bond voluntarily took a train to get picked up by a personal driver at an abandoned train station so that he could go to the SPECTRE base and be tortured.

    Then he gets there, is being tortured within 15 minutes, breaks out 5 minutes later, and is in the helicopter and gone 5 minutes after that. The whole script felt extremely forced, and this was the worst part of it. Extend that sequence, give the characters actual motivation to be there, and make that the ending of the film. Immediately makes the film better in my eyes. I didn't like a lot about SPECTRE, but everything after they got off the train were by far my least favorite parts of the film.
    Yes, it got far more complicated after they entered the base. There have been two leaked scripts, and none of them had catastrophic confusions made into the climax. Yes, they were insistent to make the London pursuit the finale, but on both cases, minus the final film, the Blofeld lair sequence was longer by far, and there were actual shootouts, not easy-way-out walk in the park, firing at the goons who don't know how to shoot and catch a bullet very easily. Bond didn't even get the chance to escape Scaramanga's unguarded island that fast, how did he manage to evade a Spectre base effortlessly I'll never know.

    Well, it is what it is. Let's hope the next script will have a solid structure.
  • PropertyOfALadyPropertyOfALady Colders Federation CEO
    Posts: 3,675
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    bondboy007 wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    It's not the capture concept that bothered some, including me, it was just... How it was executed. Now, in both of the leaked scripts, let's just say, it wasn't there. And I do believe they've added it the last minute which does seem wrong to an extent. No no, not a big problem. It was a good concept just in the wrong place... Because the capture and the break-free happened way too fast, like it was put there to attract the audience like how the hero is 'cool' to overpower his captors like that. They could have left that kind of screen trick for the next one.

    I liked his capture better when he was in Blofeld's lair.

    Anyways, I'd be waiting to hear from MGM and Eon for the next announcement.

    It happened way too fast and felt kind of odd IMO. Bond voluntarily took a train to get picked up by a personal driver at an abandoned train station so that he could go to the SPECTRE base and be tortured.

    Then he gets there, is being tortured within 15 minutes, breaks out 5 minutes later, and is in the helicopter and gone 5 minutes after that. The whole script felt extremely forced, and this was the worst part of it. Extend that sequence, give the characters actual motivation to be there, and make that the ending of the film. Immediately makes the film better in my eyes. I didn't like a lot about SPECTRE, but everything after they got off the train were by far my least favorite parts of the film.
    Yes, it got far more complicated after they entered the base. There have been two leaked scripts, and none of them had catastrophic confusions made into the climax. Yes, they were insistent to make the London pursuit the finale, but on both cases, minus the final film, the Blofeld lair sequence was longer by far, and there were actual shootouts, not easy-way-out walk in the park, firing at the goons who don't know how to shoot and catch a bullet very easily. Bond didn't even get the chance to escape Scaramanga's unguarded island that fast, how did he manage to evade a Spectre base effortlessly I'll never know.

    Well, it is what it is. Let's hope the next script will have a solid structure.

    I thought there were 3.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    edited January 2016 Posts: 15,423
    PropertyOfALady wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    bondboy007 wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    It's not the capture concept that bothered some, including me, it was just... How it was executed. Now, in both of the leaked scripts, let's just say, it wasn't there. And I do believe they've added it the last minute which does seem wrong to an extent. No no, not a big problem. It was a good concept just in the wrong place... Because the capture and the break-free happened way too fast, like it was put there to attract the audience like how the hero is 'cool' to overpower his captors like that. They could have left that kind of screen trick for the next one.

    I liked his capture better when he was in Blofeld's lair.

    Anyways, I'd be waiting to hear from MGM and Eon for the next announcement.

    It happened way too fast and felt kind of odd IMO. Bond voluntarily took a train to get picked up by a personal driver at an abandoned train station so that he could go to the SPECTRE base and be tortured.

    Then he gets there, is being tortured within 15 minutes, breaks out 5 minutes later, and is in the helicopter and gone 5 minutes after that. The whole script felt extremely forced, and this was the worst part of it. Extend that sequence, give the characters actual motivation to be there, and make that the ending of the film. Immediately makes the film better in my eyes. I didn't like a lot about SPECTRE, but everything after they got off the train were by far my least favorite parts of the film.
    Yes, it got far more complicated after they entered the base. There have been two leaked scripts, and none of them had catastrophic confusions made into the climax. Yes, they were insistent to make the London pursuit the finale, but on both cases, minus the final film, the Blofeld lair sequence was longer by far, and there were actual shootouts, not easy-way-out walk in the park, firing at the goons who don't know how to shoot and catch a bullet very easily. Bond didn't even get the chance to escape Scaramanga's unguarded island that fast, how did he manage to evade a Spectre base effortlessly I'll never know.

    Well, it is what it is. Let's hope the next script will have a solid structure.

    I thought there were 3.
    Perhaps, I am not aware... Unless we're counting the leaked notes and exchange between the superiors, too.
  • PropertyOfALadyPropertyOfALady Colders Federation CEO
    Posts: 3,675
    Does any one know for sure?
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,506
    As cool as back to back Bonds would be? I cannot see DC wishing to do that at all.
  • GettlerGettler
    Posts: 315
    He may just say "F*** it. Why not."
  • Ed83Ed83
    Posts: 1,181
    In the long run it would save him time. I can see him doing this if the price is right. Would this mean that we would get a Bond film in 2017 and 2018 (or 2018, 2019) back to back, or would they still put a 2 year gap in the release of both films?
  • tanaka123tanaka123
    Posts: 4,325
    Ed83 wrote: »
    In the long run it would save him time. I can see him doing this if the price is right. Would this mean that we would get a Bond film in 2017 and 2018 (or 2018, 2019) back to back, or would they still put a 2 year gap in the release of both films?

    It wouldn't save him time if he only intends to do one more.
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    edited January 2016 Posts: 4,441
    Daniel Craig wil be back for Bond 25 and Bond 26. 2017 and 2019 have been nice.

    There have titles of movies already and get the idea there hinting 007fan your time is up soon. The time as refer by Le Chiffre in Casino Royale.

    Return for Bond 25: Camile, and
    Vesper
    .

    Return also for
    Monica Bellucci
    and Felix (Jeffrey Wright), but not so sjure or this already be in next one and mabey in both.

    I also like to see Helen McCrory return. I think it is optional for two movies. Villiers (Tobias Menzies) mabey too.

    Inprove with making the movies not longer then 120-130 minutes. Rory Kinnear should get a credit on the posters. Let we first see what Lee Smith, Hoyte Van Hoytema and Dennis Gassner can make with Bond 25.

    No return for Sam Mendes & Thomas Newman. Also no return for
    Lea Seydoux
    . Don't trow a way the return of
    Bond finaly get the woman
    and Skyfall symbol
    of no return when Bond driving a way with woman in Astin Martin.

    Writers/Directers:

    Peter Weir, Alfonso Cuarón, John Madden and Denis Villeneuve are stil a option to direct.

    P&W are mabey needed for connections with Casino Royale, QOS, (Skyfall) and Spectre.
Sign In or Register to comment.