Come on, guys! TND isn't all THAT bad.

1246714

Comments

  • Posts: 11,189
    I certainly wouldn't describe TND as an "underrated" Bond film. I do admit to enjoying it in a throwaway manner, but I think its problems are fairly obvious - especially in the second half.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    edited March 2014 Posts: 17,687
    FoxRox wrote:
    I just can't forgive it for being what it ultimately is for me - generic.

    Okay, I want to analyse this since it's a common word used to describe TND by many.

    ge·ner·ic
    adjective
    of, applicable to, or referring to all the members of a genus, class, group, or kind; general.


    So in terms of TND, that would mean basically nothing special happens, and/or what does happen has been done before.

    I don't agree. On the face of the movie I suppose I can understand it as a toss-off criticism, but Bond coming face to face with an old love had never happened before. Bond had never been paired with such a kick-a*s female agent, though some TSWLM similarities are there. Carver's stealth boat was fairly new, not the ship-swallower from TSWLM, nor quite Atlantis. Okay, there's the world war aspect from YOLT & TSWLM, but that has to pop up once every decade or two, doesn't it? The hand-to-hand was all new & original thanks to Mr. Armstrong. The machine guns... yes, there was a lot of that laced about & concentrated in the finale. I agree that a bit of it was unnecessary. But many Bond movies indulge too far... TB had a lot of underwater stuff they could have lost, OHMSS had a lot of repetitive flirty seduction that I could have done without, TSWLM had a few explosions too many perhaps...

    I think the main unsaid criticism of TND is that it was almost edgy... then it wasn't. It was almost ridiculously OTT, but not really. In not being more severely rooted to reality, nor let free to soar the heights of real comic-book nonsense, it seems 'generic' in that way.

    I'd call that balanced, myself. ;)
  • Posts: 94
    I ve always quite liked TND. I would describe it as not being as good as the sum of its parts , the soundtrack is awesome (although they used the wrong theme tune imo,it should of been Kd langs), I ve had the car park chase music in my car ever since. The PTS is excellent and the Hamburg scenes sit well in the series. I find it refreshing that the producers try new ideas and that some films are fundamentally different to others in the series ,it wouldn't have lasted so long with 23 Dr No's, taking the films in new directions has given us CR,FYEO,LTK and arguably OHMSS. TND's biggest fault is that it was rushed and looks it. It would have been interesting to see what first choice Anthony Hopkins would have done in the villain role.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080
    chrisisall wrote:
    FoxRox wrote:
    I just can't forgive it for being what it ultimately is for me - generic.

    Okay, I want to analyse this since it's a common word used to describe TND by many.

    ge·ner·ic
    adjective
    of, applicable to, or referring to all the members of a genus, class, group, or kind; general.


    So in terms of TND, that would mean basically nothing special happens, and/or what does happen has been done before.

    I don't agree. On the face of the movie I suppose I can understand it as a toss-off criticism, but Bond coming face to face with an old love had never happened before. Bond had never been paired with such a kick-a*s female agent, though some TSWLM similarities are there. Carver's stealth boat was fairly new, not the ship-swallower from TSWLM, nor quite Atlantis. Okay, there's the world war aspect from YOLT & TSWLM, but that has to pop up once every decade or two, doesn't it? The hand-to-hand was all new & original thanks to Mr. Armstrong. The machine guns... yes, there was a lot of that laced about & concentrated in the finale. I agree that a bit of it was unnecessary. But many Bond movies indulge too far... TB had a lot of underwater stuff they could have lost, OHMSS had a lot of repetitive flirty seduction that I could have done without, TSWLM had a few explosions too many perhaps...

    I think the main unsaid criticism of TND is that it was almost edgy... then it wasn't. It was almost ridiculously OTT, but not really. In not being more severely rooted to reality, nor let free to soar the heights of real comic-book nonsense, it seems 'generic' in that way.

    I'd call that balanced, myself. ;)

    Didn't Bond have previous affairs with Pola Ivanova and Mary Goodnight?
    But forgive me for being a bit nit-picky.

    Though TND sits in 21st place in my ranking, I can't see why people berate the characters of Paris and Elliot Carver: IMO, they are some of the best bits of the film!
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,687
    Didn't Bond have previous affairs with Pola Ivanova and Mary Goodnight?
    But forgive me for being a bit nit-picky.
    Well, sexual liaisons & actual relationships are two different things.

    Aren't they-?
    :-?
  • Posts: 11,189
    chrisisall wrote:
    TND was Brosnan's YOLT, except that he was having SO much fun in the role! And Wai Lin was the best Bond girl ever IMHO.
    A big brassy bold Bond movie!

    I've watched both films fairly recently and, while I prefer Brosnan's performance to Connery's, I nonetheless think YOLT is easily the classier, better film of the two.
  • Posts: 12,243
    chrisisall wrote:
    Didn't Bond have previous affairs with Pola Ivanova and Mary Goodnight?
    But forgive me for being a bit nit-picky.
    Well, sexual liaisons & actual relationships are two different things.

    Aren't they-?
    :-?

    Depends XD But seriously, anything new that it had to offer I either forgot or just didn't consider to help the series that much for innovation purposes. Either way you look at it though, I think a few people would agree with me that it's the most generic Bond film.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080
    chrisisall wrote:
    Didn't Bond have previous affairs with Pola Ivanova and Mary Goodnight?
    But forgive me for being a bit nit-picky.
    Well, sexual liaisons & actual relationships are two different things.

    Aren't they-?
    :-?

    Well, I would say that Bond only had an "actual relationship" with two women: Tracy and Vesper.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,687
    Well, I would say that Bond only had an "actual relationship" with two women: Tracy and Vesper.
    Fair enough. I took his thing with Paris to be more like the threat of an actual relationship, then. :)>-
  • Posts: 12,243
    chrisisall wrote:
    Didn't Bond have previous affairs with Pola Ivanova and Mary Goodnight?
    But forgive me for being a bit nit-picky.
    Well, sexual liaisons & actual relationships are two different things.

    Aren't they-?
    :-?

    Well, I would say that Bond only had an "actual relationship" with two women: Tracy and Vesper.

    Agreed. Which, non-coincidentally, are my favorite two Bond girls.
  • edited March 2014 Posts: 4,622
    chrisisall wrote:
    I don't agree. On the face of the movie I suppose I can understand it as a toss-off criticism, but Bond coming face to face with an old love had never happened before. Bond had never been paired with such a kick-a*s female agent, though some TSWLM similarities are there. Carver's stealth boat was fairly new, not the ship-swallower from TSWLM, nor quite Atlantis. Okay, there's the world war aspect from YOLT & TSWLM, but that has to pop up once every decade or two, doesn't it? The hand-to-hand was all new & original thanks to Mr. Armstrong. The machine guns... yes, there was a lot of that laced about & concentrated in the finale. I agree that a bit of it was unnecessary. But many Bond movies indulge too far... TB had a lot of underwater stuff they could have lost, OHMSS had a lot of repetitive flirty seduction that I could have done without, TSWLM had a few explosions too many perhaps...

    I think the main unsaid criticism of TND is that it was almost edgy... then it wasn't. It was almost ridiculously OTT, but not really. In not being more severely rooted to reality, nor let free to soar the heights of real comic-book nonsense, it seems 'generic' in that way.

    I'd call that balanced, myself. ;)
    Nice synopsis. I think you've captured the elements that make this quite entertaining Bond film, maybe less than great.
    Its not perfect but its a pretty good Bond film I think. It maybe does seem to be too much of relentless action film at times, but still it works quite well. Carver I find to be a tad dramatic, as if he is trying a bit hard to be a quirky Bond villain, but I do like that he is a mastermind madman type, and not terribly physical. You can leave that to the henchmen and he's got a good one in Stamper.
    Personally I think Hatcher is gorgeous. She doesn't bother me at all. I would have prefered the story be rejigged so that she was lead Bond-girl needing rescuing, in the Domino mode, and reduce the role of Wai Lin action Bond-girl. Not kill her, just have her be a help along the way. Although having Wai Lin being killed in action, would not exactly have been unprecedented for a Bond film.

  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,687
    timmer wrote:
    Personally I think Hatcher is gorgeous. She doesn't bother me at all.
    Okay, we're on the same page there. But I'm a big Michelle Yeoh fan from way back (Wing Chun, Supercop, Tai-Chi Master, The Heroic Trio...) so to see her as a Bond girl was just mind boggling for me. ^:)^
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,009
    I have something I'd like to put forward...

    Up until Skyfall, Tomorrow Never Dies was the first techno-thriller type Bond. Anyone agree with that? Brosnan's second effort made use of media and technology in its plot like no Bond film had done before.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,687
    Up until Skyfall, Tomorrow Never Dies was the first techno-thriller type Bond. Anyone agree with that? Brosnan's second effort made use of media and technology in its plot like no Bond film had done before.

    Yes, that's absolutely right!
  • Posts: 12,243
    I have something I'd like to put forward...

    Up until Skyfall, Tomorrow Never Dies was the first techno-thriller type Bond. Anyone agree with that? Brosnan's second effort made use of media and technology in its plot like no Bond film had done before.

    Agreed. GE was a step towards that, but TND had a lot more of it.

  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,687
    FoxRox wrote:
    Agreed. GE was a step towards that, but TND had a lot more of it.
    TND was actually a fairly bold indictment of media manipulation.
  • Posts: 12,243
    chrisisall wrote:
    FoxRox wrote:
    Agreed. GE was a step towards that, but TND had a lot more of it.
    TND was actually a fairly bold indictment of media manipulation.

    Yes. I'll definitely give you that for an innovation of TND. I'm sorry it's just not one of my favorites, but I respect anyone's opinion that does like it. Every Bond film has at least 1 good merit for me.
  • Loved seeing Bond with two machine guns, one of the highlights of the movie!
  • BennyBenny In the shadowsAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 14,816
    Loved seeing Bond with two machine guns, one of the highlights of the movie!

    Because nothing says James Bond OO7 better, than when he's wielding two machine guns.
    It's moments like this that I prefer to keep to a minimum. It goes so far from the Fleming Bond. The character becomes yet another faceless hero, guns ablazing, using a humorous quip when he's done with the bloodshed.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    chrisisall wrote:
    FoxRox wrote:
    Agreed. GE was a step towards that, but TND had a lot more of it.
    TND was actually a fairly bold indictment of media manipulation.

    This is what I like about it. The theme at the heart of it is original for a Bond. For that reason alone I would be loathe to describe the movie as generic. Then again no Bond is generic in my eyes. They all have, in varying amounts, a frisson here and there that elevates them above a standard spy thriller or action flick. TND has plenty of great moments. As a few people have pointed out, the PTS is a particular highlight. IMHO it hasn't been bettered in the intervening years. TWINE was far too long, punctuated infrequently with moments of greatness. DAD was lacking in pace and jeopardy, with Brozzer lacking the swagger of TND. CR was very good, but is almost incomparable in terms of the content one would expect from a PTS. QoS could have been great, and at times was, but was lacking in coherence and content. SF was again very good, but I think TND was paced, edited and scored better as a package. The cross-cutting between MI6 and Bond hasn't been bettered.

  • Posts: 19,339
    I suppose the Dr Kauffman scene is the closest Brosnan came to a Fleming'esque moment,thats why its rated highly generally.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    I've had a curious relationship with this film since I first saw it. I liked it alright back in '97 but on each subsequent viewing I've found myself enjoying it less and less. To the point where it has now fallen to 21st in my rankings. The first half can be quite enjoyable at times. The Kaufman scene and parking garage chase are very exciting. However, as many others have mentioned, that second half is a real chore to get through. There is a whole lot of action but not much suspense. The humor almost always falls flat. I just find myself incredibly bored with it all. Oh well. My preferred method of watching TND is to turn it off right when Bond goes to Asia.
  • Benny wrote:
    Loved seeing Bond with two machine guns, one of the highlights of the movie!

    Because nothing says James Bond OO7 better, than when he's wielding two machine guns.
    It's moments like this that I prefer to keep to a minimum. It goes so far from the Fleming Bond. The character becomes yet another faceless hero, guns ablazing, using a humorous quip when he's done with the bloodshed.

    He had to use his resources man; a watch wouldn't do. I also think that the amount of violence was what audiences in the 1990s preferred.
  • edited March 2014 Posts: 11,189
    But it's not very believable is it?

    I prefer the shots of him setting up the grenade/jar bomb. THAT'S using resources.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    BAIN123 wrote:
    But it's not very believable is it?

    I prefer the shots of him setting up the grenade/jar bomb. THAT'S using resources.

    Neither is a man ploughing a JCB into a train and then scaling it to reach the roof of said train. I don't think believability has anything to do with it, more a case of taste and how you want your Bond portrayed.
  • Posts: 381
    Maybe not the best 007 film, but I really liked TND--it's too much fun not to like, and I loved Pryce.
  • Posts: 11,189
    RC7 wrote:
    BAIN123 wrote:
    But it's not very believable is it?

    I prefer the shots of him setting up the grenade/jar bomb. THAT'S using resources.

    Neither is a man ploughing a JCB into a train and then scaling it to reach the roof of said train. I don't think believability has anything to do with it, more a case of taste and how you want your Bond portrayed.

    You're right. I suppose its a case of "how many times have we seen other action heroes do that"?
  • Posts: 14,800
    BAIN123 wrote:
    RC7 wrote:
    BAIN123 wrote:
    But it's not very believable is it?

    I prefer the shots of him setting up the grenade/jar bomb. THAT'S using resources.

    Neither is a man ploughing a JCB into a train and then scaling it to reach the roof of said train. I don't think believability has anything to do with it, more a case of taste and how you want your Bond portrayed.

    You're right. I suppose its a case of "how many times have we seen other action heroes do that"?

    That is my issue with TND: it is so darn generic, by-the-number, unimaginative. I am not the biggest fan of LTK because although it does try in many ways to channel the spirit of Fleming, it uses far too many 80s action movies clichés. TND has the same problem, tenfold. It is a 90s action movies cliché-fest, with some of Bond movies's tropes to remind ourselves that it is a Bond movie. Some of the action is good, but Brosnan by moments plays Bond like a Terminator wearing a tuxedo. No time for character development, let's have one of the Bond girls a former flame, so he can bed her quickly, then let's not mention her again (or barely). Then there's one action piece, then another, then another... And let's have Bond play a video game, err I mean remote control his car, so he can have his BMW beat up the badguys in a parking lot. How exciting.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,687
    Ludovico wrote:
    It is a 90s action movies cliché-fest

    And SF Is a reworking of the premise from TWINE.
    And AVTAK is GF.

    You want originality? That was over in the 60's. :))
  • Posts: 1,394
    I love TND.For pure action, its one of the best Bond movies ever made.David Arnold made his debut here as a composer and it worked MUCH better than the Eric Serras terribkle score for GE.Wai Linn was a great kick ass Bond girl and Pryce is so deliciously OTT and entertaining as the baddie.This is where Brosnan really came into his own as Bond as well.There may be a little too much action in this film but its GREAT action.The BMW sequence, the bike chase, Michelle Yeoh kicking ass.I love it all.
Sign In or Register to comment.