›

007 Legends Announced

1…4142444647…110

Comments

  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    Murdock wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    Murdock wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    Halle must be sad right now.

    Or very happy.

    haha, maybe.

    You know, i wanna get up a topic here now.

    Bond will be remembering his previous missions while underwater - or unconscient.
    If he is remembering, surely he would be remembering the EXACT Things just how they happened. Bond's sense wouldn't change the race or physics of his previous villains meetings and fights. It just DOESN'T makes sense. Activision is doing crap and they can't regret it after it's too late.
    I think Activision is pulling the Hitman: Contracts card. Alter some events but leave some the same. :D <--- the smile is sarcastic.

    Hahah, i don't doubt of that. Still Hitman Games are even cooler than Activision's 007.

    ANOTHER Question. If Bond is REMEMBERING, surely the missions should take place right at the time! They've updated the missions to nowadays. License to Kill is from 80's, it shoulda happen in the 80's, not 2009 or something like this. That's crap, i won't even play this.
  • 00Beast00Beast
    Posts: 4,762
    Well, if they found the urge to change Jinx's race, at least Zao looks the same. Thankfully the whole originality of the movie hasn't been scrapped.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,334
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    Murdock wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    Murdock wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    Halle must be sad right now.

    Or very happy.

    haha, maybe.

    You know, i wanna get up a topic here now.

    Bond will be remembering his previous missions while underwater - or unconscient.
    If he is remembering, surely he would be remembering the EXACT Things just how they happened. Bond's sense wouldn't change the race or physics of his previous villains meetings and fights. It just DOESN'T makes sense. Activision is doing crap and they can't regret it after it's too late.
    I think Activision is pulling the Hitman: Contracts card. Alter some events but leave some the same. :D <--- the smile is sarcastic.

    Hahah, i don't doubt of that. Still Hitman Games are even cooler than Activision's 007.

    ANOTHER Question. If Bond is REMEMBERING, surely the missions should take place right at the time! They've updated the missions to nowadays. License to Kill is from 80's, it shoulda happen in the 80's, not 2009 or something like this. That's crap, i won't even play this.

    Yes the Hitman games are much Better than Activision's 007. (They should make Bond games like Hitman.)

    I don't much care for the timeline seeing as the timeline is an alternate Bond universe. I'm still going to get this game because I've wanted to play Some of these missions in a game form for a very long time.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    Murdock wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    Murdock wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    Murdock wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    Halle must be sad right now.

    Or very happy.

    haha, maybe.

    You know, i wanna get up a topic here now.

    Bond will be remembering his previous missions while underwater - or unconscient.
    If he is remembering, surely he would be remembering the EXACT Things just how they happened. Bond's sense wouldn't change the race or physics of his previous villains meetings and fights. It just DOESN'T makes sense. Activision is doing crap and they can't regret it after it's too late.
    I think Activision is pulling the Hitman: Contracts card. Alter some events but leave some the same. :D <--- the smile is sarcastic.

    Hahah, i don't doubt of that. Still Hitman Games are even cooler than Activision's 007.

    ANOTHER Question. If Bond is REMEMBERING, surely the missions should take place right at the time! They've updated the missions to nowadays. License to Kill is from 80's, it shoulda happen in the 80's, not 2009 or something like this. That's crap, i won't even play this.

    Yes the Hitman games are much Better than Activision's 007. (They should make Bond games like Hitman.)

    I don't much care for the timeline seeing as the timeline is an alternate Bond universe. I'm still going to get this game because I've wanted to play Some of these missions in a game form for a very long time.

    At least you'll have a taste of what Bond felt in those missions.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,334
    Yes indeed!
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    ANOTHER Question. If Bond is REMEMBERING, surely the missions should take place right at the time! They've updated the missions to nowadays. License to Kill is from 80's, it shoulda happen in the 80's, not 2009 or something like this.

    The problem with that being that the current Bond has an established birthdate, which is after 1962. Setting these missions in their original times would basically be establishing that, after all the trouble EON went through to make us certain this is a reboot and a different Bond, he'd still be the same Bond we've been seeing since 1962.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    Agent007391 wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    ANOTHER Question. If Bond is REMEMBERING, surely the missions should take place right at the time! They've updated the missions to nowadays. License to Kill is from 80's, it shoulda happen in the 80's, not 2009 or something like this.

    The problem with that being that the current Bond has an established birthdate, which is after 1962. Setting these missions in their original times would basically be establishing that, after all the trouble EON went through to make us certain this is a reboot and a different Bond, he'd still be the same Bond we've been seeing since 1962.

    Oooooh, Right.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    edited August 2012 Posts: 28,694
    00Beast wrote:
    Well, if they found the urge to change Jinx's race, at least Zao looks the same. Thankfully the whole originality of the movie hasn't been scrapped.

    DAD and 'original' in the same sentence? =)) I kid...or do I? /:)
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,037
    I may be clutching at straws here, but wasn't the title original? ;)
  • ZHalfterZHalfter
    Posts: 198
    I think the game will start with a cut scene of skyfall on the train he gets shot the falls into the water but all the missions under the water are connected in some way then when he wakes up it will be in the skyfall dlc
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    The problem is that Dan's Bond hasn't lived these events yet, so how can he have flashbacks to something he wasn't apart of?
  • ZHalfterZHalfter
    edited August 2012 Posts: 198
    The thing they are trying to get people to understand is that bond (Craig) got 00 status in 2006 and he has had these missions between the end of quantum and the new movie skyfall. He has lived the events but we as viewers have not been apart of them in cinema so they are now showing us throgh legends
  • ZHalfterZHalfter
    edited August 2012 Posts: 198
    5 Missions in 5 years?? Maybe...
  • VolanteVolante
    Posts: 774
    I don't think we should try to explain the timeline of this game, because no matter how much we try it won't make sense. Wish they'd just used the likeness of the previous Bonds and set their missions in their eras.
  • ZHalfterZHalfter
    Posts: 198
    So do I. Just like a bunch of mini games in one.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    ZHalfter wrote:
    The thing they are trying to get people to understand is that bond (Craig) got 00 status in 2006 and he has had these missions between the end of quantum and the new movie skyfall. He has lived the events but we as viewers have not been apart of them in cinema so they are now showing us throgh legends

    Is Skyfall that far apart from the end of QoS?
  • ZHalfterZHalfter
    Posts: 198
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    ZHalfter wrote:
    The thing they are trying to get people to understand is that bond (Craig) got 00 status in 2006 and he has had these missions between the end of quantum and the new movie skyfall. He has lived the events but we as viewers have not been apart of them in cinema so they are now showing us throgh legends

    Is Skyfall that far apart from the end of QoS?

    I would say it is because the movies take place in present time
  • VirageVirage
    Posts: 1,856
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    The problem is that Dan's Bond hasn't lived these events yet, so how can he have flashbacks to something he wasn't apart of?

    Different Bond. Like The Sinatra Danny Ocean is different from the Cloony Danny Ocean.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Virage wrote:
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    The problem is that Dan's Bond hasn't lived these events yet, so how can he have flashbacks to something he wasn't apart of?

    Different Bond. Like The Sinatra Danny Ocean is different from the Cloony Danny Ocean.

    But it IS Dan's Bond.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Volante wrote:
    I don't think we should try to explain the timeline of this game, because no matter how much we try it won't make sense. Wish they'd just used the likeness of the previous Bonds and set their missions in their eras.

    Yeah, I don't understand some people's obsession with this overall chronology of Bond. The more films come out, the more insane people will drive themselves. There isn't a single chronology, it's splintered all over the place.

  • oo7oo7
    edited August 2012 Posts: 1,068
    whoops wrong thread
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    RC7 wrote:
    Volante wrote:
    I don't think we should try to explain the timeline of this game, because no matter how much we try it won't make sense. Wish they'd just used the likeness of the previous Bonds and set their missions in their eras.

    Yeah, I don't understand some people's obsession with this overall chronology of Bond. The more films come out, the more insane people will drive themselves. There isn't a single chronology, it's splintered all over the place.

    Some of us, though, like chronology and continuity. There's nothing wrong with either liking it or not.
  • FromCanadaWithLoveFromCanadaWithLove Canada
    Posts: 612
    Is it me, or did they pick all of the controversial Bonds movies?
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    Moonraker: Bond in space
    OHMSS: Bond gets married, is replaced by another actor for the first time
    License to Kill: Bond goes rogue
    Die Another Day: Bond goes CGI megafest
    Mission 5 (presumed to be Goldfinger)
    Skyfall: Bond's assassination attempt by MI6

    Controversial, what'choo talkin' 'bout, Canadian?
  • ZHalfterZHalfter
    edited August 2012 Posts: 198
    Agent007391 wrote:
    RC7 wrote:
    Volante wrote:
    I don't think we should try to explain the timeline of this game, because no matter how much we try it won't make sense. Wish they'd just used the likeness of the previous Bonds and set their missions in their eras.

    Yeah, I don't understand some people's obsession with this overall chronology of Bond. The more films come out, the more insane people will drive themselves. There isn't a single chronology, it's splintered all over the place.

    Some of us, though, like chronology and continuity. There's nothing wrong with either liking it or not.

    Its not that we want chronology its that Brady does not understand that Casino Royale was the first bond book and all the other missions happened after it...they did the same thing in the reboot with Craig but they made it into a 2 part movie(QOS). What the game will be is that they are trying to tell us that CRAIG IS BOND for now and that after his first mission he had a lot of others...(monnraker, DAD, etc.). And he also now had the new "mission" Skyfall. Im not saying the missions as they announced them will be in "chronological" order im just saying that now that Craig is the new Bond (REBOTED THE SERIES IN 2006) that after CR and QOS he had these missions, including Skyfall...If anybody dosent understand just ask :D :D :D
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    I think people just read too much into it. That's fine, we can all take from it what we want I just sometimes think it's presumed the game world and film
    Agent007391 wrote:
    RC7 wrote:
    Volante wrote:
    I don't think we should try to explain the timeline of this game, because no matter how much we try it won't make sense. Wish they'd just used the likeness of the previous Bonds and set their missions in their eras.

    Yeah, I don't understand some people's obsession with this overall chronology of Bond. The more films come out, the more insane people will drive themselves. There isn't a single chronology, it's splintered all over the place.

    Some of us, though, like chronology and continuity. There's nothing wrong with either liking it or not.

    You're right. I just find it funny/odd when people get their knickers in a twist over a chronology they've formed in their own head.
  • ZHalfterZHalfter
    edited August 2012 Posts: 198
    RC7 wrote:
    I think people just read too much into it. That's fine, we can all take from it what we want I just sometimes think it's presumed the game world and film
    Agent007391 wrote:
    RC7 wrote:
    Volante wrote:
    I don't think we should try to explain the timeline of this game, because no matter how much we try it won't make sense. Wish they'd just used the likeness of the previous Bonds and set their missions in their eras.

    Yeah, I don't understand some people's obsession with this overall chronology of Bond. The more films come out, the more insane people will drive themselves. There isn't a single chronology, it's splintered all over the place.

    Some of us, though, like chronology and continuity. There's nothing wrong with either liking it or not.

    You're right. I just find it funny/odd when people get their knickers in a twist over a chronology they've formed in their own head.

    Hey why dont u read my last comment? :-* its all fact btw....
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Yeah I read it. I understand that's the general theory.
  • ZHalfterZHalfter
    Posts: 198
    Ok and what do you think?
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    ZHalfter wrote:
    Its not that we want chronology its that Brady does not understand that Casino Royale was the first bond book and all the other missions happened after it...they did the same thing in the reboot with Craig but they made it into a 2 part movie(QOS). What the game will be is that they are trying to tell us that CRAIG IS BOND for now and that after his first mission he had a lot of others...(monnraker, DAD, etc.). And he also now had the new "mission" Skyfall. Im not saying the missions as they announced them will be in "chronological" order im just saying that now that Craig is the new Bond (REBOTED THE SERIES IN 2006) that after CR and QOS he had these missions, including Skyfall...If anybody dosent understand just ask :D :D :D

    Okay... Some things I have to say.

    1) QOS is a direct sequel, not a second part. EON didn't make both CR and QOS at the same time and then split them up (and if they did, damn them for making us wait two years for what they already had filmed).
    2) We all understand that Craig is Bond, who doesn't understand that?
    3) I'm hoping we all understand that Bond had assignments between QOS and Skyfall. It's a little difficult for me to believe (even when bringing these past missions into the present) that Craig's Bond had 50 years of experience in 4 years, but if that's EON's feeling, I guess I can accept it.
    4) I actually don't have a 4, I just didn't want to end at 3.
Sign In or Register to comment.