It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Or the old woman with a machine gun in Goldfinger.
You are lucky i love you chaps !
I think with Brosnan in 87 he just didn't look or feel right and I'm not convinced he had the required acting ability to successfully pull it off. There was nothing credible about him to suggest he'd seen anything more than sunsets and shampoo bottles. If you look at Matt Damon in the first Bourne film he was what, 31? but everything about him had this aura of an already established experience and world weariness that developed and progressed with each subsequent entry. I just think that at 34 Brosnan just wasn't ready for Bond.
Frail?
I meant frail in terms of his appearance. But if we're talking about acting, then we missed out on some copious amounts of Brosnans Pain Face. :D
If Pierce was frail then so was Tim. They both had the same build. They did look similar.
And to be fair, he didn't look that well in GoldenEye, either. The rest, however? I've no complaints about. He looked at his best in The World Is Not Enough.
I agree. Brosnan matured nicely in appearance especially after GE.
However, again, he doesn't have the it factor. No one so far has.