It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Played the older teenage boyfriend to one of the characters daughters.
He could still have...
Once again after Skyfall he signed a two picture deal with the option for s third so technically he could be bond till bond 26.
Did I mention i thought she was pretty sexy then?
might have done....
Both films are directed by Martin Campbell, and they are considered to be an updating of the character to the present day. Both films are considered the high point of their respective Eras. There is a nice mix of interesting characters and explosive action. The DB5 features in both films.
Tomorrow Never Dies/Quantum of Solace
More fast paced than the previous film, both these are the shortest films of the actors tenure. They are much slicker, "a day in the life" type affairs, with an increased emphasis on action. The Bond girl is involved with the villain in both cases.
The World Is Not Enough/Skyfall
Slower, more character-driven affairs. M and the villain have previous. Both films have a chase sequence set in London. Also, there is a new Q in both films. There is also a connection to Bonds heritage.
Die Another Day/SPECTRE
Balls out action and fantasy. Both films are overladen with references to past Bond films. Bond has a car filled with gadgets, and chases said car with a henchman who has his own suped up ride. Both films feature villains who Bond has known by another name.
So as you can see, far from being polar opposites, these tenures are actually different sides of the same coin. One taken too seriously, the other not taken seriously enough. What we need now is a bridge. We need an actor who has a bit of that Irish charm mixed with the stark intensity of the Craig era. We need someone who can play both sides of the coin, and feels at ease with both. But who?
You still manage to mess up your more decent posts with the last bit. But maybe - one day... :>
You know you needn't reply to him, right? You've made your distaste toward him more than known.
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/who-will-be-the-next-bond-kit-harington-rules-himself-out-replace-daniel-craig-tom-hiddleston-aidan-a7072171.html
Yes. Why do we need Irish charm? Bond isn't Irish?
English, Irish, Scottish or welsh :)) so long as he's
A good actor, and looks good in the action sequences.
Come on I think even Mendes4lyfe would agree that like be brilliant you set the film in the distant future and have Bond coming out of retirement it could work.
Again how many times did Mission impossible do the same plot and only twice did they do it well and only once after you have seen the show (the show ruined the first film for me which is a shame as I would of loved to have seen Graves Phelps on the run and have to figure things out would really have allowed his range as an actor to show etc... Whatever)
For me cliche plot lines such as
There being a traitor in the midst
Bond going out for revenge due to a loss
Bond going rogue
Bond having to prove himself
Etc isn't bad it's just it depends on the execution...
For me the Swann Blofeld plot lines need to be finished up in bond 25 and that just well kind of it.