It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
:D
Yes, Tanner is so obviously smitten with Bond, it's plain to see.
I like this sort of cloak and dagger stuff. It's been missing from cinematic Bond since the 60's, sadly...
It's an interesting start - not sure how I feel about not actually seeing Bond almost 5 minutes into the film, though (counting the credits)
The Broz had a bit of Sneaky Bond, the Hamburg break-in in TND was pretty cool and, obviously, the GE PTS was the epitome of Sneaky. The Craig-era has Bond far more likely to use brute force (e.g. punching a wall in SP to find a hidden room).
I don't know if screenwriting is just a hobby for you, but if you want some pointers PM me.
It's just a hobby, I've never actually written before. But I'll be waiting for your opinions after I post the new segment ;)
Just had some pointers on the nuts and bolts, not necessarily the narrative.
Then feel free to PM me
Or characters that act in a plausible way amidst a heightened reality. There should always be something otherworldly about a Bond movie. A lot of Fleming stories are ludicrous but they're anchored by well developed characters and every bit of fantasy is counteracted by a dose of mundanity.
Please don't quote this post, though, it would make the thread very difficult to read lol
Firstly, I found out that intelligence is actually being outsourced to a number of private companies, which is unbelievable. What if one of these firms is infiltrated - by SPECTRE, a corrupt businessman or mobsters like the Spang Brothers. The information could then be used to manipulate or destabilize the intelligence network, pit Mi6 and the CIA against each other, eliminate enemies, leak information or ensure criminal activity is covered up etc.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/the-outsourcing-of-us-intelligence-raises-risks-among-the-benefits/2013/06/09/eba2d314-d14c-11e2-9f1a-1a7cdee20287_story.html
Secondly, what about a plot involving digital assets/currency such as bitcoin? The villain could be using it to fund a network of criminal activity or carry out financial attacks which has happened in real life...
http://www.afr.com/technology/bitcoin-criminals-dd4bc-target-financial-markets-as-attacks-rise-20150924-gjucv8
How about this.
In the Pre-titles, Bond gets poisioned. He plays it down however Q examines him and informs him that the toxin is deadly and that he has only three days to live before he dies.
He begs Q not to tell M or anyone about this, and his mission is to not only track down the terrorist in the pre-titles, (m's orders) but to find the anditote in time, before he dies.
They could really play up the ticking clock element.
Bond desperate, lying to MI6 about his health, living what he thinks is his final days on earth.
WARNING: Contains spoilers
Part 1 (Plot): Bond's mission to kill the German leader was called off as the trumpet heard from the skies around the world, while the army of mythical Gods go to war with The Martians; the ancient species from Mars. 007 and others come face to face with the leader of The Martians named Karken. Will there be the truth or consequence?
What do you think?
Interesting. But it's hard to believe that there is a toxine that has an antidote and Q or someone at MI6 can't make it. Only if the antidote is made out of some rare fruit or plant that they don't have. But in that case, why wouldn't Q go after it ? We've seen he can get "out of his bedroom" in Spectre.