› ›

DC Comics Cinematic Universe (2013 - present)

1…139140142144145…219

Comments

  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited January 2019 Posts: 15,690
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    So, basically, they're going to ignore the events of Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, Suicide Squad and Justice League. Good to know. And SS will be its own self-contained thing, I gather.

    I hope they do keep some aspects of Justice League in future installments, particularly the dynamics between certain characters (ie: Flash and Aquaman). As for Batman, I agree it's best to ignore all events from those films and whoever is chosen as the new Batman iteration can have a fresh start.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,772
    Am I the only person who is sad by this news really? I feel Affleck has forever been hated in the role and I just don’t see why? I mean how fast we forget George Clooney...

    But at least we got to see Affleck take on KgBeast Joker and who knows maybe someday we get a comic book series or something...

    Honestly I don’t know who I would go for maybe Bradley Cooper but he is too old likely and to marvel

    The issue here is Batman is 3 roles essentially and I feel Affleck much like bale nailed all three and I prefer Affleck’s voice to Bale’s (sorry his voice was fine in Begins but by the dark knight it’s like get the guy some cough drops or something sheesh)

    And of course what’s worse is everyone is cheering this and I feel bad for the guy he really wasn’t that bad...

    But moving on if we have to move on and go younger Charlie Cox maybe I believe his daredevil run is over.

    I would say Stephen Amell but that would be type casting

    I don’t know I am sure whomever it will be it will be someone who wasn’t on my radar and will surprise me much like Affleck did and to be honest Bale did too.
  • boldfingerboldfinger
    edited January 2019 Posts: 5,767
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    So does this imply that Bruce Wayne has a kid possibly named Bruce Jr that will become the next Batman......or are we simply getting a younger actor to take over the iconic role?
    My vote goes to a younger incarnation of Bruce Wayne having a son, who has a friend, who in an alternative universe is Batman :-). The whole Thing of Course set as a period piece.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,037
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    So, basically, they're going to ignore the events of Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, Suicide Squad and Justice League. Good to know. And SS will be its own self-contained thing, I gather.

    Not so much ignore as be set before them. It's the same version of the Batman, just when he was younger.

    With SS, it'll only be a soft-reboot in the sense that the team members will be swapped out. I'd expect Amanda Waller to turn up again.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I like what I'm reading here.

    "It’s very much a point of view-driven, noir Batman tale …. It’s more Batman in his detective mode than we’ve seen in the films. The comics have a history of that.

    He’s supposed to be the world’s greatest detective, and that’s not necessarily been a part of what the movies have been. I’d love this to be one where when we go on that journey of tracking down the criminals and trying to solve a crime, it’s going to allow his character to have an arc so that he can go through a transformation.    "

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2019/01/30/matt-reeves-the-batman-to-return-to-the-characters-roots/#2ddbac7641ee
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,772
    bondjames wrote: »
    I like what I'm reading here.

    "It’s very much a point of view-driven, noir Batman tale …. It’s more Batman in his detective mode than we’ve seen in the films. The comics have a history of that.

    He’s supposed to be the world’s greatest detective, and that’s not necessarily been a part of what the movies have been. I’d love this to be one where when we go on that journey of tracking down the criminals and trying to solve a crime, it’s going to allow his character to have an arc so that he can go through a transformation.    "

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2019/01/30/matt-reeves-the-batman-to-return-to-the-characters-roots/#2ddbac7641ee

    Ben said the same things years ago
  • boldfingerboldfinger
    Posts: 5,767
    And almost the same was said during the production of TDK:
  • SharkBaitSharkBait
    Posts: 2,107
    Seven_Point_Six_Five wrote: »
    Also here’s a little BoP teaser


    Looks like H&M ad.
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,506
    I liked Affleck as Batman, sad to see him go.
  • JET007JET007
    Posts: 632
    Affleck was great in BvS (other than the killing) but something was definitely missing in his JL performance. Bruce is in a different place, but the fire didn't feel like it was there in his performance (not that I blame him).

    What does everyone think of the potential of Armie Hammer getting a second chance at the Bat?
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    edited February 2019 Posts: 23,394
    Batfleck was great in Batman v Superman, Justice League is a bit of a mess for well documented reasons, Ben looked bored at times and his appearance changed quite noticeably between the Snyder and Whedon directed scenes.

    Batman was pretty lame in certain JL scenes unfortunately.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,559
    Are we talking about a Batman who might, in the future, interact with Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman post BvS? Because if so, we have to consider the continuity demand that our actor is chosen from obvious 45+ candidates.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,772
    No they are gonna do separate films which sucks I really wanted Batman and Wonder Woman to hook up. Sorry they make a better couple then Batman and Catwoman or Superman and Wonderwoman...


    That being said early rumors indicate it’s gonna be Batman: year one because another Batman origin story is exactly what everyone wants at this rate the Wayne’s have died on screen more times then the body counts of most Hollywood slashers
  • JET007JET007
    Posts: 632
    Reeves shot it down that it was gonna be Batman: Year One. I think Snyder's BvS was the most accurate their murders were and we don't need to revisit it for at least a generation or two.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,559
    There are aspects of Year One that have found their way into the script for Batman Begins. There's a perfectly decent animated version of Year One out there too. I'm sure we can do without another adaptation of this story.
  • Seven_Point_Six_FiveSeven_Point_Six_Five Southern California
    edited February 2019 Posts: 1,257
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Am I the only person who is sad by this news really? I feel Affleck has forever been hated in the role and I just don’t see why? I mean how fast we forget George Clooney...

    Maybe it’s just the parts of the web that I frequent, but I don’t see much hate for Affleck at all. I find people generally liked him as Batman, at least his role in BvS. I certainly did.

    I’m not particularly saddened to see him go, I’m just bummed he didn’t get a chance to really make his mark on history the way I believe he deserved. But the way I see it, it’s time to move on.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,690
    Aquaman will be released on digital media on March 5th.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,559
    Technically, Affleck had his three films. ;-)

    But I know what you mean, of course.
    I wish we could have gotten a Solo-Batfleck. Infinite possibilities there.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,037
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Technically, Affleck had his three films. ;-)

    But I know what you mean, of course.
    I wish we could have gotten a Solo-Batfleck. Infinite possibilities there.

    Would have liked a live-action Red Hood adaptation with Affleck. A shame.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Technically, Affleck had his three films. ;-)

    But I know what you mean, of course.
    I wish we could have gotten a Solo-Batfleck. Infinite possibilities there.

    Yes, ironic. He had as many as Bale, but fewer solo films than West, Kilmer and Clooney.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,690
    Aquaman has now passed Skyfall's $1.08 billion earnings to become the 22nd biggest film of all time at the world-wide box office.
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 23,394
    'Shazam!': "Superman" Cameo Reportedly Confirmed, Without Henry Cavill

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/comicbook.com/dc/amp/2019/02/07/shazam-superman-cameo-henry-cavill-body-double/
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Fire_and_Ice_Returns wrote: »
    'Shazam!': "Superman" Cameo Reportedly Confirmed, Without Henry Cavill

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/comicbook.com/dc/amp/2019/02/07/shazam-superman-cameo-henry-cavill-body-double/

    Cool, but Billy Batson is not Shazam.
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 23,394
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    Fire_and_Ice_Returns wrote: »
    'Shazam!': "Superman" Cameo Reportedly Confirmed, Without Henry Cavill

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/comicbook.com/dc/amp/2019/02/07/shazam-superman-cameo-henry-cavill-body-double/

    Cool, but Billy Batson is not Shazam.

    It's a shame Cavill won't appear though it could be a double bluff
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited February 2019 Posts: 15,690
    Black Adam with Dwayne Johnson is finally a go, filming aimed to be done in 2020, for a big screen release in 2021.

    https://variety.com/2019/film/news/seven-bucks-productions-hiram-garcia-dwayne-johnson-fighting-with-my-family-1203131584/

    ----

    An Aquaman spin-off, The Trench, is currently in the works by DC.

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/aquaman-spinoff-works-1184285
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,559
    They keep putting them out. I'm still hopeful that the current JL series can pick up some momentum. We've got a great Wonder Woman, Flash, Superman, Aquaman, Cyborg and, pending impressive casting, hopefully, a great Batman too. Some fairly cohesive myth has been built via previous films. There's still potential. Furthermore, a disappointing film doesn't necessarily have to mark the end of a series.

    Examples:
    - X-Men The Last Stand didn't prevent a return to form for the "old" cast in Days Of Future Past and Logan.
    - Captain America TFA evolved into the vastly superior TWS.
    - The first couple of Thor films were disappointing as hell, but then we got Ragnarok.

    So, in time, perhaps the Justice League movies can find the proper tone, the proper balance, the proper everything.
  • matt_umatt_u better known as Mr. Roark
    Posts: 4,343
    I just don’t care anymore about this so called “DCEU”.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,120
    https://movieweb.com/the-batman-villains-riddler/

    I support this. Maybe Ben Whislaw could play him.
  • Seven_Point_Six_FiveSeven_Point_Six_Five Southern California
    Posts: 1,257
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    https://movieweb.com/the-batman-villains-riddler/

    I support this. Maybe Ben Whislaw could play him.

    Me too, I can see him in that role.
  • Seven_Point_Six_FiveSeven_Point_Six_Five Southern California
    edited February 2019 Posts: 1,257
    Shazam featurette:

Sign In or Register to comment.