Skyfall: Billion Dollar Bond

1626365676882

Comments

  • Posts: 1,098
    JWESTBROOK wrote:
    Kananga wrote:
    Thunderball - $1,037,291,060.32
    Skyfall - $1,038,537,000

    Job done.

    I'll just wait for the inevitable @mepal rant. Popping the corn as we speak.

    i'am back......you called me 'JWESTBROOK'............you are a silly billy, arnt you?....haha

    actually 'SF' made $5.1 million on opening day in China, so you can add that to your total.

    ........and dont forget....there's still some way to go for 'SF' to surpass 'TB'!

    ...facts only facts

    ;)
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    Germanlady wrote:
    THIS would be the biggest mistake, they can do now. Going after China with adding considerably more action and loosing out on the rest - again. Think QOS. Not working...I hope, they won't be that stupid. Give us dialogue aand suspense over action any time. Let other films action out on China. Bond doesn't need to, as we can see now. It did just fine without China.

    Germanlady I don't know what's going on here. We seem to have reached unprecedented levels of detente. Once again you speak absolute sense (for a change).

    If SF took a massive haul it would be disastrous for the creative direction of Bond 24 as the studio would further want to tailor it to the Chinese market.

    I would be surprised if Mission Impossible V doesn't try to capitalise on the success it had in China by setting the film there or featuring Chinese actors - and more crucially tailoring the story so as not to offend.
    We have already seen what happened with Red Dawn which as far as I'm concerned is nothing more than censorship which Hollywood seems happy to do to chase the Chinese dollar.

    I wouldn't mind if they filmed a Chinese and a rest of the world version but that would cost money. Much easier to censor at the writing stage and ensure you're making a China friendly film from the start.

    It's a very worrying road we're starting down when China becomes a market to crucial to ignore, which by Bond 24 it will be.
  • Posts: 277
    Tbf China is already a huge market with massive growth every year around 30% currently so ignoring it by Bond 24 could cost the studio $100 mil if not more. Just because the chinese market has different tastes does not mean catering more to them ruins a film i think thats a bit disrespectful to the chinese cinema going general public. A good film can be successful in China e.g Mi:4 Avengers Life of PI exec. I think the main reason for the lack of success in china relatively is the gap between release is huge 3 and a half months between the Uk and China a big gap even for any hollywood film released in China Sony needs to sort that out for bond 24.
  • Posts: 1,098
    One thing that is still a problem for Hollywood studios.............is that the box office returns to the studio, are much lower in China than they are in other markets.
    A studio only gets around 25% of the Chinese BO gross returned to them, unlike closer to 50% from other markets.

    I imagine in years to come, this may change, but it makes you realise a Hollywood film has to make a fair pile of money at the Chinese BO, to guarantee a worthwhile return!

  • Posts: 277
    yh internationally studios only get 40% from anywhere apparently but international has grown so much that 40% of the international market is far more then US take.
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 1,098
    htall90 wrote:
    yh internationally studios only get 40% from anywhere apparently but international has grown so much that 40% of the international market is far more then US take.

    Yes, that is correct, more closer to 40% as the average.

    Studios do get a decent return though from their films in the US market though, the returns can be 50% +, particularly on the opening weekend, and that is why there is so much fervour about opening weekend BO in the US, as the studios know that is where they can get a big chunk of thier money back.
    As the weeks roll on the studios get less of a percentage back from the cinema chains, coz obviously as the cinema takings take a dive, the cinema still has to make it worhwhile for them to show the film, even if only a few people turn up for each screening, and they wouldnt be doing that if they had to give back most of the takings to the studio!

  • Posts: 6,601
    Germanlady wrote:
    THIS would be the biggest mistake, they can do now. Going after China with adding considerably more action and loosing out on the rest - again. Think QOS. Not working...I hope, they won't be that stupid. Give us dialogue aand suspense over action any time. Let other films action out on China. Bond doesn't need to, as we can see now. It did just fine without China.

    Germanlady I don't know what's going on here. We seem to have reached unprecedented levels of detente. Once again you speak absolute sense (for a change).

    I am sure, I will be able to break that string soon enough B-)
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 11,119
    mnhettia wrote:
    hopefully they will add more action to bond 24 ... considering China is one of the biggest emerging markets. I feel you can still maintain the thriller aspects of SF and have bigger action set pieces ... look at TLD for example. CR had the right balance IMHO. MI:GP did have some good action sequences and a lame plot.

    SF could've done with better fight scenes. That would improve the film action wise. As it stands I think the only really great action scenes were at the start and the end of the film. CR wasn't filled with huge setpieces (there's Madagascar, Miami and Venice so only one more than SF really) but it had the advantage of those brutal brilliant fight scenes inbetween.

    I think if we need to choose between an 'Espionage Thriller' or an 'Action Blockbuster', then 'Skyfall' certainly is an espionage thriller. In the good old tradition of other espionage thrillers from the franchise, like 'From Russia With Love' and 'Thunderball'. Devoid of huge overblown action set pieces, like various car chases and/or tanks destroying entire cities.

    No, 'Skyfall' doesn't succeed in warming the hearts of fans of true action blockbusters. But it does fullfil my expectations as being a worthy, multi-layered espionage thriller. A movie that is, like 'Casino Royale', much more about character, various political themes, a good plot, combined with a worthy villain and a remarkable and truly original underground foot chase scene that results in a shocking climax.

    'Skyfall' for me is nothing but perfection. Pity those Chinese can't see it....yet.
  • Posts: 277
    Apparently people where falling asleep in the cinema watching skyfall in china lol!
  • Posts: 277
    jeez skyfall opening was bad In China opening day wise it has 1200 more screens then Mi:4. Also on monday Skyfall was opening while MI:4 opened on a saturday so Monday was it's 3rd day and MI:4 nearly double it on Monday what is wrong with China lol?
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    mnhettia wrote:
    hopefully they will add more action to bond 24 ... considering China is one of the biggest emerging markets. I feel you can still maintain the thriller aspects of SF and have bigger action set pieces ... look at TLD for example. CR had the right balance IMHO. MI:GP did have some good action sequences and a lame plot.

    SF could've done with better fight scenes. That would improve the film action wise. As it stands I think the only really great action scenes were at the start and the end of the film. CR wasn't filled with huge setpieces (there's Madagascar, Miami and Venice so only one more than SF really) but it had the advantage of those brutal brilliant fight scenes inbetween.

    I think if we need to choose between an 'Espionage Thriller' or an 'Action Blockbuster', then 'Skyfall' certainly is an espionage thriller. In the good old tradition of other espionage thrillers from the franchise, like 'From Russia With Love' and 'Thunderball'. Devoid of huge overblown action set pieces, like various car chases and/or tanks destroying entire cities.

    No, 'Skyfall' doesn't succeed in warming the hearts of fans of true action blockbusters. But it does fullfil my expectations as being a worthy, multi-layered espionage thriller. A movie that is, like 'Casino Royale', much more about character, various political themes, a good plot, combined with a worthy villain and a remarkable and truly original underground foot chase scene that results in a shocking climax.

    'Skyfall' for me is nothing but perfection. Pity those Chinese can't see it....yet.

    Agree heartily with most of what you say - just can't bring myself to agree that SF is perfection.
  • Posts: 11,119
    mnhettia wrote:
    hopefully they will add more action to bond 24 ... considering China is one of the biggest emerging markets. I feel you can still maintain the thriller aspects of SF and have bigger action set pieces ... look at TLD for example. CR had the right balance IMHO. MI:GP did have some good action sequences and a lame plot.

    SF could've done with better fight scenes. That would improve the film action wise. As it stands I think the only really great action scenes were at the start and the end of the film. CR wasn't filled with huge setpieces (there's Madagascar, Miami and Venice so only one more than SF really) but it had the advantage of those brutal brilliant fight scenes inbetween.

    I think if we need to choose between an 'Espionage Thriller' or an 'Action Blockbuster', then 'Skyfall' certainly is an espionage thriller. In the good old tradition of other espionage thrillers from the franchise, like 'From Russia With Love' and 'Thunderball'. Devoid of huge overblown action set pieces, like various car chases and/or tanks destroying entire cities.

    No, 'Skyfall' doesn't succeed in warming the hearts of fans of true action blockbusters. But it does fullfil my expectations as being a worthy, multi-layered espionage thriller. A movie that is, like 'Casino Royale', much more about character, various political themes, a good plot, combined with a worthy villain and a remarkable and truly original underground foot chase scene that results in a shocking climax.

    'Skyfall' for me is nothing but perfection. Pity those Chinese can't see it....yet.

    Agree heartily with most of what you say - just can't bring myself to agree that SF is perfection.

    That's why we have opinions ;-). Well, maybe later I will tone down my feeling about 'Skyfall' a bit. But for now it feels like an almost perfect Bond film.
  • Posts: 277
    I preferred Casino royale personally Skyfall was a bit to dark and was trying a bit hard at some points to be a Nolan film. Still one of best Bond films ever.
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 2,015
    In the good old tradition of other espionage thrillers from the franchise, like 'From Russia With Love' and 'Thunderball'. Devoid of huge overblown action set pieces, like various car chases and/or tanks destroying entire cities.

    ??? FRWL has one of the biggest explosion of the whole franchise if not the biggest, and TB has one of the largest and longest action set piece...
    a remarkable and truly original underground foot chase scene that results in a shocking climax.

    "Peur sur la Ville" is a French movie very, very popular here amongst the 40+ year old. Possibly THE French action movie of the 70s that edges on being meta (it's a symbolic link between old thrillers and new thrillers : the hero has to face first a gangster and then a serial killer). Here's a little excerpt of the underground foot chase scene, alas that's only the end of it, the part that is most similar is before that (but well, a chase inside a subway has to be "run/loose him/find him/run" I guess). It's not like looking at some Remy Julienne stunts in Bond movies that were copy/paste of stunts he did in French movie before, but I'm sure French viewers of that age could not not think about the very famous Belmondo scene here.

    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1abez_peur-sur-la-ville_news#.UP8knmccZgk

    To be clear, I'm not saying Mendes copied Verneuil (who, in turn, probably copied DAF for one particular scene), but there's so many things that existed before.. I mean it's so famous here a French director here would not dare to do it again I think. When Besson had to do a chase in a subway, he put his hero on roller skates to do something totally different :)

    The trailer with the ace Ennio Morricone theme FYI, that's really one of the few French movies I tell foreigners to watch if they want to see how fun French movies can be
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4ai11_peur-sur-la-ville-bande-annonce_shortfilms#.UP8ltGccZgk
  • JamesPageJamesPage Administrator, Moderator, Director
    edited January 2013 Posts: 1,380
    You want the good news?
    Skyfall didn't open on 5,500 screens in China. It opened on 8,079! Making it the widest release ever.

    You want the bad news?
    This makes the $4.8-$5.1m opening day even worse.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    edited January 2013 Posts: 11,139
    Looks like the caviar has served us better than the Peking duck.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    JamesPage wrote:
    You want the good news?
    Skyfall didn't open on 5,500 screens in China. It opened on 8,079! Making it the widest release ever.

    You want the bad news?
    This makes the $4.8-$5.1m opening day even worse.

    You must be joking?

    $5.1m/8079= $631 per screen! On opening night?

    I hope the cinemas managed to sell a lot of popcorn to make up for this feeble return. Not quite Uma Thurmans Motherhood but not far off. Forget 50m - I'll take 20m at this stage.
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 161
    I wonder if this is down to the fact they had the bootleg copy for months or simply they hate Bond.

    got this from Commanderbond..

    Skyfall is winding down at the US box office and movie theaters across the world, but in China it just opened on Monday adding another $5.1 million to its total gross. That’s three times what Quantum of Solace did and a good 14% increase over The Dark Knight Rises which also opened in China on a Monday. Factoring this in to Skyfall’s worldwide total, it currently sits at $1.046 billion.

    This past weekend Skyfall passed the $300 million mark in the United States


  • Posts: 6,601
    Does this mean, DK did even worse?
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Who knows, maybe MI did the business because it's a Tom Cruise vehicle. SF is not a Daniel Craig 'vehicle' and Dan is nowhere near the international star the jumped up little turd Cruise is. Likewise, TDKR is not a one man vehicle. I imagine this is the kind of level the Chinese operate on. Maybe the actor is the attraction, more than the franchise, character or story.
  • Posts: 6,601
    I doubt Cruise is the reason. From what I have seen all along, its never the actor or otherwise successful actors wouldn't have any flops and they ALL do. IMO MI was the perfect mix of action and just enough plot. Both SF and DK have action but also more plot. So my guess is, the Chinese can enjoy actionless films, but as soon as they expect action, it has to have A LOT of it.
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 2,015
    JamesPage wrote:
    You want the good news?
    Skyfall didn't open on 5,500 screens in China. It opened on 8,079! Making it the widest release ever.

    You want the bad news?
    This makes the $4.8-$5.1m opening day even worse.

    You may read again now what I wrote here two days before the date about the bookings :)
    1 screen with 6 showings per day = 1 screen with one showing only at midnight if you count only "screens", but it is obviously very different in the end isn't it ? And that's only the tip of the iceberg.

    I can ask for a detailed state of SF release in China, unless of course the answer I've got contains once again the four letter word :)



  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Germanlady wrote:
    I doubt Cruise is the reason. From what I have seen all along, its never the actor or otherwise successful actors wouldn't have any flops and they ALL do. IMO MI was the perfect mix of action and just enough plot. Both SF and DK have action but also more plot. So my guess is, the Chinese can enjoy actionless films, but as soon as they expect action, it has to have A LOT of it.

    It's almost like they are 30 years behind the west. A CGI 1980's Arnie, might do well out there.

    Interesting article

    http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/in-hollywood-movies-for-china-bureaucrats-want-a-say-317522



  • Posts: 277
    It's called being a different culture to the west and bond is very western and a symbol of western culture Skyfall was also relative unsuccessful in Russia take what you want from that. Also TDRK had huge movie opening with it in spiderman on it's release so is behind Skyfall because of that and had far less screens. Big stars mean nothing if you look at transformers 3 a massive success in China.
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 12,837
    RC7 wrote:
    Who knows, maybe MI did the business because it's a Tom Cruise vehicle. SF is not a Daniel Craig 'vehicle' and Dan is nowhere near the international star the jumped up little turd Cruise is. Likewise, TDKR is not a one man vehicle. I imagine this is the kind of level the Chinese operate on. Maybe the actor is the attraction, more than the franchise, character or story.

    You have a point there.

    @Germanlady I agree with you. I think they like non action films over there but when something is advertised as an action film (like SF or Batman), they expect alot. Although who could blame them with some of the stuff they've been treated to.
  • Posts: 11,119
    htall90 wrote:
    Tbf China is already a huge market with massive growth every year around 30% currently so ignoring it by Bond 24 could cost the studio $100 mil if not more. Just because the chinese market has different tastes does not mean catering more to them ruins a film i think thats a bit disrespectful to the chinese cinema going general public. A good film can be successful in China e.g Mi:4 Avengers Life of PI exec. I think the main reason for the lack of success in china relatively is the gap between release is huge 3 and a half months between the Uk and China a big gap even for any hollywood film released in China Sony needs to sort that out for bond 24.

    I think it has nothing to do with disrespect to be honest. Stating certain cultural/ethnical facts about a country and its political environment does not necessarily mean that we are belittling a group of people. If you think it's disrespectful or not, fact is political movies will have a very hard time in China. So if the people don't learn about these things, then it is quite logical they get focussed on elements of movies that will not get censored, for instance big bloated action sequences.

    I said it before, 'Skyfall' is a very good film, and a very good 'espionage thriller'. Movies like 'Avengers' and 'Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol' are very good popcorn action blockbusters.
  • Posts: 277
    Thing is hollywood movies are not particularly political themselves as they are censored in some way to avoid stirring any real political thoughts in the general population of the west. If anything American and the west are similar a lot of films portray the east as bad and any films that portray america or western nation in a negative light do badly as well and are almost censored through bad press. It is implied in Skyfall that Silva is torture by the Chinese so this will upset the Chinese government in the same way a film that implies American or british torture would upset there respective government and nations. Skyfall is the simplest pop politics you could find in a movie so not really a political movie at all imo.
  • htall90 wrote:
    Skyfall was also relative unsuccessful in Russia take what you want from that.
    ? The"Russia $8 million" figure you can read from Boxofficemojo is the $ figure for the opening week only, the total is the line below : $25M for "Russia + CIS" (Russia, Belarus + some minor, excluding in particular Ukraine), and that's quite successful. Not "mega-mega successful", it means about 3.3M viewers in 6 weeks (the actual "real" release, it was on only a few screens after that), while the Hobbit will end at about 5M viewers and Taken 2 did 0.5M viewers to give two random comparisons.

  • Posts: 277
    I did know it made $25 mil which compared to the rest of europe is poor and The Hobbit would made a lot more but was hit by huge snow storms during it's opening and Russia box office is very front loaded.
  • SandySandy Somewhere in Europe
    Posts: 4,012
    These results in China don't surprise me, to be honest. It's a very special market, not only because of the censorship but also because they have different tastes, upbringing and priorities. This is not true for everyone, of course, and especially for those who live in the west for some time, but it is for a huge part of the population.
    Just as an example, this summer I had a Chinese intern working for me in the lab and I was sometimes left speechless with what came out of her mouth. One time I was talking about some film I had watched in the theater that weekend. She looked at me and stated that she had also been to the cinema watching it, unfortunately. I thought she didn't like it but what she told me was something like this "We are so lucky in China, we don't have to pay to watch a film! We just have to wait and download it for free, nobody cares! But now I live here so I have to pay". This doesn't explain everything but it helps.
Sign In or Register to comment.