No Time To Die: Production Diary

1199920002002200420052507

Comments

  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    edited January 2019 Posts: 3,126
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    Are we seriously entertaining the idea of a delay again??? Could you imagine how terrible that would look if EoN decided to delay again?

    I agree, It would be a total disaster.

    @Mendes4Lyfe like to spinoff what Sir Frederick Gray says in the Living Daylights we would be a laughing stock of the entire film industry. It would be a cinematic failure. : |
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited January 2019 Posts: 8,110
    007Blofeld wrote: »
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    Are we seriously entertaining the idea of a delay again??? Could you imagine how terrible that would look if EoN decided to delay again?

    I agree, It would be a total disaster.

    @Mendes4Lyfe like to spinoff what Sir Frederick Gray says in the Living Daylights we would be a laughing stock of the entire film industry. It would be a cinematic failure.

    Yes, very apt. Bond needs a strong showing to compete against Fallout and what Cruise has planned next for that franchise. We can't afford more delays!

    As Max Zorin would say. ;)
  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    Posts: 3,126
    007Blofeld wrote: »
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    Are we seriously entertaining the idea of a delay again??? Could you imagine how terrible that would look if EoN decided to delay again?

    I agree, It would be a total disaster.

    @Mendes4Lyfe like to spinoff what Sir Frederick Gray says in the Living Daylights we would be a laughing stock of the entire film industry. It would be a cinematic failure.

    Yes, very apt. Bond needs a strong showing to compete against Fallout and what Cruise has planned next for that franchise. We can't afford more delays!

    As max Zorin would say. ;)

    @Mendes4Lyfe it's like if they are going to have so many delays why bother and start fresh honestly I don't think EON has a plan after Daniel
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,110
    We will know in the next couple weeks whether everything is on track or there will be a delay. It's only a matter of time. But based on the recent track record, I'm not gonna hold my breath.
  • ShardlakeShardlake Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 4,043
    We will know in the next couple weeks whether everything is on track or there will be a delay. It's only a matter of time. But based on the recent track record, I'm not gonna hold my breath.

    You can't help yourself can you?
  • Posts: 6,677
    Shardlake wrote: »
    We will know in the next couple weeks whether everything is on track or there will be a delay. It's only a matter of time. But based on the recent track record, I'm not gonna hold my breath.

    You can't help yourself can you?

    To quote a very wise man:

    "I'm getting the idea that there certain people here that present a dignified front and supposedly are offering some balance, whereas if you read between the lines they are the biggest excrement stirrers around".

    You'll recognise the sapience, @Shardlake :)
    And quite right you were.
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    edited January 2019 Posts: 2,541
    IMDB showing Jose Fernandez as Henchmen for Bond25, do anyone have any idea who he is or seen his work?
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,527
    Shardlake wrote: »
    We will know in the next couple weeks whether everything is on track or there will be a delay. It's only a matter of time. But based on the recent track record, I'm not gonna hold my breath.

    You can't help yourself can you?

    Children. Spoilt. Children. Best to ignore and let the theee, or four or five of them have their tantrum, feed off each other, have another tantrum until they all go back to sleep again.
  • BennyBenny In the shadowsAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 14,882
    Maybe everyone should just calm down.
    We’re arguing about something that hasn’t even happened.
    Let’s all take a deep breath, and worry when we have too.
  • I'll worry when I have two.


  • Posts: 19,339
    IMDB showing Jose Fernandez as Henchmen for Bond25, do anyone have any idea who he is or seen his work?

    Not a lot tbh.

    Not sure I like the look of him though.
  • edited January 2019 Posts: 386
    Just a couple of thoughts on B25.

    Looking at Casino Royale recently, Daniel Craig delivered a towering performance in his Bond debut. It really is extraordinary. He is a prowling, seething ball of rage and deadly execution as a young(ish) agent. But what really elevates the performance are his masterful moments of vulnerability, first in the shower to console Vesper, next stripped bare as he convalesces on Lake Como, and finally on the beach when he professes his love for the girl “without a tell”.

    It is these moments that imbue Craig’s first, most memorable effort with light and shade. His other performances suffer in comparison, but only because he was not afforded the opportunity to strip his armor and thus show his full range. Quantum of Solace is a master class of smouldering rage, but he has nowhere to put it. Skyfall has Bond address his mortality only to resolve this potentially epic crisis with minimal fuss. Lastly, Spectre has Craig coasting through a clumsy narrative many of us would rather forget.

    Personally, I thought the Madeleine Swann character was just a “shag” by film’s end. The movie hadn’t done nearly enough with their relationship to deserve a triumphantly romantic denouement. One feels that Craig was happy to call it a day at the end of an apparently tense and arduous shoot.

    But he didn’t. DC made the decision to return, in my opinion to erase the bitter aftertaste Spectre gave many. A proud actor, he seems to feel the need to do everything he can to ensure a quality end product. I think we can all safely assume that the extra time afforded B25 will not have gone to waste.

    Which brings me to my theory - if one is to look back on DC’s four films thus far, Casino Royale stands head and shoulders above the others on performance alone. Craig will have recognised that he was at his searing best when he had genuine emotion to offset his brutal sneer.

    My bet is he will plumb those depths again. What better way to bow out than with a successful relationship, perhaps even marriage, with Madeleine Swann. He began by falling hopelessly for the dark charms of the compromised Vesper, and I believe the only narrative escape that carries satisfying symmetry is retirement with the daughter of a downed enemy. Looking back through Bond’s rich history, the two best and most rounded female characters, played by Diana Rigg and Eva Green, both wind up dead. Maud Adams from TMWTGG is also worth mentioning, but woefully underwritten. By having lea seydoux’s Madeleine Swan return and not only survive, but offer Bond a way out, Daniel Craig can similarly exit stage right to thunderous applause.

    Such theories lead to other questions, many relating to Boyle’s departure. Was he against the idea of Bond happily sinking into blissful domesticity? Did he want to kill Bond off? We’ll probably never know. One thing I do know is that B25 needs to save Daniel Craig’s dark, angry Bond from himself. I suspect he knows that too. With an intelligent, sexy, challenging woman to spar with, Craig is utterly electric. I predict we’ll see a welcome return to form.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,527
    GetCarter wrote: »
    Just a couple of thoughts on B25.

    Looking at Casino Royale recently, Daniel Craig delivered a towering performance in his Bond debut. It really is extraordinary. He is a prowling, seething ball of rage and deadly execution as a young(ish) agent. But what really elevates the performance are his masterful moments of vulnerability, first in the shower to console Vesper, next stripped bare as he convalesces on Lake Como, and finally on the beach when he professes his love for the girl “without a tell”.

    It is these moments that imbue Craig’s first, most memorable effort with light and shade. His other performances suffer in comparison, but only because he was not afforded the opportunity to strip his armor and thus show his full range. Quantum of Solace is a master class of smouldering rage. Skyfall has Bond address his mortality only to resolve this potentially epic crisis with minimal fuss. Lastly, Spectre has Craig coasting through a clumsy narrative many of us would rather forget.

    Personally, I thought the Madeleine Swann character was just a “shag” by film’s end. The movie hadn’t done nearly enough with their relationship to deserve a triumphantly romantic denouement. One feels that Craig was happy to call it a day at the end of an apparently tense and arduous shoot.

    But he didn’t. DC made the decision to return, in my opinion to erase the bitter aftertaste Spectre gave many. A proud actor, he seems to feel the need to do everything he can to ensure a quality end product. I think we can all safely assume that the extra time afforded B25 will not have gone to waste.

    Which brings me to my theory - now that we know that Craig is returning, it is possible to speculate on his motivation and vision for B25, particularly considering his close relationship with the producers. If one is to look back on his four films thus far, Casino Royale stands head and shoulders above the others on performance alone. Craig will have recognised that he was at his searing best when he had genuine romance to offset his brutal sneer.

    My bet is he will plumb those depths again. What better way to bow out than with a successful relationship, perhaps even marriage, with Madeleine Swann. He began by falling hopelessly for the dark charms of the compromised Vesper, and I believe the only narrative escape that carries satisfying symmetry is retirement with the resolute daughter of a downed enemy.

    Such theories lead to other questions, many relating to Boyle’s departure. Was he against the idea of Bond happily sinking into blissful domesticity? Did he want to kill Bond off? We’ll probably never know. One thing I do know is that B25 needs to save Daniel Craig’s dark, angry Bond from himself. I suspect he knows that too. At his best, Craig is utterly electric. I predict we’ll see a welcome return to form.

    Your post is a breath of fresh air. I would think that the filmmakers and the lead actor are very well aware that they are going to put a stamp on this film as they did with CR.

    Great post @GetCarter !!
  • Posts: 19,339
    GetCarter wrote: »
    Just a couple of thoughts on B25.

    Looking at Casino Royale recently, Daniel Craig delivered a towering performance in his Bond debut. It really is extraordinary. He is a prowling, seething ball of rage and deadly execution as a young(ish) agent. But what really elevates the performance are his masterful moments of vulnerability, first in the shower to console Vesper, next stripped bare as he convalesces on Lake Como, and finally on the beach when he professes his love for the girl “without a tell”.

    It is these moments that imbue Craig’s first, most memorable effort with light and shade. His other performances suffer in comparison, but only because he was not afforded the opportunity to strip his armor and thus show his full range. Quantum of Solace is a master class of smouldering rage. Skyfall has Bond address his mortality only to resolve this potentially epic crisis with minimal fuss. Lastly, Spectre has Craig coasting through a clumsy narrative many of us would rather forget.

    Personally, I thought the Madeleine Swann character was just a “shag” by film’s end. The movie hadn’t done nearly enough with their relationship to deserve a triumphantly romantic denouement. One feels that Craig was happy to call it a day at the end of an apparently tense and arduous shoot.

    But he didn’t. DC made the decision to return, in my opinion to erase the bitter aftertaste Spectre gave many. A proud actor, he seems to feel the need to do everything he can to ensure a quality end product. I think we can all safely assume that the extra time afforded B25 will not have gone to waste.

    Which brings me to my theory - now that we know that Craig is returning, it is possible to speculate on his motivation and vision for B25, particularly considering his close relationship with the producers. If one is to look back on his four films thus far, Casino Royale stands head and shoulders above the others on performance alone. Craig will have recognised that he was at his searing best when he had genuine romance to offset his brutal sneer.

    My bet is he will plumb those depths again. What better way to bow out than with a successful relationship, perhaps even marriage, with Madeleine Swann. He began by falling hopelessly for the dark charms of the compromised Vesper, and I believe the only narrative escape that carries satisfying symmetry is retirement with the resolute daughter of a downed enemy.

    Such theories lead to other questions, many relating to Boyle’s departure. Was he against the idea of Bond happily sinking into blissful domesticity? Did he want to kill Bond off? We’ll probably never know. One thing I do know is that B25 needs to save Daniel Craig’s dark, angry Bond from himself. I suspect he knows that too. At his best, Craig is utterly electric. I predict we’ll see a welcome return to form.

    Very good comments,apart from this..i pray this doesn't happen.
  • I’m unsure if this is news….but I’ll go ahead and post it purely for speculation purposes.

    I’ve recently been doing do Cary Joji Fukunaga research and stumbled on this forum:
    https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/the-cary-joji-fukunaga-appreciation-thread.759191/page-84

    Essentially, it’s full of people devoted to CJF and whoever he’s currently dating. I was quite surprised to read through it and see that he’s been out with Imogen Poots, Michelle Williams, Emma Watson and a host of other beautiful women. I mean who can blame them, he’s a dreamboat…



    Anyway, currently he’s connected to Kristine Froseth who is from Norway. Which is one of the rumoured locations for Bond 25. It almost certainly means nothing, but something to mull over for the timebeing.



    What’s probably more interesting is that Froseth recently came to London and posted a photo on Instagram. This could be here joining Fukunaga as he begins production. Once again, this probably doesn’t mean she’s in the film, but could hint that she’s moved to the city to be closer to her boyfriend. Which is a sign that Bond 25 is moving forward…


  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited January 2019 Posts: 13,944
    What’s probably more interesting is that Froseth recently came to London and posted a photo on Instagram. This could be here joining Fukunaga as he begins production. Once again, this probably doesn’t mean she’s in the film, but could hint that she’s moved to the city to be closer to her boyfriend. Which is a sign that Bond 25 is moving forward…

    Looks a LOT like Bond's supposed residence at 30 Wellington Square.
  • DrClatterhandDrClatterhand United Kingdom
    Posts: 349
    GetCarter wrote: »
    Just a couple of thoughts on B25.

    Looking at Casino Royale recently, Daniel Craig delivered a towering performance in his Bond debut. It really is extraordinary. He is a prowling, seething ball of rage and deadly execution as a young(ish) agent. But what really elevates the performance are his masterful moments of vulnerability, first in the shower to console Vesper, next stripped bare as he convalesces on Lake Como, and finally on the beach when he professes his love for the girl “without a tell”.

    It is these moments that imbue Craig’s first, most memorable effort with light and shade. His other performances suffer in comparison, but only because he was not afforded the opportunity to strip his armor and thus show his full range. Quantum of Solace is a master class of smouldering rage, but he has nowhere to put it. Skyfall has Bond address his mortality only to resolve this potentially epic crisis with minimal fuss. Lastly, Spectre has Craig coasting through a clumsy narrative many of us would rather forget.

    Personally, I thought the Madeleine Swann character was just a “shag” by film’s end. The movie hadn’t done nearly enough with their relationship to deserve a triumphantly romantic denouement. One feels that Craig was happy to call it a day at the end of an apparently tense and arduous shoot.

    But he didn’t. DC made the decision to return, in my opinion to erase the bitter aftertaste Spectre gave many. A proud actor, he seems to feel the need to do everything he can to ensure a quality end product. I think we can all safely assume that the extra time afforded B25 will not have gone to waste.

    Which brings me to my theory - if one is to look back on DC’s four films thus far, Casino Royale stands head and shoulders above the others on performance alone. Craig will have recognised that he was at his searing best when he had genuine emotion to offset his brutal sneer.

    My bet is he will plumb those depths again. What better way to bow out than with a successful relationship, perhaps even marriage, with Madeleine Swann. He began by falling hopelessly for the dark charms of the compromised Vesper, and I believe the only narrative escape that carries satisfying symmetry is retirement with the daughter of a downed enemy. Looking back through Bond’s rich history, the two best and most rounded female characters, played by Diana Rigg and Eva Green, both wind up dead. Maud Adams from TMWTGG is also worth mentioning, but woefully underwritten. By having lea seydoux’s Madeleine Swan return and not only survive, but offer Bond a way out, Daniel Craig can similarly exit stage right to thunderous applause.

    Such theories lead to other questions, many relating to Boyle’s departure. Was he against the idea of Bond happily sinking into blissful domesticity? Did he want to kill Bond off? We’ll probably never know. One thing I do know is that B25 needs to save Daniel Craig’s dark, angry Bond from himself. I suspect he knows that too. With an intelligent, sexy, challenging woman to spar with, Craig is utterly electric. I predict we’ll see a welcome return to form.

    The best post I've ever seen on these boards. Correct on all counts.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited January 2019 Posts: 8,037
    GetCarter wrote: »
    Just a couple of thoughts on B25.

    Looking at Casino Royale recently, Daniel Craig delivered a towering performance in his Bond debut. It really is extraordinary. He is a prowling, seething ball of rage and deadly execution as a young(ish) agent. But what really elevates the performance are his masterful moments of vulnerability, first in the shower to console Vesper, next stripped bare as he convalesces on Lake Como, and finally on the beach when he professes his love for the girl “without a tell”.

    It is these moments that imbue Craig’s first, most memorable effort with light and shade. His other performances suffer in comparison, but only because he was not afforded the opportunity to strip his armor and thus show his full range. Quantum of Solace is a master class of smouldering rage, but he has nowhere to put it. Skyfall has Bond address his mortality only to resolve this potentially epic crisis with minimal fuss. Lastly, Spectre has Craig coasting through a clumsy narrative many of us would rather forget.

    Personally, I thought the Madeleine Swann character was just a “shag” by film’s end. The movie hadn’t done nearly enough with their relationship to deserve a triumphantly romantic denouement. One feels that Craig was happy to call it a day at the end of an apparently tense and arduous shoot.

    But he didn’t. DC made the decision to return, in my opinion to erase the bitter aftertaste Spectre gave many. A proud actor, he seems to feel the need to do everything he can to ensure a quality end product. I think we can all safely assume that the extra time afforded B25 will not have gone to waste.

    Which brings me to my theory - if one is to look back on DC’s four films thus far, Casino Royale stands head and shoulders above the others on performance alone. Craig will have recognised that he was at his searing best when he had genuine emotion to offset his brutal sneer.

    My bet is he will plumb those depths again. What better way to bow out than with a successful relationship, perhaps even marriage, with Madeleine Swann. He began by falling hopelessly for the dark charms of the compromised Vesper, and I believe the only narrative escape that carries satisfying symmetry is retirement with the daughter of a downed enemy. Looking back through Bond’s rich history, the two best and most rounded female characters, played by Diana Rigg and Eva Green, both wind up dead. Maud Adams from TMWTGG is also worth mentioning, but woefully underwritten. By having lea seydoux’s Madeleine Swan return and not only survive, but offer Bond a way out, Daniel Craig can similarly exit stage right to thunderous applause.

    Such theories lead to other questions, many relating to Boyle’s departure. Was he against the idea of Bond happily sinking into blissful domesticity? Did he want to kill Bond off? We’ll probably never know. One thing I do know is that B25 needs to save Daniel Craig’s dark, angry Bond from himself. I suspect he knows that too. With an intelligent, sexy, challenging woman to spar with, Craig is utterly electric. I predict we’ll see a welcome return to form.

    barryt007 wrote: »
    GetCarter wrote: »
    Just a couple of thoughts on B25.

    Looking at Casino Royale recently, Daniel Craig delivered a towering performance in his Bond debut. It really is extraordinary. He is a prowling, seething ball of rage and deadly execution as a young(ish) agent. But what really elevates the performance are his masterful moments of vulnerability, first in the shower to console Vesper, next stripped bare as he convalesces on Lake Como, and finally on the beach when he professes his love for the girl “without a tell”.

    It is these moments that imbue Craig’s first, most memorable effort with light and shade. His other performances suffer in comparison, but only because he was not afforded the opportunity to strip his armor and thus show his full range. Quantum of Solace is a master class of smouldering rage. Skyfall has Bond address his mortality only to resolve this potentially epic crisis with minimal fuss. Lastly, Spectre has Craig coasting through a clumsy narrative many of us would rather forget.

    Personally, I thought the Madeleine Swann character was just a “shag” by film’s end. The movie hadn’t done nearly enough with their relationship to deserve a triumphantly romantic denouement. One feels that Craig was happy to call it a day at the end of an apparently tense and arduous shoot.

    But he didn’t. DC made the decision to return, in my opinion to erase the bitter aftertaste Spectre gave many. A proud actor, he seems to feel the need to do everything he can to ensure a quality end product. I think we can all safely assume that the extra time afforded B25 will not have gone to waste.

    Which brings me to my theory - now that we know that Craig is returning, it is possible to speculate on his motivation and vision for B25, particularly considering his close relationship with the producers. If one is to look back on his four films thus far, Casino Royale stands head and shoulders above the others on performance alone. Craig will have recognised that he was at his searing best when he had genuine romance to offset his brutal sneer.

    My bet is he will plumb those depths again. What better way to bow out than with a successful relationship, perhaps even marriage, with Madeleine Swann. He began by falling hopelessly for the dark charms of the compromised Vesper, and I believe the only narrative escape that carries satisfying symmetry is retirement with the resolute daughter of a downed enemy.

    Such theories lead to other questions, many relating to Boyle’s departure. Was he against the idea of Bond happily sinking into blissful domesticity? Did he want to kill Bond off? We’ll probably never know. One thing I do know is that B25 needs to save Daniel Craig’s dark, angry Bond from himself. I suspect he knows that too. At his best, Craig is utterly electric. I predict we’ll see a welcome return to form.

    Very good comments,apart from this..i pray this doesn't happen.

    Agreed. Everything else is spot on otherwise.
  • Posts: 1,165
    Watched QOS recently. Seems like a lifetime ago when I was speculating on message boards as to what the film will entail.
    Crazy to think that in the 11 years since then we have only had 2 Bond movies! Madness. Here’s hoping that B25 will be the end to that sort of draught going forward from here.
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,755
    Could we be so lucky to hear something from Baz tonight?
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,519
    Great post @GetCarter. Couldn't agree more I love Craig's Bond
  • Posts: 19,339
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    Could we be so lucky to hear something from Baz tonight?

    Only if I've had a curry.
  • Posts: 820
    GetCarter wrote: »
    Just a couple of thoughts on B25.

    Looking at Casino Royale recently, Daniel Craig delivered a towering performance in his Bond debut. It really is extraordinary. He is a prowling, seething ball of rage and deadly execution as a young(ish) agent. But what really elevates the performance are his masterful moments of vulnerability, first in the shower to console Vesper, next stripped bare as he convalesces on Lake Como, and finally on the beach when he professes his love for the girl “without a tell”.

    It is these moments that imbue Craig’s first, most memorable effort with light and shade. His other performances suffer in comparison, but only because he was not afforded the opportunity to strip his armor and thus show his full range. Quantum of Solace is a master class of smouldering rage, but he has nowhere to put it. Skyfall has Bond address his mortality only to resolve this potentially epic crisis with minimal fuss. Lastly, Spectre has Craig coasting through a clumsy narrative many of us would rather forget.

    Personally, I thought the Madeleine Swann character was just a “shag” by film’s end. The movie hadn’t done nearly enough with their relationship to deserve a triumphantly romantic denouement. One feels that Craig was happy to call it a day at the end of an apparently tense and arduous shoot.

    But he didn’t. DC made the decision to return, in my opinion to erase the bitter aftertaste Spectre gave many. A proud actor, he seems to feel the need to do everything he can to ensure a quality end product. I think we can all safely assume that the extra time afforded B25 will not have gone to waste.

    Which brings me to my theory - if one is to look back on DC’s four films thus far, Casino Royale stands head and shoulders above the others on performance alone. Craig will have recognised that he was at his searing best when he had genuine emotion to offset his brutal sneer.

    My bet is he will plumb those depths again. What better way to bow out than with a successful relationship, perhaps even marriage, with Madeleine Swann. He began by falling hopelessly for the dark charms of the compromised Vesper, and I believe the only narrative escape that carries satisfying symmetry is retirement with the daughter of a downed enemy. Looking back through Bond’s rich history, the two best and most rounded female characters, played by Diana Rigg and Eva Green, both wind up dead. Maud Adams from TMWTGG is also worth mentioning, but woefully underwritten. By having lea seydoux’s Madeleine Swan return and not only survive, but offer Bond a way out, Daniel Craig can similarly exit stage right to thunderous applause.

    Such theories lead to other questions, many relating to Boyle’s departure. Was he against the idea of Bond happily sinking into blissful domesticity? Did he want to kill Bond off? We’ll probably never know. One thing I do know is that B25 needs to save Daniel Craig’s dark, angry Bond from himself. I suspect he knows that too. With an intelligent, sexy, challenging woman to spar with, Craig is utterly electric. I predict we’ll see a welcome return to form.

    Wonderful post.

    I'm genuinely not anticipating specific plot or location details as much as I'm looking forward to knowing what kind of Bond film this is going to be. A lean, ruthless thriller in the vein of CR? Or a bigger finale in scope, akin to SPECTRE, that celebrates Bond's brand but doesn't have the story baggage that film had?

    I suspect the former's closer to reality, given all the points you've made above. Craig, one would hope, will go out with a definitively Craig Bond film. There's no question his era's been at its most successful when it's aimed for that.

    So much of that success will be script-dependent. I'm just...gah, I can't wait to know. It's such a weird place Bond finds itself in at the moment. I'm just so curious to know which way they've gone.

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Following the rumours of a middle eastern villain, I'd say we're going to get a premise similar to that of Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan's first season storyline.
  • dominicgreenedominicgreene The Eternal QOS Defender
    Posts: 1,756
    I think the paranoia is justified. We really should have more rumors or confirmations at this point. All we know is that previous characters are coming back.
  • Bentley007Bentley007 Manitoba, Canada
    Posts: 568
    I think the paranoia is justified. We really should have more rumors or confirmations at this point. All we know is that previous characters are coming back.

    I think between the recent post by Yves Girard and the investigative work by Pierce2Daniel it is safe to surmise that all the production team is in London working on the film currently. Keep Calm and Carry On as it were. Bond 25 is likely on track just "for EONs eyes only".
  • Posts: 19,339
    Has Dan finished all his filming commitments now and is working on B25 as well,anyone know ?
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Yep!
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    edited January 2019 Posts: 10,588
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Has Dan finished all his filming commitments now and is working on B25 as well,anyone know ?
    He's currently preparing for Bond, nothing left on his slate before March.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,527
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Has Dan finished all his filming commitments now and is working on B25 as well,anyone know ?

    Yes, since before the Holidays
Sign In or Register to comment.