It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I hear that Fincher is changing up the third act of the film considerably. I know he did the same for TGWTDT.
WARNING: Possible spoilers in the trailer.
I am looking forward to it. It seems like there might be other monsters involved. Which I approve.
That trailer is far better!!!! :O
How pathetic. We now live in a world where there are major spoilers for a film in its own trailer.
The first film? What did the trailer show? (spoiler tags, please)
Well, that's not as bad as
True, but to show the climax is still pretty poor. I guess because the film isn't a wash with action, the marketing people needed to cram in as much excitement as possible.
Trailer generally end up being disappointing when the movie is just not up to the level the trailer made you feel exciting or the trialer is better than the movie.
Whenever in the cinema I am always making a sport out of it guessing the music with the trailer, as it is rarely the music for the movie.
That was one of the best teasers ever made. The real trailer for GE however spoke of something like "his biggest enemy yet - 006", which immediately reeked of soap opera and initially made me want to avoid the film.
No, but these days it's even worse where the climaxes or big reveals in films ruin not only the film it's promoting but the future sequels that are already lined up for that series (like The Amazing Spiderman 2, for a recent example). Movies aren't about using one film to really shock and enthrall an audience anymore, it's about getting enough money to make more sequels without a care about whether it means anything special to anyone.
Ubisoft and New Regency had looked at several directors for the gig, including Daniel Espinosa and Garreth Evans.
Now I'm really wishing Gareth Evans would direct it. Both Raid films were amazing and he's brilliant at fight scenes, he could really do the games justice in that department. Still hope they just make an original assassin, in a whole new time period (and a whole new modern day hero). That way they have much more freedom, they're not confined to the games.
I can't judge as I've seen f**k all from him but I'm hoping they're looking at this guy because he's a good fit and he was passionate about it, not just because he's mates with Fassbender. I think this film has a ton of potential and with Ubisoft involved, and an actor as talented as Fassbender producing/starring in it, I'm really excited.
YES!!! Looking forward to some more outrageous blood and guts from the boys!!! :-bd
Cowabunga the new trailer
I never thought I'd see anything that would make me want to watch the 1990 original again so damn quickly! ;-)
Still not sure about this? I do know that if i should watch it? It will not be in a cinema.
I can understand why they'd make their own characters. It means they're not constrained by having to adapt the games, and as the games have a new main character every time anyway (and the modern day characters change around a lot), it isn't a big deal. In fact this is the approach I said they should take, tell a new story in a new time period.
But no parkour? Bourne style fight scenes? Almost nothing from the game franchise left in? This sounds awful.
Looks pretty good although alot of CGI by the looks of it?