Rate the Various Categories - The Films!!! 2021 - Final Community Ratings

1111214161751

Comments

  • Posts: 1,817
    For Your Eyes Only
    1. Direction - 7
    2. Screenplay - 6
    3. Script - 6
    4. Plot - 6
    5. Action - 6
    6. Main Villain - 5
    7. Main Bond Girl - 4
    8. Bond - 7
    9. Sets - 6
    10. Music - 6
    11. Cinematography - 7
    12. Fleming - 8

    13. Supporting Cast - 2
    14. Main Titles - 2
    15. Plausibility - 4
    16. Pace - 2
    17. Editing - 3
    18. Tilt - 2

    89/150 = 59.3%
    ____________________

    Casino Royale: 98.7%
    Thunderball: 92.7%
    The Living Daylights: 91.3%
    Skyfall: 89.3%
    Goldfinger: 81.3%
    Tomorrow Never Dies: 80.6%
    A View to a Kill: 77.3%
    Dr No: 76.0%
    The Man with the Golden Gun: 72.7%
    Diamonds are Forever: 70.0%
    For Your Eyes Only: 59.3%
  • Posts: 7,505
    After some thought I have concluded that I was a bit too harsh on sir Moore's performance in my initial ranking. I will therefore like to use the extra time before the number counting to tweek my "Bond performance" score in FYEO from 8 to 9. A tiny change maybe, but appropriate! :)

    My new total for FYEO stands at 120/150, approximately 80 %.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    edited May 2014 Posts: 4,422
    Your request has been granted ;-)

    I'll be rounding this one up tomorrow
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    edited May 2014 Posts: 5,080
    I hope FYEO has done well. I am very fond of that release...
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,422
    @MayDayDiVicenzo hoped FYEO would do well. Let's see....

    Overall Bondian Scores

    Casino Royale - 87.85%
    On Her Majesty's Secret Service - 82.16%
    GoldenEye - 78.94%
    Dr No- 78.7%
    The Living Daylights - 78.61%
    For Your Eyes Only - 77.68%
    Thunderball - 77.47%
    Goldfinger - 77.23%
    Skyfall - 75.4%
    A View To A Kill - 72.22%
    Tomorrow Never Dies - 70.20%
    Moonraker - 67.4%
    The Man With The Golden Gun - 61.33%
    Diamonds Are Forever - 56.05% 

    Not bad, ahead of Thunderball, and just behind The Living Daylights. Not bad at all.

    And now time for some actual discussion:

    Is it higher/lower than your own ratings?

    Personal % - 80ish Community % - 77.68. Lower. I didn't expect FYEO to be ahead of both TB and GF.

    What is your favourite category/element/thing in the film? 

    Maybe Moore's performance - his usual laconic charm, now laced with a steely determination.

    What surprised you the most, while reading other peoples ratings? 

    Julian Glover as the main villain - I didn't expect him to get such low scores. Granted he's not the most memorable character, but still....

    Feel free to comment! Another Bond film coming soon... 
  • Posts: 7,505
    What's up next?
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    edited May 2014 Posts: 5,080
    Not too bad at all!

    Is it higher/lower than your own ratings?

    Personal % - 91.33, community %- 77.68

    Lower, but I'm not surprised.

    What is your favourite category/element/thing in the film?

    Moore's performance, The Bond girl, the music and the locations all make for a superb release.

    What surprised you the most, while reading other peoples ratings?

    Nothing much, but as @royale65 says, I was taken aback at how low people scored Julian Glover as Aris Kristatos.
  • Posts: 1,595
    My favorite category/element - Moore, Columbo, the finale.

    What surprised me the most? Kristatos' low scores. He's my least favorite villain but I always sort of thought I was alone in that. I don't HATE him like I hate Graves' character, but he's just so BANAL.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080
    I forgot to ask @royale65, but @SaintMark entered his OHMSS scores late, so have these been added to the overall OHMSS score?
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    edited May 2014 Posts: 4,422
    @MayDayDiVicenzo - no, they haven't. I'll do it right now.....

    Edit -

    Overall Bondian Scores


    Casino Royale - 87.85%
    On Her Majesty's Secret Service - 82.86%
    GoldenEye - 78.94%
    Dr No- 78.7%
    The Living Daylights - 78.61%
    For Your Eyes Only - 77.68%
    Thunderball - 77.47%
    Goldfinger - 77.23%
    Skyfall - 75.4%
    A View To A Kill - 72.22%
    Tomorrow Never Dies - 70.20%
    Moonraker - 67.4%
    The Man With The Golden Gun - 61.33%
    Diamonds Are Forever - 56.05%

    A minor change, but not enough to dislodge CR.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    edited May 2014 Posts: 5,080
    royale65 wrote:
    @MayDayDiVicenzo - no, they haven't. I'll do it right now.....

    Ahh, that's great. Hopefully, @SaintMark's score will increase the average...

  • edited May 2014 Posts: 7,505
    royale65 wrote:
    @MayDayDiVicenzo - no, they haven't. I'll do it right now.....

    Ahh, that's great. Hopefully, @SaintMark's score will increase the average...
    royale65 wrote:
    @MayDayDiVicenzo - no, they haven't. I'll do it right now.....

    Edit -

    Overall Bondian Scores


    On Her Majesty's Secret Service - 82.86%

    A minor change, but not enough to dislodge CR.

    Hm... To me it seems like this does not add up. :-?

    Since OHMSS's first points count, and its very solid entry of 88%, only three people have voted: Me, @QBranch, and @SaintMark (is that correct?). I gave it a solid score of 92 %, SaintMark even higher. So even though QBranch gave it a score of 82 %, it seems odd that the total percentage would drop with 6% as a result of those included votes. Is it only me who thinks that doesn't make sense? Are you sure everything was correct in the calculations? I am not complaining and I may be wrong, but with so much data to summarize its only natural that slight mistakes occur...
  • edited May 2014 Posts: 6,396
    @Jobo is quite correct. I've re-calculated everybody's scores and the results for OHMSS should be an average of = 88.65%
  • edited May 2014 Posts: 7,505
    Praise and accolades for @WillyGalore, for bothering to do all the counting and calculations on a tuesday afternoon, and proving that I do have some sanity after all! =D>
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    edited May 2014 Posts: 4,422
    My sincerest apologies. It's quite a lot of data.

    This is how I do the totals -

    r65- 140/150 
    dd- 138/150
    may- 144/150
    wg- 144/150 
    mf- 101/150
    prof- 147/150
    cs- 141/150
    bs- 142/150
    mb- 129/150
    sns- 146/150
    00beast- 80/140 
    kerim- 142/150 
    bain- 140/150
    b007- 121/150
    qb-123/150
    jobo- 138/150
    sm- 141/150

    2257/2550 = 88.50%

    On Her Majesty's Secret Service - 88.50%
    Casino Royale - 87.85%
    GoldenEye - 78.94%
    Dr No- 78.7%
    The Living Daylights - 78.61%
    For Your Eyes Only - 77.68%
    Thunderball - 77.47%
    Goldfinger - 77.23%
    Skyfall - 75.4%
    A View To A Kill - 72.22%
    Tomorrow Never Dies - 70.20%
    Moonraker - 67.4%
    The Man With The Golden Gun - 61.33%
    Diamonds Are Forever - 56.05%

    By jingo it's reclaimed the top spot!
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080
    Yes! Where it deserves to be! Thank you to @SaintMark!
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,422
    And thanks to @jobo and @WillyGalore
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,422
    Look out! It's another Bond!

    Licence To Kill

    /10
    1. Direction - 9 (the best of Glen's)
    2. Screenplay - 9
    3. Script - 9
    4. Plot - 8
    5. Action - 10 (superb!)
    6. Main Villain - 10
    7. Main Bond Girl - 8
    8. Bond - 10 (Dalton loses the sheen of sophistication, giving us a more animalistic portrayal)
    9. Sets - 7 (accent on realism) 
    10. Music - 8 (dated but enjoyable)
    11. Cinematography - 7
    12. Fleming - 9

    /5
    13. Supporting Cast - 5 (I like the heavies in this one)
    14. Main Titles - 4
    15. Plausibility - 5
    16. Pace - 5
    17. Editing -4
    18. Tilt - 5

    132/150= 88%

    Remember the first twelve categories are out of 10, and the latter six are out of 5


    These are my personal ratings -

    On Her Majesty's Secret Service - 93.33%
    Casino Royale - 92.66% 
    Licence To Kill - 88%
    Dr No - 87.3% 
    The Living Daylights - 86.66% 
    Goldfinger - 86% 
    Skyfall - 84.6% 
    For Your Eyes Only - 80.66%
    Thunderball - 80%
    Tomorrow Never Dies - 78.66%
    GoldenEye - 74.66% 
    Moonraker - 73.3% 
    A View To A Kill - 66%
    Diamonds Are Forever - 62.66%
    The Man With The Golden Gun - 62% 


    And my rankings -

    23. Diamonds Are Forever
    22. The Man With The Golden Gun
    20. Moonraker
    19. A View To A Kill
    16. For Your Eyes Only
    15. GoldenEye
    13. Tomorrow Never Dies
    11. Goldfinger
    9. Skyfall
    8. Dr No
    7. The Living Daylights
    5. Thunderball
    4. Licence To Kill
    3. Casino Royale 
    2. On Her Majesty's Secret Service

    Groovy baby - bang on the money!!!
  • Posts: 6,396
    1. Direction - 8
    2. Screenplay - 8
    3. Script - 8
    4. Plot - 8
    5. Action - 9
    6. Main Villain - 10
    7. Main Bond Girl - 8
    8. Bond - 8
    9. Sets - 7
    10. Music - 3
    11. Cinematography - 5
    12. Fleming - 9

    /5
    13. Supporting Cast - 5
    14. Main Titles - 2
    15. Plausibility - 5
    16. Pace - 4
    17. Editing - 3
    18. Tilt - 5

    115/150 = 76.6%

    Kamen's score and cinematography bring the score down. Still a great film though.
  • Posts: 2,400
    Licence To Kill

    /10
    1. Direction - 9 (I feel that Glen's work is superb but he didn't get the best performance out of Lowell or Soto)
    2. Screenplay - 10
    3. Script - 9
    4. Plot - 10
    5. Action - 10 (Tanker chase = best action in the series)
    6. Main Villain - 10 (Best in the series)
    7. Main Bond Girl - 7
    8. Bond - 10 (A Bond who's been scorn'd is Hell on Earth; Dalton gives possibly the best performance of any actor in the series history)
    9. Sets - 7 (Perhaps the film's weakest point; nothing stands out)
    10. Music - 8 (Great work by Kamen. A bit too LW/DH/80's in general at times.)
    11. Cinematography - 9 (I reaaaaaally like that shot of Bond climbing the cargo elevator)
    12. Fleming - 10 (This is a better adaptation of LALD than LALD itself)

    /5
    13. Supporting Cast - 4 (Minus points for Soto. Sharkey's a lot of fun though and Dario is sublime)
    14. Main Titles - 2 (Bit mundane at this point in the series)
    15. Plausibility - 5
    16. Pace - 5 (This has always been the Bond movie that moves the fastest for me)
    17. Editing - 5
    18. Tilt - 5

    135/150= 90%
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    edited May 2014 Posts: 5,080
    Licence to Kill, (1989)

    1. Direction - 9
    2. Screenplay - 9
    3. Script - 9
    4. Plot - 9
    5. Action - 10
    6. Main Villain - 9
    7. Main Bond Girl - 9
    8. Bond - 10
    9. Sets - 8
    10. Music - 5
    11. Cinematography - 6
    12. Fleming - 9

    /5
    13. Supporting Cast - 5
    14. Main Titles - 2
    15. Plausibility - 5
    16. Pace - 5
    17. Editing - 4
    18. Tilt - 5

    128/150

    85.33%


    My actual ranking-
    1. OHMSS
    2. AVTAK
    3. GF
    4. FYEO
    5. LTK
    7. GE
    8. TLD
    10. CR
    11. SF
    16. TB
    17. DAF
    18. DN
    20. TMWTGG
    21. TND
    22. MR



    Percentage rating-

    1. OHMSS (96%)
    2. FYEO (91.3%)
    3. AVTAK (86%)
    4. LTK (85.33%)
    5. GF (80.7%)
    6. CR (80%)
    7. GE (77%)
    8. TLD (76%)
    9. TB (73.3%)
    10. SF (72.7%)
    11. DN (68.7%)
    12. DAF (66%)
    13. TND (63.3%)
    14. TMWTGG (62.7%)
    15. MR (61.3%)
  • edited May 2014 Posts: 7,505
    Licence To Kill

    /10
    1. Direction - 9
    2. Screenplay - 10
    3. Script - 9 (Minus for some unconvincing dialogue)
    4. Plot - 10
    5. Action - 10
    6. Main Villain - 10
    7. Main Bond Girl - 9
    8. Bond - 10 (Does it get better than this?)
    9. Sets - 7
    10. Music - 7 (Kamens score is lively. But I don't allways agree with the way it's used)
    11. Cinematography - 7
    12. Fleming - 10

    /5
    13. Supporting Cast - 3
    14. Main Titles - 4
    15. Plausibility - 5
    16. Pace - 5
    17. Editing -5
    18. Tilt - 5


    135/150 = 90%
  • edited May 2014 Posts: 7,505
    Can someone explain in what way the music score is dated?
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    edited May 2014 Posts: 4,422
    It has certain elements that are very 80's action film-ish, well in my view anyway. It doesn't help that Kamen provided the score for Lethal Weapon.
  • Posts: 6,396
    royale65 wrote:
    It has certain elements that are very 80's action film-ish, well in my view anyway. It doesn't help that Kamen provided the score for Lethal Weapon.

    And Die Hard.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    edited May 2014 Posts: 4,422
    Indeed :-) I thought that film was released in 1991, but a quick search tells me it was 1988. Hence my confusion ;-)
  • Posts: 4,762

    1. Direction - 9
    2. Screenplay - 9
    3. Script - 10
    4. Plot - 10
    5. Action - 9
    6. Main Villain - 10
    7. Main Bond Girl - 10
    8. Bond - 10
    9. Sets - 7
    10. Music - 6
    11. Cinematography - 5
    12. Fleming - N/A


    13. Supporting Cast - 5
    14. Main Titles - 4
    15. Plausibility - 5
    16. Pace - 4
    17. Editing - 5
    18. Tilt - 5

    123/140 = 88%
  • Posts: 7,653
    Licence to Kill, (1989)

    1. Direction - 9
    2. Screenplay - 7
    3. Script - 6
    4. Plot - 6
    5. Action - 7
    6. Main Villain - 7
    7. Main Bond Girl - 7 [because: Lowell 9 / Soto 4 ]
    8. Bond - 5
    9. Sets - 5
    10. Music - 5
    11. Cinematography - 6
    12. Fleming - 7

    /5
    13. Supporting Cast - 3
    14. Main Titles - 1 [license revoked just sounds smarter]
    15. Plausibility - 2
    16. Pace - 3
    17. Editing - 2
    18. Tilt - 1

    89/150

    59,33%

    Much better than I expected.
  • Posts: 6,396
    Birdleson wrote:
    royale65 wrote:
    Indeed :-) I thought that film was released in 1991, but a quick search tells me it was 1988. Hence my confusion ;-)

    1989

    Die Hard was '88.
  • Posts: 7,653
    Birdleson wrote:
    royale65 wrote:
    Indeed :-) I thought that film was released in 1991, but a quick search tells me it was 1988. Hence my confusion ;-)

    1989

    Die Hard was '88.

    Die Hard - Now there is a great actionmovie.
Sign In or Register to comment.