Last Bond Movie You Watched

1273274276278279331

Comments

  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,422
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    royale65 wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Annoys me far more than anything in Moonraker. That film was just silly. GG has a nasty streak to it and always makes cheap jokes at other peoples expense.
    I love that nastiness to it personally, as well as the 70s Carry On style humour (complete with Benny Hill raunch). It's a quirky entry but quite enjoyable for me.

    It's an odd mix and I don't think it works. At the very least it's aged horribly. I remember thinking something wasn't right with the film when I saw it as a teenager.

    Quite. GG is a mix of campy and callous that doesn't sit well with me.

    There's a very angry vibe to the whole film. You get the impression nobody was particularly happy to be on the set.

    Harry and Cubby were getting divorced after all. The children weren't happy. From what I read, Sir Rog was crucial easing the crew and casts tension.

  • Posts: 12,281
    Birdleson wrote: »
    TMWTGG was perfect for a 12 year old in 1974. That was all I needed.

    When I was that age, I also loved it. Now it’s definitely one of the worst for me, and nostalgia doesn’t even work.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,577
    When I was in my teens, through to almost present day, TMWTGG was very low in my ranking, mainly from an enjoyment point of view. I always loved Lee as Scaramanga, and even Nic Nac. It was the entirety of everything else I could do without.

    However last year I re-watched it after not bothering to for a couple of decades (that’s how offensive I found it); I loved it. The nastiness was shocking to me, but instead of being repelled by Moore’s-Bond pulling a bit of a Connery, I was very amused and very entertained. I found this cruelty to be balanced by Moore’s professional campiness (his camp feels so genuine).

    TMWTGG will never break into my top ten, but it’s now one helluva fun ride for me.
  • Posts: 3,336
    Birdleson wrote: »
    FoxRox wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    TMWTGG was perfect for a 12 year old in 1974. That was all I needed.

    When I was that age, I also loved it. Now it’s definitely one of the worst for me, and nostalgia doesn’t even work.

    Still a Top Fifteen for me.

    I am also very fond of TMWTGG. Many good memories from back in the day, i even had it in my top 5 for a long time. Now it is only top 15 (#14) and i still really like it.
  • Posts: 12,281
    On Her Majesty’s Secret Service

    Top-tier Bond material all the way here. Includes my favorite Bond villain, Bond girl, and soundtrack. And George Lazenby does a very good job as Bond.

    I could ramble on, but I’m just going to keep it very brief. It’s super close to my favorite Bond film, CR, and I have no serious issues with either of them. I’d have to nitpick if I felt like it. From start to finish, OHMSS is one of the most special and perfect Bond films. As expected, it remains extremely high. The ending gets me every single time...

    2018 Bondathon Ranking
    1. Casino Royale
    2. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service
    3. The Spy Who Loved Me
    4. Skyfall
    5. GoldenEye
    6. Licence to Kill
    7. For Your Eyes Only
    8. Live and Let Die
    9. The Living Daylights
    10. Quantum of Solace
    11. Octopussy
    12. Tomorrow Never Dies
    13. A View to a Kill
    14. The World Is Not Enough
    15. Spectre
    16. The Man with the Golden Gun
    17. Diamonds Are Forever
    18. Moonraker
    19. Die Another Day
  • Posts: 12,281
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Seeing as how we agree on so much else, it perplexes me how much you dislike DAF and TMWTGG (I'm adjusting their places in your rankings for what I am pretty is to come with the next five films you watch).

    For DAF, it’s mostly because it felt wrong to make Connery’s return so silly (felt far too much like a Moore film), and the third act is pretty lame I thought. Not a lot of stuff stands out to me as particularly good in that one besides Wint and Kidd. The lift fight is really good too.

    As for TMWTGG, it sort of feels tired and dull outside of the stuff with Scaramanga. The humor was also very weak I think. LALD was so superior; it’s like if LALD went wrong to me. There are still cool things about both movies, but they have a fair amount that irk me.
  • Posts: 12,281
    You Only Live Twice

    When I was a lot younger, YOLT was a Top 10 entry for me. In between then and now it suffered a drop down to around 16 or 17, but sure enough it managed to climb again. Like some other films this Bondathon, my viewing of YOLT was particularly good this time.

    It’s probably Connery’s weakest EON Bond performance, but he still gets a lot of good moments. It’s not a top-tier Bond performance, but still really not bad. The title song is among my favorites in the series, though I’m not a fan of the PTS. The Bond girls are all in the average/middle territory. Same goes for the villains, though Donald Pleasence’s Blofeld is growing on me more. The soundtrack is totally solid, and I love the settings used. The epic climax is one of the series’ best. I actually really like all the action in this film - the climax, the Little Nellie sequence, the dock fight, the break-in at Osato Chemicals, etc. Very good stuff. The film, while not on the stronger side of the golden age, still feels like classic Bond through and through. There’s a few moments in the middle I’m not so crazy about, but honestly it’s free of seriously bad problems. It probably has my favorite Blofeld cat too.

    Not sure exactly what made me enjoy YOLT more than usual this time, but going backwards could be part of it. Only a few films in the series post-60s were able to capture the magic of that golden era. YOLT earns a pretty decent spot on my list this time around.

    2018 Bondathon Ranking
    1. Casino Royale
    2. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service
    3. The Spy Who Loved Me
    4. Skyfall
    5. GoldenEye
    6. Licence to Kill
    7. For Your Eyes Only
    8. Live and Let Die
    9. You Only Live Twice
    10. The Living Daylights
    11. Quantum of Solace
    12. Octopussy
    13. Tomorrow Never Dies
    14. A View to a Kill
    15. The World Is Not Enough
    16. Spectre
    17. The Man with the Golden Gun
    18. Diamonds Are Forever
    19. Moonraker
    20. Die Another Day
  • Posts: 12,281
    Thunderball

    Now we're talking. Momentum builds coming off a really good watch of YOLT, to an even better watch for TB. TB was my first-ever Bond film, and it looks like it is finally headed for a spot in my Top 10 Bond films.

    Sean Connery is at his absolute best here, dishing out his best one-liners and being as lethal and charming as ever. He is basically perfect as Bond in all of his first 4 Bond films. The PTS, minus the silly jetpack, is a really great start, and the title credits and song that follow are very good too. The Bond girls are my favorite overall group in the entire series, though Tracy and Vesper are my favorite individual ones. Fiona is a perfect Bond girl and villain, while Domino is among my favorites of all the main Bond girls. Largo is alright as the villain, but not a personal favorite. He doesn't appear much, but Blofeld is perfect behind the scenes, and the SPECTRE meeting early on is a great scene. There are several individual scenes I love - the SPECTRE meeting, the chase with Fiona, the clinic sequence, Bond at Largo's at night, the fight on the Volante, etc. The soundtrack is terrific. My only complain of any kind is that there were 1 or 2 underwater scenes that sort of hurt the pace, but nothing to significantly hurt the film at all.

    I have a lot of fond memories of TB, and it's fitting it is finally making my Top 10. It used to be around 16 or 17 on my ranking, but has enjoyed a steady climb up. It deserves to be included among the greatest Bond adventures.

    2018 Bondathon Ranking
    1. Casino Royale
    2. On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    3. The Spy Who Loved Me
    4. Skyfall
    5. GoldenEye
    6. Thunderball
    7. Licence to Kill
    8. For Your Eyes Only
    9. Live and Let Die
    10. You Only Live Twice
    11. The Living Daylights
    12. Quantum of Solace
    13. Octopussy
    14. Tomorrow Never Dies
    15. A View to a Kill
    16. The World Is Not Enough
    17. Spectre
    18. The Man with the Golden Gun
    19. Diamonds Are Forever
    20. Moonraker
    21. Die Another Day
  • edited February 2018 Posts: 12,281
    Goldfinger

    GF represents everything great about Bond. It established many of the tropes we’ve seen in the series, brilliantly building on what DN and FRWL had started. GF earns its status as the quintessential Bond film.

    Connery is in top form, of course. The Bond girls are pretty good, and the villains are terrific; Oddjob is a great choice for the best henchman. The title song and soundtrack are great. The action scenes are all very good, especially the thrilling climax at Fort Knox. The PTS is one of the series’ best, and basically shows you everything Bond is about in just a few minutes. The whole film is the best showcase of what Bond is about, and fires one great scene after another: the perfect PTS, classic title song, foiling Goldfinger in Miami, the golden girl, golfing with Goldfinger, the factory chase, the laser table, the briefing of Grand Slam, the finale at Fort Knox, etc. So much good stuff. It’s the breeziest, coolest, and most Bondish Bond film of them all. There are no significant flaws.

    GF definitely remains among my absolute favorites, for doing just about everything right. This Bondathon has been my absolute favorite one so far in my life, and that’s saying a lot. Sadly just two more to go after this.

    2018 Bondathon Ranking
    1. Casino Royale
    2. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service
    3. Goldfinger
    4. The Spy Who Loved Me
    5. Skyfall
    6. GoldenEye
    7. Thunderball
    8. Licence to Kill
    9. For Your Eyes Only
    10. Live and Let Die
    11. You Only Live Twice
    12. The Living Daylights
    13. Quantum of Solace
    14. Octopussy
    15. Tomorrow Never Dies
    16. A View to a Kill
    17. The World Is Not Enough
    18. Spectre
    19. The Man with the Golden Gun
    20. Diamonds Are Forever
    21. Moonraker
    22. Die Another Day
  • Posts: 7,653
    Saw Never say never again tonight on the telly, a nice time to spend your time, the movie has enough good to great moments and Sean Connery who just is James Bond.
  • Posts: 12,281
    Dr. No

    Not going to say a lot because I’m tired, but a terrific finish to a terrific Bondathon! DN has always been a favorite of mine, and it goes up one more spot this time around! Love the villains, the girls, the story, Connery’s performance, etc. No signifcant issues at all. It’s as good a start to a franchise as one could ask for. One of the best.

    Posted my ranking in the other thread, but I’ll post it here too. Not sure when my next Bondathon will be, but for a while I’m likely to just watch one here and there. The ranking is never set in stone, but that’s what keeps it interesting! Here’s hoping we get some news about Bond 25 soon!

    2018 Bondathon Ranking (Finished)
    1. Casino Royale
    2. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service
    3. Goldfinger
    4. The Spy Who Loved Me
    5. Skyfall
    6. Dr. No
    7. From Russia with Love
    8. GoldenEye
    9. Thunderball
    10. Licence to Kill
    11. For Your Eyes Only
    12. Live and Let Die
    13. You Only Live Twice
    14. The Living Daylights
    15. Quantum of Solace
    16. Octopussy
    17. Tomorrow Never Dies
    18. A View to a Kill
    19. The World Is Not Enough
    20. Spectre
    21. The Man with the Golden Gun
    22. Diamonds Are Forever
    23. Moonraker
    24. Die Another Day
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    SaintMark wrote: »
    Saw Never say never again tonight on the telly, a nice time to spend your time, the movie has enough good to great moments and Sean Connery who just is James Bond.
    Agreed. It's an underrated film in my view, which suffers on account of the obvious shenanigans which resulted in its creation. For me at least, it shows that Bond can survive & thrive without EON.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited February 2018 Posts: 23,883
    MR

    After all the discussion on the thread about it a few weeks back, I decided to take in a viewing yesterday. This is a film that I used to think highly of when I was young (for obvious reasons perhaps) and which declined in my estimation as the years progressed. However these days it's enjoying a bit of a resurgence, along with DAF, NSNA & DAD. It's the scale which I find particularly impressive in this film, along with the whimsical & playful tone. To me it remains the epitome of what is possible with extravagant cinematic Bond - the end of a logical progression of escapism and outlandishness which began in the mid-60s. It's fitting that this film capped off the 70s and then they scaled back at the start of the 80s. Having said that, I think Bond lost a lot of that special & unique quality after this film imho, and has never regained it since. I've always loved Lonsdale's Drax and think Moore plays Bond perfectly for the kind of tone they have here. However, it is Lois Chiles' Dr. Holly Goodhead who I have had the most change in opinion about. I used to dislike her when younger and found her quite plain jane, but now think she is one of the better Bond 'girls'. She's a very independent, capable and qualified character and Chiles plays her with an aloof cool which I find increasingly appealing these days. All in all I had a great viewing experience of this one.
  • MR just drags for me. It's hard to describe why. I think it's technically very impressive and has a few really good scenes but there's no real energy to it, it's like they're going through the motions, especially in comparison to TSWLM. I feel the same about GF and TB. Going "bigger and better" never really works imo.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Lovers' Rosy Stain
    Posts: 6,763
    bondjames wrote: »
    However, it is Lois Chiles' Dr. Holly Goodhead who I have had the most change in opinion about. I used to dislike her when younger and found her quite plain jane, but now think she is one of the better Bond 'girls'. She's a very independent, capable and qualified character and Chiles plays her with an aloof cool which I find increasingly appealing these days.
    "Aloof cool." I've always liked the character but when you describe her like that, I appreciate her even more. Even if she's obviously not as charismatic as Bond, she's cut from the same cloth as him. I greatly prefer her to Barbara Bach.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited February 2018 Posts: 23,883
    mattjoes wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    However, it is Lois Chiles' Dr. Holly Goodhead who I have had the most change in opinion about. I used to dislike her when younger and found her quite plain jane, but now think she is one of the better Bond 'girls'. She's a very independent, capable and qualified character and Chiles plays her with an aloof cool which I find increasingly appealing these days.
    "Aloof cool." I've always liked the character but when you describe her like that, I appreciate her even more. Even if she's obviously not as charismatic as Bond, she's cut from the same cloth as him. I greatly prefer her to Barbara Bach.
    I really like Bach too, but Chiles is different and in my view rather contemporary (as opposed to the more glamorous Mrs. Starr). That's why she's growing on me these days.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    TND.

    One of the things I love about Brosnan is that he always looked to be having fun and made the character someone you wanted to eb and in some cases probably do a better job. But in all seriousness, I do have a lot of issues with this film, his whole era to be fair but the guy really invoked a fun factor that is noticeably missing from the last few Bond films.

    Brosnan has some very cool moments such as when he first meets Carver in Hamburg. His scenes with Paris Carver (who btw isn't as disasterous as some folks make her out to be), Bond's escape from the Hamburh Warehouse, particularly the factory escape.

    Wai Lin was alright, Stamper was...Stamper, Dr Kaufmann was pretty damn good and would like to have seen more of him. Carver as the main villain was serviceable and who can forget his infamous...

    1473787482548

    Some of the set pieces were alright although a tad overblown and machine gun-totting Bond in the manner as presented in this film is something I don't want to ever see again.

    Nothing great but its a fun enough romp.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited February 2018 Posts: 8,136
    doubleoego wrote: »
    TND.

    One of the things I love about Brosnan is that he always looked to be having fun and made the character someone you wanted to eb and in some cases probably do a better job. But in all seriousness, I do have a lot of issues with this film, his whole era to be fair but the guy really invoked a fun factor that is noticeably missing from the last few Bond films.

    Bingo. You smashed the nailed on the head right there. I would love a more mischievous Bond like Brosnan is throughout this film, and the tone is much more breezy. The type of Bond film you can easily watch on a Sunday afternoon.
  • edited February 2018 Posts: 17,332
    doubleoego wrote: »
    TND.

    One of the things I love about Brosnan is that he always looked to be having fun and made the character someone you wanted to eb and in some cases probably do a better job. But in all seriousness, I do have a lot of issues with this film, his whole era to be fair but the guy really invoked a fun factor that is noticeably missing from the last few Bond films.

    Bingo. You smashed the nailed on the head right there. I would love a more mischievous Bond like Brosnan is throughout this film, and the tone is much more breezy. The type of Bond film you can easily watch on a Sunday afternoon.

    I can't get myself to watch any of the Craig films on a Sunday – QoS perhaps the only exception, because of the runtime. Fun Bond is perfect for a Sunday. A serious Bond, not so much.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I'm not a fan of TND on the whole, but agree about the 'fun' aspect. It certainly has a breezy quality to it. In my view it's spoiled by the predictability and by the numbers quality.

    On the whole, it does feel like something one would watch on tv on a Sunday, but I'm afraid I don't mean that as a compliment.
  • Posts: 19,339
    The way BrosnanBond pushes over the satellite in the printing factory,destroying it,is a brilliant moment.

    A great way to drive Carver even more mad !
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    I always feel sorry for the security guard who will have to pay $300 million for that broken satellite. ;)
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited February 2018 Posts: 23,883
    OP

    Discussion on the Production Thread motivated a viewing. I had a blast as always, and actually this was one of my better viewings in some time. This film moves at a much faster pace than MR (which I viewed on the previous night) and the action sequences, while less extravagant, are more exciting. I now agree with some viewers who have previously stated that this is a very 'colourful' Bond film. I'm surprised I didn't notice it before. India in particular really pops. Moore plays the weary agent superbly here and the script emphasizes his strengths. From the thrilling PTS to the even better suspenseful post credit sequence (Mishka and Grishka's introduction is really well done), you know that this film means business. The auction scene remains one of the most memorable in the series for me, and the entire German sequence from arrival in the east to bomb diffusal is Roger at his sublime best. Only he could make a Bond in a clown outfit credible. The great Louis Jourdan's Kamal Khan is a formidable adversary, and one of the better villains for me. Kristina Wayborn is quite stunning and I'm glad she gets quite a bit of screentime (I prefer her to Maud's titular character - I liked Adams more in TMWTGG). Kabir Bedi & Steven Berkoff are also excellent. In fact, I'd say OP has one of the best villain rosters in the series, along with FRWL, GE & LALD. I've always liked Barry's score too, and especially the whole bit when Bond is snooping about Kamal's Monsoon Palace. Nobody could do melodic suspense like Barry. The film is only let down by the (at times) childish humour (particularly in India) and the lame finale. Yes, I admit that the plane sequence is absolutely first class, but I could have done without the circus girl show which preceded it. This was a fantastic viewing experience of a film that doesn't get enough credit imho.

    A quick question: Was Magda working for Octopussy or for Kamal? I've never been quite sure about that.
  • Posts: 19,339
    bondjames wrote: »
    OP

    Discussion on the Production Thread motivated a viewing. I had a blast as always, and actually this was one of my better viewings in some time. This film moves at a much faster pace than MR (which I viewed on the previous night) and the action sequences, while less extravagant, are more exciting. I now agree with some viewers who have previously stated that this is a very 'colourful' Bond film. I'm surprised I didn't notice it before. India in particular really pops. Moore plays the weary agent superbly here and the script emphasizes his strengths. From the thrilling PTS to the even better suspenseful post credit sequence (Mishka and Grishka's introduction is really well done), you know that this film means business. The auction scene remains one of the most memorable in the series for me, and the entire German sequence from arrival in the east to bomb diffusal is Roger at his sublime best. Only he could make a Bond in a clown outfit credible. The great Louis Jourdan's Kamal Khan is a formidable adversary, and one of the better villains for me. Kristina Wayborn is quite stunning and I'm glad she gets quite a bit of screentime (I prefer her to Maud's titular character - I liked Adams more in TMWTGG). Kabir Bedi & Steven Berkoff are also excellent. In fact, I'd say OP has one of the best villain rosters in the series, along with FRWL, GE & LALD. I've always liked Barry's score too, and especially the whole bit when Bond is snooping about Kamal's Monsoon Palace. Nobody could do melodic suspense like Barry. The film is only let down by the (at times) childish humour (particularly in India) and the lame finale. Yes, I admit that the plane sequence is absolutely first class, but I could have done without the circus girl show which preceded it. This was a fantastic viewing experience of a film that doesn't get enough credit imho.

    A quick question: Was Magda working for Octopussy or for Kamal? I've never been quite sure about that.

    Octopussy,she was in Kamal's troupe to keep an eye on things,part of her deal with him,her ambassador if you will.

    Great review by the way,and this is my favourite Moore film,so good to see you appreciate it !

  • mattjoesmattjoes Lovers' Rosy Stain
    Posts: 6,763
    bondjames wrote: »
    A quick question: Was Magda working for Octopussy or for Kamal? I've never been quite sure about that.
    I'd say she was working for Octopussy, since she was part of her circus and was with Octopussy in the final battle. If she helped Kamal Khan that was probably on Octopussy's orders.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    mattjoes wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    A quick question: Was Magda working for Octopussy or for Kamal? I've never been quite sure about that.
    I'd say she was working for Octopussy, since she was part of her circus and was with Octopussy in the final battle. If she helped Kamal Khan that was probably on Octopussy's orders.
    Same thoughts.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited February 2018 Posts: 23,883
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Great review by the way,and this is my favourite Moore film,so good to see you appreciate it !
    Thanks! I've always liked OP and it never fails to entertain when I put it in the player. In some ways, it reminds me very much of GE in that regard. Both old school unpretentious fun from start to finish.
    mattjoes wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    A quick question: Was Magda working for Octopussy or for Kamal? I've never been quite sure about that.
    I'd say she was working for Octopussy, since she was part of her circus and was with Octopussy in the final battle. If she helped Kamal Khan that was probably on Octopussy's orders.
    Same thoughts.
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Octopussy,she was in Kamal's troupe to keep an eye on things,part of her deal with him,her ambassador if you will.
    Thanks chaps. That clears that up.
  • GBFGBF
    Posts: 3,195
    I watched Goldeneye yesterday. It certainly has one of the very best plots. The story has much more depth and twist than most other Bond films. The post cold war atmosphere is brought to the screen very authentically. I also quite enjoyed parts of the score, especially toward the end of the film. All actors do a very fine job. My biggest complain is, however, that parts of the film suffer from too much machine gunning and pointless explosions. "Boys with toys" comes to mind. The tank chase also feels slightly exaggeratd even though it is fun to watch but at the same time I thought, is this Bond or Rambo?
    But overall a very solid Bond adventure.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    GBF wrote: »
    I watched Goldeneye yesterday. It certainly has one of the very best plots. The story has much more depth and twist than most other Bond films. The post cold war atmosphere is brought to the screen very authentically. I also quite enjoyed parts of the score, especially toward the end of the film. All actors do a very fine job. My biggest complain is, however, that parts of the film suffer from too much machine gunning and pointless explosions. "Boys with toys" comes to mind. The tank chase also feels slightly exaggeratd even though it is fun to watch but at the same time I thought, is this Bond or Rambo?
    But overall a very solid Bond adventure.
    GE is one of the best in my opinion. I agree with your points. Sadly the machine gunning which began here became even more prevalent and excessive in future Brosnan installments. What the producers were thinking eludes me, but someone should have politely pointed out to them that the trend they were emulating peaked a decade earlier, and that James Bond isn't John Rambo. Unfortunate, but I still feel this is one of the best Bond films and it always will have a place in my top 10.
  • GBFGBF
    Posts: 3,195
    Definately top10.
Sign In or Register to comment.