Last Bond Movie You Watched

1272273275277278331

Comments

  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 23,515
    Spectre - The more I watch this, the more frustrating a watch it becomes. I really do feel that Mendes tried way too hard to bring us a movie in the classic mould and it doesn't work for the most part and Craig doesn't have it in him to be a Bond in the Connery/Moore manner.

    Totally agree SP does not serve Craig well, the film does not play to Craig's strengths.

    It really doesn’t and it’s a real shame. Craig, for the most part, has been a super 007 but is let down here. I do hope that B25 gets the best from him.

    I loved Craig in his first two outings as all involved nailed what Craig's Bond was, I hope Bond 25 marks Craig's no nonsense Bond returning.
  • Posts: 12,281
    Diamonds Are Forever

    This viewing went a little better than usual, but DAF remains one of my least favorite entries unfortunately. I sort of lose interest in the second half, and it feels like it would have been better as a Roger Moore adventure. It's not a total loss though.

    Connery, while not giving his best performance, is still fine as Bond and has some good moments. Wint and Kidd are some of the best henchmen in the series. The title song and music are generally pretty good. I also like how a lot was set in Las Vegas. However, there are many problems I have. I don't care much for the Bond girls (Case would be among my least favorites), and Charles Gray's Blofeld is one of my least favorite main Bond villains. He's sometimes fun to watch, but just not right for Blofeld. The PTS is pretty weak IMO. The silly tone felt like it came too soon, both because of how OHMSS ended and because Connery was leading and not Moore. There were a lot of those off-putting silly moments that just didn't fit Connery's style, kind of like how that happens in SP with Craig. Also, I'd say once Bond meets Blofeld in Las Vegas, the film starts to kind of fall apart for me, with just a couple more particularly good scenes after that. One big highlight I should mention though is the lift fight with Peter Franks, which is my favorite scene in the film.

    There are moments that are really good in DAF, but collectively it's just not very impressive to me. I don't hate the film, but it has to rank low on my list. Just inferior to most of the other entries I think. It was a close call between it and TMWTGG, but I kept TMWTGG higher for Scaramanga. I will now break for a little while before finishing my marathon with the golden age 60s Bond films.

    2018 Bondathon Ranking
    1. Casino Royale
    2. The Spy Who Loved Me
    3. Skyfall
    4. GoldenEye
    5. Licence to Kill
    6. For Your Eyes Only
    7. Live and Let Die
    8. The Living Daylights
    9. Quantum of Solace
    10. Octopussy
    11. Tomorrow Never Dies
    12. A View to a Kill
    13. The World Is Not Enough
    14. Spectre
    15. The Man with the Golden Gun
    16. Diamonds Are Forever
    17. Moonraker
    18. Die Another Day
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,422
    Moonraker

    I have three pet hates when it comes to judging Bond films -
    1. Overt Humour
    2. Excessive Gadgets
    3. Outlandish Plot

    Moonraker features all of these in spades. And yet, I’m having to much fun to complain. Each line from Lonsdale is a gem; Adam and Barry are on top of their respective games and Sir Rog lights up the screen. There are some dark moments that kind of balances out the irreverent nature to the picture. Does any else get goosebumps when Drax’s space station is revealed? Bravo Mr. Barry.

    Royale’s Ranking, Bondathon October 2017

    1. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service
    2. Casino Royale
    3. Dr. No
    4. Licence to Kill
    5. Quantum of Solace
    6. Skyfall
    7. Thunderball
    8. Goldfinger
    9. For Your Eyes Only
    10. Tomorrow Never Dies
    11. The World Is Not Enough
    12. GoldenEye
    13. Moonraker
    14. A View to a Kill
    15. Diamonds Are Forever
    16. Live and Let Die
    17. Die Another Day
    18. The Man With The Golden Gun

    On to the final six Bond movies. Starting with From Russia With Love. MR and FRWL do have the Venice connection, but mainly I’m pairing these two up, because I enjoy the volte face of probably the most flip Bond film, to the most engrossing.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,422
    Sorry for the double post.

    From Russia With Love

    A complete, unadulterated joy from start to finish.

    Royale’s Ranking, Bondathon October 2017

    1. From Russia With Love
    2. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service
    3. Casino Royale
    4. Dr. No
    5. Licence to Kill
    6. Quantum of Solace
    7. Skyfall
    8. Thunderball
    9. Goldfinger
    10. For Your Eyes Only
    11. Tomorrow Never Dies
    12. The World Is Not Enough
    13. GoldenEye
    14. Moonraker
    15. A View to a Kill
    16. Diamonds Are Forever
    17. Live and Let Die
    18. Die Another Day
    19. The Man With The Golden Gun

    Next up, The Living Daylights linked to FRWL thusly, SMERSH; naive Bond Girl that gets in over her head; Walter Gotell’s first and last appearances; John Barry’s first and last scores and Cold War plots.
  • SeveSeve The island of Lemoy
    Posts: 357
    doubleoego wrote: »
    QoS.

    This film settled the theory about the Craig era consisting of 2 eras. The feel of SF and SP is decidedly weaker, less exciting, absent of an urgency and rawness that really helped make CR and QoS special.

    QoS is flawed but it's no nonsense, "let's just get on with this" disposition is something I respect and appreciate and given the scripting constraints something i admire with evefy subsequent viewing. Craig is on top form, his suits look fantastic and his fight scenes are satisfyingly visceral. Excellently paced and entertaining enough to warrant multiple viewings.

    Really?

    Weak villain, weak villain's master plan, terrible shaky cam action...

    IMO a second rate Jason Bourne knockoff

    "The Bond (Loses His) Identity"

    But fortunately he gets it back in Skyfall
  • SeveSeve The island of Lemoy
    edited January 2018 Posts: 357
    FoxRox wrote: »
    Diamonds Are Forever

    ...DAF remains one of my least favorite entries unfortunately.

    Connery, while not giving his best performance, is still fine as Bond and has some good moments... The silly tone felt like it came too soon, both because of how OHMSS ended and because Connery was leading and not Moore. There were a lot of those off-putting silly moments that just didn't fit Connery's style, kind of like how that happens in SP with Craig... with just a couple more particularly good scenes after that. One big highlight I should mention though is the lift fight with Peter Franks, which is my favorite scene in the film.

    There are moments that are really good in DAF, but collectively it's just not very impressive to me...

    I agree, getting the right balance between tension and humour has always been a key to success for the Bond franchise.

    Immitators have tended to be either more serious, losing some of the broad appeal, or too silly, losing some of the hard core action / suspence movie audience.

    Hitchcock was the original master of blending tension with humour, but it's not an easy trick to pull off, but the Bond franchise has succeeded more often than not... unfortunately DAF was one of the fails.

    Personally I don't think any of Craig's movies have reached that point, I saw SP as Craig getting back to pre YALT Connery levels of humour, rather than DAF or bad Roger levels. Whereas his earlier outings were possibly a little short of humour, reflecting the largely humourless style professional assassin movies that have predominated in the 21st century so far.

    The continued greater success of the Bond franchise and the Mission Impossible franchise over their po-faced rivals, demonstrates the financial benefits of adopting this approach.



  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,004
    Popped in DAD last night to give it a watch. Wow has Judi Dench ever aged! LOL! Anyway moving on to the film itself. I actually found myself enjoying the film as pure entertainment. Now if I wanted to sit and think seriously there are plot holes I could drive a Mack Truck through. The story isn't too bad. Yes it's over the top and big and brassy but that's part of the charm. Pierce does some of his best work here and it's a shame they didn't give him one more movie before sending him off.

    I shall now duck and run for cover as I feel the community shall being pelting with rotten eggs and tomatoes! LOL!
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Nice to see DAD get some fair love.
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 23,515
    Carry On Bond is fun, I see it for what it is, DAD is certainly entertaining though even I struggle to enjoy the finale on the plane lol
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,002
    It's not nearly as bad as some claim.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    edited January 2018 Posts: 15,423
    talos7 wrote: »
    It's not nearly as bad as some claim.
    +1. People love to overreact, @talos7. Everything has to be played out the way a Shakespearean Hamlet on the stage should for them all.
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,533
    I've always been a closet fan of DAD. I daresay the first half is Brosnan's finest hour, apart from GE.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Lovers' Rosy Stain
    Posts: 6,766
    None of the Bond films are as bad as claimed by those who dislike them the most in this place.
  • Posts: 6,855
    Yes, and DAD most certainly is that Bond film!
  • Posts: 19,339
    I've always championed DAD on here...its a great film to unwind to with a drink or 10.
  • Posts: 6,855
    barryt007 wrote: »
    I've always championed DAD on here...its a great film to unwind to with a drink or 10.

    10 wouldn't be enough!
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Yes, and DAD SF most certainly is that Bond film!
    There. Now it looks aptly put. ;)
  • edited January 2018 Posts: 11,189
    Though DAD is worse, MWTGG is the one that always physically angers me everytime I try to watch it.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,141
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Though DAD is worse, MWTGG is the one that always physically angers me everytime I try to watch it.

    Why is that?
  • edited January 2018 Posts: 11,189
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Though DAD is worse, MWTGG is the one that always physically angers me everytime I try to watch it.

    Why is that?

    The slapstick humour. It's just painful and not funny.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Though DAD is worse, MWTGG is the one that always physically angers me everytime I try to watch it.

    Why is that?
    The slapstick humour. It's just painful and not funny.
    Phu-Yuck!
  • Posts: 11,189
    Annoys me far more than anything in Moonraker. That film was just silly. GG has a nasty streak to it and always makes cheap jokes at other peoples expense.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Annoys me far more than anything in Moonraker. That film was just silly. GG has a nasty streak to it and always makes cheap jokes at other peoples expense.
    I love that nastiness to it personally, as well as the 70s Carry On style humour (complete with Benny Hill raunch). It's a quirky entry but quite enjoyable for me.
  • Posts: 12,281
    For a long time now, my bottom entries have been TMWTGG, DAF, MR, and DAD. They just have the most things that irritate me, and can’t stack up to the better entries of the series.
  • BAIN123 wrote: »
    Though DAD is worse, MWTGG is the one that always physically angers me everytime I try to watch it.

    Honestly I think DAD is better. It's crap but you at least get the sense they're trying. GG is the only Bond film that feels lazy and half arsed imo. It has its bright spots, there's probably more good there than in DAD, but I think the whole thing is definitely less consistent. And then there's this

    "Bond has to fight some sumo wrestlers. He tries to beat one by squeezing his arse with an accompanying sound effect but it doesn't work. The henchman is about to kill him with a trident for some reason but then they inexplicably decide to sentence him to death by karate school instead. He's rescued by his contact and his karate school girl nieces who then leave him behind for no apparent reason. But that's okay because remember that long boring boat chase from the last one? Time for a reprisal!"

    Just so, so crap. I don't like being that blunt with Bond, I like finding stuff to enjoy, but I think GG is just a genuinely awful poorly put together film. The good stuff it has just makes me hate it more because of what could have been. It's not my least favourite (that's still QoS for me), but I think it's the worst.
  • edited January 2018 Posts: 11,189
    bondjames wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Annoys me far more than anything in Moonraker. That film was just silly. GG has a nasty streak to it and always makes cheap jokes at other peoples expense.
    I love that nastiness to it personally, as well as the 70s Carry On style humour (complete with Benny Hill raunch). It's a quirky entry but quite enjoyable for me.

    It's an odd mix and I don't really think it works. It just seems too unpleasant for me. At the very least it's aged horribly and I remember thinking something wasn't right with the film when I saw it as a teenager.

    The Connery films may have had a vicious streak to them but they were usually fairly consistent in tone.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,422
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Annoys me far more than anything in Moonraker. That film was just silly. GG has a nasty streak to it and always makes cheap jokes at other peoples expense.
    I love that nastiness to it personally, as well as the 70s Carry On style humour (complete with Benny Hill raunch). It's a quirky entry but quite enjoyable for me.

    It's an odd mix and I don't think it works. At the very least it's aged horribly. I remember thinking something wasn't right with the film when I saw it as a teenager.

    Quite. GG is a mix of campy and callous that doesn't sit well with me.

  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited January 2018 Posts: 23,883
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Annoys me far more than anything in Moonraker. That film was just silly. GG has a nasty streak to it and always makes cheap jokes at other peoples expense.
    I love that nastiness to it personally, as well as the 70s Carry On style humour (complete with Benny Hill raunch). It's a quirky entry but quite enjoyable for me.

    It's an odd mix and I don't really think it works. It just seems too unpleasant for me. At the very least it's aged horribly and I remember thinking something wasn't right with the film when I saw it as a teenager.

    The Connery films may have had a vicious streak to them but they were usually consistent in tone.
    I'm sure I have a bias because it was one of the earliest films I remember seeing (I think I recorded it on ITV and may have the tape somewhere). It's one of the flicks that got me into Bond. I can't deny any of the criticisms but there's something about it which still works for me. Moore is just too good in it (that nastiness combined with his inimitable natural charm and style just works).
  • Posts: 11,189
    royale65 wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Annoys me far more than anything in Moonraker. That film was just silly. GG has a nasty streak to it and always makes cheap jokes at other peoples expense.
    I love that nastiness to it personally, as well as the 70s Carry On style humour (complete with Benny Hill raunch). It's a quirky entry but quite enjoyable for me.

    It's an odd mix and I don't think it works. At the very least it's aged horribly. I remember thinking something wasn't right with the film when I saw it as a teenager.

    Quite. GG is a mix of campy and callous that doesn't sit well with me.

    There's a very angry vibe to the whole film. You get the impression nobody was particularly happy to be on the set.
  • Posts: 11,189
    bondjames wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Annoys me far more than anything in Moonraker. That film was just silly. GG has a nasty streak to it and always makes cheap jokes at other peoples expense.
    I love that nastiness to it personally, as well as the 70s Carry On style humour (complete with Benny Hill raunch). It's a quirky entry but quite enjoyable for me.

    It's an odd mix and I don't really think it works. It just seems too unpleasant for me. At the very least it's aged horribly and I remember thinking something wasn't right with the film when I saw it as a teenager.

    The Connery films may have had a vicious streak to them but they were usually consistent in tone.
    I'm sure I have a bias because it was one of the earliest films I remember seeing (I think I recorded it on ITV and may have the tape somewhere). It's one of the flicks that got me into Bond. I can't deny any of the criticisms but there's something about it which still works for me. Moore is just too good in it (that nastiness combined with his inimitable natural charm and style just works).

    It was one of the last films I watched when I was going through the series for the first time, so maybe I'm a bit more critical towards it because of that.
Sign In or Register to comment.