› ›

SPECTRE Production Timeline

1…421422424426427…870

Comments

  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    Posts: 4,619
    AceHole wrote: »
    Ugh, not a motorboat scene on the Thames. Been there, done that.

    According to the photos this won't be a chase scene.
  • AceHoleAceHole Belgium, via Britain
    Posts: 1,727
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    AceHole wrote: »
    Ugh, not a motorboat scene on the Thames. Been there, done that.

    According to the photos this won't be a chase scene.

    I realize that. But still , there are so many great, cinematic places in London that haven't been used yet in the franchise. These repeat locations are tiresome.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Tounet77 wrote: »
    I'm not sure about this since I'm not english, but isn't that "V sign" DC "jockingly" addressed to someone a not so polite sign ?

    You're absolutely correct, but it was done in jest.

    Craig can be a little unrefined at times (read some of his interviews). I'm sure he wouldn't have wanted that photo splashed all over the place if he could do it again.
  • leas_moleleas_mole love is the promise of suffering
    Posts: 574
    Tounet77 wrote: »
    I'm not sure about this since I'm not english, but isn't that "V sign" DC "jockingly" addressed to someone a not so polite sign ?
    Yes, normally the V sign done that way with the back of the hand showing is not very polite at all. But DC is smiling whilst he is doing this so he is not doing this in an offensive way but more of a joking way. Like a naughty schoolboy ;)
  • AceHoleAceHole Belgium, via Britain
    Posts: 1,727
    Tounet77 wrote: »
    I'm not sure about this since I'm not english, but isn't that "V sign" DC "jockingly" addressed to someone a not so polite sign ?

    Nah, he's just ordering 2 pints

    :D
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 14,844
    AceHole wrote: »
    Tounet77 wrote: »
    I'm not sure about this since I'm not english, but isn't that "V sign" DC "jockingly" addressed to someone a not so polite sign ?

    Nah, he's just ordering 2 pints

    :D
    A friend of mine nearly got into trouble in a pub ordering two pints this way.
  • Mi6LisbonBranchMi6LisbonBranch Lisbon, Portugal
    Posts: 243
    No photos today? Nor even a brief report? What are our "spies" doing??
  • marketto007marketto007 Brazil
    Posts: 3,277
    Mi6LisbonBranch wrote: »
    No photos today? Nor even a brief report? What are our "spies" doing??

    kfSeRis.jpg

    32oNMKO.jpg
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    Posts: 4,619
    A flying boat? What's next? An invisible car?
  • Mi6LisbonBranchMi6LisbonBranch Lisbon, Portugal
    Posts: 243
    marketto007 wrote: »
    Mi6LisbonBranch wrote: »
    No photos today? Nor even a brief report? What are our "spies" doing??

    kfSeRis.jpg

    32oNMKO.jpg

    Voila!
    Thanks @marketto007.
    The day just got better!

  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 14,844
    AceHole wrote: »
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    AceHole wrote: »
    Ugh, not a motorboat scene on the Thames. Been there, done that.

    According to the photos this won't be a chase scene.

    I realize that. But still , there are so many great, cinematic places in London that haven't been used yet in the franchise. These repeat locations are tiresome.

    We saw the Thames featured once before, minus the odd shot, in an overlong boat chase. This on the other hand seems to be a scene with a proper sense of place and atmosphere, not an action scene.
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    Ludovico wrote: »
    AceHole wrote: »
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    AceHole wrote: »
    Ugh, not a motorboat scene on the Thames. Been there, done that.

    According to the photos this won't be a chase scene.

    I realize that. But still , there are so many great, cinematic places in London that haven't been used yet in the franchise. These repeat locations are tiresome.

    We saw the Thames featured once before, minus the odd shot, in an overlong boat chase. This on the other hand seems to be a scene with a proper sense of place and atmosphere, not an action scene.


    Guys. It'll be a similar scene as the one we're Bond was transported with Tanner in a Range Rover to the underground MI6 office in "Skyfall". Nothing more. It'll probably be a scene of 1 min. And like all those London intro's in the Bond films. Like the 4 sec shot of the Big Ben in "Casino Royale" before we see a raging "M" leaving the committee room...
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,512
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    A flying boat? What's next? An invisible car?

    Shhhh, don't give them any ideas or...


    ...oh. Wait...
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 14,844
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    AceHole wrote: »
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    AceHole wrote: »
    Ugh, not a motorboat scene on the Thames. Been there, done that.

    According to the photos this won't be a chase scene.

    I realize that. But still , there are so many great, cinematic places in London that haven't been used yet in the franchise. These repeat locations are tiresome.

    We saw the Thames featured once before, minus the odd shot, in an overlong boat chase. This on the other hand seems to be a scene with a proper sense of place and atmosphere, not an action scene.


    Guys. It'll be a similar scene as the one we're Bond was transported with Tanner in a Range Rover to the underground MI6 office in "Skyfall". Nothing more. It'll probably be a scene of 1 min. And like all those London intro's in the Bond films. Like the 4 sec shot of the Big Ben in "Casino Royale" before we see a raging "M" leaving the committee room...

    That's what I think it will be.
  • Mi6LisbonBranchMi6LisbonBranch Lisbon, Portugal
    Posts: 243
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    AceHole wrote: »
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    AceHole wrote: »
    Ugh, not a motorboat scene on the Thames. Been there, done that.

    According to the photos this won't be a chase scene.

    I realize that. But still , there are so many great, cinematic places in London that haven't been used yet in the franchise. These repeat locations are tiresome.

    We saw the Thames featured once before, minus the odd shot, in an overlong boat chase. This on the other hand seems to be a scene with a proper sense of place and atmosphere, not an action scene.


    Guys. It'll be a similar scene as the one we're Bond was transported with Tanner in a Range Rover to the underground MI6 office in "Skyfall". Nothing more. It'll probably be a scene of 1 min. And like all those London intro's in the Bond films. Like the 4 sec shot of the Big Ben in "Casino Royale" before we see a raging "M" leaving the committee room...

    That's what I think it will be.

    agree
  • GermanladyGermanlady
    Posts: 6,601
    I think, we should change this title to just Time Line thread. The filming on the themse certainly is over. Why put every bit in the title, when people just need to follow the mark of new posts? What I mean is, do we NOT read it if there is NO new headline?
  • JWESTBROOKJWESTBROOK
    Posts: 5,745
    Germanlady wrote: »
    I think, we should change this title to just Time Line thread. The filming on the themse certainly is over. Why put every bit in the title, when people just need to follow the mark of new posts? What I mean is, do we NOT read it if there is NO new headline?

    Does it matter either way? Bottom line is itsbthe timeline thread. Ignore the extra if you want. I do it so people know the difference between a 7 page argument and an actual update.
  • zebrafishzebrafish <°)))< in Octopussy's garden in the shade
    Posts: 4,313
    Does anyone know where the pic with the boat out of the water was made? Is it Danbury Street?
  • GermanladyGermanlady
    Posts: 6,601
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    Germanlady wrote: »
    I think, we should change this title to just Time Line thread. The filming on the themse certainly is over. Why put every bit in the title, when people just need to follow the mark of new posts? What I mean is, do we NOT read it if there is NO new headline?

    Does it matter either way? Bottom line is itsbthe timeline thread. Ignore the extra if you want. I do it so people know the difference between a 7 page argument and an actual update.

    It was just a suggestion, which I believe is valid. I didn't mean to interfer. But then be up to date. The Thames shoot is over and I feel, its irritating, if you leave those titles until the next comes along. Again, its up to you, of course.
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    Posts: 4,619
    Germanlady wrote: »
    The Thames shoot is over and I feel, its irritating, if you leave those titles until the next comes along.
    Having a bad week?
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    Germanlady wrote: »
    The Thames shoot is over and I feel, its irritating, if you leave those titles until the next comes along.
    Having a bad week?

    Don't make a hoo ha about things.

    The Thames shoot is indeed over, so a valid comment from GL. I would say that the most up to date topic is product placement.
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    edited December 2014 Posts: 4,619
    MayDayDiVicenzo wrote: »
    Don't make a hoo ha about things.

    The Thames shoot is indeed over, so a valid comment from GL. I would say that the most up to date topic is product placement.
    I'm just baffled about how anyone can find something like this irritating. Relax and chill! This is just a thread title...
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    edited December 2014 Posts: 5,080
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    MayDayDiVicenzo wrote: »
    Don't make a hoo ha about things.

    The Thames shoot is indeed over, so a valid comment from GL. I would say that the most up to date topic is product placement.
    I'm just baffled about how anyone can find something like this irritating. Relax and chill! This is just a thread title...

    Well, as English is not GL's mother tongue (I believe?), one would suspect that it is a semantics issue, no?

    It's a problem I encounter all the time when I speak French as a non native speaker.
  • GermanladyGermanlady
    Posts: 6,601
    Thanks May, but no, its not about the language or a bad week, its just me, who tries to give her view on this or that. This whole forum structure is not easy to organize to begin with, so it seems useful to be as clear as possible to make it easier. As I said, a suggestion, not to be taken personal. But its sorta funny, if we read in one weeks time, that according to this thread, they are still on the Thames. So I said, cut that off until the next location or whatever comes along and leave just the bones of this thread in the title until then.
  • ggl007ggl007 www.archivo007.com Spain, España
    Posts: 2,539
    Two more clapperboards... but not official, of course:

    daniel-craig-filming-for-the-new-bond-movie_4509065.jpg

    daniel-craig-rory-kinnear-bond-film-set-london_4510481.jpg

    19A
    25F
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 14,844
    I do have to say, I love his bathrobe. I wonder where they bought it.
  • Pierce2DanielPierce2Daniel
    Posts: 4,400
    For the record I'm avoiding the leaks like the plague but I'm mighty confused about what has actually leaked out?

    -I understand from the Gawker article and the EON press release over the weekend that two early versions of the script got out. However, these documents are part of a large file dump so have been difficult for people to actually get hold of.

    -Secondly, I know that a detailed 10 page shooting schedule has leaked that goes through the film scene by scene.

    But is that it? I have no intention of reading any leaks until after I've seen the film but I just want to be sure what people who have read them have actually seen (mainly so I know what topics to avoid discussing with them).
  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    Posts: 560
    Sony Officially Cancels 'The Interview' Theatrical Release

    Wed, 17 December 2014


    “Sony Pictures has been the victim of an unprecedented criminal assault against our employees, our customers, and our business,” the studio’s statement continued. “Those who attacked us stole our intellectual property, private emails, and sensitive and proprietary material, and sought to destroy our spirit and our morale – all apparently to thwart the release of a movie they did not like. We are deeply saddened at this brazen effort to suppress the distribution of a movie, and in the process do damage to our company, our employees, and the American public. We stand by our filmmakers and their right to free expression and are extremely disappointed by this outcome.”



    http://www.justjared.com/2014/12/17/sony-officially-cancels-the-interview-theatrical-release/

  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Ludovico wrote: »
    I do have to say, I love his bathrobe. I wonder where they bought it.

    You can get an almost identical one at your local M&S.

  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    chipsticks wrote: »
    Sony Officially Cancels 'The Interview' Theatrical Release

    Wed, 17 December 2014


    “Sony Pictures has been the victim of an unprecedented criminal assault against our employees, our customers, and our business,” the studio’s statement continued. “Those who attacked us stole our intellectual property, private emails, and sensitive and proprietary material, and sought to destroy our spirit and our morale – all apparently to thwart the release of a movie they did not like. We are deeply saddened at this brazen effort to suppress the distribution of a movie, and in the process do damage to our company, our employees, and the American public. We stand by our filmmakers and their right to free expression and are extremely disappointed by this outcome.”



    http://www.justjared.com/2014/12/17/sony-officially-cancels-the-interview-theatrical-release/

    Now they should fire or at least demote Amy Pascal while they're at it.
Sign In or Register to comment.