›

EoN sells up - Amazon MGM to produce 007 going forwards (Heyman and Pascal confirmed as producers)

1…9596979899101»

Comments

  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,009
    delfloria wrote: »
    Eyes are on the new Superman's success, not on The Batman at this moment. Hope and lightness vs dark and somber and serious.

    Bingo.

    And look at Fantastic Four, Spaceballs 2, Masters of the Universe, The Naked Gun - hope is winning.
  • TroyTroy
    Posts: 364
    delfloria wrote: »
    Eyes are on the new Superman's success, not on The Batman at this moment. Hope and lightness vs dark and somber and serious.

    As a pure consumer / viewer, whose eyes are so focussed on this? Many posts are deeply concerned with Box Office figures - will it break $billion? I understand that high earnings influence future spend, but considering that many posters on this forum prefer lower budgets to drive greater creativity, are high earnings and comparisons between Superman and The Batman important?

    I ask, not to be controversial, but because I’m generally interested
  • 007HallY007HallY
    Posts: 5,392
    I’d say The Batman’s a very hopeful film, albeit one with a darker tone. I think a Bond film will come off differently to that film and Superman no matter what (and yes, it’ll have a good dash of fun and escapism and try to convey that in the marketing/trailers even if it has a ‘maturity’ to it). I don’t think it’s any indication about what kind of Bond film we’ll get.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,768
    007ClassicBondFan wrote: »
    DEKE_RIVERS wrote: »
    007ClassicBondFan wrote: »
    DEKE_RIVERS wrote: »
    007ClassicBondFan wrote: »
    DEKE_RIVERS wrote: »
    I'm not going to argue this further

    “I’m not going to argue this further” = “I can’t support the argument I was trying to make so I’m done trying.”

    No, I've already talked a lot about GE. You know my opinion. I don't want to sound like a broken record.

    That's all.

    Well we all know that you find the film generic and nothing else because that’s all you really say whenever you post about the film so it’s a bit late to stop yourself from sounding like a broken record but I digress.

    Come on, man, I don't want another discussion about GE. I've fought in that war many times.

    It’s a war you’ll keep losing ;)

    C'mon, guys, there's room for both lace and leather.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,630
    Superman has always been the Boy Scout in the skies.He needs to be an optimistic and hopeful character (part of the criticism that came out of the Snyder interpretation was Superman shouldn’t be so glum and dour)

    James Bond has wayyyy more grey to the character. And will have much more nuance. After all, when you have a license to kill, you’re in the death business, so…

    And I’d hold onto pointing out the Fantastic 4 and He-Man as examples of “Hope is winning (and the other two examples are legacy comedy sequels that no one really asked for, but; they’re comedies, @Mendes4Lyfe — of course they’re going to be on the lighter side by nature of the genre, lol).

    Once B26 starts boarding talent (writers, director, and the actor), we will have at least a glimpse of the direction they’ll be going in. If I was to bet, and this means zero, Amazon won’t try and break too much new ground. I wouldn’t be surprised if they have a small list of “what makes a Bond film a successful worldwide phenomenon; that makes the brand instantly recognizable “, and they’ll creatively try and stick inside of these lines and deliver this to the marketplace — at least for the first film or two.
  • M_BlaiseM_Blaise
    Posts: 402
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    delfloria wrote: »
    Eyes are on the new Superman's success, not on The Batman at this moment. Hope and lightness vs dark and somber and serious.

    Bingo.

    And look at Fantastic Four, Spaceballs 2, Masters of the Universe, The Naked Gun - hope is winning.

    None of those have been released though.
  • CrabKeyCrabKey
    Posts: 2,196
    The mentions of other nonBond films always puts me off. I have no interest in what Batman, Superman, and all the rest are doing. I don't want a Bond film that reminds me of some other blockbuster or picks up on a technique or trend that is fashionable. For me Bond has always been unique and I hope the films remain so. I don't need a one up of Mission Impossible or similar action films. Even with new faces in front of and behind the camera, once the lights fade in the theater and the film begins, I want it to be like it always is, the familiar comfort of a Bond film.
  • delfloriadelfloria
    Posts: 2,019
    CrabKey wrote: »
    The mentions of other nonBond films always puts me off. I have no interest in what Batman, Superman, and all the rest are doing. I don't want a Bond film that reminds me of some other blockbuster or picks up on a technique or trend that is fashionable. For me Bond has always been unique and I hope the films remain so. I don't need a one up of Mission Impossible or similar action films. Even with new faces in front of and behind the camera, once the lights fade in the theater and the film begins, I want it to be like it always is, the familiar comfort of a Bond film.

    But what is a Bond film? The differences between Moonraker and Dr. No are astronomical.
  • CrabKeyCrabKey
    Posts: 2,196
    And yet they are Bond films because they contain the elements that make Bond films recognizable and unique. Our familiarity with the gun barrel sequence, the Bond theme, "Bond, James Bond," etc. are what provide the comfort.
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    Posts: 2,090
    delfloria wrote: »
    CrabKey wrote: »
    The mentions of other nonBond films always puts me off. I have no interest in what Batman, Superman, and all the rest are doing. I don't want a Bond film that reminds me of some other blockbuster or picks up on a technique or trend that is fashionable. For me Bond has always been unique and I hope the films remain so. I don't need a one up of Mission Impossible or similar action films. Even with new faces in front of and behind the camera, once the lights fade in the theater and the film begins, I want it to be like it always is, the familiar comfort of a Bond film.

    But what is a Bond film? The differences between Moonraker and Dr. No are astronomical.

    Dr. No is the Bond film. ;)

    Yes, there are many types of Bond movies, but if you ask me, I know what to answer. I hope Amazon has a good answer, too.
  • TroyTroy
    Posts: 364
    delfloria wrote: »
    CrabKey wrote: »
    The mentions of other nonBond films always puts me off. I have no interest in what Batman, Superman, and all the rest are doing. I don't want a Bond film that reminds me of some other blockbuster or picks up on a technique or trend that is fashionable. For me Bond has always been unique and I hope the films remain so. I don't need a one up of Mission Impossible or similar action films. Even with new faces in front of and behind the camera, once the lights fade in the theater and the film begins, I want it to be like it always is, the familiar comfort of a Bond film.

    But what is a Bond film? The differences between Moonraker and Dr. No are astronomical.

    A Bond film is a film that features the character James Bond in the employ of special operations arm of British intelligence (akin to SOE) defeating a larger-than-life villain threatening the Western world
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    Posts: 2,090
    I'm sure they'll follow the trends because the film has to feel modern. But I don't think it matters too much. The issue is how much of Fleming remains.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,235
    Troy wrote: »
    delfloria wrote: »
    CrabKey wrote: »
    The mentions of other nonBond films always puts me off. I have no interest in what Batman, Superman, and all the rest are doing. I don't want a Bond film that reminds me of some other blockbuster or picks up on a technique or trend that is fashionable. For me Bond has always been unique and I hope the films remain so. I don't need a one up of Mission Impossible or similar action films. Even with new faces in front of and behind the camera, once the lights fade in the theater and the film begins, I want it to be like it always is, the familiar comfort of a Bond film.

    But what is a Bond film? The differences between Moonraker and Dr. No are astronomical.

    A Bond film is a film that features the character James Bond in the employ of special operations arm of British intelligence (akin to SOE) defeating a larger-than-life villain threatening the Western world

    I’ve seen those! :D
Sign In or Register to comment.