Quick Big Mi6 Music Score Ranking Game

11718192123

Comments

  • mattjoesmattjoes Kicking: Impossible
    Posts: 6,721
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Then again, who'd have thought LALD could beat some of Barry's aweso--okay okay, I'm over it! Leave me alone. ;-)
    Haha, live and let "Live and Let Die" live.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    Well I was hoping YOLT would win the title but I'm not surprised. Still, I can't complain as my 3 favorites took the top 3 spots, albeit in a different order. What a great game. I really enjoyed reading all of your detailed thoughts and thanks for once again to @GoldenGun for compiling all the info.

    My biggest difference was that I had SF in 9th place while the group ranking was 20th for a total of 11 spots. What was everyone else's?
  • edited August 2021 Posts: 6,844
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    As a matter of fact, I was thinking about the main villains for the next contest @DarthDimi :)

    I'm very down with this idea.

    I suppose there are two, possibly three films where the identity of the main villain might be in contention.

    There's usually a question as to whether Georgi Koskov or Brad Whitaker is the main villain of The Living Daylights. The two are working together and technically neither one holds any more power than the other in their partnership, but I'm personally more inclined to call Koskov the main villain and Whitaker a secondary antagonist as Koskov has more screen time, presence and involvement in the climax, and more of a relationship with James Bond. Thoughts?

    Similarly, Renard and Elektra King are working together in The World Is Not Enough, but I see even less of a question here as to who is really in charge. Elektra has Renard wrapped around her finger to the extent he is willing to die to see her scheme fulfilled. Elektra is quite undeniably the main villain in my view and Renard perhaps the most glorified henchman of all. I believe the question only arises because the first half of the film sets the viewer up to believe Elektra is the main Bond girl and Renard the main villain when the truth is anything but.

    As for the other possible point of contention regarding who the main villain is, some might be tempted to call Blofeld the main villain of From Russia With Love because Klebb is seen reporting to him along with Kronsteen and Morzeny and is herself clearly quite intimidated by him, but I see Klebb as no less the main villain of FRWL than Emilio Largo is of Thunderball or Maximillian Largo of Never Say Never Again.

    I'd imagine the rest are more or less straightforward.

    Dr. Julius No
    Rosa Klebb
    Auric Goldfinger
    Emilio Largo
    Ernst Stavro Blofeld (YOLT)
    Le Chiffre (CR '67)
    Ernst Stavro Blofeld (OHMSS)
    Ernst Stavro Blofeld (DAF)
    Kananga
    Francisco Scaramanga
    Karl Stromberg
    Hugo Drax
    Aris Kristatos
    Kamal Khan
    Maximillian Largo
    Max Zorin
    Georgi Koskov
    Franz Sanchez
    Alec Trevelyan
    Elliot Carver
    Elektra King
    Colonel Tan-Sun Moon/Gustav Graves
    Le Chiffre (CR '06)
    Dominic Greene
    Tiago Rodriguez/Raoul Silva
    Ernst Stavro Blofeld (SP)

    Opposing views?
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,544
    I would present duos in some cases. Like Klebb and Grant.
  • Surely Red Grant is the henchman and not the villain. He plays no part in the masterminding. He's the heavy hired by Klebb to carry out her orders. Technically Klebb herself is following Kronsteen's plan, but she's in charge of executing it, and again Grant's the muscle. I see no distinction between the role played by Grant and that of Oddjob, May Day, Necros, or Xenia. He's intelligent and well-spoken, true, but so are other henchmen and secondary antagonists like Irma Bunt, Baron Samedi, Locque, General Orlov, General Orumov, Dr. Kaufman, and some of those arguably play a greater role in plotting the schemes of their respective films than Grant his. It's not my call ultimately, but at the risk of turning the game into a ranking of villain ensembles (which itself could be an interesting idea), I think it should be possible to narrow each film down to the one most aptly identifiable main villain.
  • DwayneDwayne New York City
    edited August 2021 Posts: 2,623
    @GoldenGun. Even though I sat this game out, I still want to thank you for your hard work in pulling this off. It has been fun to track this everyday.

    BTW. Today (August 4th) marked Louis Armstrong's 120th birthday, so OHMSS winning this game was quite appropriate.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    pachazo wrote: »
    Well I was hoping YOLT would win the title but I'm not surprised. Still, I can't complain as my 3 favorites took the top 3 spots, albeit in a different order. What a great game. I really enjoyed reading all of your detailed thoughts and thanks for once again to @GoldenGun for compiling all the info.

    My biggest difference was that I had SF in 9th place while the group ranking was 20th for a total of 11 spots. What was everyone else's?
    Biggest difference for me was SP, which I had at no. 10. Biggest in the other direction was TLD, which I put as no 18.

    As for who the main villains are, I am thinking Klebb in FRWL, Elektra in TWINE and Whitaker in TLD.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,784
    Personally I was leaning towards Klebb for FRWL, Whitaker for TLD and Elektra for TWINE. And if anyone's interested Dr. Noah for CR67.
  • edited August 2021 Posts: 1,469
    I think my most disparate rankings were putting AVTAK at #22 (it was #3), and in the other direction, I had FYEO at #6 (it was #22). But I was fairly close with most of the top 10.
    There's usually a question as to whether Georgi Koskov or Brad Whitaker is the main villain of The Living Daylights. The two are working together and technically neither one holds any more power than the other in their partnership, but I'm personally more inclined to call Koskov the main villain and Whitaker a secondary antagonist as Koskov has more screen time, presence and involvement in the climax, and more of a relationship with James Bond. Thoughts?

    ...As for the other possible point of contention regarding who the main villain is, some might be tempted to call Blofeld the main villain of From Russia With Love because Klebb is seen reporting to him along with Kronsteen and Morzeny and is herself clearly quite intimidated by him, but I see Klebb as no less the main villain of FRWL than Emilio Largo is of Thunderball or Maximillian Largo of Never Say Never Again.

    Regarding just these two films, yes Klebb answers to Blofeld, but I personally think Red Grant is worse than Klebb because he kills Fake James Bond; the Bulgar agent; Captain Norman Nash; Ali Kerim Bey and Commisar Benz; drugs Tania and almost kills Bond, coming closer to that than Klebb's poisoned shoe blade. Grant dominates so much and is on a level above your everyday run-of-the-mill henchman. TLD: Yes Brad Whitaker is a tough cookie, but I think Koskov is the more central villain.
  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,395
    The one killing the most isn't necessarly the main villain. Red Grant is easily one of the best henchmen but he isn't a main villain per definition. He is recruited by Klebb.
    I would also say that Whitaker is the main villain and Elektra for sure.
  • Klebb, Koskov, and King make total sense to me as main villains compared to the subservient Grant and Renard, as well as the non-impactful Whitaker who's in just a few scenes. Calling him a main villain is like calling Obanno a main villain over Le Chiffre.
  • DarthDimi wrote: »
    I had YOLT at #6 and OHMSS a #9. I prefer the more exotic music to the more simplistic music, though I fully understand why OHMSS is our winner. Great competition as usual @GoldenGun, thanks very much! I look forward to the next one!

    Can you get more exotic than with YOLT, though? I seem to recall reading somewhere that Barry had broken new ground with this score, that it was essentially the first time a Western composer had incorporated Japanese flavours in his music.

    I'm also curious about what you mean by "simplistic", @Quantum_of_Tomorrow. I can't think of too many Bond scores that are more layered, rich and complex.

    I meant "exotic" as a general word, I actually meant YOLT as being the most exotic, it's just that I generally prefer those scores but not always. With regard to "simplistic" I meant simple rhythmic structures, which is in OHMSS's main structural theme.
  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,395
    Comparing Whitaker to Obanno is something I never thought about. Fair point.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,544
    With regard to "simplistic" I meant simple rhythmic structures, which is in OHMSS's main structural theme.

    I see. Fair point, @Quantum_of_Tomorrow. Would you say the score in its entirety repeats those simple structures all the time? Because I'm not exactly musically trained, so I don't pay a lot of attention to that myself.
  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    edited August 2021 Posts: 1,690
    Comparing Whitaker to Obanno is something I never thought about. Fair point.

    Well, the climactic battle of Casino Royale was not with Obanno.... That's a pretty hyperbolic point. Whitaker may not be the best villain, and he may not be in the film much more than Klebb is in hers, but he's a main villain.
  • DarthDimi wrote: »
    With regard to "simplistic" I meant simple rhythmic structures, which is in OHMSS's main structural theme.

    I see. Fair point, @Quantum_of_Tomorrow. Would you say the score in its entirety repeats those simple structures all the time? Because I'm not exactly musically trained, so I don't pay a lot of attention to that myself.

    Not all the time, but I think it has the same core structures all the way through, but Barry expands on them.
  • Posts: 2,400
    I always read TLD as Koskov manipulating Whitaker to an extent. Either way, the only solution I can arrive at is to have 27 slots with both of them included.
  • edited August 2021 Posts: 6,844
    Thrasos wrote: »
    There's usually a question as to whether Georgi Koskov or Brad Whitaker is the main villain of The Living Daylights. The two are working together and technically neither one holds any more power than the other in their partnership, but I'm personally more inclined to call Koskov the main villain and Whitaker a secondary antagonist as Koskov has more screen time, presence and involvement in the climax, and more of a relationship with James Bond. Thoughts?

    ...As for the other possible point of contention regarding who the main villain is, some might be tempted to call Blofeld the main villain of From Russia With Love because Klebb is seen reporting to him along with Kronsteen and Morzeny and is herself clearly quite intimidated by him, but I see Klebb as no less the main villain of FRWL than Emilio Largo is of Thunderball or Maximillian Largo of Never Say Never Again.

    Regarding just these two films, yes Klebb answers to Blofeld, but I personally think Red Grant is worse than Klebb because he kills Fake James Bond; the Bulgar agent; Captain Norman Nash; Ali Kerim Bey and Commisar Benz; drugs Tania and almost kills Bond, coming closer to that than Klebb's poisoned shoe blade. Grant dominates so much and is on a level above your everyday run-of-the-mill henchman. TLD: Yes Brad Whitaker is a tough cookie, but I think Koskov is the more central villain.

    Red Grant is a great character, no question, and he does a lot, but there are a number of henchmen who take on a great deal of responsibility in their respective films. What it all comes down to is what role does the character serve in the story? Is he the main villain or is he a henchman? Grant takes his orders from Klebb; no one takes their orders from Grant. I would say Renard and what he does in TWINE is more akin to what you would expect of the main villain than what we see of Grant. But at the end of the day, Renard is subordinate to the main villain and takes his orders from Elektra. Grant similarly is subordinate to the main villain in FRWL and takes his orders from Klebb.

    I agree with those who regard Koskov THE main villain of TLD as he's the more prominent character of the two, but I'm fine with either Koskov or Whitaker being used. I am curious though, for those who regard Whitaker as the better choice, why Whitaker over Koskov? The two are as far as I can tell on equal footing and Koskov has more presence in the film.

    Re: CR '67, I agree Dr. Noah makes the most sense.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,784
    Thrasos wrote: »
    There's usually a question as to whether Georgi Koskov or Brad Whitaker is the main villain of The Living Daylights. The two are working together and technically neither one holds any more power than the other in their partnership, but I'm personally more inclined to call Koskov the main villain and Whitaker a secondary antagonist as Koskov has more screen time, presence and involvement in the climax, and more of a relationship with James Bond. Thoughts?

    ...As for the other possible point of contention regarding who the main villain is, some might be tempted to call Blofeld the main villain of From Russia With Love because Klebb is seen reporting to him along with Kronsteen and Morzeny and is herself clearly quite intimidated by him, but I see Klebb as no less the main villain of FRWL than Emilio Largo is of Thunderball or Maximillian Largo of Never Say Never Again.

    Regarding just these two films, yes Klebb answers to Blofeld, but I personally think Red Grant is worse than Klebb because he kills Fake James Bond; the Bulgar agent; Captain Norman Nash; Ali Kerim Bey and Commisar Benz; drugs Tania and almost kills Bond, coming closer to that than Klebb's poisoned shoe blade. Grant dominates so much and is on a level above your everyday run-of-the-mill henchman. TLD: Yes Brad Whitaker is a tough cookie, but I think Koskov is the more central villain.

    Red Grant is a great character, no question, and he does a lot, but there are a number of henchmen who take on a great deal of responsibility in their respective films. What it all comes down to is what role does the character serve in the story? Is he the main villain or is he a henchman? Grant takes his orders from Klebb; no one takes their orders from Grant. I would say Renard and what he does in TWINE is more akin to what you would expect of the main villain than what we see of Grant. But at the end of the day, Renard is subordinate to the main villain and takes his orders from Elektra. Grant similarly is subordinate to the main villain in FRWL and takes his orders from Klebb.

    I agree with those who regard Koskov THE main villain of TLD as he's the more prominent character of the two, but I'm fine with either Koskov or Whitaker being used. I am curious though, for those who regard Whitaker as the better choice, why Whitaker over Koskov? The two are as far as I can tell on equal footing and Koskov has more presence in the film.

    Re: CR '67, I agree Dr. Noah makes the most sense.

    My reasoning is that Whitaker is giving orders to both Koskov and Necros. There is even a scene where they're both at the pool and they are being collected by that fake soldier, something along the lines of 'the chief wants you', with Koskov saying to Necros 'We have to report.'
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Baker also has top billing both in the poster and the title sequence. Not that this is any proof, and not that it s a big deal in any way.
  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,395
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Or include them together as one character slot.

    Good idea.
  • edited August 2021 Posts: 6,844
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    Thrasos wrote: »
    There's usually a question as to whether Georgi Koskov or Brad Whitaker is the main villain of The Living Daylights. The two are working together and technically neither one holds any more power than the other in their partnership, but I'm personally more inclined to call Koskov the main villain and Whitaker a secondary antagonist as Koskov has more screen time, presence and involvement in the climax, and more of a relationship with James Bond. Thoughts?

    ...As for the other possible point of contention regarding who the main villain is, some might be tempted to call Blofeld the main villain of From Russia With Love because Klebb is seen reporting to him along with Kronsteen and Morzeny and is herself clearly quite intimidated by him, but I see Klebb as no less the main villain of FRWL than Emilio Largo is of Thunderball or Maximillian Largo of Never Say Never Again.

    Regarding just these two films, yes Klebb answers to Blofeld, but I personally think Red Grant is worse than Klebb because he kills Fake James Bond; the Bulgar agent; Captain Norman Nash; Ali Kerim Bey and Commisar Benz; drugs Tania and almost kills Bond, coming closer to that than Klebb's poisoned shoe blade. Grant dominates so much and is on a level above your everyday run-of-the-mill henchman. TLD: Yes Brad Whitaker is a tough cookie, but I think Koskov is the more central villain.

    Red Grant is a great character, no question, and he does a lot, but there are a number of henchmen who take on a great deal of responsibility in their respective films. What it all comes down to is what role does the character serve in the story? Is he the main villain or is he a henchman? Grant takes his orders from Klebb; no one takes their orders from Grant. I would say Renard and what he does in TWINE is more akin to what you would expect of the main villain than what we see of Grant. But at the end of the day, Renard is subordinate to the main villain and takes his orders from Elektra. Grant similarly is subordinate to the main villain in FRWL and takes his orders from Klebb.

    I agree with those who regard Koskov THE main villain of TLD as he's the more prominent character of the two, but I'm fine with either Koskov or Whitaker being used. I am curious though, for those who regard Whitaker as the better choice, why Whitaker over Koskov? The two are as far as I can tell on equal footing and Koskov has more presence in the film.

    Re: CR '67, I agree Dr. Noah makes the most sense.

    My reasoning is that Whitaker is giving orders to both Koskov and Necros. There is even a scene where they're both at the pool and they are being collected by that fake soldier, something along the lines of 'the chief wants you', with Koskov saying to Necros 'We have to report.'

    I think you have to take that line as sarcasm—Koskov poking fun at Whitaker's self-importance and delusions of being an actual military man. He also sticks his tongue out at the "soldier" and strolls up to Whitaker's table in a bathrobe and Panama hat, ready to get back to necking the two girls he's with. Koskov is buying illegal arms from Whitaker with KGB funds. That's all their relationship amounts to.

    Pushkin told Whitaker the arms deal was off. Koskov assures Whitaker that James Bond is going to assassinate Pushkin, meaning the deal is still on. Whitaker doesn't believe him and says Necros should kill Pushkin. Necros is reluctant to do so. Koskov suggests Necros kill another agent (Saunders) to convince Bond to kill Pushkin. Whitaker agrees, but demands Necros kill Pushkin if Bond fails to.

    It's all about making sure their deal stays on so Koskov gets his arms and Whitaker gets his money. They're business partners but neither one is controlling the other. It's in Koskov's own interests that Pushkin wind up dead so he can get his arms. Whitaker doesn't really have a say in how Pushkin winds up dead. He just doesn't believe Koskov has a British agent who's going to do the job for him.

    By all appearances, Necros is Koskov's hired hand, not Whitaker's. We only see Necros at Whitaker's place when Koskov is there, and Necros is the one who stages Koskov's abduction, kills Saunders at Koskov's behest, and accompanies Koskov on his drug deal with the Mujahideen. Whitaker's just the guy Koskov is buying illegal arms from.

    I can see how the scene would be misleading though because Whitaker demands Koskov come over to where he's sitting at the head of the table, cracking open lobster claws in his full fake general regalia. He's also directing what sounds like orders at Koskov and Necros alike. But Whitaker has no authority over either of them, Koskov or Necros. He's just short-tempered and irritated about Pushkin interfering with the deal, whereas Koskov is laid-back and confident Bond will resolve the problem for them.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Kicking: Impossible
    edited August 2021 Posts: 6,721
    Orlov is a fairly important villain, too. Kamal Khan does the heavy lifting in the evil scheme, and has many more dealings with Bond, but Orlov provides the jewelry, the bomb, and most importantly, the motivation for the US Air Base plan, which is in fact only the first step of a larger plan to take over Europe. I wouldn't place him at the same level of importance as, say, Ourumov. I've always thought of Khan and Orlov as legitimate co-villains, because without Orlov, Khan is just a smuggler out to make money, and the evil plan of the film is about more than that. Just my two cents.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    edited August 2021 Posts: 6,784
    If we do Koskov/Whitaker, and I'd be fine with that, I'm rather tempted to go for Kamal Khan/Orlov too actually...

    Whould this list be fine for everyone?

    Dr. Julius No
    Rosa Klebb
    Auric Goldfinger
    Emilio Largo
    Dr. Noah
    Ernst Stavro Blofeld #1
    Ernst Stavro Blofeld #2
    Ernst Stavro Blofeld #3
    Dr. Ross Kananga
    Francisco Scaramanga
    Karl Stromberg
    Hugo Drax
    Aris Kristatos
    Kamal Khan & Orlov
    Maximilian Largo
    Max Zorin
    Brad Whitaker & Georgi Koskov
    Franz Sanchez
    Alec Trevelyan
    Elliott Carver
    Elektra King
    Gustav Graves / Colonel Moon
    Le Chiffre
    Dominic Greene
    Silva
    Ernst Stavro Blofeld #4
  • edited August 2021 Posts: 6,844
    I'm fine with both Whitaker & Koskov and Khan & Orlov being included. Though Khan serves the more traditional Bond villain role in the film, the two are as much partners as Whitaker and Koskov are and Orlov is a prominent character in his own right. Would folks be okay with listing them as separate entries though? It would only be two additional and this way you wouldn't have to "weigh" the two characters together.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,784
    I'm fine with that. =D>
  • edited August 2021 Posts: 6,844
    I also see @Birdleson's perspective and would be okay with Orlov not being included. While Orlov may qualify from a technical standpoint, Khan is indeed presented as the clear-cut primary antagonist from a formula standpoint and checks several main villain boxes that Orlov does not. (Orlov is also one of my favorite characters of the franchise.)

    It might be interesting to have a secondary antagonist game at some point, featuring villains who don't quite qualify as henchmen but who are in league with or in a kind of partnership with the main villain (Kronsteen, Mr. Ling, Osato, Irma Bunt, Baron Samedi, Hai Fat, Orlov, Milton Krest, Ourumov, General Chang, Renard, Mr. White, Obanno, Medrano, and there are others I'm sure).
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,544
    Fine with the choices either way. ;-)
  • Slazenger7Slazenger7 Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts: 1,334
    Renard should definitely be included along with Elektra. He is presented as the main villain at first, I see him as a main villain rather than a henchman.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,467
    Looks good to me!
Sign In or Register to comment.