It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I did, will dig them out later.
I say the brand video was a poor choice but not unlike lots of other bits of PR which various companies have done over the years without people losing their minds over (my immediate reaction at seeing it was to be nonplussed- it's just standard PR guff we've seen a million times, I couldn't believe the weird overreaction to it); the rebrand is absolutely fine and looks pretty nice (and you can't call a typeface woke); the car itself looks incredibly striking. It's not pretty as such (although the rear end is quite graceful), but it's not really trying to be- it's almost more like a piece of architecture. It looks like a development of Jaguar and would turn heads, so job done IMHO. The concept of Jag repositioning to do only high-end luxury EVs on the other hand doesn't feel like it makes sense at the moment as that end of the market isn't doing too well.
Here's some of my snaps; first the Jag pavilion and the two cars in there which were drawing a lot of attention. The car is oddly not quite as big as I thought it would be:
And the two Goldfinger cars:
Here's the guy showing off the golden putter in the boot and the little 007 logo which is projected from the homer on the underside of the boot (you can just about see it on his hand: