It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Infamy, infamy the Wiz has it in for me.
You really should've pointed out that you were joking old son as it's difficult to spot given the above statement bears very close comparison to your histrionics in the Brexit thread when you certainly weren't joking. But you must excuse me - not being Dutch I sometimes find your sense of humour difficult to follow.
Precisely. No need to bleat about it.
"This isn't freedom, this is fear."
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-collapse-of-wtc-seven/15201
It's getting more annoying than amusing now, and with each post you make in here you only serve to prove our points against you. Not trying to be indelicate here, but a man has his limits.
0Brady: A man may have his limits, but it is a woman's prerogative to change her mind.
GL: You may have missed it, but awhile back Mendes4Lyfe did the same thing: promising the leave the thread but forever returning to make just one more jibe. My response was to post a video of a song by the late great Dan Hicks: "How Can I Miss You When You Won't Go Away?" Much as I hate to repeat myself, that video is still available for reposting... ;)
Love how you say that like it's an accepted fact.
When you say 'everything' I presume you extend that all the way to the earth not being flat and the dinosaurs being made up to test us by God.
No doubt WW2 was a hoax as well?
Science is based on fact. Observable, repeatable, verifiable fact; checked and rechecked by several sources. If nearly all reputable scientific minds are in agreement that global climate patterns are changing, incrementally, over the course of decades, and that this change is largely due to human activity such as the widespread burning of fossil fuels, then we can take as fact: climate change is a real, factual phenomenon. A few naysayers, often in the pay of corporate interests, do not change the established judgment of the scientific community: climate change is still an actual, verifiable fact. On the other hand, a Weather-Changing machine, whether in the hands of Vladimir Putin or in Sarah Palin's backyard in Alaska...until verified by the scientific community... is going to be considered by most reasonable people as science fiction, not science fact.
We live in a world of consensual reality. If nine out of ten people look at a blade of grass and declare it green, why then, so it is! If the tenth person in our sampling is color blind, and declares that blade to be grey, it does not alter the grass' agreed-upon hue one iota. I'm sorry, @GL, but a fair amount of what you assert to be true just isn't accepted as such yet. You can preach your gospel of conspiracy all you want -- and just between you & me, I don't believe that Oswald killed JFK all by himself either -- but you're likely to be dismissed by 8 out of 10 people that hear you. And in this world of consensual reality, the grass is still going to be green.
Agreed.
Not so sure about this.
Everyone thought the earth was flat hundreds of years ago so did that make it true?
If the consensus of the electorate is to vote Trump president because they think he's the best candidate does that suddenly make him fit for the job?
For what it's worth @GL a lot of these theories are not without plausibility but until they are rigourously tested and proven with evidence they are, like any other scientific hypothesis, merely theories and not fact as you appear to be stating.
The issue with 9/11 in my judgement is that the investigation wasn't entirely as transparent as it could have been and some of the questions raised by doubters were pushed under the rug rather than given proper scrutiny. So these questions still remain, including the one about Building 7's collapse.
Conspiracy 'theorists' often fall into the trap of jumping to conclusions and proposing alternative hypotheses without any confirming basis in fact. This allows others to readily debunk the theories and claims, which usually are proven false.
Unfortunately, these alternative 'theorists' are also lumped in with those who ask valid questions, and those questions are given short shrift and not answered or investigated. I've always believed in the idiom that 'there is no such thing as a stupid question'.
I keep coming back to the lead up to the Iraq War, which was probably the largest 'conspiracy theory' of modern times, propagated by the United States Government with its willing poodle, Tony Blair, following with his nose firmly up Bush's backside. Many with common sense, including Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei,
Director General of the International Automic Agency, were saying that there was no evidence that Saddam had WMD and that investigators needed more time, but guess who said no in order to start another war and feed the cancer that is the MIC. Follow the War Machine and you'll get closer to the truth usually, but keep asking questions along the way.
So Goldfinger sucks & Thunderball doesn't?
PS: Just kidding, TF, I like 'em both. But then, I first viewed them through the eyes of a twelve year old & hopefully I always will.
It means we'll find out the "truth" pretty darn soon!
I hate to get all relativistic on you, but truth (in my opinion) can be subjective. Religion (to name just one topic) can be very "True" to some people. To others it's a total fallacy. I guess we'll each of us get to the truth of that particular topic in our own good time...
Hilariously funny and now my suspicions that one of you is truly delusional has been confirmed.
Keep on being that entertaining, it's a hoot!
And @GL: you only tease the ones you love. Keep trying, Lady!
There's a big difference between what some people perceive as the truth and empirical fact. Some religious sect may very well fervently believe that their dead relative will come back to life if they slaughter a goat and then kneel amongst the blood and entrails and pray on their knees to God. That doesn't alter the fact that the person are dead and will remain so.
NO! 'Here he comes to save the day..' It's Mighty Mouse!!!!
Democracy is not a spectator sport, @Jason -- it's a participatory event. Get involved! Post something outrageous!