What Directors Should Helm A Bond Film?

1939495969799»

Comments

  • edited May 7 Posts: 110
    Jonathan Nolan is an interesting suggestion, @peter. Honestly I haven't seen "Fallout" because I think it's not exactly my cup of tea, but based on the trailer and the reviews he could bring some fresh ideas into Bond, even including some solid humor.
    I think the 007 producers should look more into TV/streaming shows anyway, there are some very talented writers and directors out there.
    Regarding writers, Charlie Brooker ("Black Mirror") and Noah Hawley ("Fargo") come to mind, for example.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,634
    Kojak007 wrote: »
    Jonathan Nolan is an interesting suggestion, @peter. Honestly I haven't seen "Fallout" because I think it's not exactly my cup of tea, but based on the trailer and the reviews he could bring some fresh ideas into Bond, even including some solid humor.
    I think the 007 producers should look more into TV/streaming shows anyway, there are some very talented writers and directors out there.
    Regarding writers, Charlie Brooker ("Black Mirror") and Noah Hawley ("Fargo") come to mind, for example.

    I agree @Kojak007 , TV/streaming is boasting a lot of talent. I wouldn't be surprised if EoN is mining these series for, especially, writing talent (directing may be a little trickier, especially on a huge $200 million tent pole film; it could overwhelm . But a director who has done both elite series on streaming, and features...)

    Re: Fallout, I was a little late to watching it because, like you, I wasn't sure if it was quite to my tastes.

    I had even watched the trailer a few times, and I was very doubtful.

    The first episode intrigued me. By the second episode, I could feel myself being drawn in. By the third, I was completely onboard. The series did it's job and won me over through fantastic storytelling.

    I hope you'll be able to give it a go down the line. It was really not something I expected to respond to so strongly, but here I am, an absolute fan, 😂!!
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    edited May 7 Posts: 4,152
    Kojak007 wrote: »
    Jonathan Nolan is an interesting suggestion, @peter. Honestly I haven't seen "Fallout" because I think it's not exactly my cup of tea, but based on the trailer and the reviews he could bring some fresh ideas into Bond, even including some solid humor.
    I think the 007 producers should look more into TV/streaming shows anyway, there are some very talented writers and directors out there.
    Regarding writers, Charlie Brooker ("Black Mirror") and Noah Hawley ("Fargo") come to mind, for example.

    I agree about Jonathan Nolan writing. I think his brother would be jealous, lol. But yes, the writing does need to change for Bond. Maybe an action writer as well, would work for me.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,159
    Ever since @benny suggested brad bird a little while ago I can't help keep thinking about how that could really work. From the incredibles to mission impossible, he's been pivotal to some of the best film experiences I've had in my life. Assuming he hasn't lost it in his aging years, that's really not a bad shout. I'd love to see a Randian vision of Bond brought to life on the big screen. The Incredibles is really a 60's Bond film in disguise anyway.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,031
    Was keen on Edgar Wright. Oh well.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 1,450
    He was already too busy with Running Man, which hasn't started filming yet. I love Wright's work but it always feels too childish for Bond, to me. Yes, even last night in Soho. That movie was weird, like a child fantasy/nightmare.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,634
    LucknFate wrote: »
    He was already too busy with Running Man, which hasn't started filming yet. I love Wright's work but it always feels too childish for Bond, to me. Yes, even last night in Soho. That movie was weird, like a child fantasy/nightmare.

    💯 there’s something fun, yet infantile, about everything he does. Fun, yet shows no adult coolness, nor adult gravitas for Bond…
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    edited May 14 Posts: 1,450
    peter wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    He was already too busy with Running Man, which hasn't started filming yet. I love Wright's work but it always feels too childish for Bond, to me. Yes, even last night in Soho. That movie was weird, like a child fantasy/nightmare.

    💯 there’s something fun, yet infantile, about everything he does. Fun, yet shows no adult coolness, nor adult gravitas for Bond…

    Always comes back to Hamilton or Campbell for me. Could I see them forging a new, stylish man out of an actor? A gentleman out of the box? Wright I can not.
  • mattjoesmattjoes matjoevakia
    Posts: 6,789
    Wright it down: Edgar's not doing Bond.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,123
    200w.gif
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,031
    Can we at least have Matt Smith and Anya from Soho? Both would make amazing additions to the Bondverse.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 1,450
    QBranch wrote: »
    Can we at least have Matt Smith and Anya from Soho? Both would make amazing additions to the Bondverse.

    Where would you put Matt Smith? He reminds me of the NSNA M.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,031
    LucknFate wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Can we at least have Matt Smith and Anya from Soho? Both would make amazing additions to the Bondverse.
    Where would you put Matt Smith? He reminds me of the NSNA M.
    Someone here once mentioned Matt Smith for Q, and it blew my mind. Too similar to young Whishaw's Q maybe? He might play a colleague of Bond's, like an MI6 co-worker. Maybe the new guy in the office that rubs Bond the wrong way or Bond is suspicious of, but he proves himself later to be of help, a bit like Saunders? Then again he would make effortless henchman material too. Not entirely sure where I'd put him, I just know he's an excellent actor, has a presence and that unconventional character face that pops up in each Bond film. Fave NuWho Doctor too.

    Anya, with her massive eyes looks otherworldly, or how every human will evolve to look like in 200 years. Similar thoughts with her: versatile as the main Bond girl, femme fatale, henchwoman or reluctant mistress to the villain. Perhaps a young Bond falls for the honeytrap.
  • Posts: 785
    It's time for a female Q.
  • Posts: 3,042
    How about an AI Q if they really wanted to shake things up? Played by an actor/actress of course but just as a computer…

    That said not sure if even I like that idea!
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,634
    007HallY wrote: »
    How about an AI Q if they really wanted to shake things up? Played by an actor/actress of course but just as a computer…

    That said not sure if even I like that idea!

    I dunno if I like it, but what I do like is great thinking out of the box. Nice!
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited May 17 Posts: 15,108
    Toby Jones could be great.
    Jason Watkins maybe? Bill Nighy could be good: Q as a funky cool uncle.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    edited May 17 Posts: 750
    007HallY wrote: »
    How about an AI Q if they really wanted to shake things up? Played by an actor/actress of course but just as a computer…

    That said not sure if even I like that idea!

    I think AI is overused, but they probably will use it in the new film because that is the trend.

    An AI was virtually a supporting character in the recent A Murder at the End of the World (cinematography by Charlotte Bruus Christensen, who you suggested as a potential DP for Bond), and following this tenuous link, I think Emma Corrin who lead that miniseries would make for a good non-binary Q if they wanted to go that route.
  • edited May 17 Posts: 3,042
    peter wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    How about an AI Q if they really wanted to shake things up? Played by an actor/actress of course but just as a computer…

    That said not sure if even I like that idea!

    I dunno if I like it, but what I do like is great thinking out of the box. Nice!

    Cheers! I’m definitely not sold on it myself but who knows.
    007HallY wrote: »
    How about an AI Q if they really wanted to shake things up? Played by an actor/actress of course but just as a computer…

    That said not sure if even I like that idea!

    I think AI is overused, but they probably will use it in the new film because that is the trend.

    An AI was virtually a supporting character in the recent A Murder at the End of the World (cinematography by Charlotte Bruus Christensen, who you suggested as a potential DP for Bond), and following this tenuous link, I think Emma Corrin who lead that miniseries would make for a good non-binary Q if they wanted to go that route.

    I think it depends on how it’s used. I know the latest MI film depicted an AI weapon as some sort of faceless all knowing entity, and it doesn’t seem to have worked. The thinking I actually had for a computerised Q was more Robin Williams as the AI programme in the Steven Spielberg film A.I. Something which allows the actor’s personality to come out while still fulfilling a plot purpose (and which doesn’t show this sort of tech as being fundamentally bad and instead being used for practical purposes, although it’s a bit too sci fi in many ways).

    Have not seen that yet! As for a non-binary Q I suspect it’d depend on the actor, and it’d be handled/referenced even more subtly than Wishaw’s Q being gay was, if at all. But Corrin’s good.
  • Posts: 9,784
    I have been so convinced of Chinese whispers and shadows of shadows (not a bad bond title) that i never stopped to ask who I would actually want…


    I like Guy Ritchie…
    I wouldnt mind Christopher Mcquarrie
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited May 18 Posts: 23,627
    I watched PARADISE LAGOON the other day, also known as THE ADMIRABLE CRICHTON, a 1957 romantic adventure comedy directed by none other than Lewis Gilbert. While certainly an entertaining film, nothing about this one screamed "Bond director!" (fun fact: the film did star Sean Connery's later wife Diane Cilento.) This reminded me that potential Bond directors do not necessarily need to make "Bondian" films to have what it takes. Gilbert's 007 adventures aren't to everyone's liking, but at least two of them are, in my experience, met with praise within the Bond fan community. And yet, PARADISE LAGOON suggests a completely different skill set.

    And then I rewatched Leigh Whannell's exquisite 2020 horror film THE INVISIBLE MAN. Seeing what Whannell was capable of doing with only 7 million dollars, how well he told the film's story, how easily he grabbed my attention in the very first minutes if not seconds of the film, how he built tension, and what amazing performances he elicited from the likes of Elisabeth Moss, Aldis Hodge, Storm Reid and Michael Dorman, I got to thinking: what if Whannell directed a Bond film?

    I honestly think he could do it. Films such as UPGRADE and THE INVISIBLE MAN prove that he has matured as a director since the days of SAW and INSIDIOUS, that he can do action, tension and character work, and that he can tell a compelling story. He's never done anything that involves suave spying and such, but I don't see that as an obstacle either. To me, he's more than proven himself capable of making good, intense and suspenseful films. I'd like to see him make a Bond film at some point.
  • CharmianBondCharmianBond Pett Bottom, Kent
    Posts: 537
    I hadn't thought about Emma Corrin as Q but I would love to see that and as for other NB actors I think Emma D'Arcy would be amazing as a hench person. But Q's already been reimagined as a quantum computer in the Double O books which works well but I think giving it a voice would be tipping into Die Another Day territory.
Sign In or Register to comment.