Which Bond director would you rather...

1111214161754

Comments

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Oh she would alright... She would... ;)
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Which Bond would you rather see in Thunderball

    Sean Connery -1
    George Lazenby-1
    Pierce Brosnan - 6
    Daniel Craig - 2
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Are you doing this now up to Spectre??

    TB - Sir Rog
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Yes, we have to do all the films , don t you think?

    Sean Connery -1
    George Lazenby-1
    Roger Moore-1
    Pierce Brosnan - 6
    Daniel Craig - 2
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    With an effective majority of the votes, Pierce Brosnan is the perfect Bond for Thunderball. Strange to see Connery getting only one vote, but at least he beat Dalton.

    And now

    Which Bond would you rather see in You Only Live Twice?
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,695
    Timothy Dalton.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    George Lazenby.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    For YOLT:

    George Lazenby-1
    Timothy Dalton-2

    Would love to see Dalton disguise himself as a Japanese. He is the tallest of the bunch. If we imagine Pleasence is still Blofeld, he would reach up to his waist.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    edited May 2016 Posts: 7,314
    Daniel Craig.

    As Connery gave a more "reserved" performance, I could see Craig taking his place in this one. I'd love to see him in the fight scenes, for sure. Plus, since Craig is the shortest Bond, he might blend in better as a Japanese fisherman - if you could get him to wear the wig!
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    pachazo wrote: »
    Daniel Craig.

    As Connery gave a more "reserved" performance, I could see Craig taking his place in this one. I'd love to see him in the fight scenes, for sure. Plus, since Craig is the shortest Bond, he might blend in better as a Japanese fisherman - if you could get him to wear the wig!
    This!

    Craig's normal hairstyle mirrors that Japanese disguise anyway. They'd just have to dye it that's all.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    Good call.
  • George Lazenby.
  • CommanderRossCommanderRoss The bottom of a pitch lake in Eastern Trinidad, place called La Brea
    edited May 2016 Posts: 8,030
    David Niven. Only to see them try turn him in a Japanese. Would be far more fun then CR '67.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,813
    Yes, I'll give this one to Daniel Craig too.
  • Posts: 3,336
    Lazenby
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Bond for YOLT:

    David Niven-1
    George Lazenby-3
    Timothy Dalton-2
    Daniel Craig-3

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    @Thunderfinger, here's something...

    Which Bond would you rather see in every Bond film?
    Pierce Brosnan. ;)
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Maybe we can do that later.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Not a single vote for Connery (that s a first), Moore or Brosnan.

    It is a tie between George Lazenby and Daniel Craig (also a first).

    Next out, next down, next up!

    Which Bond would you rather see in OHMSS?
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    Which Bond would you rather see in OHMSS?

    Connery. I would have liked to have seen a more vulnerable side to him. Unfortunately, if they had made the film with him, it probably wouldn't have been the same film at all.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    bondjames wrote: »
    Which Bond would you rather see in OHMSS?

    Connery. I would have liked to have seen a more vulnerable side to him. Unfortunately, if they had made the film with him, it probably wouldn't have been the same film at all.

    Would probably be harder to ignore that he and Blofeld had met before.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Does Tom Hiddleston already count?
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    No.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Then I'll go with Jamie Bell.

    Or Roger Moore. Take your pick.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Sean Connery-1
    Roger Moore-1
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Timothy Dalton in his TLD/LTK years (yet the film is set in 1969, OHMSS that is) would've been perfect for it.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,813
    No doubt here, Timothy Dalton.
  • Pierce Brosnan here. He could do it.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    I'd actually like to see how Moore, circa 1969, would handle it. Imagine if his tenure started here. How would the rest of it play out?
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,459
    Definitely for sure Connery.
Sign In or Register to comment.