› › ›

No Time To Die: Production Diary

1…25042505250725092510…2583

Comments

  • peterpeter
    Posts: 5,174
    talos7 wrote: »
    This "injury report from The Sun has taken on a life of it's own; countless sites are reporting it and that filming has been suspended, all with The Sun report as the source. . I'm skeptical of the report and think that the seriousness of the injury is being exaggerated to sensationalize the story.
    @peter @ColonelSun do either of you have any insight into this?

    Yes I was just told that he is 100% injured but it’s not serious and was told minor delay in filming.
  • tqbtqb
    Posts: 974
    Any insights into the latest sun article? lol
  • 00Agent00Agent You Know The Name. You Know The Number.
    Posts: 4,705
    The amout of BS stories about Craig and this production is staggering. I just saw a new article in a cheap german tabloid that Rami Malek and Daniel Craig supposedly hate each other, based on nothing but speculation obviously.
    It's like every tabloid has a hard-on for this movie. Which ultimately is just free advertising.
  • tqbtqb
    Posts: 974
    unfortunately, one could argue we're the ones that add fuel to the tabloid fire since we're sitting here talking about it.
  • AgentM72AgentM72
    Posts: 576
    peter wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    This "injury report from The Sun has taken on a life of it's own; countless sites are reporting it and that filming has been suspended, all with The Sun report as the source. . I'm skeptical of the report and think that the seriousness of the injury is being exaggerated to sensationalize the story.
    @peter @ColonelSun do either of you have any insight into this?

    Yes I was just told that he is 100% injured but it’s not serious and was told minor delay in filming.

    Thanks for confirming this, Peter.

    Craig twisted his ankle. Minor impact on the shooting schedule. More time to get things right. Move along.
  • AlexanderWaverlyAlexanderWaverly
    Posts: 2,115
    00Agent wrote: »
    The amout of BS stories about Craig and this production is staggering. I just saw a new article in a cheap german tabloid that Rami Malek and Daniel Craig supposedly hate each other, based on nothing but speculation obviously.
    It's like every tabloid has a hard-on for this movie. Which ultimately is just free advertising.

    Have Craig and Malek even had a chance to meet in person? I suppose they have, but it's not like they've had a lot of time together given Malek's Mr. Robot schedule, etc.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 4,897
    It was fascinating to watch how countless outlets used a sensationalized, exaggerated story from a tabloid to verify a story; it took on a life of its own with each site adding it's own spin.
  • AlexanderWaverlyAlexanderWaverly
    Posts: 2,115
    The Sun strikes again. Things weren't so bad after all.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/9076212/daniel-craig-james-bond-return-fall/
  • ToTheRightToTheRight
    Posts: 9,945
    I'm surprised this whole tabloid B.S. hasn't exploded to the point the film is now delayed until 2021 while Craig recovers from having his entire leg amputated. Bond will have a CGI leg for the rest of filming.
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,366
    Next will be he and Cary hate each other thanks to the pictures from The Mirror...
  • AlexanderWaverlyAlexanderWaverly
    Posts: 2,115
    BTW, this tweet contains the title card for the writing credit for the 1954 Casino Royale:



  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 3,972
    tqb wrote: »
    unfortunately, one could argue we're the ones that add fuel to the tabloid fire since we're sitting here talking about it.

    There is an element of truth to that, however I'd argue that the majority of us are hopeful of the story being utter tosh, whereas The Sun is aiming towards the folk of Facebook comment sections and Twitter threads who revel in failure.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 4,897
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    tqb wrote: »
    unfortunately, one could argue we're the ones that add fuel to the tabloid fire since we're sitting here talking about it.

    There is an element of truth to that, however I'd argue that the majority of us are hopeful of the story being utter tosh, whereas The Sun is aiming towards the folk of Facebook comment sections and Twitter threads who revel in failure.

    I agree, many of the comments here were skeptical. Time to move on.
  • M_BlaiseM_Blaise
    Posts: 140
    So what I'm gathering is, Daniel is fine thought there may have been a fall, and he and Cary have been seen talking.
  • BonSimonLeBon_1BonSimonLeBon_1
    Posts: 1,091
    AlexanderWaverly wrote: »
    The Sun strikes again. Things weren't so bad after all.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/9076212/daniel-craig-james-bond-return-fall/

    From the whole film being cancelled to a delay of a week - talk about hyperbole!
  • Bentley007Bentley007 Manitoba, Canada
    Posts: 396
    AgentM72 wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    This "injury report from The Sun has taken on a life of it's own; countless sites are reporting it and that filming has been suspended, all with The Sun report as the source. . I'm skeptical of the report and think that the seriousness of the injury is being exaggerated to sensationalize the story.
    @peter @ColonelSun do either of you have any insight into this?

    Yes I was just told that he is 100% injured but it’s not serious and was told minor delay in filming.

    Thanks for confirming this, Peter.

    Craig twisted his ankle. Minor impact on the shooting schedule. More time to get things right. Move along.

    It appears as though both Jeffrey Wright and Billy Magnussen are in likely in studio shooting their scenes. Does this fit with your understanding of accommodating Craig's recovery? @peter @ColonelSun
  • SuperintendentSuperintendent A separate pool. For sharks, no less.
    edited May 2019 Posts: 704
    Bentley007 wrote: »
    AgentM72 wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    This "injury report from The Sun has taken on a life of it's own; countless sites are reporting it and that filming has been suspended, all with The Sun report as the source. . I'm skeptical of the report and think that the seriousness of the injury is being exaggerated to sensationalize the story.
    @peter @ColonelSun do either of you have any insight into this?

    Yes I was just told that he is 100% injured but it’s not serious and was told minor delay in filming.

    Thanks for confirming this, Peter.

    Craig twisted his ankle. Minor impact on the shooting schedule. More time to get things right. Move along.

    It appears as though both Jeffrey Wright and Billy Magnussen are in likely in studio shooting their scenes. Does this fit with your understanding of accommodating Craig's recovery? @peter @ColonelSun

    You could be right.

    If Craig got injured while filming in Jamaica, then they might be going back there later in the year to finish up. Is that possible?

    They did leave Jamaica earlier than expected, so perhaps that was the reason.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Overt here
    Posts: 35,121
    And the same doctor also treated some football player earlier, in case someone still did not catch that. Incredible!
  • TR007TR007
    Posts: 941
    peter wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    This "injury report from The Sun has taken on a life of it's own; countless sites are reporting it and that filming has been suspended, all with The Sun report as the source. . I'm skeptical of the report and think that the seriousness of the injury is being exaggerated to sensationalize the story.
    @peter @ColonelSun do either of you have any insight into this?

    Yes I was just told that he is 100% injured but it’s not serious and was told minor delay in filming.

    Thanks so much for confirming @peter . A source we can trust! :)

  • vzokvzok
    Posts: 3,731
    BonSimonLeBon_1 wrote: »
    AlexanderWaverly wrote: »
    The Sun strikes again. Things weren't so bad after all.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/9076212/daniel-craig-james-bond-return-fall/

    From the whole film being cancelled to a delay of a week - talk about hyperbole!

    I wish The S*n was cancelled.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ocean Club, Bahamas.
    Posts: 2,255
    TR007 wrote: »
    This injury is meant to have happened last week while Craig was in Jamaica.
    Yesterday Wright was in Pinewood and looked like the production was still motoring along.
    Waller-Bridge didn’t mention anything about production stalling during the Baftas on Sunday.

    Plus, a few pages back a board member mentioned that Craig was snapped in NY over the weekend.

    Sorry but I really don’t think that production has stalled and really won’t believe it until it’s confirmed by a more reputable source than an English newspaper.

    This. A lot of us here are freaking out (again) for nothing.

    To my knowledge The Sun has hated Craig since day one.

    But Panchito had the news.

    Let there be injury,
  • matt_umatt_u better known as Mr. Roark
    Posts: 1,616
    “Things were deemed to be a disaster at first. But the injury is not as severe as believed and he will be able to film while not over exerting his ankle. He will be back on set within the week."

    Hope he won't suffer anymore injury throughout the process.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    Apparantly |Craig is being examined in NYC by the surgeon who worked on Harry Kane.
  • bondsumbondsum
    Posts: 2,964
    The Sun story is not dissimilar to a lot of football stories about certain Premier League players that have picked up a serious knock in a match, been ruled out for the following game, to then magically appear on the bench in their full kit ready to play as if the injury was never a big deal to begin with. Like football stars, I'm sure DC was getting the very best possible treatment to reduce the swelling so he could play on. That's not to say the story was bunk to begin with. It's just the nature of these types of injuries aren't so easy to predict because it's also down to an individual's recovery time and how quickly they heal. Fortunately, it doesn't look that serious.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    He always picks up an injury so at least he has got it out of the way early this time !! ;))
  • GetafixGetafix
    Posts: 10,979
    Should feel lucky he didnt slash his wrists I guess
  • QuantumArtQuantumArt
    Posts: 22
    ]
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    TR007 wrote: »
    This injury is meant to have happened last week while Craig was in Jamaica.
    Yesterday Wright was in Pinewood and looked like the production was still motoring along.
    Waller-Bridge didn’t mention anything about production stalling during the Baftas on Sunday.

    Plus, a few pages back a board member mentioned that Craig was snapped in NY over the weekend.

    Sorry but I really don’t think that production has stalled and really won’t believe it until it’s confirmed by a more reputable source than an English newspaper.

    This. A lot of us here are freaking out (again) for nothing.

    To my knowledge The Sun has hated Craig since day one.

    But Panchito had the news.

    Let there be injury,

    You really need to get out of your little bubble

  • HildebrandRarityHildebrandRarity Centre international d'assistance aux personnes déplacées, Paris, France
    Posts: 184
    Tabloids basically want drama. If Daniel Craig slipped while running and hurt himself, that means for them that he's severely injured.
    From the later reports, it looks like the production sent him to New York to get checked by a top surgeon and physician, just in case, but it turned out that the issue was minor. Hardly healine-worthy.
  • antovolkantovolk
    Posts: 2,110
    The weirdest thing is Variety, as it turns out, just basically quoting The Sun verbatim both yesterday and today. I would have at first thought they heard more info on their end about it but none of the other trades (THR or Deadline) chimed in...seems like for good reason.
  • BondAficionadoBondAficionado Former IMDBer
    Posts: 1,671
    Well we could always single out the journalist R. Mitchell as being lazy/biased. Sort of an inverse situation of Baz at the Daily Mail (although some would now argue otherwise).
Sign In or Register to comment.