SPECTRE Production Timeline

1846847849851852871

Comments

  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,203
    Ed83 wrote: »
    It's looping now. Yeah that was a big blunder during the big Lea interview. I loved Mr Waltz's answer when asked about accepting the role "Nobody needs to say yes or no" on both sides.

    I didn't catch the blunder...or what I thought was a huge one. Was it this?
    That Seydoux's character could conceivably come back in the next Bond film?


  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    TripAces wrote: »
    Ed83 wrote: »
    It's looping now. Yeah that was a big blunder during the big Lea interview. I loved Mr Waltz's answer when asked about accepting the role "Nobody needs to say yes or no" on both sides.

    I didn't catch the blunder...or what I thought was a huge one. Was it this?
    That Seydoux's character could conceivably come back in the next Bond film?


    Nope ...although that was asked

  • Posts: 1,181
    Yeah, that was it. It didn't really offend me, but I can see how some wouldn't appreciate it. Awesome show though overall. Loved seeing all the fans get some autographs and photos with everyone.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    edited October 2015 Posts: 4,116
    Ed83 wrote: »
    Yeah, that was it. It didn't really offend me, but I can see how some wouldn't appreciate it. Awesome show though overall. Loved seeing all the fans get some autographs and photos with everyone.

    The big spoiler was regarding this film. Spoiler tags aren't working so argh

  • Pajan005Pajan005 Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts: 432
    I hadn't seen these interviews before.

  • Thunderball007Thunderball007 United States
    Posts: 306
    TripAces wrote: »
    DC: "I hate seeing myself on screen."

    He's said this before. He hates his ears. LOL

    What? That is so? LOL!

    =))
  • Posts: 152
    Tuulia wrote: »
    I hope the guy, Walliams??? whatever he's called, will get plenty feedback afterwards...
    I think Mr Wilson got his revenge when he said " your already married" in response to Walliams saying he wants to marry into the Bond/Broccoli dynasty. Walliams and his wife recently split up, the look on his face said it all.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,482
    Yeah, I'd hate to be him right now.
  • Seven_Point_Six_FiveSeven_Point_Six_Five Southern California
    Posts: 1,256
    On a scale of 1-10, how big of spoiler was it?
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,482
    On a scale of 1-10, how big of spoiler was it?

    11.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,203
    TripAces wrote: »
    DC: "I hate seeing myself on screen."

    He's said this before. He hates his ears. LOL

    What? That is so? LOL!

    =))

    Yes. It's true. He says so in this interview from 2012:

    http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/cover-story-excerpt-daniel-craig-the-man-behind-james-bond-20121109?page=6
  • DCisaredDCisared Liverpool
    Posts: 1,213
    He dropped a few the one about madelline was a massive clanger though. 10 I'd say
  • First B-roll is out:

  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,250
    Thanks for posting @ManinCableCar that was great.
  • mini_453434Sanstitre.png

    First glimpse of SPECTRE in Paris (except for the DB10 of course)

    (No Seydoux on the poster, then)
  • aaron819aaron819 Switzerland
    Posts: 1,207
    behind the scenes:

  • aaron819 wrote: »
    David Walliams just brought out a super spoiler while interviewing Waltz!

    Didn't see the Premiere live. Just watched it. That interviewer dropped a number of spoilers! The look on Barbara Broccoli's face when he dropped one of them was priceless. You could tell she was annoyed! At the beginning of the broadcast he also said that SF made over $1.1million instead of a billion. I guess its correct either way you look at it but over 1.1billion sounds more impressive. Either than that it was great to see the stars working the red carpet with the crowds. Great to see the main crew getting interviewed on the red carpet but I didn't see Hoyte Van Hoytema. The screenwriters all showed up. Neal Purvis didn't appear as friendly as all the others. John Logan was in a good mood as was Jez Butterworth. Always enjoy an interview with Sam Mendes. Haven't seen SPECTRE yet but I hope that he and Craig make many more together. Seems like BB and MGW don't want them to leave either.

  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,250
    To me David Walliams came across like a spoilt kid who wants everyone to
    Know he has seen it first, so dropped spoilers in, where he could. :(
  • Posts: 6,601
    John Logan shouldn't have been there. He screwed it up, no? Cost them months to rewrite his crap. Sorry...
  • Germanlady wrote: »
    John Logan shouldn't have been there. He screwed it up, no? Cost them months to rewrite his crap. Sorry...

    Considering the behind the scenes stories of the script it was refreshing to see all the writers on the red carpet. Also - glad no one asked questions about the behind the scenes issues with the screenplay (but I guess they were told not to ask!) If all the stories are true then I guess he won't be asked back to write Bond 25.

  • Posts: 2,081
    DrGorner wrote: »
    To me David Walliams came across like a spoilt kid who wants everyone to
    Know he has seen it first, so dropped spoilers in, where he could. :(

    Yes. Also seemed to think he knew what he was doing and was oh so funny (ha ha), supposedly, anyway. And what kind of a question is something like "what is it like kissing Daniel Craig?" Who the hell asks something like that? A 14 year old (who'd like to do it)? I didn't even know the name of David Walliams before yesterday. I do know... and sort of wish I didn't.

  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    Was Wade there? Yea Purvis comes off as a jerk. Much higher opinion of himself than deserved.
  • edited October 2015 Posts: 1,010
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Was Wade there? Yea Purvis comes off as a jerk. Much higher opinion of himself than deserved.


    Yes. He was there. Gave a better interview than Purvis.

    Considering the stories about the issues with the script Purvis basically said in his interview that he and Wade wrote the good bits while the other two (Logan Butterworth) wrote the bad bits??!!! and he didn't sound like he was joking!! The interviewer then jumped in and said - but there are no bad bits.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe "I need a year off" Craig
    edited October 2015 Posts: 7,293
    The reason they could crank out the Bond films of yesteryear. Is because th
    Germanlady wrote: »
    John Logan shouldn't have been there. He screwed it up, no? Cost them months to rewrite his crap. Sorry...

    Considering the behind the scenes stories of the script it was refreshing to see all the writers on the red carpet. Also - glad no one asked questions about the behind the scenes issues with the screenplay (but I guess they were told not to ask!) If all the stories are true then I guess he won't be asked back to write Bond 25.

    I say Good readings to him! L-)
  • Posts: 6,396
    For fans of Father Ted:
    CSUvlTkXIAAT8_Q.jpg

    :D
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,250
    =)) Brilliant !
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Was Wade there? Yea Purvis comes off as a jerk. Much higher opinion of himself than deserved.


    Yes. He was there. Gave a better interview than Purvis.

    Considering the stories about the issues with the script Purvis basically said in his interview that he and Wade wrote the good bits while the other two (Logan Butterworth) wrote the bad bits??!!! and he didn't sound like he was joking!! The interviewer then jumped in and said - but there are no bad bits.

    Ok thanks. ...and yes good save by interviewer



  • Posts: 1,552
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Was Wade there? Yea Purvis comes off as a jerk. Much higher opinion of himself than deserved.


    Yes. He was there. Gave a better interview than Purvis.

    Considering the stories about the issues with the script Purvis basically said in his interview that he and Wade wrote the good bits while the other two (Logan Butterworth) wrote the bad bits??!!! and he didn't sound like he was joking!! The interviewer then jumped in and said - but there are no bad bits.

    Ok thanks. ...and yes good save by interviewer
    The interviewer asked him who wrote what, basically asking how much of a collaboration it was and the way Purvis answered it seems like he was going for a joke that fell flat.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,068
    For fans of Father Ted:
    CSUvlTkXIAAT8_Q.jpg

    :D

    Bloody hell =))
Sign In or Register to comment.