It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
A lot of people hate Tesla's because of Musk.
Didn't you like Bond driving a BMW either ?
How about driving a Lotus 7, but then, sort of, further developed?
My view on this is that Bond is a fellow of style and elegance, and since budgetary restraints do not need to be considered, he would always drive a stylish car, which means by defintion he would prefer a European one (just imo, of course :) ). Same goes for watches, it would be out of character for James Bond to wear an apple watch or whatever that's called. I'd like my Bond to appreciate timeless elegance. Or you might as well give him a baseball cap for the next film.
Anyone going ?
Neither, rather forgettable. It gives me a Corvette-vibe.
:))
You should get a (grey) Anthony Sinclair suit like the one bond wore in DN or GF for such an occasion.
I'd love to get one for myself, stunning suits. The GOAT of suits ? 🏆
A tuxedo would be nice too.
All I can say is that it doesn't look anything like the Renault 4 which I used to drive all those years ago in the 80s.
And then, I saw a Renault Rafale.
First time I saw any of these two cars.
As for the Rafale, I think the attempt to cash in on the jet's name is preposterous. It's just yet another plug-in hybrid mini-SUV, neither fish nor flesh. I can't tell most of them apart any more until I see the badge.
The Rafale, I don't know if I've seen one or not to be honest; as you say JW, it's just another car.
Still, it goes to show that design wise, we've ended up in a desert, which is indeed underscored by the 'Rafale'.
Which I can't describe better than 'a car'. I was checking the Dutch website, and to me, they're definately not promoting it in a way it will stand out. 32 driving support systems? The car 'constantly thinks with you'? And what if I disagree with the car?
One thing that stands out though, it has '4 wheel steering'.
I understand it's helpfull for parking in Paris (but I'd go for a smaller car than that in a place like that), but otherwise? Or is the turning circle so bad they had to do it that way?
My issue with most modern cars in one sentence. I do not want to be driven by a car, I want to be the driver myself. I want a car, not a computer on wheels.
It ruins the beautiful lines of the original DBS,
I don’t really get the complaint. Cars have always used technology to improve on shortcomings, they are made of technology. Yes they made the turning circle smaller with clever thinking. Is that bad?
That part wasn't meant as a complaint, it was a genuine question. Four wheel steering has been demonstrated countless times, but never caught on, for reasons. I was wondering why they decided to go for it in a production model.