It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
And if he had done so, and we had seen the photo on the net of Craig inside the Tom Ford shop, you'd have explained us how "convenient" that his photo looks like for an ad for it, that it was surely staged "Bond, by a Bond blogger, in a Bond shop, and you call that luck, ah ah", that he did it for the money, etc.
You bring a very clever look at the situation @Suivez_ce_parachute, I can only imagine the comments as well.
Now, back on topic. I think both Rupert Wyatt and Joe Wright are very possible choices right now. Both are talented directors and both seem to be free. Wyatt apparently has some TV film in pre-production but I wonder if, given the possibility of directing a Bond film, he could possibly refuse. Joe Wright seems to be completely free. His filmography so far has focused mostly on female-centered stories, which is interesting. He has shown to be an inspired director when it comes to action in Hanna but mostly he's a man who knows how to tell a story well and is keen on adapting from literary sources. I found Wright has an interesting Bond connection, he was engaged to Rosamund Pike.
Are you smoking weed?
Thanks posting it, GL. :) I do NOT in any way think Daniel Craig came off as a jerk or rude. Not at all. People, he was nice and polite, not at all rude. Of course he doesn't have to allow his picture to be taken during his private life.
And it was classy and real that he offered his hand. I liked that, and what he said, a lot. My opinion of him remains.
For this particular topic: I think within 3 years is a good statement to make, rather than promising 2 years - but I do think with Skyfall's incredible success they will make every effort to get it out a bit sooner. With quality staff on hand. Really hope we know the director by summer.
Maybe that's it...
Just ignore and IFM, people. No sense in entertaining the circus.
TB-1965 gave us such thrills when I determined to watch them the very first day they were released for the public.
I swear! ,
So many prominent news sites are giving the movie a date of 2016.
Marc Forster has jumped ahead of Guy Ritchie in betting for the next director
Most unlikely. But I will be very happy if true, that brings David Arnold and a modern classy look back to the table.
i wouldn't mind a Forster return.. i loved most of his direction on QOS.. provided that he
1. doesn't chop up the action like an MTV music video
2. retains Daniel Kleinman for the title sequences
3. allows someone like Alexander Witt to handle the action sequences, and not Dan Bradley.
Forster was working behind the 8-ball the entire time on QOS, and i can't blame him for all of that film's troubles.. but he needs needs needs to handle action in a more graceful manner.... so given the provisions above, i'd welcome him back with bells on..
in on a private meeting with Babs and Michael were you?
I loved the QoS action , it had a sense of threat and thrill.
I agree with @doubleoego. You don't need a meeting with Michael or Babs to see the obvious.
true... but they did invite him back to direct Bond 23 after all... but he declined.... and i dont think they would extend the offer, just in hopes that he would decline either..
so... anything still remains possible at this point - if he'd be willing to come back, i'm sure EON would take him back.
When Marc was offered to return, Babs or Michael had no clue that their next endeavour will be such a hit among the critics, seeing the critical reception of Skyfall I feel there is little chance for Marc to return.
Though I would absolutely love it ! :D
Nothing that hurt the film - REALLY hurt it- was due to the writers strike. It was the cut and shakey camera. Had the roof top chase been given air to breathe, it would have been extraordinary. Had the opening sequence been given air to breathe ... had the Siena bit excluding the roof top given air to breathe...
If you want the next to FAIL, Skyfail - yes then offer it to MF.
Check out the Bond24 score thread @haserot , made a good post regarding Arnold.
it will be someone new for bond 24.
This is not entirely true. Forster and DC did discuss the 60's (as it seemed to have been the case with Sam) and how they wanted to create something with a 60's touch and some hints to that period (Fields covered in oil). Forster knew Bond...
still they should keep him away.
Thanks @germanlady for pointing that out.
@fjdinardo, what you mentioned in the Bond 24 composer thread is not true either.