› ›

Should we get a new M / Q / Moneypenny for BOND 26 and beyond ?

1…2425272930

Comments

  • Herr_StockmannHerr_Stockmann
    Posts: 893
    M - David Harewood or Emma Thompson
    STGG_LD_2829.jpg?ssl=1
    FspzYzC-asset-mezzanine-16x9-iyY0ntP.jpg?focalcrop=1200x630x50x10&format=auto


    Moneypenny - Sophie Cookson
    0eb7db32c2949563bc57f64448ec125a.jpg


    Q - Himesh Patel
    Casio-G-Shock-Watch-of-Himesh-Patel-as-Mahir-in-Tenet-2020.jpg


    Tanner - James Norton
    d00a2ca8d8475dbb409e2471bd27195990b0ecdb.jpg
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited November 2022 Posts: 5,869
    Herr_Stockmann wrote: »
    Q - Himesh Patel
    Casio-G-Shock-Watch-of-Himesh-Patel-as-Mahir-in-Tenet-2020.jpg
    Great minds @Herr_Stockmann, great minds ;)
  • 007HallY007HallY
    edited November 2022 Posts: 2,901
    David Harewood is a good shout for M (I don't know why but I'm really leaning towards younger, black British actors known for playing authoritative roles as M).
  • Herr_StockmannHerr_Stockmann
    Posts: 893
    Denbigh wrote: »
    Great minds @Herr_Stockmann, great minds ;)
    Yes, I only remembered after posting it that you suggested his name before. To be honest, I feel like Eon needs to do something different with Q: Llewelyn is still very much remembered and it will be difficult to try something close, while a younger Q was already tried with Whishaw and I can't imagine them portraying the character in a similar way so soon. Another idea I had was eventually to have the Ann Reilly character from the Gardner novels.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 1,430
    Not sure if this is the right place but I literally just learned that apparently the League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen sometimes features a character named "Campion Bond" who is supposed to be the great-grandfather of James. I've never heard of this before??
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,869
    Herr_Stockmann wrote: »
    Denbigh wrote: »
    Great minds @Herr_Stockmann, great minds ;)
    To be honest, I feel like Eon needs to do something different with Q: Llewelyn is still very much remembered and it will be difficult to try something close, while a younger Q was already tried with Whishaw and I can't imagine them portraying the character in a similar way so soon.
    He's the only guy I really have in mind. As for doing something different with Q, I agree, which is why I feel it would be an interesting route to have Bond and Q be around the same age. I've already mentioned it a couple of times but we've seen the dynamic of an older Q and a younger Bond, and the reverse, so why not meet in the middle for the next era?
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,526
    Herr_Stockmann wrote: »
    M - David Harewood or Emma Thompson
    STGG_LD_2829.jpg?ssl=1
    FspzYzC-asset-mezzanine-16x9-iyY0ntP.jpg?focalcrop=1200x630x50x10&format=auto


    Moneypenny - Sophie Cookson
    0eb7db32c2949563bc57f64448ec125a.jpg


    Q - Himesh Patel
    Casio-G-Shock-Watch-of-Himesh-Patel-as-Mahir-in-Tenet-2020.jpg


    Tanner - James Norton
    d00a2ca8d8475dbb409e2471bd27195990b0ecdb.jpg

    Good picks.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,513
    In that photo, Sophie Cookson reminds me of Caroline Bliss and the receptionist at The Ocean Club from Casino Royale. Good choice mate
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,526
    David Harewood would be my pick for M. Casting anybody like Emma Thompson would just inevitably result in comparisons to Judi.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 13,936
    Bring back Peter Notley, the MI6 techie from CR. He looks like Q from the comics:

    52496727230_23c1387d9c_o.png
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited November 2022 Posts: 2,928
    Loved that droll 'ow' from Craig after he'd been through all that in Miami without flinching! :D
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,526
    QBranch wrote: »
    Bring back Peter Notley, the MI6 techie from CR. He looks like Q from the comics:

    52496727230_23c1387d9c_o.png

    Good call... I wonder if he was meant to be the defacto Q for Casino Royale? Considering we didn't have Whishaw yet, and this tracker could be considered the only "gadget" of CR...
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 13,936
    NickTwentyTwo wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Bring back Peter Notley, the MI6 techie from CR. He looks like Q from the comics:

    52496727230_23c1387d9c_o.png

    Good call... I wonder if he was meant to be the defacto Q for Casino Royale? Considering we didn't have Whishaw yet, and this tracker could be considered the only "gadget" of CR...
    Don't forget, someone had to install the Aston defib/P99 compartment trays as well as the various mapping apps on Bond's phone. Maybe he mentors Whishaw?
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 14,831
    QBranch wrote: »
    Bring back Peter Notley, the MI6 techie from CR. He looks like Q from the comics:

    52496727230_23c1387d9c_o.png

    Yes! YES! I always thought he looked a bit like the real life Boothroyd. In fact, I was sure he was going to be revealed as Major Boothroyd/Q at some point after CR. I wonder I'd it wasn't in the plan at some point.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 2,928
    Excellent - would've made a great Boothroyd, for sure.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 13,936
    Ludovico wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Bring back Peter Notley, the MI6 techie from CR. He looks like Q from the comics:

    52496727230_23c1387d9c_o.png

    Yes! YES! I always thought he looked a bit like the real life Boothroyd. In fact, I was sure he was going to be revealed as Major Boothroyd/Q at some point after CR. I wonder I'd it wasn't in the plan at some point.
    Good call, it looks like this comic version in particular was modeled on Boothroyd.

    I'd like to see Q get back into demonstrating the tech in front of Bond - dummies included. Whishaw's interpretation didn't really do that, but rather give the items to Bond and simply explain their function, leaving Bond to figure out how they operate in the field.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    edited November 2022 Posts: 1,430
    QBranch wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Bring back Peter Notley, the MI6 techie from CR. He looks like Q from the comics:

    52496727230_23c1387d9c_o.png

    Yes! YES! I always thought he looked a bit like the real life Boothroyd. In fact, I was sure he was going to be revealed as Major Boothroyd/Q at some point after CR. I wonder I'd it wasn't in the plan at some point.
    Good call, it looks like this comic version in particular was modeled on Boothroyd.

    I'd like to see Q get back into demonstrating the tech in front of Bond - dummies included. Whishaw's interpretation didn't really do that, but rather give the items to Bond and simply explain their function, leaving Bond to figure out how they operate in the field.

    All those excellent Above-and-underground sets of "London" and none of them were a high tech demonstration q-lab (except for spectre, kinda)
  • ImpertinentGoonImpertinentGoon Everybody needs a hobby.
    Posts: 1,351
    QBranch wrote: »
    NickTwentyTwo wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Bring back Peter Notley, the MI6 techie from CR. He looks like Q from the comics:

    52496727230_23c1387d9c_o.png

    Good call... I wonder if he was meant to be the defacto Q for Casino Royale? Considering we didn't have Whishaw yet, and this tracker could be considered the only "gadget" of CR...
    Don't forget, someone had to install the Aston defib/P99 compartment trays as well as the various mapping apps on Bond's phone. Maybe he mentors Whishaw?

    There is the callcentre crew when Bond gets poisoned. That seems to be Q section (or at least adjacent) as they seem to know what's in the car and what isn't. Could of course also just be 00-tech support line...
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,526
    Yeah, I suppose that was more or less Q branch in CR. Our friend Pseud-royd should have shown up again in that scene.
  • ImpertinentGoonImpertinentGoon Everybody needs a hobby.
    Posts: 1,351
    NickTwentyTwo wrote: »
    Yeah, I suppose that was more or less Q branch in CR. Our friend Pseud-royd should have shown up again in that scene.

    This should probably go in the Questions thread (and I could just look it up), but is one of the guys in the callcentre also the guy with the weird Microsoft Surface table in QoS?
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,526
    Possibly! Good call… I’d be interested in looking into that too.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,513
    I would love Ben Whishaw to carry on as Q, I think he's brilliant. Although I think his recasting would make heads explode like Judy being M in Casino.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,571
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I would love Ben Whishaw to carry on as Q, I think he's brilliant. Although I think his recasting would make heads explode like Judy being M in Casino.

    In which case, it would be worth doing just for *%&$ and giggles...It was only recently, btw, when I understand - thanks to these forums - that Judi D's M was not the same person in both sets of Brosnan and Craig films. Unless, of course, whoever wrote about got it wrong or I misunderstood. At the time, I just took it as "some actors stay, some don't, even for the same part" as had historically been the case.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,502
    @Since62 ... I still don't understand the difference and I keep my life simple using the same as your original thought: some actors go, some stay... Helps from having what gray matter I have left, from leaking out of my ear.
  • BennyBenny In the shadowsAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 14,880
    Yep, that's exactly how I accept the Judi Dench as M from Brosnan to Craig films.
    Or actors like Joe Don Baker playing Whittaker in TLD, then turning up as Wade in GE and TND.
    Don't dwell on it too much.
  • CrabKeyCrabKey
    Posts: 1,518
    Actors playing different roles in Bond films takes me out of the film. Dench didn't bother me because she was playing the same role. There has always been plenty of talent that using the same actor twice wasn't necessary. If he were so inclined, Craig could come back as M. That shouldn't bother anyone who doesn't have a problem with actors playing different roles in Bond films.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,571
    CrabKey wrote: »
    Actors playing different roles in Bond films takes me out of the film. Dench didn't bother me because she was playing the same role. There has always been plenty of talent that using the same actor twice wasn't necessary. If he were so inclined, Craig could come back as M. That shouldn't bother anyone who doesn't have a problem with actors playing different roles in Bond films.

    Would that be a cross-dressing Craig ? he's a good actor...if Milton Berle could do it, Craig could do it even better
  • ImpertinentGoonImpertinentGoon Everybody needs a hobby.
    Posts: 1,351
    Supposedly on Dench M is a woman called Barbara Mawdsley and the other is Olivia Mansfield. However, the canon-status of these names is debated AFAIK as they are never stated.

    To me, they are different character because they behave quite differently. M in Goldeneye is basically the polar opposite from M in Skyfall. Of course, the intervening decades could have changed her outlook on things, but together with it just being way easier to rationalize the Craig films as one big side-step universe, I would say they are just different people/different versions of a person.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,526
    Yeah it really seemed like Brosnan M hated Bond and Craig M loved him.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,869
    NickTwentyTwo wrote: »
    Yeah it really seemed like Brosnan M hated Bond and Craig M loved him.
    Does the M relationship coincide with Barbara's own feelings of the actor? ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.