No Time To Die: Production Diary

1188918901892189418952507

Comments

  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,533
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    I don’t know, I’m ready for a bit of a change. I wouldn’t mind a DAF type out of shape Bond. Something different and unexpected, especially for Craig’s Bond.

    -Diamonds-Are-Forever-james-bond-35262762-500-284.jpg

    If Craig in Bond 25 look anything like DAF Connery, I'll have a genuine laugh out loud moment! :D
    And Connery still looks more Bondian in that pic than Craig at his best. Just a testament to Connery being the real deal. Everyone else is an imitator. Only Moore can give Connery any serious competition when it comes to the ideal cinematic Bond.

    Moore is my favourite actually, and a big part of that is that he didn't try to copy Connery – he just went ahead and did it differently.
    Dalton is mine because he didn’t do what Connery or Moore did

    Shame he only did a couple of films!
    I don’t know, I’m ready for a bit of a change. I wouldn’t mind a DAF type out of shape Bond. Something different and unexpected, especially for Craig’s Bond.

    -Diamonds-Are-Forever-james-bond-35262762-500-284.jpg

    If Craig in Bond 25 look anything like DAF Connery, I'll have a genuine laugh out loud moment! :D
    And Connery still looks more Bondian in that pic than Craig at his best. Just a testament to Connery being the real deal. Everyone else is an imitator. Only Moore can give Connery any serious competition when it comes to the ideal cinematic Bond.

    Moore is my favourite actually, and a big part of that is that he didn't try to copy Connery – he just went ahead and did it differently.
    For me it’s really a toss-up between Connery and Moore. I guess it all depends on my mood. Though I’ll say that Connery in GF is the ultimate representation of 007, especially in that white dinner jacket. Will never be topped!

    Wouldn't argue with Connery being the ultimate representation of 007 in GF, but instead of the white dinner jacket, it's the navy blue suit he wears when he gets the Aston Martin that makes it the ultimate representation for me. Moore of course had the 70's fashion to "struggle" with.

    Makes me wonder how the tight-fitting suits of the Craig era will be looked upon in the future.



    Well with Dalton it’s a mixed bag for me his two films are near perfect but let’s look at the Craig era (or at least how I view it)

    Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace are top notch but Skyfall and Spectre are meh to worse true he could pull it out with Bond 25

    But the same thing nearly happened with Dalton

    I’m sorry but The Property of a Lady would of been abysmal Bond fighting a Sex-bot is all I need to know about the film to know it would of jumped the shark in a way that made Die another Day and Moonraker feel flemingesque

    @Risico007 the cyborg thing would have only lasted two minutes and there's a very small chance it would have made it to the screen. With that scene omitted and a few other things done a little differently, then Bond 17 with Dalton would have been a pretty fun flick. His GF or TSWLM.
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,533
    It wasn't called The Property of A Lady. That's just a public rumour.

    I wonder how that rumor got started anyway. I still like to think that would have been the title.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I'm not convinced that Dalton could have pulled off a GF/TSWLM type flick personally.

    Even though I would have liked a third Dalton effort, to a degree I'm glad he stopped with the two he did. I think his era is internally consistent at least.
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,533
    bondjames wrote: »
    I'm not convinced that Dalton could have pulled off a GF/TSWLM type flick personally.

    Even though I would have liked a third Dalton effort, to a degree I'm glad he stopped with the two he did. I think his era is internally consistent at least.

    How does Dalton usually do in more fantastical movies? I haven't seen The Rocketeer so maybe that would be a good indication.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,040
    bondjames wrote: »
    I'm not convinced that Dalton could have pulled off a GF/TSWLM type flick personally.

    Even though I would have liked a third Dalton effort, to a degree I'm glad he stopped with the two he did. I think his era is internally consistent at least.

    Agree. TLD is as balanced as a Bond film could possibly be. Another one like that would have been my preference.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Remington wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    I'm not convinced that Dalton could have pulled off a GF/TSWLM type flick personally.

    Even though I would have liked a third Dalton effort, to a degree I'm glad he stopped with the two he did. I think his era is internally consistent at least.

    How does Dalton usually do in more fantastical movies? I haven't seen The Rocketeer so maybe that would be a good indication.
    It's a good point and I haven't actually seen that film myself. I can see him doing the adventurer type well enough, but it's more the lighter humour and demeanour that usually accompanies these more larger scale efforts where I have trouble visualizing him being comfortable or a natural.

    I just have an image of him as Mr. intense Bond who can snap at any moment.
  • Posts: 9,779
    Back on the topic of Bond 25

    I am assuming January is when we will start getting rumors and this is truely the calm before the storm so as we go into the season of Bond I would like to say thank you to everyone this ride has been probably the most intriguing of any bond film to date with rumors of a new actor rumors of different direction and then the same direction etc Danny Boyle in then Danny Boyle our and now something none of us thought we would see in our life time An American Director... (which I like to think made Spielberg slightly annoyed)

    Over all we can all say a lot of things but the last 3 years have been anything but boring
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Remington wrote: »
    It wasn't called The Property of A Lady. That's just a public rumour.
    I wonder how that rumor got started anyway. I still like to think that would have been the title.
    It's the usual criteria of biased Bond fans shoehorning unused Fleming titles. With the available premise of Dalton's unrealized third film, there's no indication how the title would compliment that treatment or the topic of the script in any way.
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited December 2018 Posts: 5,185
    Remington wrote: »
    It wasn't called The Property of A Lady. That's just a public rumour.
    I wonder how that rumor got started anyway. I still like to think that would have been the title.
    It's the usual criteria of biased Bond fans shoehorning unused Fleming titles. With the available premise of Dalton's unrealized third film, there's no indication how the title would compliment that treatment or the topic of the script in any way.

    Well, the Bond franchise was about to become the 'Property of a Lady' and that's probably as good as it'll ever get :))
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    00Agent wrote: »
    Remington wrote: »
    It wasn't called The Property of A Lady. That's just a public rumour.
    I wonder how that rumor got started anyway. I still like to think that would have been the title.
    It's the usual criteria of biased Bond fans shoehorning unused Fleming titles. With the available premise of Dalton's unrealized third film, there's no indication how the title would compliment that treatment or the topic of the script in any way.
    Well, the Bond franchise was about to become the 'Property of a Lady' and that's probably as good as it'll ever get :))
    Finally, I saw the light. :))
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    Posts: 5,185
    00Agent wrote: »
    Remington wrote: »
    It wasn't called The Property of A Lady. That's just a public rumour.
    I wonder how that rumor got started anyway. I still like to think that would have been the title.
    It's the usual criteria of biased Bond fans shoehorning unused Fleming titles. With the available premise of Dalton's unrealized third film, there's no indication how the title would compliment that treatment or the topic of the script in any way.
    Well, the Bond franchise was about to become the 'Property of a Lady' and that's probably as good as it'll ever get :))
    Finally, I saw the light. :))

    a5570d4d-3078-40a2-b294-e5dcc2553510_text_hi.gif
    Don't forget to wear sunglasses :)
  • edited December 2018 Posts: 4,619
    Considering the lack of leaks/news, it's very hard to believe filming will start in just 92 days...
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    00Agent wrote: »
    00Agent wrote: »
    Remington wrote: »
    It wasn't called The Property of A Lady. That's just a public rumour.
    I wonder how that rumor got started anyway. I still like to think that would have been the title.
    It's the usual criteria of biased Bond fans shoehorning unused Fleming titles. With the available premise of Dalton's unrealized third film, there's no indication how the title would compliment that treatment or the topic of the script in any way.
    Well, the Bond franchise was about to become the 'Property of a Lady' and that's probably as good as it'll ever get :))
    Finally, I saw the light. :))
    a5570d4d-3078-40a2-b294-e5dcc2553510_text_hi.gif
    Don't forget to wear sunglasses :)
    l3UcoDBz59nnaaG6Q.gif

    I'll keep that in mind... ;)
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited December 2018 Posts: 23,883
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Back on the topic of Bond 25

    I am assuming January is when we will start getting rumors and this is truely the calm before the storm so as we go into the season of Bond I would like to say thank you to everyone this ride has been probably the most intriguing of any bond film to date with rumors of a new actor rumors of different direction and then the same direction etc Danny Boyle in then Danny Boyle our and now something none of us thought we would see in our life time An American Director... (which I like to think made Spielberg slightly annoyed)

    Over all we can all say a lot of things but the last 3 years have been anything but boring
    I don't know about everybody else, but I'd definitely trade all of this drama and excitement (and I'm sure we'll have more, just based on evidence to date) for a film released on time and within a 3 year timeframe at most going forward.
  • Posts: 17,301
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    I don’t know, I’m ready for a bit of a change. I wouldn’t mind a DAF type out of shape Bond. Something different and unexpected, especially for Craig’s Bond.

    -Diamonds-Are-Forever-james-bond-35262762-500-284.jpg

    If Craig in Bond 25 look anything like DAF Connery, I'll have a genuine laugh out loud moment! :D
    And Connery still looks more Bondian in that pic than Craig at his best. Just a testament to Connery being the real deal. Everyone else is an imitator. Only Moore can give Connery any serious competition when it comes to the ideal cinematic Bond.

    Moore is my favourite actually, and a big part of that is that he didn't try to copy Connery – he just went ahead and did it differently.
    Dalton is mine because he didn’t do what Connery or Moore did

    Shame he only did a couple of films!
    I don’t know, I’m ready for a bit of a change. I wouldn’t mind a DAF type out of shape Bond. Something different and unexpected, especially for Craig’s Bond.

    -Diamonds-Are-Forever-james-bond-35262762-500-284.jpg

    If Craig in Bond 25 look anything like DAF Connery, I'll have a genuine laugh out loud moment! :D
    And Connery still looks more Bondian in that pic than Craig at his best. Just a testament to Connery being the real deal. Everyone else is an imitator. Only Moore can give Connery any serious competition when it comes to the ideal cinematic Bond.

    Moore is my favourite actually, and a big part of that is that he didn't try to copy Connery – he just went ahead and did it differently.
    For me it’s really a toss-up between Connery and Moore. I guess it all depends on my mood. Though I’ll say that Connery in GF is the ultimate representation of 007, especially in that white dinner jacket. Will never be topped!

    Wouldn't argue with Connery being the ultimate representation of 007 in GF, but instead of the white dinner jacket, it's the navy blue suit he wears when he gets the Aston Martin that makes it the ultimate representation for me. Moore of course had the 70's fashion to "struggle" with.

    Makes me wonder how the tight-fitting suits of the Craig era will be looked upon in the future.



    Well with Dalton it’s a mixed bag for me his two films are near perfect but let’s look at the Craig era (or at least how I view it)

    Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace are top notch but Skyfall and Spectre are meh to worse true he could pull it out with Bond 25

    But the same thing nearly happened with Dalton

    I’m sorry but The Property of a Lady would of been abysmal Bond fighting a Sex-bot is all I need to know about the film to know it would of jumped the shark in a way that made Die another Day and Moonraker feel flemingesque

    What?! :-O
    00Agent wrote: »
    00Agent wrote: »
    Remington wrote: »
    It wasn't called The Property of A Lady. That's just a public rumour.
    I wonder how that rumor got started anyway. I still like to think that would have been the title.
    It's the usual criteria of biased Bond fans shoehorning unused Fleming titles. With the available premise of Dalton's unrealized third film, there's no indication how the title would compliment that treatment or the topic of the script in any way.
    Well, the Bond franchise was about to become the 'Property of a Lady' and that's probably as good as it'll ever get :))
    Finally, I saw the light. :))

    a5570d4d-3078-40a2-b294-e5dcc2553510_text_hi.gif
    Don't forget to wear sunglasses :)

    I know it would have been a left field choice (like Craig), but I sometimes wonder how Toby Stephens could have been as Bond (if not already having played a villain, of course).
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,983
    In hindsight, he would have ben a good choice and shouldn’t be judged by his role in DAD.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Didn't Stephens audition for CR, as well?
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,755
    Considering the lack of leaks/news, it's very hard to believe filming will start in just 92 days...

    I’m hoping we hear some info. this month. Hopefully by the end of December. Then again, with the holidays I could be completely wrong.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    Judging by Craig’s weight gain and the freshness of a new director I would say no news until March-May?

    Filming starts maybe in June? I think CF is used to the tv time frame so it wont take them long to film. We shall see..
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    edited December 2018 Posts: 1,755
    Judging by Craig’s weight gain and the freshness of a new director I would say no news until March-May?

    Filming starts maybe in June? I think CF is used to the tv time frame so it wont take them long to film. We shall see..

    Valid point. I’m even starting to wonder if filming will be delayed a few more months.
  • Posts: 17,301
    talos7 wrote: »
    In hindsight, he would have ben a good choice and shouldn’t be judged by his role in DAD.

    I think he did just alright i DAD. He played a nasty character just fine (and it wasn't that much to work with script-wise).
    Didn't Stephens audition for CR, as well?

    Did he? Would have been interesting with a former villain actor ending up playing the hero himself.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,983
    If it’s not effects heavy it could be a relatively fast period of principle photography, with a similar post production.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Didn't Stephens audition for CR, as well?
    Did he? Would have been interesting with a former villain actor ending up playing the hero himself.
    Ultimately, he did get to play Bond, after all. ;)

    Just not on the screen.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,040
    Judging by Craig’s weight gain and the freshness of a new director I would say no news until March-May?

    Filming starts maybe in June? I think CF is used to the tv time frame so it wont take them long to film. We shall see..

    Filming starts in March.
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,755
    Judging by Craig’s weight gain and the freshness of a new director I would say no news until March-May?

    Filming starts maybe in June? I think CF is used to the tv time frame so it wont take them long to film. We shall see..

    Filming starts in March.

    Filming is SUPPOSED to start in March. @CASINOROYALE may be correct in saying filming will start in June instead.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    talos7 wrote: »
    If it’s not effects heavy it could be a relatively fast period of principle photography, with a similar post production.

    I don’t see it being effects heavy, one thing I am worried about is CF’s lack of movie experience, especially with a huge budget. Hopefully he isnt overwhelmed. Storywise I am not worried.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Filming will start on 4 March 2019.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,040
    Filming will start on 4 March 2019.

    This.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,983
    talos7 wrote: »
    If it’s not effects heavy it could be a relatively fast period of principle photography, with a similar post production.

    I don’t see it being effects heavy, one thing I am worried about is CF’s lack of movie experience, especially with a huge budget. Hopefully he isnt overwhelmed. Storywise I am not worried.

    I wouldn’t be concerned; he has worked as a cinematographer and in other technical capacities. Jane Eyre is gorgeous. He’s a director with a strong technical pedigree.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I think we should keep in mind that it's quite possible the budget will be significantly scaled down this time around. All of the directors they were looking at (bar Villeneuve) weren't so experienced with big budgets, including Boyle, Demange, Layton, Clarkson etc.
Sign In or Register to comment.