It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
In SMALLVILLE there’s an episode where a vial of Clark’s blood is placed next to kryptonite and it literally starts boiling. THAT is how lethal kryptonite is supposed to be. Even if Superman were to lift an entire island made of Kryptonite he should have died right after. It felt like Bryan Singer wanted to have his cake and eat it too by using the famous “Superman is Dead” headline from the comics, but then immediately had him revive at the end looking just fine.
Well it depends, years ago people could tell a full story with interesting characters in well under 2hrs. The first 2 indiana jones films are under 2hrs and so are the first 3 Bond films. Star Wars is 121 minutes and Empire is 124 minutes, so from that perspective 2hrs to tell a Superman story should be plenty.
I do agree with how self-indulgent cinema has become since the millennium, its a bit of a worry the film could be overstuffed.