It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Having watched several interviews, Suter appears very comfortable with the media and comes off as charming and appropriately self deprecating; this would serve the franchise well. He definitely deserves a look.
Yeah I can see that too. I couldn't really find any other Bondian pics of him. He's normally got long hair and a beard in Vikings: Valhalla, he's the sole reason my Mrs has been watching the show honestly
Debbie also said so. It's the gravitas thing. 30-age Bond won't have the right feel. Next film needs to be massive.
It depends on the actor. Like I said, if they found an actor they liked, had the right gravitas, and embodied the part well who was in his 20s, they'd go for them.
Not that I disagree with this but we live in a time where,, for several reasons, 40 really is the new 30. . Actors are much more aware of fitness, diet and even skin care, so with that I think 40 is still viable.
The only thing I would disagree with here is the good Bondian look. He looks nothing like the traditional Bondian screen image, which arguably for most people is a cross between Brozza/Dalton/Connery and Laz - all tall, white, dark haired left parting, but with either blue eyes or brown eyes.
Craig doesn't even fit the traditional Bondian look, and Moore is a struggle too, despite other attributes they both brought to the role.
To me Sope would be a big no, because he doesn't tally with Fleming's original description. I still think that is the benchmark, the target, the blueprint - to physically resemble what Fleming wrote in the books. I know others will disagree, but hey ho.
I think Moore may have broken the mould back in the 70’s with his Sandy Brown Hair. He’s not exactly close in looks to Connery and Lazenby, and certainly was a far cry from looking like Fleming’s Bond. But Craig was a much further departure from the “Traditional Bond” looks.
Oh good, I was starting to think that I might be coming down with a syndrome where I see a resemblance to Sinatra in everyone I see.
The casting of a new Superman ranks up there with casting a new Bond ; you’ve got to get it right.
Edit: I’m wrong, it said he was up for Superman
“ Three are up for Clark Kent/Superman – Nicholas Hoult (“Mad Max: Fury Road”), David Corenswet (“Hollywood”) and Tom Brittney (“Grantchester”).”
2nd edit: Actually the May article did say Hoult was up for Luthor
“ There is one role that seems to be almost a lock and only has one name attached – Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor. Hoult was previously the runner-up to play Batman for Matt Reeves before Robert Pattinson was cast.”
Of the names contenders , David Corenswet stands out as far as looking the part.
I thought I remembered hearing that too, glad to know I'm not going insane.
There are potentially actors in their 20s who a) simply look a bit older and b) can convey the right amount of world weariness. Again, I’m being hypothetical though. Worth saying there has been a Bond to play the part in his 20s (Lazenby) so it’s possible.
To be fair to Craig he does have those icy blue eyes and cruel mouth which stand out so much about the literary Bond. So I never thought he was quite as ‘non-traditional’ as many have claimed. I’d argue Connery with his noticeable Scottish accent (and looks which aren’t comparable to Hoagey Carmichael) was slightly further away from Fleming’s Bond than Craig was in some weird way.
Well none of the Bond actors look like Hoagy Carmichael really. But at least the likes of Connery, Laz, Dalton, and Brosnan were closer to that description than both Moore and Craig were. That isn’t a put down on either of them as well, it’s great that while Moore and Craig don’t look like your “typical” Bond, they still inhibit all the necessary traits. I still buy Craig and Moore as Bond due to their acting skills. I agree about Craig’s features though. He does have that ‘cruel mouth’ Fleming describes in Casino Royale.
Craig looks closest to Hoagy Carmichael. I believe it's in part why he got the Bond role.
Not really sure how you are seeing Hoagy in Daniel Craig. Their face shapes and features are completely different. Craig's face is square shaped, whereas Hoagy's is long and slim.
Dalton is probably the closest.
He doesn't fit the Fleming look for Bond, but I think Sope has a Bondian look as far as he has a strong masculine look. An intensity and a brooding look. You could believe he was a Bond that had experience, who has lived, could be a womanizer.
Obviously not such a Fleming inspired look, but even Connery didn't fully posses that look. ;)