No Time to Die production thread

113141618191208

Comments

  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    Waltz has played such an iconic role in Basterds (still one of the greatest performances ever), that of course he would have had a hard time following that one up.

    But not even during the meeting with all them luxury cars he "scared" me.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,403
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    He wasn't given much to work with.
  • edited May 2019 Posts: 163
    Two things...

    I see A LOT of people saying that’s the same yacht from Casino Royale. It is NOT. Bond isn’t wealthy enough to purchase a yacht is he?

    Didn’t someone find out his Bond character was bringing in $60,000 a year? Something a long those lines?

    Is there actually any info on this? 60.000$ a year? I am aware that this is a fictional world, but the MI6 affords Aston Martins for Bond to crash and the man himself can’t even afford a Range Rover without a lease? Why doesn’t he just become a commercial flight pilot and make double that? He’s pretty good with planes

  • Posts: 4,400
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    He wasn't given much to work with.

    I feel the Waltz criticisms have been exaggerated.

    I think Mendes and Waltz deliberately made the decision to have a more restrained and subdued villain. In the previous film, Bardem played a much more flamboyant baddie and I think Mendes wanted to do the opposite of that.

    Interestingly, Waltz is known for playing flamboyant villains. In many respects, the part of Silva is more in his wheelhouse. Bardem is more known for playing restrained and menacing villains.

    So it’s commendable that Mendes tried to experiment and mix it up. In the case of Bardem it worked. With Waltz it didn’t. Though I feel the more cold and sociopathic Blofeld works well in the scene where he demonstrates his psychological theory between Bond and Madeleine: “Out of horror comes beauty”.


  • BennyBenny In the shadowsAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 14,864
    It's possible Waltz as Blofeld will have a part in B25. But it's not confirmed yet.
    Let's at least leave whether he was a good or bad part of SP out of this thread. Thanks.
  • Posts: 11,425
    Speaking of locations, won't this mark the fourth out of five DC Bond movies where 007 goes to Italy? I understand that Italy is a beautiful and cinematic country, but c'mon. There are so many locations that Bond has not traveled in the films (Australia and New Zealand, anyone?) so do we need to keep repeating the same ones?

    A minor gripe that does not mar my excitement, which is currently through the roof. The knowledge that a new Bond film is in production has me so elated.

    I think EON just like going to Italy!

    Who wouldn't?

    Whenever Purvis and Wade suggest a scene set in Italy it just gets green-lit immediately.
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    Posts: 2,541
    Didn't CJF laughed while saying "officially returning" in GoldenEye interview. I think there is still some chance that we get see some more characters who haven't been officially announced yet i.e Waltz Blofeld.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    edited May 2019 Posts: 4,554
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    He wasn't given much to work with.

    I feel the Waltz criticisms have been exaggerated.

    I think Mendes and Waltz deliberately made the decision to have a more restrained and subdued villain. In the previous film, Bardem played a much more flamboyant baddie and I think Mendes wanted to do the opposite of that.

    Interestingly, Waltz is known for playing flamboyant villains. In many respects, the part of Silva is more in his wheelhouse. Bardem is more known for playing restrained and menacing villains.

    So it’s commendable that Mendes tried to experiment and mix it up. In the case of Bardem it worked. With Waltz it didn’t. Though I feel the more cold and sociopathic Blofeld works well in the scene where he demonstrates his psychological theory between Bond and Madeleine: “Out of horror comes beauty”.


    Agreed. I don't recall Waltz's performance being a main criticism at the time; it's gained momentum as people keep "piling on." It went from bland to bad to really bad to the "worst" in a couple of years.
    Benny wrote: »
    It's possible Waltz as Blofeld will have a part in B25. But it's not confirmed yet.
    Let's at least leave whether he was a good or bad part of SP out of this thread. Thanks.

    Ooops. Duly noted.
  • Posts: 4,400
    TripAces wrote: »
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    He wasn't given much to work with.

    I feel the Waltz criticisms have been exaggerated.

    I think Mendes and Waltz deliberately made the decision to have a more restrained and subdued villain. In the previous film, Bardem played a much more flamboyant baddie and I think Mendes wanted to do the opposite of that.

    Interestingly, Waltz is known for playing flamboyant villains. In many respects, the part of Silva is more in his wheelhouse. Bardem is more known for playing restrained and menacing villains.

    So it’s commendable that Mendes tried to experiment and mix it up. In the case of Bardem it worked. With Waltz it didn’t. Though I feel the more cold and sociopathic Blofeld works well in the scene where he demonstrates his psychological theory between Bond and Madeleine: “Out of horror comes beauty”.


    Agreed. I don't recall Waltz's performance being a main criticism at the time; it's gained momentum as people keep "piling on." It went from bland to bad to really bad to the "worst" in a couple of years.

    I suspect it has something to do with the drought. The great benefit of a new director coming in, is that we will hopefully see a unique take on the “Bond villain”.

    In other news....Ana De Armas has returned to Spain to film “Wasp Network”. It has a very starry cast, so I’m unsure how large a role she plays.


    I believe they are shooting in Jamaica for three weeks with the principal cast. She could return later.
  • Posts: 1,453
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    He wasn't given much to work with.

    I feel the Waltz criticisms have been exaggerated.

    I think Mendes and Waltz deliberately made the decision to have a more restrained and subdued villain. In the previous film, Bardem played a much more flamboyant baddie and I think Mendes wanted to do the opposite of that.

    Interestingly, Waltz is known for playing flamboyant villains. In many respects, the part of Silva is more in his wheelhouse. Bardem is more known for playing restrained and menacing villains.

    So it’s commendable that Mendes tried to experiment and mix it up. In the case of Bardem it worked. With Waltz it didn’t. Though I feel the more cold and sociopathic Blofeld works well in the scene where he demonstrates his psychological theory between Bond and Madeleine: “Out of horror comes beauty”.


    I agree with much of what u are saying (God, we are in agreement!!!). I do think Waltz brought quite a low keep creepy vibe to the role, and I wonder if, after Blofeld has been incarcerated for nearly 5 years (if he indeed appears) what mental state he will be in. I could see Waltz playing him unhinged, seething with hate towards Bond, and therefore we see a far more vicious side to the man than we saw in SP.
  • edited May 2019 Posts: 832
    I really don’t buy his performance. Given his very limited screen time, it feels forced. And the pleasance scar was just embarrassing and out of place. Admittedly I expected more flamboyance, but I think that would have worked much better.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,964

    Am I wrong in recalling that there was tension between Waltz and Mendes?
    I tend to blame the director and material more than the actor; Waltz is capable of much stronger work .
  • skropper13skropper13 United States
    Posts: 117
    anybody been seeing the articles claiming the crew members hate working with Daniel? This is the first I'm hearing of him being difficult to work with. The stories made it sound like it's always been the case...
  • Posts: 75
    skropper13 wrote: »
    anybody been seeing the articles claiming the crew members hate working with Daniel? This is the first I'm hearing of him being difficult to work with. The stories made it sound like it's always been the case...

    Typical British gutter press - think the Sun published it first which says it all :)
  • Posts: 2,436
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    He wasn't given much to work with.

    I feel the Waltz criticisms have been exaggerated.

    I think Mendes and Waltz deliberately made the decision to have a more restrained and subdued villain. In the previous film, Bardem played a much more flamboyant baddie and I think Mendes wanted to do the opposite of that.

    Interestingly, Waltz is known for playing flamboyant villains. In many respects, the part of Silva is more in his wheelhouse. Bardem is more known for playing restrained and menacing villains.

    So it’s commendable that Mendes tried to experiment and mix it up. In the case of Bardem it worked. With Waltz it didn’t. Though I feel the more cold and sociopathic Blofeld works well in the scene where he demonstrates his psychological theory between Bond and Madeleine: “Out of horror comes beauty”.


    I think Craig is the best Bond and a good actor, but his acting in that scene is terrible.
  • matt_umatt_u better known as Mr. Roark
    Posts: 4,343
    Speaking of locations, won't this mark the fourth out of five DC Bond movies where 007 goes to Italy? I understand that Italy is a beautiful and cinematic country, but c'mon. There are so many locations that Bond has not traveled in the films (Australia and New Zealand, anyone?) so do we need to keep repeating the same ones?

    Venice, Matera, Rome, Lake Como, Siena etc etc. are all quite unique places, so I honestly don't see any "repetition". That is because Italy's cultural richness is so brilliant and diverse that is quite incomparable. Plus, in Italy movie production companies can take advantage of big financial incentives. Then of course the food is good. ;)

    BTW there is still a chance that the ancient town of Matera will double for another country, like it did a lot of times before.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    talos7 wrote: »
    Am I wrong in recalling that there was tension between Waltz and Mendes?
    I tend to blame the director and material more than the actor; Waltz is capable of much stronger work .

    Not tension so much, but if I remember correctly Waltz claimed he wasn’t given much in the way of direction.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    edited May 2019 Posts: 5,962
    I think Madeleine coming back points to Blofeld coming back too. But after the Sony leaks last time, they'll work hard to hide this fact.

    If I had to guess, Madeleine has a small role in B25. Too many other characters to introduce and develop.
  • Posts: 15,801
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    I think Charles Gray's Blofeld could kick Waltz' Blofeld's a$$.
    TBH I think Truman-Lodge or Boris could whip Waltz' Blofeld.
  • Posts: 4,599
    I doubt whether the line "No, Mr Bond, I expect you to die" would have become so iconic if it had been delivered whilst chatting in a corridor. Actors need something to get their teeth into. Zero tension in that scene.
  • Posts: 6,677
    patb wrote: »
    I doubt whether the line "No, Mr Bond, I expect you to die" would have become so iconic if it had been delivered whilst chatting in a corridor. Actors need something to get their teeth into. Zero tension in that scene.

    Well said. And that corridor scene is the worst scene in the entire film, IMO. Bland is not enough to describe it. It is cringeworthy.
  • ShardlakeShardlake Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 4,043
    RC7 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Am I wrong in recalling that there was tension between Waltz and Mendes?
    I tend to blame the director and material more than the actor; Waltz is capable of much stronger work .

    Not tension so much, but if I remember correctly Waltz claimed he wasn’t given much in the way of direction.

    Maybe Mendes thought he could just rely on the 2 times Oscar winning actor to come up with the goods on his own. I don't think it's the worst performance and Waltz got shackled with that bloody backstory, whereas Bardem got something much juicier.
    I think Mendes needs to accept quite a bit of the responsibility, Craig all so gave his most lacklustre performance of the series. Fiennes wasn't much better and only Wishaw seemed to shine.
    I think it comes down to Sam should have never returned, he was a one shot Bond director.
  • Posts: 4,619
    The sooner EON realizes that Blofeld is the single least interesting part of the Bond mythology, the better.
  • duke_togoduke_togo france
    Posts: 138
    Grace Jones is rumored to make a cameo in the movie; this rumor makes sense because Fukunaga already said that the first Bond movie that he saw as a kid was "A View To A Kill" and it kind of confirmed that Lashana Lynch will probably be a villainess à la May Day... also Lupita Nyong'o was probably envisaged for this same role...

    https://pagesix.com/2019/04/25/theres-already-trouble-in-paradise-on-new-james-bond-set/
  • edited May 2019 Posts: 1,661
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    He wasn't given much to work with.

    I feel the Waltz criticisms have been exaggerated.

    I think Mendes and Waltz deliberately made the decision to have a more restrained and subdued villain. In the previous film, Bardem played a much more flamboyant baddie and I think Mendes wanted to do the opposite of that.

    Interestingly, Waltz is known for playing flamboyant villains. In many respects, the part of Silva is more in his wheelhouse. Bardem is more known for playing restrained and menacing villains.

    So it’s commendable that Mendes tried to experiment and mix it up. In the case of Bardem it worked. With Waltz it didn’t. Though I feel the more cold and sociopathic Blofeld works well in the scene where he demonstrates his psychological theory between Bond and Madeleine: “Out of horror comes beauty”.


    I think Craig is the best Bond and a good actor, but his acting in that scene is terrible.

    I didn't think the acting was that bad, sounds fine to me, although Craig's posture - when they're looking at the monitor - looks a tad self-conscious, like he's trying to be too stoical and it come over stiff. I think Craig's all-time worst bit of dialogue is at the end of Skyfall when he says for a second time: "with pleasure." Sounds almost robotic. I've never seen a Bond actor more stiff than that. I reckon 'never acted before' George Lazenby would have said that line better.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,964
    duke_togo wrote: »
    Grace Jones is rumored to make a cameo in the movie; this rumor makes sense because Fukunaga already said that the first Bond movie that he saw as a kid was "A View To A Kill" and it kind of confirmed that Lashana Lynch will probably be a villainess à la May Day... also Lupita Nyong'o was probably envisaged for this same role...

    https://pagesix.com/2019/04/25/theres-already-trouble-in-paradise-on-new-james-bond-set/

    If there were a print copy of this it would be best suited on the bottom of my birds cage.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,554
    fanbond123 wrote: »
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    He wasn't given much to work with.

    I feel the Waltz criticisms have been exaggerated.

    I think Mendes and Waltz deliberately made the decision to have a more restrained and subdued villain. In the previous film, Bardem played a much more flamboyant baddie and I think Mendes wanted to do the opposite of that.

    Interestingly, Waltz is known for playing flamboyant villains. In many respects, the part of Silva is more in his wheelhouse. Bardem is more known for playing restrained and menacing villains.

    So it’s commendable that Mendes tried to experiment and mix it up. In the case of Bardem it worked. With Waltz it didn’t. Though I feel the more cold and sociopathic Blofeld works well in the scene where he demonstrates his psychological theory between Bond and Madeleine: “Out of horror comes beauty”.


    I think Craig is the best Bond and a good actor, but his acting in that scene is terrible.

    I didn't think the acting was that bad, sounds fine to me, although Craig's posture - when they're looking at the monitor - looks a tad self-conscious, like he's trying to be too stoical and it come over stiff. I think Craig's all-time worst bit of dialogue is at the end of Skyfall when he says for a second time: "with pleasure." Sounds almost robotic. I've never seen a Bond actor more stiff than that. I reckon 'never acted before' George Lazenby would have said that line better.

    I cringe at the "weeping blood" line in CR. Not only was it corny as hell, but so was DC's delivery of it. (And I say this loving DC and loving CR.)
  • Red_SnowRed_Snow Australia
    Posts: 2,495
    fanbond123 wrote: »
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.

    He wasn't given much to work with.

    I feel the Waltz criticisms have been exaggerated.

    I think Mendes and Waltz deliberately made the decision to have a more restrained and subdued villain. In the previous film, Bardem played a much more flamboyant baddie and I think Mendes wanted to do the opposite of that.

    Interestingly, Waltz is known for playing flamboyant villains. In many respects, the part of Silva is more in his wheelhouse. Bardem is more known for playing restrained and menacing villains.

    So it’s commendable that Mendes tried to experiment and mix it up. In the case of Bardem it worked. With Waltz it didn’t. Though I feel the more cold and sociopathic Blofeld works well in the scene where he demonstrates his psychological theory between Bond and Madeleine: “Out of horror comes beauty”.


    I think Craig is the best Bond and a good actor, but his acting in that scene is terrible.

    I didn't think the acting was that bad, sounds fine to me, although Craig's posture - when they're looking at the monitor - looks a tad self-conscious, like he's trying to be too stoical and it come over stiff. I think Craig's all-time worst bit of dialogue is at the end of Skyfall when he says for a second time: "with pleasure." Sounds almost robotic. I've never seen a Bond actor more stiff than that. I reckon 'never acted before' George Lazenby would have said that line better.

    I was always lead to believe that Craig being slightly off during that scene was due to the injury. He does have a slight awkwardness to his walk when they walk through the computer hall.
  • edited May 2019 Posts: 820
    patb wrote: »
    I doubt whether the line "No, Mr Bond, I expect you to die" would have become so iconic if it had been delivered whilst chatting in a corridor. Actors need something to get their teeth into. Zero tension in that scene.

    Huge tangent here (and I don't mean to derail the thread) but I always thought to myself there was a missed opportunity to include it in Skyfall. Now that film (IMO) balances perfectly on fan service so this may have been going too far, but I would have loved to try the ice lake confrontation at the end like this:

    Not really a

    (Silva shoot at Bond's feet, Bond stops, dialogue plays out the same -- Silva talks running around, jumping, mother's calling, etc.)

    Bond (mockingly):
    After all this, you expect me to talk?

    (Silva hesitates. And then Bond just bursts out laughing. Like Casino Royale torture scene laughing. Mocking. Basically ridiculing this villain who just simply won't shut up. Then Silva joins in. Tentatively. Not really sure why they're laughing. But now they're both laughing. In this ridiculous circumstance. And Silva's loving how weird it is, because he's weird like that).

    (And then mid-laugh, Bond pulls the rifle-spin move and the scene plays out identically. Including Silva's reaction. But as he walks away --)

    Silva:
    No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to die.

    ....I know, I know. Cheesy fan fiction garbage. But I'd love to see that take.




  • Posts: 4,400
    This photo was posted by Amer Yossef - a member of Cary's team. It was posted two hours ago in Port Antonio. Cary is in the middle, Linus is on the left and Cary's 1st AD Jon Mallard on the right.



    It looks as though filming is going strong in Jamaica.
Sign In or Register to comment.