It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The trouble with Norton is his soft voice, as you can hear here. I have no issues with his acting ability, though.
Agreed. Craig was a wildcard, for Bond number 7 I'd like a more traditional Bond. Cavill could be that now that he's looking more rugged. :D
After Craig, it’s got fail written all over it. You can do traditional, but you quite simply have to bring something more to the table these days and nothing I’ve seen suggests Cavill can or will do that.
I don’t know what, though? The guy has pretty much stated he’s in the business for the $$$, which is completely fine, but I don’t see what he’s bringing beyond looking like a generic video game Bond.
We may never know.
Hopefully.
Different strokes. :)>-
Jack O'Connell all the way boys. He might be shorter than the other Bond actors but hey, Craig was blonder than the rest and he turned out fine. I think someone like him would appeal more to Barbara than someone like Cavill too, he's a more realistic choice imo.
So is James Norton he is a very diverse young actor who can bring a lighter and more comical touch to the character yet balance out being both light hearted and serious at the same time plus he's only 33 and not very well known to broader audiences yet not too familiar with O'Connell except for 71 directed by would have been bond 25 director yann demange
What do you mean, was he moping around on set for 2 and a half hours or something? I'd be surprised because he's only ever seemed awesome to work with.
On the rise how? Craig starred in good films but they weren't box office smash hits and neither is he as a leading man. His Bond films BO takings are standard for a Bond film with the exception of SF and SP and it wasn't because of him that those 2 films made the money they did.
Norton is superb. Next to him, Cavill and Turner are wholly two-dimensional.
What everybody used to say when daniel craig was cast as bond
Not me, Craig looks way better than both of them.
As demonstrated in Flatliners (2017). He still sounds like a school prefect though, and his acting sends me to sleep. A huge swerve.
You must have skipped all the trailers? Because i bet you 10 Dollars Cavill will not make it out of that Movie alive.
Which would at least make him free for Bond.
They also went after Léa Seydoux just after she had a role in MI4.
This
That's a good point of course, but stranger things have happened in the movie business before, surely.