What Directors Should Helm A Bond Film?

1109110111112113115»

Comments

  • Posts: 6,195
    He was considered this time round wasn’t he?
    Think he may well have been second to Villeneuve if rumours are to be believed.

    I like Berger as a director. I’d be interested.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,342
    Berger has 2 projects in the works, "The Riders" starting Bard Pitt starts shooting next Feb, and then the film about the journalist stuck in Russian jail. He should be available right around the time Bond 27 begins development.
    007HallY wrote: »
    He was considered this time round wasn’t he?
    Think he may well have been second to Villeneuve if rumours are to be believed.

    I like Berger as a director. I’d be interested.

    I feel as though he could take what Villeneuve does and just oil the hinges and loosen things up a bit, at least looking at Ballard of a small player, I see the potential.
  • edited October 24 Posts: 6,195
    Berger does have a very darkly comedic streak in some of his works and a strong visual style. So yeah, I’m sure he could do something interesting with Bond, whatever that’ll be. It was him and Mark Mylod I was interested in for Bond 26. Both of whom I guess work with the current producers in some capacity now.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 2,208
    Wouldn't Berger likely develop the exact type of Bond movie the Wright stans don't want? Just funny that both suggestions came from the same person...
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,799
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Wouldn't Berger likely develop the exact type of Bond movie the Wright stans don't want? Just funny that both suggestions came from the same person...

    Yeah! My feeling as well. I mean Conclave and All Quiet aren’t exactly a ball of laughs…
  • Posts: 2,495
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Wouldn't Berger likely develop the exact type of Bond movie the Wright stans don't want? Just funny that both suggestions came from the same person...

    There are many different Bond films so technically you can hire very different directors.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    Posts: 1,149
    peter wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Wouldn't Berger likely develop the exact type of Bond movie the Wright stans don't want? Just funny that both suggestions came from the same person...

    Yeah! My feeling as well. I mean Conclave and All Quiet aren’t exactly a ball of laughs…

    …but Deutschland 83 was a pretty funny spy miniseries. He’s got range, and could go either way.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,799
    peter wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Wouldn't Berger likely develop the exact type of Bond movie the Wright stans don't want? Just funny that both suggestions came from the same person...

    Yeah! My feeling as well. I mean Conclave and All Quiet aren’t exactly a ball of laughs…

    …but Deutschland 83 was a pretty funny spy miniseries. He’s got range, and could go either way.

    Dunno 🤷, haven’t seen it. I’ve only watched his stuff that he’s recently done. Was it funny? I think the guy is an exceptional talent, with keen eye for cinematic imagery, but, at least in his recent work, it seems to shows a filmmaker exploring themes that are pretty deep and thought provoking. I never got a sense of him exactly being a ball of laughs. Nor the material he chooses.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    Posts: 1,149
    peter wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Wouldn't Berger likely develop the exact type of Bond movie the Wright stans don't want? Just funny that both suggestions came from the same person...

    Yeah! My feeling as well. I mean Conclave and All Quiet aren’t exactly a ball of laughs…

    …but Deutschland 83 was a pretty funny spy miniseries. He’s got range, and could go either way.

    Dunno 🤷, haven’t seen it. I’ve only watched his stuff that he’s recently done. Was it funny? I think the guy is an exceptional talent, with keen eye for cinematic imagery, but, at least in his recent work, it seems to shows a filmmaker exploring themes that are pretty deep and thought provoking. I never got a sense of him exactly being a ball of laughs. Nor the material he chooses.

    Deutschland 83 has a streak of black comedy running through it, though I wouldn’t go so far as to call it a comedy. I really liked. I think gallows humour works well for Bond, and Berger might well be a good fit, if he was interested. Of course you might be right in thinking he wouldn’t go for it at this stage of his career, though, not when he seems to be able to get funding for whatever he wants to shoot.

    If you could get any script of yours made, would you write a Bond film, or would you write something original?
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,799
    peter wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Wouldn't Berger likely develop the exact type of Bond movie the Wright stans don't want? Just funny that both suggestions came from the same person...

    Yeah! My feeling as well. I mean Conclave and All Quiet aren’t exactly a ball of laughs…

    …but Deutschland 83 was a pretty funny spy miniseries. He’s got range, and could go either way.

    Dunno 🤷, haven’t seen it. I’ve only watched his stuff that he’s recently done. Was it funny? I think the guy is an exceptional talent, with keen eye for cinematic imagery, but, at least in his recent work, it seems to shows a filmmaker exploring themes that are pretty deep and thought provoking. I never got a sense of him exactly being a ball of laughs. Nor the material he chooses.

    Deutschland 83 has a streak of black comedy running through it, though I wouldn’t go so far as to call it a comedy. I really liked. I think gallows humour works well for Bond, and Berger might well be a good fit, if he was interested. Of course you might be right in thinking he wouldn’t go for it at this stage of his career, though, not when he seems to be able to get funding for whatever he wants to shoot.

    If you could get any script of yours made, would you write a Bond film, or would you write something original?

    I would never want to write a Bond film.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 5,210
    peter wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Wouldn't Berger likely develop the exact type of Bond movie the Wright stans don't want? Just funny that both suggestions came from the same person...

    Yeah! My feeling as well. I mean Conclave and All Quiet aren’t exactly a ball of laughs…

    …but Deutschland 83 was a pretty funny spy miniseries. He’s got range, and could go either way.

    Dunno 🤷, haven’t seen it. I’ve only watched his stuff that he’s recently done. Was it funny? I think the guy is an exceptional talent, with keen eye for cinematic imagery, but, at least in his recent work, it seems to shows a filmmaker exploring themes that are pretty deep and thought provoking. I never got a sense of him exactly being a ball of laughs. Nor the material he chooses.

    Deutschland 83 has a streak of black comedy running through it, though I wouldn’t go so far as to call it a comedy. I really liked. I think gallows humour works well for Bond, and Berger might well be a good fit, if he was interested. Of course you might be right in thinking he wouldn’t go for it at this stage of his career, though, not when he seems to be able to get funding for whatever he wants to shoot.

    If you could get any script of yours made, would you write a Bond film, or would you write something original?

    I would never want to write a Bond film.

    I can’t fully believe that @peter you would at least want to share a few ideas, like me :)
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,799
    Hey @MaxCasino — hope you’re well!

    No, I’d never want to write a Bond film. Script doctoring, yeah. Absolutely. Writing one from scratch? Never. I couldn’t do it.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 5,210
    peter wrote: »
    Hey @MaxCasino — hope you’re well!

    No, I’d never want to write a Bond film. Script doctoring, yeah. Absolutely. Writing one from scratch? Never. I couldn’t do it.

    Thank you, I’m mostly well! As you said, maybe script doctoring, definitely tossing ideas out for use (as long as I get some form of credit). Other than that, I have a Bond short story in mind. I hope you are doing well yourself!
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,799
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    Hey @MaxCasino — hope you’re well!

    No, I’d never want to write a Bond film. Script doctoring, yeah. Absolutely. Writing one from scratch? Never. I couldn’t do it.

    Thank you, I’m mostly well! As you said, maybe script doctoring, definitely tossing ideas out for use (as long as I get some form of credit). Other than that, I have a Bond short story in mind. I hope you are doing well yourself!

    Keep writing, ✍️, Max. It’s a great exercise for the brain, and opens up that creativity!
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 5,210
    peter wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    Hey @MaxCasino — hope you’re well!

    No, I’d never want to write a Bond film. Script doctoring, yeah. Absolutely. Writing one from scratch? Never. I couldn’t do it.

    Thank you, I’m mostly well! As you said, maybe script doctoring, definitely tossing ideas out for use (as long as I get some form of credit). Other than that, I have a Bond short story in mind. I hope you are doing well yourself!

    Keep writing, ✍️, Max. It’s a great exercise for the brain, and opens up that creativity!

    Thank you for the encouragement @peter its always good to hear from you and your opinions, Bond or not.
  • Posts: 6,195
    peter wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Wouldn't Berger likely develop the exact type of Bond movie the Wright stans don't want? Just funny that both suggestions came from the same person...

    Yeah! My feeling as well. I mean Conclave and All Quiet aren’t exactly a ball of laughs…

    …but Deutschland 83 was a pretty funny spy miniseries. He’s got range, and could go either way.

    Dunno 🤷, haven’t seen it. I’ve only watched his stuff that he’s recently done. Was it funny? I think the guy is an exceptional talent, with keen eye for cinematic imagery, but, at least in his recent work, it seems to shows a filmmaker exploring themes that are pretty deep and thought provoking. I never got a sense of him exactly being a ball of laughs. Nor the material he chooses.

    Deutschland 83 has a streak of black comedy running through it, though I wouldn’t go so far as to call it a comedy. I really liked. I think gallows humour works well for Bond, and Berger might well be a good fit, if he was interested. Of course you might be right in thinking he wouldn’t go for it at this stage of his career, though, not when he seems to be able to get funding for whatever he wants to shoot

    Same for Patrick Melrose. And that’s a great way of putting it - that gallows humour could work for Bond. I’d be interested.

    Also writing (or doing anything) for Bond seems like a burden of a task, but a really compelling one. Not for the faint hearted, but probably an amazing experience for those who are lucky enough to be involved.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 5,210
    007HallY wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Wouldn't Berger likely develop the exact type of Bond movie the Wright stans don't want? Just funny that both suggestions came from the same person...

    Yeah! My feeling as well. I mean Conclave and All Quiet aren’t exactly a ball of laughs…

    …but Deutschland 83 was a pretty funny spy miniseries. He’s got range, and could go either way.

    Dunno 🤷, haven’t seen it. I’ve only watched his stuff that he’s recently done. Was it funny? I think the guy is an exceptional talent, with keen eye for cinematic imagery, but, at least in his recent work, it seems to shows a filmmaker exploring themes that are pretty deep and thought provoking. I never got a sense of him exactly being a ball of laughs. Nor the material he chooses.

    Deutschland 83 has a streak of black comedy running through it, though I wouldn’t go so far as to call it a comedy. I really liked. I think gallows humour works well for Bond, and Berger might well be a good fit, if he was interested. Of course you might be right in thinking he wouldn’t go for it at this stage of his career, though, not when he seems to be able to get funding for whatever he wants to shoot

    Same for Patrick Melrose. And that’s a great way of putting it - that gallows humour could work for Bond. I’d be interested.

    Also writing (or doing anything) for Bond seems like a burden of a task, but a really compelling one. Not for the faint hearted, but probably an amazing experience for those who are lucky enough to be involved.

    One thing that I noticed with Richard Maibaum was that for all of his ego and criticizing others, he really did have a passion for Bond. In his interviews, he didn’t hide his passion. You could tell that he truly enjoyed writing them (usually by himself, obviously). With interviews with Purvis and Wade, I don’t fully get that feeling, even with them both being big Fleming fans. Plus, some of their more recent comments make me feel like it’s time for them to move on. Even some big named authors have turned down writing a Bond novel because of the pressure and lack of creative control (Lee Child for one). For all we know, there could be a third writer with Steven Knight and Denis Villeneuve. Possibly for the next Bond movie after this one.
Sign In or Register to comment.