What Directors Should Helm A Bond Film?

1111112113114115117»

Comments

  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,976
    I have to say, let's wait and see what Villeneuve gives us first, though.
  • edited 5:22pm Posts: 6,245
    Berger's a talented director, yes. He's got an interesting perspective on American/British action films too as a German/going from interviews he's given about AQOTWF. Concave was a very stylish and tense film, and I've really enjoyed the dark humour and drama of Patrick Melrose. I know his latest film seems to have had mixed reviews, but I still need to check it out.

    If the stars align and he ever gets another chance at Bond, I'd be very interested. And I think whatever way they just need to get the best director they see fit based on pitches, meetings, prior work etc. (and that's not something I think we can really judge after a point, for all our talk about 'auteurs' or 'workmen').

    Spielberg would be less likely and I'm not sure if he'd even be interested.
    I have to say, let's wait and see what Villeneuve gives us first, though.

    Yep, agreed. I'm not his biggest fan, but he's an exceptionally talented filmmaker, and even rewatching Blade Runner I could see a lot in there that would suit Bond. Prisoners is an awesome film too. I'm cautious, but looking forward to what we get.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,807
    It’s absolutely nuts to think there’s not even a script for Bond 26 and an individual has already kinda/sorta/has judged an entire $250M film that doesn’t even exist. And that same person is proclaiming a completely different director (whom I loved two out of his last three films— Ballad of a Small Player was a clunker, imo), would be perfect for the film AFTER the film that hasn’t been made!!! That’s absolutely craaaazyyyyyy. And the unconscious entitlement…wait to see what they give us, and move from there. Honestly, I’ve never heard/seen this type of extreme pearl clutching before.

    In the end, these are movies. To entertain and have a little escape. This isn’t Gaza. Or Ukraine. Just live in the moment, and enjoy life, and the unraveling of a film…

    No one has any idea what Villeneuve will do. Will it be Sicario meets BR? The Arrival meets Prisoner? Or something completely off the wall like ENEMY— which is bat shit crazy (and I love it).

    But c’mon Mendes, calm down. Give the passive doom and gloom a rest. Just an utter kill joy.

    The sun comes up every day— enjoy that. Read a Fleming. Do what you said you were going to do: enjoy the Bond films you love. I’d much rather read your thoughts on those films. That’d be a nice change.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,976
    If Villeneuve opens Bond 26 with a big and inventive ski chase, then scuba diving action, he would immediately win Bond fans over. I think from his conversation with Nolan about Bond...few years back, Villeneuve knows what makes Bond work.
  • Posts: 6,245
    If Villeneuve opens Bond 26 with a big and inventive ski chase, then scuba diving action, he would immediately win Bond fans over. I think from his conversation with Nolan about Bond...few years back, Villeneuve knows what makes Bond work.

    Well, a memorable PTS at least should do it, surely? ;)

    I'm sure they'll be thinking about how to hook viewers into a new Bond (or Bond world). I'm sure they'll do it.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,976
    007HallY wrote: »
    If Villeneuve opens Bond 26 with a big and inventive ski chase, then scuba diving action, he would immediately win Bond fans over. I think from his conversation with Nolan about Bond...few years back, Villeneuve knows what makes Bond work.

    Well, a memorable PTS at least should do it, surely? ;)

    I'm sure they'll be thinking about how to hook viewers into a new Bond (or Bond world). I'm sure they'll do it.

    Yeah. Exactly.
Sign In or Register to comment.