Last Movie you Watched?

1101110121013101410151017»

Comments

  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 7,823
    THE GIRLFRIEND (2025)
    Fine. I enjoyed it and I thought it was overall rather well done. Nothing truly exceptional either though definitely good for a few lazy evenings.
  • Posts: 7,271
    As Bond, Pierce was often On Deadly Ground, and Steven was a bit of a Live Wire. However, Steven never went on a Quest for Camelot, and Pierce never traveled Into the Sun.
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,502
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    mattjoes wrote: »
    I'd check out Out for Justice or Exit Wounds for the closest to quality moviemaking as we commonly understand it. Executive Decision is even better, but he's not the lead. If you're looking for 100% pure Seagality, I'd check out On Deadly Ground. In other words, don't check it out.

    Definitely be checking out 'On Deadly Ground' then..

    :))

    I'm not sure if i've seen Executive Decision...
    Mate, the only good thing about 'Executive Decision' is that Seagal bows out early!!
    Can't stand the man!

    Yeah, i know he's bumped off early. Much to the horror of my late mother in-law who worshipped him! :)) But who's worse @Mathis1 Seagal or Brossa...? :D

    😂 Well they both have something in common, in that they're both wooden!! 😉
    Though Seagal is less smug, cos he has no expression at all 😁😁😁

    Love it mate 😆
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    edited September 23 Posts: 26,515
    mattjoes wrote: »
    As Bond, Pierce was often On Deadly Ground, and Steven was a bit of a Live Wire. However, Steven never went on a Quest for Camelot, and Pierce never traveled Into the Sun.

    Pierce did travel around the world in 80 days, which is almost as impressive as traveling into the sun.

    Brosnan%2B80%2BDays%2B2.jpg
    Pierce as Phileas Fogg.
  • redherringredherring Netherlands
    Posts: 22
    Watched Silkwood (1983) for the first time yesterday. I understand why the arguments in favor of nuclear energy are very appealing and I'm by no means an expert, but what her story (whole death mystery thing aside) and the Chernobyl disaster illustrate to me is that nuclear energy production is unsafe because it is sensitive to human error (if nothing else). By that I mean financial pressures that lead to cost cutting, mishandling toxic waste, the fight for water, sidestepping safety checks & regulations, etc. I'm sure practise has improve since then, but with the rise of governments in favor of deregulation, reduced corporate transparency & accountability and union busting, I can see this becoming a real problem rather than simply a case of 'the benefits outweighing the disadvantages'. I feel deeply for people living near things like AI datacenters or those in my own country, living in the toxic triangle between Schiphol, Tata Steel and the tulip fields, real people who have to pay for these advantages... or am I talking crazy here?
  • Posts: 1,800
    Summer Rental 3.5/6 , meh not that funny imo
    Cool Runnings , 4.5/6
    Watching Canadian Bacon now
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    edited September 26 Posts: 7,823
    CINEMA PARADISO (1988)
    (aka Nuovo Cinema Paradiso)
    Directed by Giuseppe Tornatore

    Cinema-Paradiso-Vintage-Movie-Poster-Original_f85c04c6_1024x1024.jpg?v=1755658909

    I think this is the most beautiful film I have ever seen.

    I just can't find the words. I'm utterly speechless. Honestly.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    edited September 26 Posts: 8,648
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    CINEMA PARADISO (1988)
    (aka Nuovo Cinema Paradiso)
    Directed by Giuseppe Tornatore

    Cinema-Paradiso-Vintage-Movie-Poster-Original_f85c04c6_1024x1024.jpg?v=1755658909

    I think this is the most beautiful film I have ever seen.

    I just can't find the words. I'm utterly speechless. Honestly.

    I absolutely love this film; I saw it upon its original U.S. release at an historic, single screen theater in New Orleans, the Prytania. Truly magical…
  • Posts: 8,551
    The ending brings a tear to my eye every time! Joyous film!
  • DwayneDwayne New York City
    Posts: 3,069
    Yeah, the ending of CINEMA PARADISO never fails to make me teary eyed. Even "The Simpsons" riff is breathtaking ...

  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited September 27 Posts: 24,956
    Another series I ploughed through last Summer involves children and an elusive entity walking behind the rows:

    C H I L D R E N . OF . T H E . C O R N

    popqmh88309f.jpg

    Average film quality: moderate
    Average (guilty) amusement factor: bad to moderate


    Let us bow our heads and give thanks to He Who Walks Behind The Rows, for without Him, we would never have been “blessed” with almost a dozen Children of the Corn movies. King wrote a short story, it was creepy, and somehow the world decided this was fertile ground for ten increasingly unhinged sequels and a Syfy remake.

    It all began with Disciples of the Crow (1983), a 19-minute short that proves you can tell this story in under the length of a Seinfeld episode. No filler, no tangents, no ancient symbols carved in rocks. Just a spooky little tale of kids murdering their parents for a Lovecraftian scarecrow. Tight, efficient, eerie. Nineteen minutes might be exactly how long this concept deserves before the corn starts to wilt.

    Then came Children of the Corn (1984), starring The Terminator’s Linda Hamilton, which dared to stretch the short story into a feature film. The result is a horror flick that’s more uncomfortable than terrifying, but it has just enough atmosphere to carve out a spot as a minor genre classic. I watch it every few years.

    1993 brought Children of the Corn II: The Final Sacrifice. The title’s optimism is almost sweet. This one leans hard into Native American mysticism as a last-ditch explanation, but the film takes itself so seriously that it drains any potential fun. Instead of spooky, it’s just tedious.

    Children of the Corn III: Urban Harvest (1995) picks things back up with Eli, a pint-sized prophet of doom in Chicago who manages to be both sinister and unintentionally hilarious. Look for an uncredited Charlize Theron in the background. Children of the Corn IV: The Gathering (1996) continues the streak, with Naomi Watts and Karen Black lending surprising gravitas. Creepy atmosphere and sinister vibes almost elevate it to respectability. Both films offer hope that the Corn series has finally found a template for sequels that are inventive, engaging, and not shackled too tightly to King’s original story.

    Unfortunately, the decline resumes with Children of the Corn V: Fields of Terror (1998), starring Eva Mendes, David Carradine, and Alexis Arquette. The film staggers between half-baked gore and bargain-bin camp, never finding its footing. Children of the Corn 666: Isaac’s Return (1999) sinks even lower. John Franklin comes back as Isaac, but the menace is gone. Nancy Allen and Stacey Keach turn up, but the film itself is eighty minutes of dimly lit nothing. The true horror here is how much it tests the viewer’s patience.

    Children of the Corn: Revelation (2001) at least tosses in Michael Ironside for a few minutes, along with Crystal Lowe’s two unforgettable contributions. A haunted apartment complex surrounded by corn is nonsense, but entertaining nonsense all the same. The film is almost Lynchian in its weirdly eerie vibes, which compensates for its lack of plot.

    2009’s Syfy remake, Children of the Corn, lands somewhere between exploitative and tedious. The image of Isaac directing ambushes from rooftops is entertaining, and "outlander" Burt’s PTSD adds flavour. Unfortunately, the constant screaming and bickering between Burt and his wife drags the film down. Kandyse McClure, generally not a bad actress, hits a career low here. The caustic accusations she spits at her husband are made even worse by her painful overacting. A particularly grim child-death scene turns the film into an unpleasant ride. Yet messy as it is, it’s still not the worst of the bunch.

    Children of the Corn: Genesis (2011) barely qualifies as part of the series. Two unlucky travellers end up at Billy Drago’s creepy house, and the film proceeds to do almost nothing with the setup. The climax suddenly veers into a random car pile-up, as if footage from another movie had been spliced in. There’s hardly any corn, no genesis, and no reason for this entry to exist.

    2018’s Children of the Corn: Runaway at least attempts something new. A former cult child grappling with her past while protecting her son is a compelling idea, and the film takes its script seriously. It isn’t great, but it feels like the writers were actually trying instead of phoning it in.

    Finally, 2020’s Children of the Corn attempts to modernise the original story but quickly collapses into slasher clichés, gratuitous sadism, and an ill-fated attempt to set up sequels. Callan Mulvey and Bruce Spence give the material more effort than it deserves, but the result is still a field of clichés rather than a harvest of terror.

    So there it is: nearly a dozen trips through the rows, ranging from “surprisingly okay” to “why was this made?” Watching the entire series is like surviving the harvest itself: you come out the other side traumatised, but with a strange fascination with how a Stephen King short story was turned into a film series that so far has spawned 11 feature-length entries. Here's how I rate them:
    1. COTC III
    2. Disciples of the Crow (short)
    3. COTC IV
    4. COTC Runaway
    5. COTC (1984)
    6. COTC Revelation
    7. COTC (2009)
    8. COTC (2020)
    9. COTC V
    10. COTC Genesis
    11. COTC II
    12. COTC 666

    Should you watch these films?

    Let us say thanks
    To He Who Walks Behind The Rows
    Too many films
    But scary kids and crows
    Some are good
    But there are blows
    Yet at least overall
    There are a few good shows
  • K2WIK2WI Europe
    Posts: 66
    Paul Thomas Anderson’s latest, One Battle After Another.

    Might be my favourite film of 2025. 162 minutes that just flew by with nary a drag. Terrific performances all-around. A lot of lines and scenes that had myself and the rest of the audience howling with laughter.
  • Posts: 12,864
    K2WI wrote: »
    Paul Thomas Anderson’s latest, One Battle After Another.

    Might be my favourite film of 2025. 162 minutes that just flew by with nary a drag. Terrific performances all-around. A lot of lines and scenes that had myself and the rest of the audience howling with laughter.

    Great to hear! I’m so excited for this one - going to try to see it next week.
  • Posts: 2,234
    Lamborghini: A story about everything but the cars. Apparently the production budget could only allow for a couple of Lambo cameos. But if you want to see a lot of smoking, girlfriends, and a tractor, this is a movie for you.
  • Posts: 12,864
    L.A. Confidential (1997), for the first time. Absolutely amazing movie. About as good as it gets, in fact.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 7,823
    PHENOMENA (1985)
    Directed by Dario Argento

    6427.jpg?cb=1729952221

    Another visual triumph from the man who makes horror look like paintings.
    Great soundtrack too, and a few Bond alumni co-starring next to a superb Jennifer Connolly: YOLT's Donald Pleasence and AVTAK's Patrick Bauchau.
    I also noted Giorgio Armani being credited as the designer of styled clothing.
    All in all, an Argento in good form, which is always a treat for horror fans.
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,502
    FoxRox wrote: »
    L.A. Confidential (1997), for the first time. Absolutely amazing movie. About as good as it gets, in fact.

    Agreed. A first rate film with an amazing cast!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,502
    Executive Decision (1996)

    Can't believe i have never seen this before, especially as it came out when i was a very active cinema goer.

    Really enjoyed it! Kept me engrossed from beginning to end. Are there any films this gripping these days..?

    As a cross between Die Hard and Airport 77 this works supremely well as each obstacle for the rescuers gets increasingly more difficult.

    It helps that it has a capable director in Stuart Baird, who has since edited Casino Royale and Skyfall (Wonder why he was never offered the Bond gig?)

    I've read at least 3 different versions as to why Steven Seagal only has a limited role or is absent from the opening credits. So i have no idea of the actual truth...
  • Posts: 8,551
    Executive Decision (1996)

    Can't believe i have never seen this before, especially as it came out when i was a very active cinema goer.

    Really enjoyed it! Kept me engrossed from beginning to end. Are there any films this gripping these days..?

    As a cross between Die Hard and Airport 77 this works supremely well as each obstacle for the rescuers gets increasingly more difficult.

    It helps that it has a capable director in Stuart Baird, who has since edited Casino Royale and Skyfall (Wonder why he was never offered the Bond gig?)

    I've read at least 3 different versions as to why Steven Seagal only has a limited role or is absent from the opening credits. So i have no idea of the actual truth...

    Obvious mate....he's rubbish 😂😂😂
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,956
    Executive Decision (1996)

    Can't believe i have never seen this before, especially as it came out when i was a very active cinema goer.

    Really enjoyed it! Kept me engrossed from beginning to end. Are there any films this gripping these days..?

    As a cross between Die Hard and Airport 77 this works supremely well as each obstacle for the rescuers gets increasingly more difficult.

    It helps that it has a capable director in Stuart Baird, who has since edited Casino Royale and Skyfall (Wonder why he was never offered the Bond gig?)

    I've read at least 3 different versions as to why Steven Seagal only has a limited role or is absent from the opening credits. So i have no idea of the actual truth...

    Read Seagalogy, one of my favourite books ever. Everything you need to know about the man with the ponytail is in there. 😊
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,648
    Executive Decision (1996)

    Can't believe i have never seen this before, especially as it came out when i was a very active cinema goer.

    Really enjoyed it! Kept me engrossed from beginning to end. Are there any films this gripping these days..?

    As a cross between Die Hard and Airport 77 this works supremely well as each obstacle for the rescuers gets increasingly more difficult.

    It helps that it has a capable director in Stuart Baird, who has since edited Casino Royale and Skyfall (Wonder why he was never offered the Bond gig?)

    I've read at least 3 different versions as to why Steven Seagal only has a limited role or is absent from the opening credits. So i have no idea of the actual truth...

    I actually think he was utilized as intended, and it was brilliant.

  • Posts: 7,271
    Executive Decision (1996)

    Can't believe i have never seen this before, especially as it came out when i was a very active cinema goer.

    Really enjoyed it! Kept me engrossed from beginning to end. Are there any films this gripping these days..?

    As a cross between Die Hard and Airport 77 this works supremely well as each obstacle for the rescuers gets increasingly more difficult.

    It helps that it has a capable director in Stuart Baird, who has since edited Casino Royale and Skyfall (Wonder why he was never offered the Bond gig?)

    I've read at least 3 different versions as to why Steven Seagal only has a limited role or is absent from the opening credits. So i have no idea of the actual truth...

    Seagull had to fly.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    edited September 30 Posts: 14,271
    It was a well done twist. You see Sensei Sevenchins as a Gravy Seal, and you just assume he's the hero. He exited the film with a speed that's rarely seen these days.
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 26,515
    FoxRox wrote: »
    L.A. Confidential (1997), for the first time. Absolutely amazing movie. About as good as it gets, in fact.

    Wow at it being your first time watch, L.A. Confidential arguably the best film made in the 90's I rate it in the same bracket as other Neo Noir classics like Chinatown.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,648
    I think there is too much fixation on the specific actor; any established "action hero" would have been excellent in the role. Picture Clint Eastwood, Bruce Willis or Stallone in the same role. It's not so much Seagal the actor/man; it's the persona that sells the plot device; that creates a great deal of tension for what follows.
  • Posts: 12,864
    FoxRox wrote: »
    L.A. Confidential (1997), for the first time. Absolutely amazing movie. About as good as it gets, in fact.

    Wow at it being your first time watch, L.A. Confidential arguably the best film made in the 90's I rate it in the same bracket as other Neo Noir classics like Chinatown.

    It doesn’t surpass Chinatown for me, but it is in its league, which is pretty much the highest praise I could give any movie. There’s still some classics here and there I haven’t seen yet, but I’m hoping to cross them all off in due time!
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    edited September 30 Posts: 18,004
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    chrisisall wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    Anora (2024)
    Woman of the Hour (2023)

    Both excellent, imo.

    Anora is fantastic! Saw it, loved it.

    I just ordered a copy on blu ray- I trust you Darth!

    Ow, well. I hope you won't be disappointed then. 😉

    Sincere thanks for your recommendation on Anora, DD. I just watched it, and in the first few minutes I felt like I was watching a Showgirls clone, but it quickly became a much more nuanced & fascinating immersion into this girl's life & emotions.... not sure how feminists would perceive it, and not gonna show it to my Wife, but it actually elicited a few tears here & there. And some laughs... the NY locations were especially interesting to me, having lived there. What an asymmetrically masterful piece of work...
Sign In or Register to comment.