Who should/could be a Bond actor?

1129512961297129812991301»

Comments

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,805
    LucknFate wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »

    That's very interesting, thank you; it's a bit murky to try and figure out where they're getting that from, but the actor is so obscure that I tend to believe it.
    The most interesting part really is that they're testing actors (although it's unclear when this happened I guess); not entirely surprising I suppose, but heartening to know it's actually happening.

    It's in the mag issue that's printed, so THR have likely known about it for at least a few days/weeks.

    His Insta shows him very fit and much slimmer than that THR pic currently.

    Oh yeah, I should have read a bit closer, it actually says late June!
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »

    That's very interesting, thank you; it's a bit murky to try and figure out where they're getting that from, but the actor is so obscure that I tend to believe it.
    The most interesting part really is that they're testing actors (although it's unclear when this happened I guess); not entirely surprising I suppose, but heartening to know it's actually happening.

    Oh good, the eighth choice for Bond has supposedly auditioned. Incidentally If he becomes Bond I’ll happily be wrong!

    Heh! The eighth choice? How do you mean? :)
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,554
    If it's true that Scott Rose-Marsh was tested, I find it depressing.
  • edited August 13 Posts: 5,744
    mtm wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »

    That's very interesting, thank you; it's a bit murky to try and figure out where they're getting that from, but the actor is so obscure that I tend to believe it.
    The most interesting part really is that they're testing actors (although it's unclear when this happened I guess); not entirely surprising I suppose, but heartening to know it's actually happening.

    It's in the mag issue that's printed, so THR have likely known about it for at least a few days/weeks.

    His Insta shows him very fit and much slimmer than that THR pic currently.

    Oh yeah, I should have read a bit closer, it actually says late June!
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »

    That's very interesting, thank you; it's a bit murky to try and figure out where they're getting that from, but the actor is so obscure that I tend to believe it.
    The most interesting part really is that they're testing actors (although it's unclear when this happened I guess); not entirely surprising I suppose, but heartening to know it's actually happening.

    Oh good, the eighth choice for Bond has supposedly auditioned. Incidentally If he becomes Bond I’ll happily be wrong!

    Heh! The eighth choice? How do you mean? :)

    Just a way of saying he may not be the top contender or the one who gets it, even if he’s been invited to audition via tape (which is very much a first line thing anyway, especially for untested candidates - that’s how Sam Worthington and Anthony Starr got ousted from the candidate list).

    I mean, CR supposedly has 200 potential names at the start, even if Craig was supposedly the favourite. They’ll go through these guys.
  • Posts: 464
    It's Chalamet it's a given. You guys image of Bond is of the past. The current rights owners don't care about the past, they want Gen Z bums in seats. Crypto money story, influencer as James Bond Woman, Dubai parties and cities, selfies and making money by putting videos online and becoming instant millionaires. It's either Chalamet or Taron Egerton but Taron is too masculine, they are going to go with Chalamet (also because he is easy going and has a relationship working with the director). It's a slam dunk. Bond that we loved died in No Time to Die, it's time to deal with it.
  • Posts: 5,744
    Stamper wrote: »
    It's Chalamet it's a given. You guys image of Bond is of the past. The current rights owners don't care about the past, they want Gen Z bums in seats. Crypto money story, influencer as James Bond Woman, Dubai parties and cities, selfies and making money by putting videos online and becoming instant millionaires. It's either Chalamet or Taron Egerton but Taron is too masculine, they are going to go with Chalamet (also because he is easy going and has a relationship working with the director). It's a slam dunk. Bond that we loved died in No Time to Die, it's time to deal with it.

    Don’t take this the wrong way, but I feel you’re either a similar influencer bro living in Dubai to what you describe in your posts, or a guy living in your mum’s basement. No inbetween 😂
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,805
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »

    That's very interesting, thank you; it's a bit murky to try and figure out where they're getting that from, but the actor is so obscure that I tend to believe it.
    The most interesting part really is that they're testing actors (although it's unclear when this happened I guess); not entirely surprising I suppose, but heartening to know it's actually happening.

    It's in the mag issue that's printed, so THR have likely known about it for at least a few days/weeks.

    His Insta shows him very fit and much slimmer than that THR pic currently.

    Oh yeah, I should have read a bit closer, it actually says late June!
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »

    That's very interesting, thank you; it's a bit murky to try and figure out where they're getting that from, but the actor is so obscure that I tend to believe it.
    The most interesting part really is that they're testing actors (although it's unclear when this happened I guess); not entirely surprising I suppose, but heartening to know it's actually happening.

    Oh good, the eighth choice for Bond has supposedly auditioned. Incidentally If he becomes Bond I’ll happily be wrong!

    Heh! The eighth choice? How do you mean? :)

    Just a way of saying he may not be the top contender or the one who gets it, even if he’s been invited to audition via tape (which is very much a first line thing anyway, especially for untested candidates - that’s how Sam Worthington and Anthony Starr got ousted from the candidate list).

    I mean, CR supposedly has 200 potential names at the start, even if Craig was supposedly the favourite. They’ll go through these guys.

    Oh yeah absolutely, if this story is true then he's one of dozens if not hundreds, as you say. I'm not particularly interested in this guy, I think the interesting thing is that they're actively looking at people now; and not just the big stars. Although I think they'd look at everyone anyway just to do a thorough job. As you say, they did the same when they were looking for Bond#6 even though they had their sights on Craig the whole time.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 2,044
    Strangely, his name came up on the books back in July! Do we have our man all of a sudden? https://screenrant.com/james-bond-26-007-actor-scott-rose-marsh-betting-odds/
  • edited August 13 Posts: 5,744
    If it’s him, hats off to the guy. But I think there’s a very big list and his name is one of many. Statistically (and frankly from what I’ve seen of him) I’ll say it’s unlikely to be him. But you never know.
    mtm wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »

    That's very interesting, thank you; it's a bit murky to try and figure out where they're getting that from, but the actor is so obscure that I tend to believe it.
    The most interesting part really is that they're testing actors (although it's unclear when this happened I guess); not entirely surprising I suppose, but heartening to know it's actually happening.

    It's in the mag issue that's printed, so THR have likely known about it for at least a few days/weeks.

    His Insta shows him very fit and much slimmer than that THR pic currently.

    Oh yeah, I should have read a bit closer, it actually says late June!
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »

    That's very interesting, thank you; it's a bit murky to try and figure out where they're getting that from, but the actor is so obscure that I tend to believe it.
    The most interesting part really is that they're testing actors (although it's unclear when this happened I guess); not entirely surprising I suppose, but heartening to know it's actually happening.

    Oh good, the eighth choice for Bond has supposedly auditioned. Incidentally If he becomes Bond I’ll happily be wrong!

    Heh! The eighth choice? How do you mean? :)

    Just a way of saying he may not be the top contender or the one who gets it, even if he’s been invited to audition via tape (which is very much a first line thing anyway, especially for untested candidates - that’s how Sam Worthington and Anthony Starr got ousted from the candidate list).

    I mean, CR supposedly has 200 potential names at the start, even if Craig was supposedly the favourite. They’ll go through these guys.

    Oh yeah absolutely, if this story is true then he's one of dozens if not hundreds, as you say. I'm not particularly interested in this guy, I think the interesting thing is that they're actively looking at people now; and not just the big stars. Although I think they'd look at everyone anyway just to do a thorough job. As you say, they did the same when they were looking for Bond#6 even though they had their sights on Craig the whole time.

    They’d be stupid not to cast a wide net. If they have their sight on a Callum Turner or Harris Dickinson and can’t get them, they need other options. Plus you never know who could shine through.

    Personally though, I believe they’ll ultimately go for a more established actor a la Craig. He seems an interesting guy though (apparently worked in a call centre before coming into acting, which is quite cool).
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited August 13 Posts: 18,805
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Strangely, his name came up on the books back in July! Do we have our man all of a sudden? https://screenrant.com/james-bond-26-007-actor-scott-rose-marsh-betting-odds/

    I guess that's after he sent his tape in (today's story said he did that in late June) so the source for both stories may well be the same. It could be that he told a mate of his in June, that mate told some other mates, they put bets on him being 007, the bookies noticed that and it became a story on screenrant in July. But him or his agent being loose-lipped about it also became known to this THR reporter this week so this story appears.
    That his name has come up twice just means that he or his agent have been more indiscreet than all the other guys who have been testing.
  • Posts: 427
    Venutius wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    I really don't see much Bond in this guy.
    So, the guy on the right doesn't look like James Bond...

    SeanConneryAdrianPaul.jpg

    But these guys do?
    british-1.jpg?w=1000&h=576&crop=1
    Really?

    If they chose Bond actors based on Bond style photo shoots I don't think they would do very well.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,768
    Just clone Hoagy Carmichael and call it a day
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 3,320
    Callum Turner vaguely has something of the Hoagy look about him in some shots, tbf!

    another-pitch-for-callum-turner-v0-87zurdse6qpc1.jpeg?width=1707&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7f63a55e8a0c2c6a5ebde5f74bd43656624112a8
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    edited August 13 Posts: 8,554
    I think the "Hoagy Carmichael" standard needs to be left in the past
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,397
    talos7 wrote: »
    I think the "Hoagy Carmichael" standard needs to be left the past

    Agreed. Is it so hard to find an actor who could easily embody this?
    rSbqE0y.jpg
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,844
    Rose-Marsh feels like one that fits into the "we tested 100's of actors" category. With all due respect to him he's been in nothing. I think the leak has come from his agent to boost his profile.

    With hiring Villeneuve to direct and Knight to write, I think them two alone will have their own pull to bring in a strong calibre of actor.

    If I were to guess, I think they'll hire an actor with a similar career to Daniel in 2005, perhaps with more Television/streaming series under their belt, as the gap between film and TV is much smaller than it was in 2005
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 421
    I love those screentests from Cavill, Worthington, Friend and Starr.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 421
    I would have picked all of them before Craig.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 421
    Cavill looked the part but i think Friends acting was better.
  • Posts: 2,313
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    Rose-Marsh feels like one that fits into the "we tested 100's of actors" category. With all due respect to him he's been in nothing. I think the leak has come from his agent to boost his profile.

    With hiring Villeneuve to direct and Knight to write, I think them two alone will have their own pull to bring in a strong calibre of actor.

    If I were to guess, I think they'll hire an actor with a similar career to Daniel in 2005, perhaps with more Television/streaming series under their belt, as the gap between film and TV is much smaller than it was in 2005

    He's 37, so I guess other older actors are getting their chance
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 421
    From those screentests my list would have gone:

    1. Friend.

    2. Cavill.

    3. Starr.

    4. Worthington.

  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 421
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    Rose-Marsh feels like one that fits into the "we tested 100's of actors" category. With all due respect to him he's been in nothing. I think the leak has come from his agent to boost his profile.

    With hiring Villeneuve to direct and Knight to write, I think them two alone will have their own pull to bring in a strong calibre of actor.

    If I were to guess, I think they'll hire an actor with a similar career to Daniel in 2005, perhaps with more Television/streaming series under their belt, as the gap between film and TV is much smaller than it was in 2005

    He's 37, so I guess other older actors are getting their chance
    I think 37 is pretty much perfect age to start.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 421
    Tom Brittney, 34, is set for the co-lead opposite J.K. Simmons in MGM's new crime gang series The Westies. This could potentially give his profile a massive boost, especially in the US. The downside I suppose would be that his commitment to the series could rule him out of any Bond involvement.

    5c3674825fd6eb000e3ba322
    Perfect age and looks the part but can he act?
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 421
    Jonah Hauer-King hasn't been mentioned for a while and he fits the 30 and under, with major film experience criteria. He seems older, more manly than I remember and is certainly handsome, although perhaps lacks an edge. Ironically, he's making a film with Leo Suter at the moment called The Face Of Horror, however that film looks unlikely to catapult either into the big league. He also has Kathryn Bigelow's House Of Dynamite with Idris Elba and Rebecca Ferguson coming up which looks more promising.

    My top five for a young Bond in no particular order -

    Leo Suter
    Harry Lawtey
    Tom Blyth
    Jonah Hauer-King
    Harris Dickinson






    Screentest material for sure.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,805
    MSL49 wrote: »
    Cavill looked the part but i think Friends acting was better.

    Watching Friend in Jurassic World Rebirth it's not too hard to imagine him as a decent Bond.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 421
    I think what we need is more traditionally looking actor for the role like Hauer-King.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 3,320
    Murdock wrote: »
    Is it so hard to find an actor who could easily embody this?

    rSbqE0y.jpg
    Here you go:
    601bcdec0b288af8b9f39679d16466f9.jpg
    ;)
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,554
    Paul is such an interesting case. I am a big fan of Highlander:the series; years 2 through 4 are Highlander, film or tv, at its best. He was very good as Duncan Macleod and it’s easy to see why many saw his potential a Bond; but ultimately it was the only role in which he was any good.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited 1:19pm Posts: 3,320
    Afraid so. Such a shame. Band of Brothers from that first series was as good as any of the film sequels. There were all kinds of press rumours over the years: that Cubby had spotted Adrian Paul in Last Rites and had his eye on him as a future Bond, that he'd auditioned for GE, that he was Cubby's favourite to replace Brosnan, etc, but a couple of years back Adrian himself said that the nearest he got was when Barbara Broccoli asked him in for a meeting and it 'didn't go very well' because he said that he only liked the Connery films! Oops.
  • RyanRyan Canada
    Posts: 772
    MSL49 wrote: »
    From those screentests my list would have gone:

    1. Friend.

    2. Cavill.

    3. Starr.

    4. Worthington.

    I agree with this. I might even put Starr above Cavill, who I thought was just okay. Friend was a real surprise to me. I would have never considered him in my head as a Bond, but the screen test was excellent in my view. The best of the four.
Sign In or Register to comment.