Who should/could be a Bond actor?

16466476496516521194

Comments

  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    Benny wrote: »
    I think it's pretty clear that Nicholas Hoult is the best choice to take on the role of James Bond after Daniel Craig departs the role.
    7vsbgdj3nl3j.jpg

    He's a very talented young actor, who hasn't quite made the break through into leading man status. He's also just under the radar as a household name, though well known enough to immediately be acceptable in the role. That is of course, if he would want the role.
    He's got to be a favourite.

    He’s not my favourite. But the arguments for him are certainly sensible. Looks-wise he needs to ‘age’ a bit first.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 15,063
    mtm wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Denbigh wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Hoult's face still looks very young to me, if one get's what i mean.

    Which is perfect; If he starts his tenure in 5 years he will have a bit more maturity to his look, but will be in a position to stay in the role for some time.

    The big problem with that is we don't know if he might mature in 5 years, it's just an assumption. He may or may not, which is why i can't say that for sure at the moment. My opinion might change in 5 yrs but i can't see him at the moment.
    With that said, if the want to do an established Bond , who is still early in his career...
    I do think this is the best move for the next era. They need really freshen things up for the next film.

    The biggest 'refresh' they could do is to actually start making and releasing some films. The contract should be three films in 6 years, with a planned outline of where the story could go and the overall tone (and still be relatively standalone), and with options of extending the contract after that.

    A big yes to this; there needs to be a vision, a blueprint for the course of the next incarnation.

    The blue print is Fleming surely. Like the Dalton era.

    Two of the bottom three least successful Bond movies. Surely not.

    Would those films be as unsuccessful if they were being released now, though? The straighter approach seems to have worked pretty well with Daniel Craig, despite a couple of creative hiccups.

    I don’t know if there’s much reason to think they would be. The Craig films are a different mix, and if the advice is to change the course of the Bond films by doing what the Craig ones are doing then it’s not much of a change :)

    I agree, there's no reason to think they would be unsuccessful now.

    Sorry, no; I wasn’t clear- I mean there’s no reason to think they’d be more successful now.
    A question though; if the Craig films are a different mix (I agree, they are; the straightness I refer to above is mainly in terms of atmosphere and attitude rather than story, which people seem to appreciate) to the more directly Fleming-inspired Dalton ones, how would that not be a change? Surely it would be?

    I don’t really follow? They’re making the Craig films at the moment: making the next films in the vein of the Craig ones wouldn’t seem like a change to me.
    I’m not saying there has to be a change, but that’s what the conversation was.

    Personally I wouldn’t mind them being slightly lighter.
  • JeremyBondonJeremyBondon Seeking out odd jobs with Oddjob @Tangier
    Posts: 1,318
    7vsbgdj3nl3j.jpg

    'The name's Bond, Jamie Bond'

  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    7vsbgdj3nl3j.jpg

    'The name's Bond, Jamie Bond'

    That’s what I meant about him needing to ‘age’......quite a bit.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited June 2020 Posts: 5,869
    Sorry I’d still prefer Callum I think - has more of an edge in my books.

    Also members need to stop trying to over police this site, just let people talk about their opinions. If they’re not antagonising anyone or presenting their opinion as fact, what’s the problem?
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,046
    mtm wrote: »
    I don’t really follow? They’re making the Craig films at the moment: making the next films in the vein of the Craig ones wouldn’t seem like a change to me.
    I’m not saying there has to be a change, but that’s what the conversation was.

    Personally I wouldn’t mind them being slightly lighter.

    I don't think they would really be in the vein of the Craig films as we'd be "going back to Fleming". Beyond CR, which will likely be almost twenty years ago when the new Bond arrives, there's been little to no Fleming in his films. There's about as much influence from the novels in SP (and NTTD, by the looks of it so far) as there was in something like TWINE.
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Agreed. It also worked with the early Connery’s. Even today, many fans both young and old, both enthusiasts and casual viewers name the early Connery’s as the highlights of the series.

    Yes, that's true, though it's usually along with Casino Royale and Skyfall, in fairness! Those two still have a very firm grip on people's minds.
    suavejmf wrote: »
    7vsbgdj3nl3j.jpg

    'The name's Bond, Jamie Bond'

    That’s what I meant about him needing to ‘age’......quite a bit.

    A few years is a long time. Just look at 2020 all by itself!

    I think beyond Hoult, who has taken the stage as he's the most recent suggestion, I still quite like the idea of Richard Madden for the part. The idea took root during Bodyguard and hasn't left my mind yet.

    ?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F71%2Fd1%2Fe9b02d7a32e63ca515d5495aadd2%2Fla-1557523961-ify42hy5j3-snap-image
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 15,063
    mtm wrote: »
    I don’t really follow? They’re making the Craig films at the moment: making the next films in the vein of the Craig ones wouldn’t seem like a change to me.
    I’m not saying there has to be a change, but that’s what the conversation was.

    Personally I wouldn’t mind them being slightly lighter.

    I don't think they would really be in the vein of the Craig films as we'd be "going back to Fleming". Beyond CR, which will likely be almost twenty years ago when the new Bond arrives, there's been little to no Fleming in his films. There's about as much influence from the novels in SP (and NTTD, by the looks of it so far) as there was in something like TWINE.

    I've lost track of what we're discussing then. You said 'the approach worked well with Craig' but we're not suggesting going down the Craig route?
    Personally I'd say the crater base, Bond's seduction of Bellucci etc. in Spectre feels more like anything from Fleming than most of The Living Daylights does. You've obviously got the Bratislavia bit, but that's gone pretty quickly. And already Bond living in Jamaica in NTTD gives off the pretty strong vibes more than Dalton, I dunno, with a hamper or ruched leather jacket. I'm not saying they didn't have a go with Fleming (the beginning of LTK I think he's looking like the spit of Fleming's Bond) but Craig's stuff has evoked the feel of the novels more often for me.
  • FatherValentineFatherValentine England
    edited June 2020 Posts: 737
    The problem with saying that an actor needs to look a little more aged is that people generally look younger these days. Don't know how old Hoult was in that photo, but he's 30 in real life. He won't look much older when he's 35. And once an actor gets to 40, we start to think of him as being too old to start being Bond.

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 15,063
    The problem with saying that an actor needs to look a little more aged is that people generally look younger these days. Don't know how old Hoult was in that photo, but he's 30 in real life. He won't look much older when he's 35. And once an actor gets to 40, we start to think of him as being too old to start being Bond.

    Yeah I think he's looking a bit more mature in that Armani ad.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,046
    mtm wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I don’t really follow? They’re making the Craig films at the moment: making the next films in the vein of the Craig ones wouldn’t seem like a change to me.
    I’m not saying there has to be a change, but that’s what the conversation was.

    Personally I wouldn’t mind them being slightly lighter.

    I don't think they would really be in the vein of the Craig films as we'd be "going back to Fleming". Beyond CR, which will likely be almost twenty years ago when the new Bond arrives, there's been little to no Fleming in his films. There's about as much influence from the novels in SP (and NTTD, by the looks of it so far) as there was in something like TWINE.

    I've lost track of what we're discussing then. You said 'the approach worked well with Craig' but we're not suggesting going down the Craig route?

    I said the "straight approach" worked with Craig. Playing it straight doesn't equal taking direct inspiration from Fleming, which is what was suggested for the next era. All thumbs are fingers but not all fingerd are thumbs, I guess? :P Beyond Casino Royale, the Craig era hasn't really done that for me. It was just an example of why I feel Dalton's films would likely be better received had he, in a different world, arrived at the time Daniel Craig did.
    mtm wrote: »
    Personally I'd say the crater base, Bond's seduction of Bellucci etc. in Spectre feels more like anything from Fleming than most of The Living Daylights does. You've obviously got the Bratislavia bit, but that's gone pretty quickly. And already Bond living in Jamaica in NTTD gives off the pretty strong vibes more than Dalton, I dunno, with a hamper or ruched leather jacket. I'm not saying they didn't have a go with Fleming (the beginning of LTK I think he's looking like the spit of Fleming's Bond) but Craig's stuff has evoked the feel of the novels more often for me.

    That's fair enough - people will pick up on different things in different ways, I suppose. I'm working my way through them again and I don't get that vibe with Spectre having rewatched it recently - at least, no more than I did with some of the lip service afforded to it in the Moore or Brosnan eras.
  • edited June 2020 Posts: 4,400
    Hoult's face still looks very young to me, if one get's what i mean.

    I totally hear this...he just seems a tad boy-ish at the moment....which I think works against him. Maybe because I just see him as a child actor, it's weird to see him as a grown man.

    Though on that motorcycle, he does looks like a bit of a smouldering babe. I can see Eon flirting with the idea of Hoult. Though, he has been ont eh scene for a long while and hasn't really broken through. Despite a lot of prominent starry roles. He always seems ont he cusp of breaking through. He isn't exactly that most renowned actor on the indie scenes (like Robert Pattinson) or made much of his blockbuster films (those woeful X-Men films).

    He might be a bit of a spent commodity. But he is young and I haven't seen The Great.

    2020-03-14_lif_57622709_I4.JPG
    Denbigh wrote: »
    I can see it with Hoult, but I just think there are much better actors around his age that have more of an edge.

    I echo this sentiment wholly.

    It's the chief reason I'm a bit gutted that we can't have Robert Pattinson. He would perfectly fit into the category of an edgy, interesting proper actor. Someone who would make bold choices and excite interesting directors to work on the franchise. Sadly, the Batman connection may have killed that chance.

    Speaking of Batman though, the recent news that Michael Keaton will reprise his iconic role has got me thinking. Maybe the next Bond should be an old Bond? Why not let Quentin Tarantino make his Bond film with Pierce Brosnan?

    Eon are in the business of courting A-list directors these days, having Quentin and giving him a smaller $90-100m budget and bringing back Pierce would be a helluva bold move. It almost be a Bond concept album....something to whet appetites before the 'big reboot'....perhaps it's a littler too experimental.

    But I think the Batman franchise are doing precisely this now - especially in light of Joker, the film with R-Patz and now Michael Keaton's return.

    I'd kinda love it.....

    17301_psvn.jpg
    tarantino.jpg

    However, the whole 'Old Bond' angle seems to be played out after SF, SP and NTTD (which seems to be focussing on it especially). So maybe a younger Bond is required. Watching Bond as an SAS agent who gets recruited by MI6 to carry out a job sounds like an appealing film. I could see Timothee Chalamet (he is sufficiently edgy and interesting) to play such a role.

    tenor.gif?itemid=16940492

    There are 100's of different directions the story could take...we will have to wait till a director and writer is hired for Bond 26 before we can narrow down our speculation.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    edited June 2020 Posts: 5,131
    I’d pick Hoult over Chalamet.

    He’s better looking, he’s a lot taller, he’s a British actor rather than American (or French). He also looks older than 21 and not like Harry Potters best friend.
  • Posts: 6,677
    Hoult's too tall.

    Kidding ;)

    I'd be fine with Hoult. When he wants to and is given proper material to work with, he's a very good actor. He's a good thespian in every registry, even in comedy.

  • GadgetManGadgetMan Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 4,247
    It seems we all have our various picks for Bond 7, now than ever and a great deal of the Candidates aren't miles apart from each other in terms of age and fame....they're mostly upcoming stars. Maybe EON can do the unprecedented and say 'Let's do the audition for all the Bond Candidates, Pick the Top 5 or 10 candidates and allow the fans Vote, Just to give the fans a Voice'....It's not the most feasible idea, but it sounds like fun, only if some fans don't like the Candidate who wins, it would irk them more....Coz Good or Bad, fans would like EON to make decisions themselves.
  • Posts: 6,677
    GadgetMan wrote: »
    It seems we all have our various picks for Bond 7, now than ever and a great deal of the Candidates aren't miles apart from each other in terms of age and fame....they're mostly upcoming stars. Maybe EON can do the unprecedented and say 'Let's do the audition for all the Bond Candidates, Pick the Top 5 or 10 candidates and allow the fans Vote, Just to give the fans a Voice'....It's not the most feasible idea, but it sounds like fun, only if some fans don't like the Candidate who wins, it would irk them more....Coz Good or Bad, fans would like EON to make decisions themselves.

    We'll, Aidan Turner or Nicholas Hoult would win then.

    I'd be a happy fan.

    But they will never do that.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    Univex wrote: »
    Hoult's too tall.

    Kidding ;)

    I'd be fine with Hoult. When he wants to and is given proper material to work with, he's a very good actor. He's a good thespian in every registry, even in comedy.


    Ha ha ha! At 6ft 3in he’s nearly too tall!! Ha ha! An inch over Moore and Connery! Fleming had Bond at 6ft....tall for the 50’s. Slightly above UK average now (5ft 10in).
  • edited June 2020 Posts: 6,677
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    Hoult's too tall.

    Kidding ;)

    I'd be fine with Hoult. When he wants to and is given proper material to work with, he's a very good actor. He's a good thespian in every registry, even in comedy.


    Ha ha ha! At 6ft 3in he’s nearly too tall!! Ha ha! An inch over Moore and Connery! Fleming had Bond at 6ft....tall for the 50’s. Slightly above UK average now (5ft 10in).

    Here's him next to a very tall guy ;)

    33ca0642ce7c5486c98cfab06abada24.jpg

    And next to a very tall lady (stolen from the Poldark set). Can we have a petition to have Eleanor Tomlinson as his Bond gi...woman?

    article-2285158-18510E67000005DC-388_634x854.jpg
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 15,063
    GadgetMan wrote: »
    It seems we all have our various picks for Bond 7, now than ever and a great deal of the Candidates aren't miles apart from each other in terms of age and fame....they're mostly upcoming stars. Maybe EON can do the unprecedented and say 'Let's do the audition for all the Bond Candidates, Pick the Top 5 or 10 candidates and allow the fans Vote, Just to give the fans a Voice'....It's not the most feasible idea, but it sounds like fun, only if some fans don't like the Candidate who wins, it would irk them more....Coz Good or Bad, fans would like EON to make decisions themselves.

    I can't imagine a worse idea I'm afraid! :D We'd have ended up with that chunk of wood Cavill last time if they'd done that :)
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,046
    Univex wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    Hoult's too tall.

    Kidding ;)

    I'd be fine with Hoult. When he wants to and is given proper material to work with, he's a very good actor. He's a good thespian in every registry, even in comedy.


    Ha ha ha! At 6ft 3in he’s nearly too tall!! Ha ha! An inch over Moore and Connery! Fleming had Bond at 6ft....tall for the 50’s. Slightly above UK average now (5ft 10in).

    Here's him next to a very tall guy ;)

    33ca0642ce7c5486c98cfab06abada24.jpg

    And next to a very tall lady (stolen from the Poldark set). Can we have a petition to have Eleanor Tomlinson as his Bond gi...woman?

    article-2285158-18510E67000005DC-388_634x854.jpg

    Woah, he is tall isn't he? I knew he was above average alright, but he's quite the pillar!
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited June 2020 Posts: 5,869
    Yeah @Pierce2Daniel, Robert would’ve been my top choice too before the Batman, as much as I’m looking forward to him in that role. But to me the two best alternatives to him are Callum Turner or Aaron Taylor-Johnson. Funnily enough, Callum Turner said he wants to play the Joker for Pattinson’s Batman haha :) Anyway, Chalamet to me is a specific kind of an actor, and one that would be better suited to a villain than Bond himself.
  • Posts: 9,779
    Hoult's face still looks very young to me, if one get's what i mean.

    I totally hear this...he just seems a tad boy-ish at the moment....which I think works against him. Maybe because I just see him as a child actor, it's weird to see him as a grown man.

    Though on that motorcycle, he does looks like a bit of a smouldering babe. I can see Eon flirting with the idea of Hoult. Though, he has been ont eh scene for a long while and hasn't really broken through. Despite a lot of prominent starry roles. He always seems ont he cusp of breaking through. He isn't exactly that most renowned actor on the indie scenes (like Robert Pattinson) or made much of his blockbuster films (those woeful X-Men films).

    He might be a bit of a spent commodity. But he is young and I haven't seen The Great.

    2020-03-14_lif_57622709_I4.JPG
    Denbigh wrote: »
    I can see it with Hoult, but I just think there are much better actors around his age that have more of an edge.

    I echo this sentiment wholly.

    It's the chief reason I'm a bit gutted that we can't have Robert Pattinson. He would perfectly fit into the category of an edgy, interesting proper actor. Someone who would make bold choices and excite interesting directors to work on the franchise. Sadly, the Batman connection may have killed that chance.

    Speaking of Batman though, the recent news that Michael Keaton will reprise his iconic role has got me thinking. Maybe the next Bond should be an old Bond? Why not let Quentin Tarantino make his Bond film with Pierce Brosnan?

    Eon are in the business of courting A-list directors these days, having Quentin and giving him a smaller $90-100m budget and bringing back Pierce would be a helluva bold move. It almost be a Bond concept album....something to whet appetites before the 'big reboot'....perhaps it's a littler too experimental.

    But I think the Batman franchise are doing precisely this now - especially in light of Joker, the film with R-Patz and now Michael Keaton's return.

    I'd kinda love it.....

    17301_psvn.jpg
    tarantino.jpg

    However, the whole 'Old Bond' angle seems to be played out after SF, SP and NTTD (which seems to be focussing on it especially). So maybe a younger Bond is required. Watching Bond as an SAS agent who gets recruited by MI6 to carry out a job sounds like an appealing film. I could see Timothee Chalamet (he is sufficiently edgy and interesting) to play such a role.

    tenor.gif?itemid=16940492

    There are 100's of different directions the story could take...we will have to wait till a director and writer is hired for Bond 26 before we can narrow down our speculation.

    nah if we are bringing older actors back deage Dalton and give us a third Dalton film!
  • Posts: 928
    There's gotta be a basic litmus test when anyone suggests a candidate:

    1. Do you see the actor defeating the likes of Robert Shaw, Andreas Wiszniewski, or Dave Bautista in a fist fight?
    2. Do you see the actor being credible on (and off) screen against Adolfo Celi, Telly Savalas, Christopher Lee, Robert Davi, Sean Bean, or Javier Bardem?
    3. Does the actor look like he can seduce Daniela Bianchi, Luciana Paluzzi, Diana Rigg, Maud Adams, Sophie Marceau, or Monica Bellucci?
    4. Can the actor successfully pull off wearing a kilt?
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited June 2020 Posts: 5,869
    There's gotta be a basic litmus test when anyone suggests a candidate:

    1. Do you see the actor defeating the likes of Robert Shaw, Andreas Wiszniewski, or Dave Bautista in a fist fight?
    2. Do you see the actor being credible on (and off) screen against Adolfo Celi, Telly Savalas, Christopher Lee, Robert Davi, Sean Bean, or Javier Bardem?
    3. Does the actor look like he can seduce Daniela Bianchi, Luciana Paluzzi, Diana Rigg, Maud Adams, Sophie Marceau, or Monica Bellucci?
    4. Can the actor successfully pull off wearing a kilt?
    I would say yes to of all my main suggestions (Callum, Aaron, and Sean) with these questions :) Although the issue with the first question is that actors like Bautista, the huge henchmen, is that they’re meant to look unbeatable, but Bond still prevails cause he’s Bond.
  • Posts: 3,333
    Benny wrote: »
    I think it's pretty clear that Nicholas Hoult is the best choice to take on the role of James Bond after Daniel Craig departs the role.
    7vsbgdj3nl3j.jpg

    He's a very talented young actor, who hasn't quite made the break through into leading man status. He's also just under the radar as a household name, though well known enough to immediately be acceptable in the role. That is of course, if he would want the role.
    He's got to be a favourite.
    A very decent chap is Nicholas Hoult. He once held the door open for me with a smile. However, I haven't seen anything of his acting to show me that he's got that earthy animal magnatism required to make a convincing Bond. Could turn out to be another lightweight that flatters to decieve. But I'll take him over the majority of other suggestions posted on here.
  • Posts: 928
    Denbigh wrote: »
    There's gotta be a basic litmus test when anyone suggests a candidate:

    1. Do you see the actor defeating the likes of Robert Shaw, Andreas Wiszniewski, or Dave Bautista in a fist fight?
    2. Do you see the actor being credible on (and off) screen against Adolfo Celi, Telly Savalas, Christopher Lee, Robert Davi, Sean Bean, or Javier Bardem?
    3. Does the actor look like he can seduce Daniela Bianchi, Luciana Paluzzi, Diana Rigg, Maud Adams, Sophie Marceau, or Monica Bellucci?
    4. Can the actor successfully pull off wearing a kilt?
    I would say yes to of all my main suggestions (Callum, Aaron, and Sean) with these questions :) Although the issue with the first question is that actors like Bautista, the huge henchmen, is that they’re meant to look unbeatable, but Bond still prevails cause he’s Bond.

    Definitely agreed - it takes brains as well to defeat pure brawn.
  • FatherValentineFatherValentine England
    edited June 2020 Posts: 737
    There's gotta be a basic litmus test when anyone suggests a candidate:

    1. Do you see the actor defeating the likes of Robert Shaw, Andreas Wiszniewski, or Dave Bautista in a fist fight?
    2. Do you see the actor being credible on (and off) screen against Adolfo Celi, Telly Savalas, Christopher Lee, Robert Davi, Sean Bean, or Javier Bardem?
    3. Does the actor look like he can seduce Daniela Bianchi, Luciana Paluzzi, Diana Rigg, Maud Adams, Sophie Marceau, or Monica Bellucci?
    4. Can the actor successfully pull off wearing a kilt?

    That's a very interesting litmus test.

    However. If you had applied that to Daniel Craig prior to Bond there's no way anyone would have suggested he could pull Bellucci. And anyone watching the finished film is likely to remain unconvinced too, I would suggest. Hence why we never actually see him seducing anyone - in the Craig films it usually cuts to him in bed or shower with someone because he's so dreadful in the seduction scenes (or, more charitably, they are very badly written).
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    There's gotta be a basic litmus test when anyone suggests a candidate:

    1. Do you see the actor defeating the likes of Robert Shaw, Andreas Wiszniewski, or Dave Bautista in a fist fight?
    2. Do you see the actor being credible on (and off) screen against Adolfo Celi, Telly Savalas, Christopher Lee, Robert Davi, Sean Bean, or Javier Bardem?
    3. Does the actor look like he can seduce Daniela Bianchi, Luciana Paluzzi, Diana Rigg, Maud Adams, Sophie Marceau, or Monica Bellucci?
    4. Can the actor successfully pull off wearing a kilt?

    I like this! Good list.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited June 2020 Posts: 5,869
    There's gotta be a basic litmus test when anyone suggests a candidate:

    1. Do you see the actor defeating the likes of Robert Shaw, Andreas Wiszniewski, or Dave Bautista in a fist fight?
    2. Do you see the actor being credible on (and off) screen against Adolfo Celi, Telly Savalas, Christopher Lee, Robert Davi, Sean Bean, or Javier Bardem?
    3. Does the actor look like he can seduce Daniela Bianchi, Luciana Paluzzi, Diana Rigg, Maud Adams, Sophie Marceau, or Monica Bellucci?
    4. Can the actor successfully pull off wearing a kilt?
    However. If you had applied that to Daniel Craig prior to Bond there's no way anyone would have suggested he could pull Bellucci.
    The question should be can the actor seduce Barbara Broccoli? Haha :)
    Denbigh wrote: »
    There's gotta be a basic litmus test when anyone suggests a candidate:

    1. Do you see the actor defeating the likes of Robert Shaw, Andreas Wiszniewski, or Dave Bautista in a fist fight?
    2. Do you see the actor being credible on (and off) screen against Adolfo Celi, Telly Savalas, Christopher Lee, Robert Davi, Sean Bean, or Javier Bardem?
    3. Does the actor look like he can seduce Daniela Bianchi, Luciana Paluzzi, Diana Rigg, Maud Adams, Sophie Marceau, or Monica Bellucci?
    4. Can the actor successfully pull off wearing a kilt?
    I would say yes to of all my main suggestions (Callum, Aaron, and Sean) with these questions :) Although the issue with the first question is that actors like Bautista, the huge henchmen, is that they’re meant to look unbeatable, but Bond still prevails cause he’s Bond.

    Definitely agreed - it takes brains as well to defeat pure brawn.
    Although I think Aaron could bring the brawn with full force. The only thing holding him back is his voice.

    Aaron-Taylor-Johnson-Workout-2.jpg
    c148b58e9fd318a9510d6ec9228fa264.jpg

  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,006
    What’s Aaron’s favorite exercise? Planking! 😁
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited June 2020 Posts: 8,046
    talos7 wrote: »
    What’s Aaron’s favorite exercise? Planking! 😁

    :))

    I don't think he's really a leading man, but he's been good in a couple of supporting roles I've seen him in.
Sign In or Register to comment.