SPECTRE: Thomas Newman is Back! (appreciation topic)

13468927

Comments

  • Matt_Helm wrote: »
    HASEROT wrote: »
    James Bond has changed since Craig became Bond. The franchise is not just an entertaining popcorn blockbuster franchise anymore (like it was during the Brosnan-era), but also a movie franchise that, directly and indirectly, has socio-critical messages. CR, SF and to a lesser extent QOS all did address some geopolitical elements and had nicely interwoven themes (politically and socially).

    these themes, messages and elements you speak of have been present throughout the entire series from the very beginning, not just the last 3 with Craig.

    Well, I didn't hear "M" citing a complete poem in GE. Nor did I hear "M" explaining the importance of secret intelligence services as opposed to Richard Snowden's, Julian Assange's WikiLeaks scandal.

    .

    Well,maybe it is because the Bonds of yesteryear didn't feel the need to PRETEND they were intellectual. Probably that's the main reason why they didn't feel as pseudo as ...You know.

    Yes, they were, as you call it, less "intellectual". They were indeed slightly more "brainless". They were chewing the popcorn for us, so to say :-P.
  • Matt_Helm wrote: »
    HASEROT wrote: »
    James Bond has changed since Craig became Bond. The franchise is not just an entertaining popcorn blockbuster franchise anymore (like it was during the Brosnan-era), but also a movie franchise that, directly and indirectly, has socio-critical messages. CR, SF and to a lesser extent QOS all did address some geopolitical elements and had nicely interwoven themes (politically and socially).

    these themes, messages and elements you speak of have been present throughout the entire series from the very beginning, not just the last 3 with Craig.

    Well, I didn't hear "M" citing a complete poem in GE. Nor did I hear "M" explaining the importance of secret intelligence services as opposed to Richard Snowden's, Julian Assange's WikiLeaks scandal.

    .

    Well,maybe it is because the Bonds of yesteryear didn't feel the need to PRETEND they were intellectual. Probably that's the main reason why they didn't feel as pseudo as ...You know.

    Yes, they were, as you call it, less "intellectual". They were indeed slightly more "brainless". They were chewing the popcorn for us, so to say :-P.

    If a movie pretends to have an intellectual approach, BUT has a storyline that makes no sense at all, I call it pseudo. Feel free to correct me,BUT only if you can point out ONE SINGLE POINT in SF story development, that bears scrutiny. Otherwise you just might consider, that you're simply overestimating Logan and Mendes ( I'm not mentioning Newman,since he has nothing to to with the script, but obviously I see him as overrated as well).
    Btw,you can ridicule the Brosnan Bonds from breakfest to dinner,but TWINE was the last Bond flic without ANY plot holes, and I just happen to appreciate such niceties (somehow makes me feel,there is indeed some brain involved in the making)
  • You can have an intellectual approach without a storyline, just look at some French cinema ;) I put a smiley but this is not a derogatory comment, sometimes the storyline can take a backseat in the movie (in a blockbuster, that's a bit weird though). But you can have also a pompous approach as a result.

    As for the "old vs new" layer in Skyfall, I found it quite "in your face". Chewed for us indeed. Multiple times.

    And for Newman, I've heard "New Digs" on French TV already a few times for some reality shows and documentaries. The problem is that it is a suspenseful tune, yes, but a too generic one IMO. Even the oriental vibe is a bit weird when it's played in Skyfall.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,541
    Fellas, this thread is about Newman and even more so about appreciation for Newman. I fail to see what this has to do with SF's plot...
  • DarthDimi wrote: »
    Fellas, this thread is about Newman and even more so about appreciation for Newman. I fail to see what this has to do with SF's plot...

    Agreed :-)
  • edited September 2014 Posts: 2,015
    Isn't Silva the first villain in Bond movies to use music so clearly ("Boum" and "Boom Boom") ? Hence the absence of themes for him, and a rather generic moody music otherwise when he appears ? Here the story has an impact on the music.
  • WalecsWalecs On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    Posts: 3,157
    Isn't Silva the first villain in Bond movies to use music so clearly ("Boum" and "Boom Boom") ? Hence the absence of themes for him, and a rather generic moody music otherwise when he appears ? Here the story has an impact on the music.

    This would be (and it is, actually) a nice observation, hadn't it been that the lack of a motif for Silva is due to the composer.
  • edited September 2014 Posts: 2,015
    I was trying to be a bit diplomatic :) But discussing about the composer's job on one particular movie without discussing the impact of the director, the story, the cast, etc... is a bit weird IMO.

    Here the use of music with Silva made it clear that Mendes wanted Silva to be flamboyant "in the real world of the movie" IMO (in French, I would use better terms, but right now it's late).

    We had use of "real music" in Bond before (the QOS opera scene, the TB nightclub, for instance), but here it was another step. I don't think we'll get a Dogma Bond soon though (in it, music should come from a source in the movie, the characters hear it, etc).

    If there's any music for Silva when he first appears, it's mixed incredibly low, then there's "Boum", then a few seconds of dare I say, generic action movie music, and then some Bond theme music. I think that with a few seconds, what can a composer do more than some generic action movie music in such a case ? There's no "Silva theme" to play with, he only has the Bond one (and rumors say it's the producers' hand here, moreover).

    And with "Boom Boom" (which is used for quite a long time), Silva makes an entrance again with no theme. After "Boom Boom", that's also some generic music I dare say, you can't have two strong musical cues one just after the other, we're looking at a movie, not MTV. Or Gardians of the Galaxy ;)

  • Posts: 11,425
    Well, the best I can say is that as he's an experienced and well respected composer Newman probably can do better. Let's hope he does so on B24.
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    edited November 2014 Posts: 4,399
    (deleted)
  • Posts: 11,425
    HASEROT wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    Well, the best I can say is that as he's an experienced and well respected composer Newman probably can do better. Let's hope he does so on B24.

    agreed.... if Sam does indeed bring him back onboard - which every part of me says he will.. directors are creatures of habit when it comes to their production crew, and they generally like to work with the same people over and over (especially if they've had success working together in the past)... but.... with that being said, the only way Newman doesn't come back for Bond 24, is if he doesn't want to come back.... just checked Newman's IMDB, and it looks like he has a full plate of stuff coming up for not only later this year, but for 2015 and 2016 as well....... I'm sure he and Sam have had discussions about it already - and are probably playing things by ear right now.. Once filming gets started we'll probably have an answer one way or another.

    So there's still hope! May be he's scoping out other composers. Could be interesting.

    I wonder whether he'd even contemplate working with Arnold if Newman is not available.
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    edited November 2014 Posts: 4,399
    (deleted)
  • edited September 2014 Posts: 11,425
    Funny you should say that. I really like Away We Go and even have the soundtrack! Can't see Alexi Murdoch doing a Bond theme - although might be interesting.
  • edited September 2014 Posts: 2,598
    Shardlake wrote:
    Newman bought more originality to the table with his first score than Arnold had in his entire time, I didn't hear any pastiches on Barry during his score.

    Don't forget the producers asked Arnold to be more "Barryesque" after the Eric Serra score that left them a bit puzzled (they even felt they had to change the music for the tank action sequence, and "censored" Serra's score to put something more Barry-esque by John Altman or whoever).

    As for the nomination being so important and meaning "true movie fan should then acknowledge the score is brilliant", will we ever know how many voters for the nominees thought Skyfall's score composer also composed Skyfall, the song by Adele (the ballots for nominees only have "Skyfall" written I think) ? No. But I think it's more than a few :)



    I agree @Shardlake. Part of what I like about Skyfall is the music. Newman's music feels more natural, original, real, atmospheric overall and harmonises with all the scenes as opposed to Arnold's loud, overbearing clumsiness in parts. Sometimes Arnold's music just takes me out of the scene altogether. Many of Arnold's pastiches aren't even good ones. The only thing missing from Newman's score is a nice slow melody. Arnold has made the odd nice one. I love ''Paris and Bond'".

    I like what Campbell did with CR better than what Mendes did with SF in terms of the humour. However, since Mendes is back, I'll feel frustrated if Newman doesn't return and Arnold takes up the mantle once more.

    Bring back Newman!

    However, didn't MI6 say that Arnold would probably be returning or did I misread something?
  • Bounine wrote: »
    Shardlake wrote:
    Newman bought more originality to the table with his first score than Arnold had in his entire time, I didn't hear any pastiches on Barry during his score.

    Don't forget the producers asked Arnold to be more "Barryesque" after the Eric Serra score that left them a bit puzzled (they even felt they had to change the music for the tank action sequence, and "censored" Serra's score to put something more Barry-esque by John Altman or whoever).

    As for the nomination being so important and meaning "true movie fan should then acknowledge the score is brilliant", will we ever know how many voters for the nominees thought Skyfall's score composer also composed Skyfall, the song by Adele (the ballots for nominees only have "Skyfall" written I think) ? No. But I think it's more than a few :)



    I agree @Shardlake. Part of what I like about Skyfall is the music. Newman's music feels more natural, original, real and harmonises with all the scenes as opposed to Arnold's loud, overbearing clumsiness in parts. Sometimes Arnold's music just takes me out of the scene altogether. Many of Arnold's pastiches aren't even good ones. The only thing missing from Newman's score is a nice slow melody. Arnold has made the odd nice one. I love ''Paris and Bond'".

    I like what Campbell did with CR better than what Mendes did with SF in terms of the humour. However, since Mendes is back, I'll feel frustrated if Newman doesn't return and Arnold takes up the mantle once more.

    Bring back Newman!

    However, didn't MI6 say that Arnold would probably be returning or did I misread something?

    Yes, but this is most likely wrong, as David Arnold himself announced two times on Twitter that he won't be returning (August & September last week).
  • Posts: 11,425
    Would be very surprised if Mendes asked Arnold to return, although he did have to eat humble pie with Purvis and Wade, so you never know.
  • Posts: 2,598
    I remember saying when Logan was first announced as sole scriptwriter that the story might come under question and let's not forget that P & W were good with the plots laced with that Fleming touch and making the story relevant. I do worry about the dialogue and humour though. Their dialogue usually needs re-writes, now they were the ones to make the final touches. They changed the story but that requires dialogue changes. Anyway, back on topic. Well, if Arnold isn't returning then I guess it will be Newman unless he isn't available or just doesn't want the job. It's regular work for him though as long as Mendes is on board. I wonder if Mendes will return for Bond 25 providing 24 does alright. He might come back just to stick with Craig through his swan song.
  • Posts: 11,425
    Bounine wrote: »
    I remember saying when Logan was first announced as sole scriptwriter that the story might come under question and let's not forget that P & W were good with the plots laced with that Fleming touch and making the story relevant. I do worry about the dialogue and humour though. Their dialogue usually needs re-writes, now they were the ones to make the final touches. They changed the story but that requires dialogue changes. Anyway, back on topic. Well, if Arnold isn't returning then I guess it will be Newman unless he isn't available or just doesn't want the job. It's regular work for him though as long as Mendes is on board. I wonder if Mendes will return for Bond 25 providing 24 does alright. He might come back just to stick with Craig through his swan song.

    Yeah, I'm assuming that Mendes want's Newman back.

    I was surprised that Mendes came back for B24 as I really didn't think he'd be interested. So I won't rule out his return for B25.
  • Bounine wrote: »
    I remember saying when Logan was first announced as sole scriptwriter that the story might come under question and let's not forget that P & W were good with the plots laced with that Fleming touch and making the story relevant. I do worry about the dialogue and humour though. Their dialogue usually needs re-writes, now they were the ones to make the final touches. They changed the story but that requires dialogue changes. Anyway, back on topic. Well, if Arnold isn't returning then I guess it will be Newman unless he isn't available or just doesn't want the job. It's regular work for him though as long as Mendes is on board. I wonder if Mendes will return for Bond 25 providing 24 does alright. He might come back just to stick with Craig through his swan song.

    If I'm not mistake, screenplay writer John Logan has mostly a theatre/playwright background. From what I've read from the big Taschen jubilee book "The James Bond Archives", John Logan mainly worked on the elaborated dialogue, like Silva's entrance speech about rats and M's speech supported by Tennyson's poem. On the whole, Logan was the one who added the more intelligent, thought-provoking lines to the screenplay.

    The one-liners though, are usually more the work of Purvis & Wade. And allthough they did improved in "Skyfall", they did seem a bit out of touch, like in the Brosnan-era. Still, the line "He's keen to get home" made me laugh :-).

    I really hope, that Purvis & Wade this time do it right with the humour. And I also hope that more intelligent, elaborate lines, written by Logan, have not been deleted completely.

    In essence, I think the overall plot (villain's plot) and story, created by John Logan, hasn't been changed that much. I expect that Logan's main idea is still in place. The same goes for Peter Morgan's idea for "Skyfall", which was in essence also used by Purvis, Wade & Logan in the end.
  • edited September 2014 Posts: 11,425
    Logan was done quite a lot of films - many of them big Hollywood blockbusters. Most notably Gladiator, which I think most people would agree has decent and memorable dialogue.

    I would have preferred if Logan had been brought in to pollish a P+W script, not the other way round. Logan is not very interesting or original with his plots - they tend to be heavily derivative. Not that I have much faith in P+W's plotting either.

    I really don't understand why it always seems to come back to P+W - bizarre.
  • Bounine wrote: »
    I remember saying when Logan was first announced as sole scriptwriter that the story might come under question and let's not forget that P & W were good with the plots laced with that Fleming touch and making the story relevant. I do worry about the dialogue and humour though. Their dialogue usually needs re-writes, now they were the ones to make the final touches. They changed the story but that requires dialogue changes. Anyway, back on topic. Well, if Arnold isn't returning then I guess it will be Newman unless he isn't available or just doesn't want the job. It's regular work for him though as long as Mendes is on board. I wonder if Mendes will return for Bond 25 providing 24 does alright. He might come back just to stick with Craig through his swan song.

    If I'm not mistake, screenplay writer John Logan has mostly a theatre/playwright background. From what I've read from the big Taschen jubilee book "The James Bond Archives", John Logan mainly worked on the elaborated dialogue, like Silva's entrance speech about rats and M's speech supported by Tennyson's poem. On the whole, Logan was the one who added the more intelligent, thought-provoking lines to the screenplay.

    The one-liners though, are usually more the work of Purvis & Wade. And allthough they did improved in "Skyfall", they did seem a bit out of touch, like in the Brosnan-era. Still, the line "He's keen to get home" made me laugh :-).

    I really hope, that Purvis & Wade this time do it right with the humour. And I also hope that more intelligent, elaborate lines, written by Logan, have not been deleted completely.

    In essence, I think the overall plot (villain's plot) and story, created by John Logan, hasn't been changed that much. I expect that Logan's main idea is still in place. The same goes for Peter Morgan's idea for "Skyfall", which was in essence also used by Purvis, Wade & Logan in the end.

    According to P&W Mendes and Logan heavily changed the script especially from the point on where Bond comes to Shanghai. This is - certainly not by pure accident - exactly the moment in SF where nothing makes any sense anymore in an almost insulting way. Thought-provoking? Sure, but not in a good way! One good monologue (Silvas entry speech) is certainly not enough to redeem this mess. Also I doubt that the one-liners were by P&W , since while not being the bee knees they always displayed an at least slightly higher standard. (these "put it all on red and circle of life" lines to me are the worst one-liners ever been spoken in the whole franchise. Tasteless and not even funny in the slightest!)
  • edited September 2014 Posts: 11,425
    For me, plot-wise, SF falls apart most jarringly from the point the helicopers appear hovering over Silva's island. It just becomes a garbled mess after that, not that the first act is all that great, but at least it builds some tension quite nicely. I don't know what I prefer - a relatively coherent P+W plot, but weighed down with their wooden dialogue, or narrative incoherence from Logan, with at least some half decent lines along the way.

    Having just watched LTK last night it's an uplifting reminder of what a good plot and some old-fashioned solid storytelling does to lift the general tone and quality of a Bond movie.

    It's more than evident in SF that Mendes borrowed heavily from Batman, particularly in the sort of slap-dash, impressionistic approach to story-telling, where you're just supposed to be carried along by the visual spectacle and sustained by the broad thematic approach. Nolan's trilogy became increasingly less interesting to me as it went along, precisely because it ended up without much of a story to tell. This is a million miles away from the traditional Bond plot approach, but does seem fashionable at the moment.

    Any way, at least Batman had good production design and an excellent composer. I've said it before and will say it again - I think it is a real shame that Hans Zimmer does not seem to have ever been considered for Bond. He at least deserves to do one movie. He is a brilliant collaborator and with the right title song performer, it could be magic.
  • Getafix wrote: »

    Having just watched LTK last night it's an uplifting reminder of what a good plot and some old-fashioned solid storytelling does to lift the general tone and quality of a Bond movie.

    "Old fashioned storytelling". Probably because it's plot was directly lifted (stolen) from Yojimbo!
  • edited September 2014 Posts: 11,425
    Getafix wrote: »

    Having just watched LTK last night it's an uplifting reminder of what a good plot and some old-fashioned solid storytelling does to lift the general tone and quality of a Bond movie.

    "Old fashioned storytelling". Probably because it's plot was directly lifted (stolen) from Yojimbo!

    Yes, I'd read that somewhere before. Part of MGW's contribution I believe.

    Well, there's a lesson there - if you're going to steal your ideas from somewhere else, make sure the source material you're pinching is better than Nolan's Batman trilogy.

    Bond's almost single-handed destruction of Sanchez's empire through sowing suspicion and misinformation is nicely done. One of the last times we've actually seen Bond really use his intelligence and wits to out-fox the villain. Very enjoyable.

    More on topic, Kamen's score is okay, but not brilliant. Actually made me appreciate Newman's SF effort a little more.
  • Getafix wrote: »

    Having just watched LTK last night it's an uplifting reminder of what a good plot and some old-fashioned solid storytelling does to lift the general tone and quality of a Bond movie.

    "Old fashioned storytelling". Probably because it's plot was directly lifted (stolen) from Yojimbo!

    You are -of course - talking about "for a handful of dollars" and "last man standing" not LTK, which obviously lacks the second gang and many other points to make it a derivative of Yojimbo (which itself is heavily inspired by "red harvest" from the one and only Dashiell Hammett).
  • Matt_Helm wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »

    Having just watched LTK last night it's an uplifting reminder of what a good plot and some old-fashioned solid storytelling does to lift the general tone and quality of a Bond movie.

    "Old fashioned storytelling". Probably because it's plot was directly lifted (stolen) from Yojimbo!

    You are -of course - talking about "for a handful of dollars" and "last man standing" not LTK, which obviously lacks the second gang and many other points to make it a derivative of Yojimbo (which itself is heavily inspired by "red harvest" from the one and only Dashiell Hammett).

    MGW was the one who stated it's central theme was lifted from Yojimbo, not me.

    Take your complaint up with him if you disagree.
  • Matt_Helm wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »

    Having just watched LTK last night it's an uplifting reminder of what a good plot and some old-fashioned solid storytelling does to lift the general tone and quality of a Bond movie.

    "Old fashioned storytelling". Probably because it's plot was directly lifted (stolen) from Yojimbo!

    You are -of course - talking about "for a handful of dollars" and "last man standing" not LTK, which obviously lacks the second gang and many other points to make it a derivative of Yojimbo (which itself is heavily inspired by "red harvest" from the one and only Dashiell Hammett).

    MGW was the one who stated it's central theme was lifted from Yojimbo, not me.

    Take your complaint up with him if you disagree.

    This only underscores how much Wilson is lacking. Obviously he's not even able to identify from what he's stealing. Probably he thinks Craigs Bond derrivates from Oliver Twist. Mind you even if license to kill stemmed fromYojimbo it would be still nothing to be especially proud off! Copying is easy,to create is the heavy part.
  • Posts: 11,425
    It's rare when something is created without reference to or the influence of something that has come before, especiallly in storytelling. I think the fact that MGW took inspiration from Yojimbo is a good thing. At least it indicates a commitment to and interest in the quality of the narrative structure, something that has been very noticeable by its absence in many of the proceeding movies.
  • Again, LTK has nothing in common withYojimbo. Even the suspicion bond seeds (which together with the fact that bond is a stranger in town is the greatest similarity to Yojimbo ) is between the big boss and his own henchmen not another gang.
  • Posts: 11,189
    I remember watching Raw Deal a few weeks ago. Terrible film featuring Arnie and Robert Davi. There's one scene when Arnie meets Davi in his massive office in a casino. Reminded me a lot of Licence to Kill in terms of its overall look.
Sign In or Register to comment.