Last Movie you Watched?

1935936938940941981

Comments

  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 7,074
    I agree with @Revelator! It's probably even my favourite of the 50's-60's Roman-themed (or biblical) epics that Hollywood produced.

    For all the reasons mentioned, but also because it doesn't pretend to be more than it is, leaving out the typical lecturing and self-seriousness that plague some, or dare I say most, of its peers.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,978
    Curse Of The Knight Templer aka Curse Of The Blind Dead (2020)
    A Blind Dead film released in 2020, that I only found out about a few days ago. Umm... well it starts out right. It opens with the Templers about to conduct a sacrificial ritual complete with the Blind Dead theme, until some angry villagers burst in, tie the Templars to a stake each, burn out their eyes, and then burn them. Via a title sequence showing a montage of wars, riots and various terrorist acts, we land in the post apocalyptic future. A father and his pregnant daughter are trying to survive, when they are attacked by an unfriendly trio, but are rescued by some people, who are part of some religious sect, and taken to their base, to be offered free food and sanctuary. It turns out that this sect, are looking for a new born baby to use as sacrifice to bring back the Blind Dead, and hopefully stop the apocalypse... or something. The only thing clear thing about their plan, is how it predictably it goes to shit.
    This one lacks the gothic atmosphere of the original quartet, but tries to make up for it with more violent kills. Some have been done in other films (one is ripped straight from Hatchet 1.... no Hatchet 2, no, actually was the first Hatchet), and one that has never been done before, and probably for good reason (that one was... ooof). Also why do we get 'Templer Vision', when they are blind? Plus they only vaguely look like they did in the original films. If only the rest of the film was as good as the opening.

    1. Night Of The Seagulls (1975)
    2. Return Of The Evil Dead (1973)
    3. Tombs Of The Blind Dead (1972)
    4. The Ghost Galleon (1974)
    5. Curse Of The Blind Dead (2020)

    I want to track down the Jess Franco cash-in from the mid 80s', but i'm not expecting much from that tone, given what little I know.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Julie T.
    Posts: 7,016
    Revelator wrote: »
    If you're interested in Roman/Egyptian history, Cleopatra is surprisingly enjoyable. It sticks relatively close to the facts and doesn't have an excess of Hollywood BS. The actors are larger than life in a good way and the dialogue is intelligent and cynical. The film is notorious for going over budget and the Taylor/Burton affair, but it deserves a higher reputation for doing a fine job with its historical subjects, thanks to writer/director Joseph Mankiewicz.
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    I agree with @Revelator! It's probably even my favourite of the 50's-60's Roman-themed (or biblical) epics that Hollywood produced.

    For all the reasons mentioned, but also because it doesn't pretend to be more than it is, leaving out the typical lecturing and self-seriousness that plague some, or dare I say most, of its peers.

    It sounds very interesting. I'll check it out.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,547
    Three all time classics:

    One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest (1975) Jack's never been better.
    Easy Rider (1969) Proof that a barely budgeted, barely scripted movie can do amazing things.
    Jaws (1975) One of the most flawless movies ever. Robert Shaw should have gotten more award recognition.
  • Posts: 3,965
    Watched Cocktail (1988) for the first time. I know it got torn apart by critics when it first came out and even won Razzies, which I don't think is entirely fair. Still, it's a strange film. There's definitely a darkness/sadness to it, but it's packaged in a film that sometimes doesn't quite do its ideas any justice.

    It's had a bit of a reevaluation amongst younger people, and I think this is due to a) a more recent pop culture fascination with the 80s in general and b) the fact that a lot of younger people can probably relate to having to take bartending jobs, most often with other dreams in mind, and getting sucked into that lifestyle. Having worked a lot of bar jobs in my late teens/early 20s I certainly recognise characters such as Brian and Doug.

    I do wonder what a remake of this movie would look like for today.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited August 2023 Posts: 3,137
    I finally watched The King's Man. It was ok for what it was, but, well...a comedy should be funny, right? 🤔
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,120
    Venutius wrote: »
    I finally watched The King's Man. It was ok for what it was, but...a comedy should be funny, right? 🤔

    Yeah... The Rasputin sequence was great, and the rest... not so much. I'm feeling seriously let down after one perfect film and a pretty decent follow-up.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited August 2023 Posts: 3,137
    Yes, same. Kingsman was great and really funny; the sequel wasn't on the same level but had plenty of good moments, but diminishing returns had really set in with the prequel by the look of it. Shame.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,182
    Venutius wrote: »
    I finally watched The King's Man. It was ok for what it was, but, well...a comedy should be funny, right? 🤔

    I didn't really view the prequel as a comedy, to be honest. I think that's why I found it the most enjoyable of the three. It's still deliberately absurd, of course, but the crassness has been dialed down and I think the second act twist is quite brilliant.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,562
    Still haven't finished the Prequel but Golden Circle was my favorite
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 3,137
    Yeah, I didn't think of it as a comedy either after I'd watched it... ;)
  • Posts: 7,380
    Venutius wrote: »
    I finally watched The King's Man. It was ok for what it was, but, well...a comedy should be funny, right? 🤔

    I didn't really view the prequel as a comedy, to be honest. I think that's why I found it the most enjoyable of the three. It's still deliberately absurd, of course, but the crassness has been dialed down and I think the second act twist is quite brilliant.

    I agree. Really enjoyed it, and I dont consider these films as comedies. I hated the 2nd one, it had none of the charm of the first, ( and the less said about Elton John, the better!)
    I just thought 'The Kings Man' was a great idea, good cast, and solid action!
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited August 2023 Posts: 3,137
    You didn't think the first one was laugh out loud funny? Ah, well, just me then. How about this one: if The Golden Circle been an '80s film, they'd definitely have had Elton repeat the 'If you save the world...' gag and then shown the reaction on Eggsy's face. Er, ok, I'll get my coat...
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    edited August 2023 Posts: 24,950
    Apocalypse Now: Final Cut 4K One of the greatest films of all time, it is becoming an annual rewatch for me since I bought in in 4K a few years back. This film is astounding especially with Dolby Atmos I can't think of many films with better sound design. This is one of the best home cinema experiences along with 2001.

    I studied Heart of Darkness at University, the novel is a masterpiece.

    'The horror, the horror'.
  • Apocalypse Now: Final Cut 4K One of the greatest films of all time, it is becoming an annual rewatch for me since I bought in in 4K a few years back. This film is astounding especially with Dolby Atmos I can't think of many films with better sound design. This is one of the best home cinema experiences along with 2001.

    I studied Heart of Darkness at University, the novel is a masterpiece.

    'The horror, the horror'.

    What would you say are the biggest differences between Redux and Final Cut? I’ve been wanting to purchase Final Cut for a while now but I haven’t been compelled enough.
  • Posts: 12,439
    Going from Redux (my first watch of the movie) to theatrical was night and day in my enjoyment level of the film, with the latter being the only way to go for me. I’ll check out the Final Cut someday I’m sure, but theatrical is just so perfect.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited August 2023 Posts: 3,137
    I did like the idea of the French colonial family trying to maintain a semblance of their previous way of life on the plantation despite much reduced circumstances, though. Made me think of the kind of thing that must've happened for a generation or so at the end of Roman Britain. But, er, anyway...despite that, yes, I think I prefer the theatrical version of Apocalypse Now too, tbh.
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 24,950
    Apocalypse Now: Final Cut 4K One of the greatest films of all time, it is becoming an annual rewatch for me since I bought in in 4K a few years back. This film is astounding especially with Dolby Atmos I can't think of many films with better sound design. This is one of the best home cinema experiences along with 2001.

    I studied Heart of Darkness at University, the novel is a masterpiece.

    'The horror, the horror'.

    What would you say are the biggest differences between Redux and Final Cut? I’ve been wanting to purchase Final Cut for a while now but I haven’t been compelled enough.

    Unfortunately it has been such a long time since I saw the Redux or the Theatrical version I am not sure anymore of the differences, I would have to rewatch them. Plus I have probably watched the Final cut maybe 20 times since I saw the other versions, i also randomly watch certain scenes in isolation from the Final Cut.
  • Posts: 1,698


    funny Quint parody , lol.......

    Watched Jaws on 45 anniversary passing of Robert Shaw

    Might watch Avalanche Express even if its not good
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    edited August 2023 Posts: 24,950
    Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny 4K my opinion has not changed much, it's a bit of a joyless dreary slog. The opening sequence worked better for me this time round. The only moment where I smiled and felt emotion was the last two minutes. Helena is a poorly written character and the action feels very repetive, at least KOTCS had fun moments despite it's obvious issues.

    I bought DOD as I am an Indy fan and I honestly am trying to like the film though its not easy. Ford for the most part looked great for his age, I wish he was not given such a depressing story.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,908
    Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny 4K my opinion has not changed much, it's a bit of a joyless dreary slog. The opening sequence worked better for me this time round. The only moment where I smiled and felt emotion was the last two minutes. Helena is a poorly written character and the action feels very repetive, at least KOTCS had fun moments despite it's obvious issues.

    I bought DOD as I am an Indy fan and I honestly am trying to like the film though its not easy. Ford for the most part looked great for his age, I wish he was not given such a depressing story.

    I'd enjoy seeing it in even better quality but I've had almost no desire to return to it. Hell, even KOTCS I rewatched several times after I saw it in theaters.
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 24,950
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny 4K my opinion has not changed much, it's a bit of a joyless dreary slog. The opening sequence worked better for me this time round. The only moment where I smiled and felt emotion was the last two minutes. Helena is a poorly written character and the action feels very repetive, at least KOTCS had fun moments despite it's obvious issues.

    I bought DOD as I am an Indy fan and I honestly am trying to like the film though its not easy. Ford for the most part looked great for his age, I wish he was not given such a depressing story.

    I'd enjoy seeing it in even better quality but I've had almost no desire to return to it. Hell, even KOTCS I rewatched several times after I saw it in theaters.

    In 4K (digital version) the film has some good detail you can see where some of the money was spent, this time round I spotted even more dead end story lines that went nowhere after a scene ended, it's difficult to get invested in the film.

    I have held off getting the films in physical format on 4K so I will likely buy the 4K Boxset when part 5 is added.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,908
    I was the same as you for the longest time, filling out collections for the sake of completing them, but life changed for me with a kid and I already have such rare times to watch a film uninterrupted on TV that I no longer bother.

    Even the latest John Wick, as much as I love the series, didn't connect with me like the other three, so that's $25 or so saved.
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 24,950
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I was the same as you for the longest time, filling out collections for the sake of completing them, but life changed for me with a kid and I already have such rare times to watch a film uninterrupted on TV that I no longer bother.

    Even the latest John Wick, as much as I love the series, didn't connect with me like the other three, so that's $25 or so saved.

    I think I only have the first John Wick film on Bluray and others on Digital. Again I have held of buying 4K physical copies until a boxset of all the films is available.

    I have cut back on buying excessively there are only certain films I will spend money on now. There are instances when you have to prioritise spending, more often than not my recent physical purchases are deal prices.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,908
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I was the same as you for the longest time, filling out collections for the sake of completing them, but life changed for me with a kid and I already have such rare times to watch a film uninterrupted on TV that I no longer bother.

    Even the latest John Wick, as much as I love the series, didn't connect with me like the other three, so that's $25 or so saved.

    I think I only have the first John Wick film on Bluray and others on Digital. Again I have held of buying 4K physical copies until a boxset of all the films is available.

    I have cut back on buying excessively there are only certain films I will spend money on now. There are instances when you have to prioritise spending, more often than not my recent physical purchases are deal prices.

    I sold off my 4Ks about a month ago. My physical collection is fairly nonexistent these days, aside from some of my favorite Criterions and my Bond blu-rays.

    I feel you on that prioritization.
  • j_w_pepperj_w_pepper Born on the bayou, but I now hear a new dog barkin'
    edited August 2023 Posts: 8,983
    Watched tonight Force 10 from Navarone. Doesn't have that much to do with The Guns of Navarone, except that two characters from that one, albeit played by different actors, are involvd and still it's not really a sequel.

    Here we have JB heavies like Robert Shaw, (and at the time recently) Barbara Bach and Richard Kiel, not to mention Harrison Ford and Edward Fox. So actually, there is nothing to dislike about the movie, as outlandish its plot might be. I liked it either way.

    Get a load of popcorn, forget about history, and enjoy it!
  • Posts: 12,439
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I was the same as you for the longest time, filling out collections for the sake of completing them, but life changed for me with a kid and I already have such rare times to watch a film uninterrupted on TV that I no longer bother.

    Even the latest John Wick, as much as I love the series, didn't connect with me like the other three, so that's $25 or so saved.

    I think I only have the first John Wick film on Bluray and others on Digital. Again I have held of buying 4K physical copies until a boxset of all the films is available.

    I have cut back on buying excessively there are only certain films I will spend money on now. There are instances when you have to prioritise spending, more often than not my recent physical purchases are deal prices.

    I sold off my 4Ks about a month ago. My physical collection is fairly nonexistent these days, aside from some of my favorite Criterions and my Bond blu-rays.

    I feel you on that prioritization.

    That’s a shame, but I understand where you’re coming from. For me, 4K Blu-Rays have been the perfect opportunity for me to both upgrade from standard DVDs and also figure out the films I truly feel I want to keep, since it’s a reset and because of their expensiveness I only get what I know I’ll rewatch now. And I need to have my physical media for my favorite stuff, as I refuse to trust digital / streaming where I own nothing in actuality. But clearing the clutter of excess stuff you realize you don’t need feels great!
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,120
    j_w_pepper wrote: »
    Watched tonight Force 10 from Navarone. Doesn't have that much to do with The Guns of Navarone, except that two characters from that one, albeit played by different actors, are involvd and still it's not really a sequel.

    Here we have JB heavies like Robert Shaw, (and at the time recently) Barbara Bach and Richard Kiel, not to mention Harrison Ford and Edward Fox. So actually, there is nothing to dislike about the movie, as outlandish its plot might be. I liked it either way.

    Get a load of popcorn, forget about history, and enjoy it!

    I enjoy Force 10 from Navarone, though not as much as The Guns of Navarone. The climax is pretty good, though.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,908
    The Crazies (2010)

    Still holds up pretty well, though it's slightly cheesier than I remembered it being. Still, I applaud the practical effects and gore, the constant sense of tension and dread, and how the thriller/horror sequences are fairly minimal but happen one after another after another (even though I wish we had one large scale moment, perhaps during the finale, that felt akin to a ravenous zombie invasion). All in all though, this one's entertaining, and the first film I ever saw at my local Alamo Drafthouse back in 2010.
  • edited August 2023 Posts: 7,380
    Oppenheimer (2023)
    Not long home from seeing it. Was in two minds about going, with some saying it was a long bore! They couldn't be more wrong. Was gripped from the opening frames. Mostly talking heads, but Nolan has written it and directed so well, and with Ludwig Goransson constant thumping sound/music, its utterly compelling. Cast are mostly excellent ( though I'm unsure of Tom Conti as Einstein, I kept hearing his lecherous Restaurant owner in 'Shirley Valentine', "Boat is boat, and F##k is f##k") but its a towering performance from Cillian Murphy. The build up and execution of the bomb is superb, and then we get a tribunal, as Robert Downey Jnrs Strauss tries to discredit Oppenheimer, but this section is no less compelling ( and Emily Blunt has her wonderful moment!) Really enjoyed it, and it has to be seen in IMAX. A wonderful cinema experience!
Sign In or Register to comment.