James Bond Documentary Everything or Nothing Coming Oct. 5

17891012

Comments

  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    chrisM wrote:
    When does the docu come out in England???

    Come and gone mate. Move to America they're probably giving the bluray away free on street corners.
  • It popped up all over the Internet yesterday for download in HDTV ;)
  • edited November 2020 Posts: 121
    1
  • Artemis81Artemis81 In Christmas Land
    edited October 2012 Posts: 543
    It popped up all over the Internet yesterday for download in HDTV ;)
    I found a couple of torrents already. Downloading now to see how good the quality is.
  • Posts: 157
    yep 720p. great news!
  • Artemis81Artemis81 In Christmas Land
    Posts: 543
    ^Awesome. Just finished downloading it and it looks great. I even got to the see the missing piece that I was unable to get when I capture it.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,350
    Great news. Thanks for letting us know. I'll have to download it soon.
  • Posts: 7,653
    Samuel001 wrote:
    Great news. Thanks for letting us know. I'll have to download it soon.

    You know that is illigal and gets you banned on certain sites? ;)
  • SaintMark wrote:
    Samuel001 wrote:
    Great news. Thanks for letting us know. I'll have to download it soon.

    You know that is illigal and gets you banned on certain sites? ;)

    It was illegal not showing this fine piece of Bond history in all countries on Bond Day for ALL fans :D
  • Posts: 7,653
    Have seen it and it was a very nice documentary were even the painfull moments were covered in a nice blanket. Not a lot of new information but a fun one and a half hour to spend.
  • Posts: 15
    Thanks for this brilliant documentary - well worth watching, and a great way to obtain/refresh additional knowledge about Bond after just having watched Skyfall!
  • Where can I watch/download this?
  • Posts: 157
    Just watched it. It was ok, although I think John Cork could have done a better job- his more recent documentaries on Casino Royale Deluxe were superb.
    I liked how it focused on Fleming, Broccoli and Saltzman and then on to each Bond. There’ s been documentary’s on the Girls, the gadgets and effects, the music and each of those could easily make up 90 minutes so it was good to keep that out of it.

    I was expecting them to show some older interview clips of Sean but it was mainly audio. Dalton seems to be bizarrely over-enthusiastic. Brosnan is the actor I idolised as being an ultra-cool Bond when I first saw his films, but now in perspective he is someone to me that comes across quite superficial, he has this plastic veneer about him. Whether he’s being himself or not, I can’t connect with his personality and sense of humour.
    I think they covered TMWTGG and breakup pretty well and I enjoyed David Picker’s perspective on Sean’s quitting and subsequent come back. I think they could of squeezed in something about the 1967 Casino Royale.

    So then, George Lazenby- I do like him as a person much more than his interpretation of Bond, or at least the one they moulded together in the editing room. He’s kind of that anti-establishment rouge Bond. But when did they fire him? He also said at the time he wouldn’t do anymore- was that before the premiere or after the shoot? Was there a time that they wanted him to do more but he wouldn’t sign on? Lazenby seems to reflect differently every time his interviewed. Does anyone have an definitive version events based on media reports of the time? I should really buy Charles Helfenstein book I guess!....
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,350
    grunther wrote:
    Does anyone have an definitive version events based on media reports of the time?

    Lazenby was offered a 7 Bond film contract from James Bond production company Eon before, during, and after filming of On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Despite the popular belief that he quit the role or that he was fired, he actually simply was in a lengthy contract disupute, of which his saying he had quit the role was part of his negotiating ploy. There was a lengthy dispute over Lazenby's Bond contract because it was 14 inches thick and covered everything from how Lazenby should behave in public, how he should dress, what car he should drive, how he should wear his hair, that he always be cleanly shaven, how he handle his personal life, where he should dine out, who he should be seen in public with, among numerous other things over the 14 year length of the contract. Lazenby felt he needed to be paid extra money in order to keep in line with such a Draconian contract for so many years. In the end, Lazenby turned down a very large amount of money and demanded twice what he was offered, and Bond production company Eon and United Artists then removed him from there plans in the Bond franchise.

    Lazenby was offered a then huge actor's salary of $1 million to play 007 in Diamonds Are Forever by Bond co-producer Harry Saltzman and United Artists, but he demanded twice that amount and thus was never signed for the role.

    Ever Wondered Why George Lazenby Only Made One James Bond Movie?

    The question of how come George Lazenby only played 007 in one Bond film has long been one of those great movie trivia questions. There are many conflicting reports and stories on why George Lazenby was only in one 007 movie, and there seems to be a real dearth of the actual facts or story being printed in the press or known to most of the public as to why he only donned the famous Bond tuxedo and played the world's most famous film character just once.

    The following is the true and complete account of why George Lazenby only made one James Bond film, a subject that has baffled many people for years, who have often wondered how a previously unkown model/actor from a small town in The Outback of Australia could have been in his right mind to leave what was at the time the world's most coveted celebrity status position, and thus end up being known as the proverbial and quintessential one-hit wonder. The following article about Lazenby's Bond contract negotiations is based on the historical accounts by United Artists film studio and Eon Productions Company that detailed these particular events in question.

    Why George Lazenby Didn't Have All The Time In The World

    It has often been reported that George Lazenby signed only a one film movie contract to make On Her Majesty's Secret Service, choosing to decline the 7 film contract that he was offered by Eon and United Artists. However this is in fact incorrect. In October of 1968, Lazenby turned down the 14 year/7 film contract that he had been offered and instead chose to sign a 7 year/4 film contract instead. Lazenby also agreed in this contract to sign a Legal Letter of Intent to play James Bond 007 in the James Bond film Diamonds Are Forever, which was to follow Lazenby's first 007 movie, 1969's On Her Majesty's Secret Service.

    It should be noted that Lazenby felt he wasn't going to make another Bond film during the middle of On Her Majesty's Secret Service's production because he had grown extremely tired of the treatment he was receiving on all accounts. However this does not change the fact that he was still under contract, and that the Bond producers always thought he was going to make the next Bond film. The producers simply believed this was a ploy by Lazenby's managers to get him a better deal, which it in fact was. The fact that Lazenby already felt he was done at that point changes none of the below.

    Also some of Lazenby's comments in interviews have been largely taken out of context to make it seem like he implied that he only was signed and obligated for one Bond film. That is absolutely wrong. Lazenby was only paid for one Bond film, with an additional first payment for his next Bond film. Meaning then, that because he had only been paid for one, that was the only one he had to make legally, providing he was not released from his contract. This has then been taken out of context and skewed by numerous media reports and "non-biased" interviewers as to mean he was only signed to a one picture deal, which is totally incorrect.

    The 7 year/4 film contract that Lazenby signed was at industry minimum standard pay for a lead actor in films as big as the Bond films, with the built in industry pay increases for each successive film. This did not sit well with the Bond producers who wanted the young Lazenby locked in to his contract for 7 films at the minimum pay rate they wanted him to get. Lazenby's managers however advised him that it would be better to sign a smaller contract at first, then re-negotiate his longer 7 film deal later on, so that he could demand more money for future films after he had already made some Bond films.

    It has been widely reported that when Lazenby announced he was quitting the role of Bond during the filming of On Her Majesty's Secret Service that he indeed was only obligated contractually to make that film. But that is not accurate. Lazenby was in fact signed and obligated to make 4 Bond films over a 7 year period. During filming of On Her Majesty's Secret Service, the Bond producers constantly offered him the 7 film deal. Meaning he would then sign for 3 extra films in addition to the 4 that he had already signed on for. This offer to Lazenby was eventually extended to 7 Bond films after On Her Majesty's Secret Service, or 8 Bond films in total, and then finally to 7 Bond films after On Her Majesty's Secret Service, in addition to 5 non-Bond films made by United Artists. Lazenby wanted to sign the contract that included the 5 non-Bond films, but his personal manager told him not to.

    It was announced to the press once again that Lazenby was leaving the role of Bond at the premiere of Secret Service. It was Lazenby's publicist that actually made the announcement. Lazenby also said he was leaving the 007 role while on an airing of The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson. By this point Bond producers Harry Saltzman and Cubby Broccoli were furious with Lazenby and did not know what to do with him. Contrary to popular belief, Lazenby was not free from his contract at this time. He was still obligated to make 3 more Bond movies. Also contrary to popular belief, Lazenby was not fired at this time. Instead the Bond producers decided to let Lazenby out of his Bond contract the day after the premiere of On Her Majesty's Secret Service.

    The big dispute between Lazenby and Bond co-producer Cubby Broccoli was over the rules in Lazenby's contract. He actually could be fired for something as simple as not shaving every day while not even filming a Bond movie. There was even a clause in his contract that stated that he had to get his dinner guests approved by Cubby Broccoli before he could be seen dining out with them in public. There were numerous clauses of this nature in his contract and none of them sat well with Lazenby.

    The Bond producers finally realized that they had to let Lazenby out of his contract because he was not going to behave as they wanted him to unless they did so. For example, Lazenby's wearing a beard and long hair in public, hanging out at nightclubs and bars, and saying he was quitting the role numerous times. This sort of thing was done by Lazenby so that he could get the 7 film deal he wanted, but minus all the Draconian rules it had contained within it. In order to do that he first had to get out of the original contract that he had signed.

    Although Cubby Broccoli didn't want to take these clauses out of Lazenby's deal he realized he had no choice, so Saltzman and Broccoli released Lazenby from his deal. They then began negotiating with him on his new contract. The many reports that he was by this time officially no longer Bond are wrong. At this time Harry Saltzman and Lazenby negotiated with each other directly, minus Broccoli and Lazenby's managers. Saltzman had been given full power by United Artists and Broccoli to get Lazenby whatever deal he wanted as long as it stayed within the salary range they wanted to pay him. Lazenby would then take the offers to his manager for approval.

    Saltzman then offered Lazenby a contract for 7 more Bond films and 5 non-Bond films minus all the Draconian clauses in the deal. However, the offer was still to start at the minimum industry standard pay with the same built in industry standard increases for each successive film. Lazenby and his now rather infamous top personal manager/publicist Ronan O'Rahilly, a well known British producer who created Radio Caroline, worked for The BBC and who also managed The Beatles for just one week's time (although some people say it was actually for just one day's time), turned that offer down. They countered it by asking for twice the pay rate offered, as well as Lazenby getting twice as big a dressing room, twice as big a limo, twice as big a trailer, twice as big a personal expense account with Eon, and also with a clause in the contract that stated that Lazenby would keep all the Saville Row suits, Rolex watches, and Bond cars used in his films.

    Although Saltzman, and in particular United Artists, were willing to meet these demands, Cubby Broccoli was not. Broccoli insisted that since Sean Connery did not even get much of that treatment, it did not make sense to give it to Lazenby, even though he would essentially become the world's biggest movie star if he signed the deal. Broccoli remarked how Richard Burton had made similar demands from Eon and UA while he and Lazenby were the final two candidates for the Bond role, and that they wouldn't give Burton what he wanted. In Broccoli's mind he felt that George Lazenby was better for Bond than Burton, but he also felt that if Eon and UA weren't willing to give Burton the sort of perks that he had wanted, it would be foolish to give them to Lazenby. Broccoli therefore would not agree to Lazenby's demands.

    Studio heads from United Artists then met with Saltzman and Broccoli in New York and instructed them to offer Lazenby a longer term deal, termed "a lifetime contract", in the hopes that this would entice him to take the money being offered, as it would ensure that Lazenby would be at the top of the movie business for many years. The thinking behind this was that Lazenby would take less money and perks than he was asking for if he had a guaranteed, extremely lucrative, and heralded gig for the rest of his career, and that this would then firmly establish in the public and press that Lazenby was Bond for life and that Connery, or no one else was going to be Bond.

    Eon offered Lazenby 10 additional Bond movies, which would have given him a total of 11 Bond films in all. The contract was to cover a period of 20 years beginning in 1970 and ending in 1990. Lazenby's last Bond film was to be shot in 1988, and released in 1989. This film eventually became Licence To Kill starring Timothy Dalton, who in a strange twist of irony was actually offered the role of Bond in On Her Majesty's Secret Service before auditions for unkowns were held.

    Cubby Broccoli felt that it was of absolute top priority that they establish in the minds of the press and the public that Bond was Lazenby's gig exclusively and that he be known entirely for Bond. In Broccoli's view, Eon could fully groom Lazenby for the Bond role since he was known simply for it and had not been a professional actor; and that by having everyone know Lazenby had a lifetime contract that would cover two whole decades, it would make the public not only change their mind's that only Connery was clearly Bond, but it would also eventually lead to Lazenby replacing Connery in the public's minds as the definitive Bond.

    When Lazenby was offered this deal he was anxious to sign it, but he still had to get approval for it from his managers. This was because Lazenby had signed an agreement with his managers that they had to approve of all of his deals. He had signed this agreement just days after he had won the Bond casting. Lazenby felt that his biggest obstacle and hurdle in playing Bond was the public's belief that Bond was Connery's gig, so the lifetime contract was the perfect way for him to overcome that, since everyone would be told that he was signed for the next 20 years. This would stop any sentiment amongst the movie-going public that Connery could be brought back if people were hard on Lazenby and stayed away from his films at the box office.

    When Lazenby showed the contract offer to his main manager, he was advised by him that Bond would not last that much longer past the early 1970's because it was no longer a viable character for the times. He advised Lazenby that the tuxedo-clad super-spy had become a cultural dinosaur that was out of touch with the realities of the popular hippie culture of the time. He also advised Lazenby that by signing this contract, he would become completely type cast in the Bond role and then find himself stuck in a star role that was no longer fit for the times, and one that would not enjoy even half the success that it had in the earlier 1960's Sean Connery era. Lazenby did not agree with this advice and wanted to sign the contract, but his managers would not approve of it, and because he had signed the agreement with them that he couldn't sign any deals without their approval, he could not accept the offer.

    When Lazenby then had to turn this offer down, Harry Saltzman broke off contract talks and went back to United Artists along with Cubby Broccoli to discuss their options. At that point they first considered looking for a new Bond, and also offering a huge contract to Sean Connery. They then decided to sign American actor John Gavin to the Bond role as an insurance policy. Gavin's contract stated that if they could not get Lazenby or Connery signed in time to make the scheduled filming start of Diamonds Are Forever, that Gavin would then make the film. However, if either Connery or Lazenby could be re-signed to make the film, Gavin would then receive a one-time $500,000 severance pay, and no longer be attached to the role. UA and Eon could not simply delay the film because they already had sold some of the film's overseas merchandising profits to various investors, and if the film was delayed they could then be sued for that money.

    UA and the Bond co-producers finally decided to simply offer Lazenby a film contract for Diamonds Are Forever at a salary of $1 million. Saltzman met Lazenby in London, in February of 1970, and offered him $1 million to make Diamonds Are Forever, and told him that after that film was completed that they could then either negotiate further films for Lazenby, or that if Lazenby wanted to then quit he could. Saltzman explained to Lazenby that they did not have time to cast another Bond, that it had cost them over $1 million just to cast him, and that they could not take on neither that task, nor cost again at the time. So Saltzman told Lazenby that, Eon needed enough time to prepare for Bond 007 actor casting again if it had to be done over. He also informed Lazenby that Eon/UA had to make the scheduled production start of Diamonds Are Forever, because if they did not, John Gavin would get the role, and they didn't want that to happen.

    Lazenby was also willing to sign this deal. However when he brought it to his main personal manager he was told that the salary was not high enough. Although Lazenby just wanted to take the deal, he still had to get the approval from his managers. Lazenby was told to tell Saltzman that he would make just one more 007 film for a salary of $2 million, and that he would then not make any more Bond films after that. When Lazenby told this to Saltzman, he was informed that the producer had only been authorized to offer up to $1 million by his partners, and that he would have to discuss the $2 million demand with them.

    Saltzman flew back to New York to meet with Broccoli and studio heads from United Artists to discuss his last meeting with Lazenby. When Saltzman informed them of Lazenby's final demand, Cubby Broccoli became outraged. Saltzman and UA were actually willing to pay the $2 million salary but Broccoli refused. He was particularly angry at Lazenby not only demanding such an astronomically huge salary at that time, but also the news that even if Lazenby got such a pay he would still not make another Bond film. The $1 million film salary that they were offering to Lazenby to star in Diamonds would have made him the highest paid male lead for base salary in movie history. Broccoli therefore felt that Lazenby's $2 million asking price was simply an out of line demand, especially considering Lazenby would not commit to more than one more film.

    It was then that United Artists decided that Lazenby was out of consideration for the Bond role. United Artists executive David V. Picker, then ordered Saltzman and Broccoli to re-sign Sean Connery at any cost. They offered Connery a then huge base salary of $1.25 million, as well as 12.5 percent of the film's net US profits, extra pay for the film going over the set shooting schedule, and also funding for Connery to produce and star in 3 film projects of his own choosing.

    This was seen as the biggest deal ever for an actor for a single film to that point. In the end, Connery ended up earning a reported $6 million total for Diamonds Are Forever (three times the amount Lazenby had asked for), and he donated his entire $1.25 million base salary that he earned from the film to the Scotish International Educational Trust, which Connery co-founded. Only one of Connery's 3 non-Bond films allocated in the deal was actually produced, and Connery claimed that Bond co-producer Cubby Broccoli never paid him the $4.75 million of the film's profits that he was owed, although there was never any legal verification or ruling that was true. Connery signed the deal just days after Lazenby's handlers had made their final salary demands. Gavin was paid his $500,000 contract buyout by United Artists.

    Lazenby, for having signed a Legal Letter of Intent to star as 007 in Diamonds, had been given an early initial payment of his salary for that film prior to the time that Connery had been officially signed to return the Bond role. Under the agreement in Lazenby's Legal Letter of Intent, if he did not star as James Bond in Diamonds Are Forever, he would have to reimburse Eon for the initial payment he had received for the film. Lazenby reimbursed Eon for this money after Connery signed.

    http://www.freewebs.com/moonrakerbondstation/georgelazenby.htm

    well according to that he basically got horrible advice, got a little greedy, was stupid, arrogant, and also was treated like crap by the producers, so that pretty much = you are only going to make one film.
  • edited November 2012 Posts: 157
    @Samuel001
    Nice link! I guess Lazenby was caught between a rock and a hard place in a way. The clauses were pretty unworkable and his management were being pure greedy. Its an interesting perspective that Cubby was trying to tie him in for longer. I’m not sure how that would have worked out, that seems too many films for one actor.

    I’m glad he stuck by his principals as Lazenby’s management were taking the piss.
    I find it a shame that in interviews or certain books they would just say he quit or he was fired. Neither seems to be the case here but the passage of time and media reporting can blur the facts considerably.

    I’d be interested to know if there is another resource on any more Bond contract negotiations. Like the time that Connery quit- was that in the middle of the YOLT shoot? Certainly there’s clips on set of him talking about it. Is there anymore resource on this DAF percentage that Connery supposedly didn’t receive? I would guess that’s his main bug bear as it was agreed he would get it and its quite a sum of money.
    You can see why there was hatred between them.

    -edit: i just noticed the whole site is about the actors salary- very interesting!
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    edited November 2012 Posts: 13,882
    @Samuel001 I don't know what to say... good job in digging that article up. I thought that I knew the Lazenby situation, clearly I did not.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,350
    I saved it to Microsoft Word on my PC many years ago because it's that good. Glad to know people enjoyed reading it.
  • I finnally got around to watching this last night, and can happily say it was a fantastic documentary. My only complaint was that it was too short and didn't really dwell on the Lazenby, Dalton or latter Moore eras. But I understand why, it's focus was on the producers and the struggle to keep Bond on screen and keep the series relevant, and there are always those indivudal making-of's on the DVD's for those interested. on the whole it was a very well-made doc, despite clearly being from the EON-wheelhouse, it was the first time i've seen a Bond doc that really cast aspersions over the producers, particularly the relationship Cubby and Harry had, which was very new to me. Also the general treatment of Sean Connery, and how David Picker, the then head of UA, thought Harry and Cubby were being too greedy. The Bond story does seem to be one of greed, and the story made an interesting point about how Bond seems to almost destroy the people who bought him to life. In the end it was Fleming's creation that got the better of him, it drove a rift between the producers and their leading man and McClory is depicted as an obbesive trying to claw at power. However, it was refreshing to see a more honest take on the genesis of the franchise. I must also admit to weeping a tear when Barbara talked about her father's passing. All in all, its a great doc and a must-watch for all Bond fans, but don't go in expecting to see or hear anything all that new. But still it's a fitting tribute to the franchise and the men who bought it to the big screen, a great tip of the hat to 50 years of 007.
  • Posts: 157
    I see the DVD has been announced but no blu ray! if i'm going to buy this, it needs to be the blu ray with lots of unseen interview footage that didn't make it.

    also whilst on the trail of dirty McClory and EON laundry I came across this 3 part link:
    http://www.spywise.net/untold1.html

    some interesting inside nuggets of Bond info such as the attempt of an EON takeover and bringing back none other than .....George Lazenby!

    I'm still looking to find info on whether Connery successfully sued Broccoli. It seems at some point Broccoli was countersuing Connery.

  • Posts: 12,506
    grunther wrote:
    I see the DVD has been announced but no blu ray! if i'm going to buy this, it needs to be the blu ray with lots of unseen interview footage that didn't make it.

    also whilst on the trail of dirty McClory and EON laundry I came across this 3 part link:
    http://www.spywise.net/untold1.html

    some interesting inside nuggets of Bond info such as the attempt of an EON takeover and bringing back none other than .....George Lazenby!

    I'm still looking to find info on whether Connery successfully sued Broccoli. It seems at some point Broccoli was countersuing Connery.

    I am just sooo pleased that it is being released at all, if only on DVD as i was very disappointed at still not seeing it yet! So this will be a definate purchase for me next month! :-bd
  • brinkeguthriebrinkeguthrie Piz Gloria
    Posts: 1,400
    is there a USA release?
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    After the screwing we got here in the UK, I have no intention of buying this on DVD. I have it downloaded onto my HD, saving myself cash better and rightfully spent elsewhere.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    edited January 2013 Posts: 9,117
    =bg= wrote:
    is there a USA release?

    Is that supposed to be a joke?
    doubleoego wrote:
    After the screwing we got here in the UK, I have no intention of buying this on DVD. I have it downloaded onto my HD, saving myself cash better and rightfully spent elsewhere.

    Likewise Sir. Well said.

    I'll probably pick it up in about a year when it goes down to £3 in HMV just because it looks nicer on the shelf than on your hard drive.
  • I didn't see it at the cinema and I'm not buying the DVD now. I'm not giving them a penny.

    I've seen it online now and it's still on Youtube. If at some point I fancy rewatching it and it's suddenly not online anymore, then I'll consider getting the DVD if it's cheap.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    I didn't see it at the cinema and I'm not buying the DVD now. I'm not giving them a penny.

    I've seen it online now and it's still on Youtube. If at some point I fancy rewatching it and it's suddenly not online anymore, then I'll consider getting the DVD if it's cheap.
    YouTube took it down a long time ago.
  • Eh, still not buying the DVD. I saw it not long ago anyway.
  • ShardlakeShardlake Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 4,043
    I do have to ask a question, why is this being released in a format that by all rights should be starting to be phased out well the players at least?

    You can pick up a Blu ray player so cheap now and anyone telling me the discs are expensive just doesn't hunt around much, why oh why is this just on DVD?

    This should be all rights an extra on the Skyfall Blu ray or available as an option on a more expensive version of SF when it's released.

    I assume the eventual U.S release will get this format as always, this country doesn't do much to support the format and seem to take ages to get their act together, just glad I've got a region free player and can take the pick of the World's Blu ray cat, not having access to the The Criterion Collection on the format was particularly frustrating.
  • Posts: 1,817
    Any words on the DVD release in the US?
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    edited January 2013 Posts: 9,117
    http://www.mi6-hq.com/news/index.php?itemid=10757&t=mi6&s=news

    Just checked Netflix UK and what do you think we get? Everything? Or nothing?

    Yep folks its nothing as usual.

    Just keep on kicking us whilst we're down EON.

    Why not also have Daniel Craig personally deliver copies of the DVD signed by all the Bonds to every household in America?

    Or just build a series of massive Drax/Graves style 100km wide space screens that float in orbit over each state so that every US citizen can watch it on a loop 24/7 merely by looking out of the window?
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    edited January 2013 Posts: 28,694
    http://www.mi6-hq.com/news/index.php?itemid=10757&t=mi6&s=news

    Just checked Netflix UK and what do you thing we get? Everything? Or nothing?

    Yep folks its nothing as usual.

    Just keep on kicking us whilst we're down EON.

    Why not also have Daniel Craig personally deliver copies of the DVD signed by all the Bonds to every household in America?

    Or just build a series of massive Drax/Graves style 100km wide space screens that float in orbit over each state so that every US citizen can watch it on a loop 24/7 merely by looking out of the window?

    @Wizard, you crack me up! =))

    And by the way, the screens over here are 150km. ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.