Controversial opinions about other movies

1333436383958

Comments

  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    chrisisall wrote: »
    My controversial opinion is that I prefer the theatrical cut of Blade Runner to the countless later versions. I think the ending actually works better with the ride-into-the-sunset Shining outtakes than it does just stopping dead near a lift shaft. And I am ok with the voiceover too, I don’t love it but am ok with it. I’ve seen the film so often that I mentally fill in the voiceover anyway if I’m watching a non-voiceover version
    Am I the Brudder you got? Because, man, this makes me so happy that I'm not the only one!!!
    I've owned every version down through the years, gave each one attention, but I keep coming back to the one I saw 15 times in the theatre back in 1982 (I saw a test screening in very early '82 that ended up being the theatrical version). Ford's uninterested & flat delivery of the voice-over was perfect for the character. He thought he was sabotaging it, but he ended up doing it better than if had put any effort into it, LOL. But I'm a big fan of the 1982 international theatrical release though- more violent, and thus more uncomfortable at a couple of points....

    I have no problems with the voiceover except when Roy "shuts down". Only silence can follow that amazing monologue. Ford's voice ruins that moment completely.

    I saw it when I was 22 (& maybe mentally 5 years younger than that), so it's possible that I took it in very differently than anyone 25 or older later on. I though it was borderline sweet of Deckard.
  • Posts: 15,818
    Count me in as another fan of the theatrical BLADE RUNNER.
    I actually really like Ford's voice over narration and gives the film that classic noir vibe.
    I should track down a copy of the theatrical version.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Count me in as another fan of the theatrical BLADE RUNNER.
    I actually really like Ford's voice over narration and gives the film that classic noir vibe.
    I should track down a copy of the theatrical version.

    Here (for example): https://www.ebay.com/itm/125040044428?epid=61911949&hash=item1d1cf7a98c:g:5ngAAOSwucxhr92S
  • Posts: 15,818
    chrisisall wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Count me in as another fan of the theatrical BLADE RUNNER.
    I actually really like Ford's voice over narration and gives the film that classic noir vibe.
    I should track down a copy of the theatrical version.

    Here (for example): https://www.ebay.com/itm/125040044428?epid=61911949&hash=item1d1cf7a98c:g:5ngAAOSwucxhr92S

    Thanks! I may treat myself to an early Christmas gift.
  • Posts: 1,883
    I was 15 when I saw Blade Runner the first time and instead of getting a thrill ride along the lines of Ford's two previous summer blockbusters, I got a ponderous, philosophical film without much action but a lot of great scenery. Major disappointment for teen me, but I grew to appreciate BR and its many incarnations over the years. The story of its creation is in many ways even better than the actual film.
  • edited December 2021 Posts: 6,844
    BT3366 wrote: »
    I was 15 when I saw Blade Runner the first time and instead of getting a thrill ride along the lines of Ford's two previous summer blockbusters, I got a ponderous, philosophical film without much action but a lot of great scenery. Major disappointment for teen me, but I grew to appreciate BR and its many incarnations over the years. The story of its creation is in many ways even better than the actual film.

    It absolutely is! If anyone hasn't already, they really should check out the phenomenal 3+ hour-long Dangerous Days documentary included on the set @chrisisall linked to.
  • Posts: 1,394
    Iv never understood that scene in BR where Deckard is ordering sushi at the street market and the cook ( seemingly only able to speak Chinese ) gets his order wrong.Deckard just gives up trying to get through to him and accepts what the cook is giving him.Then Gaff shows up and the cook says “ He say you under arrest Mr Deckard! “.Deckard doesn’t act surprised that the cook can speak english and says “ Tell him I’m eating “.

    The hell was going on there?
  • Posts: 14,832
    BT3366 wrote: »
    I was 15 when I saw Blade Runner the first time and instead of getting a thrill ride along the lines of Ford's two previous summer blockbusters, I got a ponderous, philosophical film without much action but a lot of great scenery. Major disappointment for teen me, but I grew to appreciate BR and its many incarnations over the years. The story of its creation is in many ways even better than the actual film.

    I think that's how many people perceived it when it was released and how I perceived BR when I first watched it: we were expecting Han Solo mixed with Indiana Jones in a post apocalyptic setting.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 2,928
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    I have no problems with the voiceover except when Roy "shuts down". Only silence can follow that amazing monologue. Ford's voic e ruins that moment completely.

    Absolutely.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    Iv never understood that scene in BR where Deckard is ordering sushi at the street market and the cook ( seemingly only able to speak Chinese ) gets his order wrong.Deckard just gives up trying to get through to him and accepts what the cook is giving him.Then Gaff shows up and the cook says “ He say you under arrest Mr Deckard! “.Deckard doesn’t act surprised that the cook can speak english and says “ Tell him I’m eating “.

    The hell was going on there?

    The cook was telling Deckard that his order violated volume protocols. He was unhappy with that.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    edited December 2021 Posts: 13,894
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,551
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    I'm inclined to partially agree. I never thought of him as the King of Cool but... he was cool enough for me. (Same with people calling Wes Craven the "Master Of Horror". He wasn't in my opinion, but he did contribute quite a bit to the genre.)
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    edited December 2021 Posts: 7,526
    I've only seen him in Bullitt and I don't think it really had a lasting impact on me. But I do really like his style and his penchant for racing.

    I could be wrong here, but it's my understanding he did a film about Le Mans, and then there was a documentary about this film (doc called The Man and Le Mans); am I mistaken and they're one in the same? I seem to only be able to find the documentary anywhere.

    If not, I'd love to watch the actual film itself.
  • Posts: 5,811
    , the seond in No, they're not one and the same. The first movie (with Steve McQueen) was filmed in 1970, the second in 2015. I've seen the first one on TV.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Mans_(film)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_McQueen:_The_Man_%26_Le_Mans
  • Posts: 9,771
    I hate Christmas Vacation I know everyone loves it claims its so funny... I don't get it. I enjoy comedy I enjoy physical comedy I hate this bloody film and honestly the whole franchise!
  • Posts: 372
    I hate pretty much anything with Chevy Chase in it to be honest. The guy is just not funny. But then he comes from a long line of American film comics who become popular without ever being funny. Chase, Carrey, Martin Short, Will Ferrell to name but a few.
  • Posts: 1,394
    The best way to watch the Star Wars Skywalker saga is in chronological episode order 1-6 ( The Disney trilogy doesn’t exist ).

    Some may say it ruins the Darth Vader reveal in TESB but I argue by watching in episode order it makes Anakins downfall in Episode 3 more shocking and tragic for new viewers.
  • Posts: 15,818
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    A friend of mine told me HIS controversial opinion: Franco Nero was cooler than Steve McQueen. My response was in that case I'll say Robert Mitchum was cooler than McQueen too.
    Either way I'm still a fan of McQueen and always enjoyed his performances.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,894
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    I'm inclined to partially agree. I never thought of him as the King of Cool but... he was cool enough for me. (Same with people calling Wes Craven the "Master Of Horror". He wasn't in my opinion, but he did contribute quite a bit to the genre.)

    I wasn't expecting that from you, @DarthDimi. You've really surprised me, there. Coming up with the idea for Freddy, alone, was genius, and would allow Craven to be called a Master Of Horror. Then going on to reinvent the slasher genre for the 90's with Scream (even if I am not a fan of the Scream films).
    I've only seen him in Bullitt and I don't think it really had a lasting impact on me. But I do really like his style and his penchant for racing.

    I have seen Bullit a few times, and while the reputation surrounding the chase is... ok, i'll say it's well deserved the rest of the film is completely forgettable.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    A friend of mine told me HIS controversial opinion: Franco Nero was cooler than Steve McQueen. My response was in that case I'll say Robert Mitchum was cooler than McQueen too.
    Either way I'm still a fan of McQueen and always enjoyed his performances.

    I was actually thinking that when I made my post, but then I am biased in favour of Mitchum.

    https://www.austinfilm.org/2015/08/was-robert-mitchum-the-coolest-guy-ever-evidence-points-to-yes/
    https://www.slantmagazine.com/features/robert-mitchum-playing-it-cool/

    giphy.gif

    Snoop agrees, so it must be true.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,526
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    The best way to watch the Star Wars Skywalker saga is in chronological episode order 1-6 ( The Disney trilogy doesn’t exist ).

    Some may say it ruins the Darth Vader reveal in TESB but I argue by watching in episode order it makes Anakins downfall in Episode 3 more shocking and tragic for new viewers.

    I like 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 6
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,113
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    I'm inclined to partially agree. I never thought of him as the King of Cool but... he was cool enough for me. (Same with people calling Wes Craven the "Master Of Horror". He wasn't in my opinion, but he did contribute quite a bit to the genre.)

    I wasn't expecting that from you, @DarthDimi. You've really surprised me, there. Coming up with the idea for Freddy, alone, was genius, and would allow Craven to be called a Master Of Horror. Then going on to reinvent the slasher genre for the 90's with Scream (even if I am not a fan of the Scream films).
    I've only seen him in Bullitt and I don't think it really had a lasting impact on me. But I do really like his style and his penchant for racing.

    I have seen Bullit a few times, and while the reputation surrounding the chase is... ok, i'll say it's well deserved the rest of the film is completely forgettable.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    A friend of mine told me HIS controversial opinion: Franco Nero was cooler than Steve McQueen. My response was in that case I'll say Robert Mitchum was cooler than McQueen too.
    Either way I'm still a fan of McQueen and always enjoyed his performances.

    I was actually thinking that when I made my post, but then I am biased in favour of Mitchum.

    https://www.austinfilm.org/2015/08/was-robert-mitchum-the-coolest-guy-ever-evidence-points-to-yes/
    https://www.slantmagazine.com/features/robert-mitchum-playing-it-cool/

    giphy.gif

    Snoop agrees, so it must be true.

    I agree partly about Steve McQueen and fully about Bullitt. McQueen was a druggie alcoholic who was full of himself as a bully. Other the car chase, Bullitt is overrated and forgettable. For me, George Clooney and Johnny Depp are often called cool, but one can’t act and the other one’s fans have blown him up into possibly the most overrated actor ever. George Clooney thinks of himself as a liberal brand. He thought that before he made it big. He says that Batman & Robin psychologically scarred him, honestly his acting range hasn’t changed much in 25 years. He’s still playing himself in all roles. Different roles sure, but he thinks of himself as a brand more than a actor.
    Johnny Depp, where do I begin and end with this guy and his fans? He plays the same character in every role, just loads of makeup and thinking he’s British. His fans find no fault in him, and it’s as disgusting as when Tim Burton only used him and Helena Bonham Carter (who is someone else who is overrated) as his only leads. As for his career now, the bigger they rise, the harder they fall. No sympathy from me on his troubles, Amber Heard or not.
    As for Scarlett Johansson, I finally found a video clip that best describes her acting.


  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,551
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    I'm inclined to partially agree. I never thought of him as the King of Cool but... he was cool enough for me. (Same with people calling Wes Craven the "Master Of Horror". He wasn't in my opinion, but he did contribute quite a bit to the genre.)

    I wasn't expecting that from you, @DarthDimi. You've really surprised me, there. Coming up with the idea for Freddy, alone, was genius, and would allow Craven to be called a Master Of Horror. Then going on to reinvent the slasher genre for the 90's with Scream (even if I am not a fan of the Scream films).

    I get that, @MajorDSmythe ;) The problem for me is that while Craven made some pretty solid films, one of which originated my favourite horror icon (the immortal dream demon, the man of my dreams, Mr Freddy Krueger esquire), he also dropped some stinkers in our catalogue, several of which suggest anything but mastery over the horror genre ('The Hills Have Eyes 2, Cursed, ...) Apart from 'Last House', 'The Hills Have Eyes' and 'Nightmare', Craven worked better with other people's material (e.g. Scream, Red Eye).

    John Carpenter would be my preferred 'master of horror'. Halloween is a masterpiece, The Thing possibly one of the scariest films ever made; Prince Of Darkness an underrated jewel; The Fog, Eyes Of Laura Mars, Christine and They Live delicious little gems as well. Carpenter isn't perfect either, but he did manage to build great films from his own scripts, low budgets and unjustifiable attacks from critics.

    There's also a new generation of potential masters of horror ready to claim that title (but not yet getting it due to low quantity of output, rather than quality.) I'm thinking about Ari Aster, Robert Eggers, Benson & Moorhead, Jordan Peele, ...

    Even Rob Zombie and Eli Roth, heavily criticised for their extreme brutality, are better candidates for the Master of Horror title than Craven, at least in my opinion. ;-)
  • edited December 2021 Posts: 6,820
    Have to defend McQueen and 'Bullitt' here! One of my favourite thrillers. British Director Peter Yates does a great job filming in San Francisco locations! McQueen IS cool here, Robert Vaughan is a wonderful slimy foil to him, Jackie Bisset is gorgeous, and It presents her as the beautiful, gentle, innocent part of Bullitts life, the total opposite to his nasty horrible violent work life. The car chase is the icing on the cake, Oh and I musnt forget Lalo Schifrins score, and one of the coolest title sequences in films. Nope, you're all wrong!!😄
  • Posts: 1,883
    Bullitt is one of those films that was built up over the years into a classic, but when you see it through modern eyes you kind of wonder what they hype was. It's good, but not the classic it's made out to be, at least for me.

    Yeah, McQueen is cool in it but I do think that car chase is a bit overrated. I'll take The French Connection's over it as far as that classic era goes.
    cooperman2 wrote: »
    I hate pretty much anything with Chevy Chase in it to be honest. The guy is just not funny. But then he comes from a long line of American film comics who become popular without ever being funny. Chase, Carrey, Martin Short, Will Ferrell to name but a few.

    I love Chevy Chase, not sure why. He's just somebody who has amused me for 40 years. Will Ferrell I will agree with every time. Funny thing is I like Adam Sandler, who some people say plays mostly the same types of roles as Ferrell, but there's just something about Ferrell that just grates on me. I was horrified when I heard the other day there's a day dedicated to quoting lines from Elf.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,416
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    I'm inclined to partially agree. I never thought of him as the King of Cool but... he was cool enough for me. (Same with people calling Wes Craven the "Master Of Horror". He wasn't in my opinion, but he did contribute quite a bit to the genre.)

    I wasn't expecting that from you, @DarthDimi. You've really surprised me, there. Coming up with the idea for Freddy, alone, was genius, and would allow Craven to be called a Master Of Horror. Then going on to reinvent the slasher genre for the 90's with Scream (even if I am not a fan of the Scream films).
    I've only seen him in Bullitt and I don't think it really had a lasting impact on me. But I do really like his style and his penchant for racing.

    I have seen Bullit a few times, and while the reputation surrounding the chase is... ok, i'll say it's well deserved the rest of the film is completely forgettable.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    A friend of mine told me HIS controversial opinion: Franco Nero was cooler than Steve McQueen. My response was in that case I'll say Robert Mitchum was cooler than McQueen too.
    Either way I'm still a fan of McQueen and always enjoyed his performances.

    I was actually thinking that when I made my post, but then I am biased in favour of Mitchum.

    https://www.austinfilm.org/2015/08/was-robert-mitchum-the-coolest-guy-ever-evidence-points-to-yes/
    https://www.slantmagazine.com/features/robert-mitchum-playing-it-cool/

    giphy.gif

    Snoop agrees, so it must be true.

    I agree partly about Steve McQueen and fully about Bullitt. McQueen was a druggie alcoholic who was full of himself as a bully. Other the car chase, Bullitt is overrated and forgettable. For me, George Clooney and Johnny Depp are often called cool, but one can’t act and the other one’s fans have blown him up into possibly the most overrated actor ever. George Clooney thinks of himself as a liberal brand. He thought that before he made it big. He says that Batman & Robin psychologically scarred him, honestly his acting range hasn’t changed much in 25 years. He’s still playing himself in all roles. Different roles sure, but he thinks of himself as a brand more than a actor.
    Johnny Depp, where do I begin and end with this guy and his fans? He plays the same character in every role, just loads of makeup and thinking he’s British. His fans find no fault in him, and it’s as disgusting as when Tim Burton only used him and Helena Bonham Carter (who is someone else who is overrated) as his only leads. As for his career now, the bigger they rise, the harder they fall. No sympathy from me on his troubles, Amber Heard or not.
    As for Scarlett Johansson, I finally found a video clip that best describes her acting.


    I only enjoy Clooney in the Oceans movies and Depp in the Pirates movies, but only the first three. The Jack Sprarrow shtick got old after World's End.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,788
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    I'm inclined to partially agree. I never thought of him as the King of Cool but... he was cool enough for me. (Same with people calling Wes Craven the "Master Of Horror". He wasn't in my opinion, but he did contribute quite a bit to the genre.)

    I wasn't expecting that from you, @DarthDimi. You've really surprised me, there. Coming up with the idea for Freddy, alone, was genius, and would allow Craven to be called a Master Of Horror. Then going on to reinvent the slasher genre for the 90's with Scream (even if I am not a fan of the Scream films).

    I get that, @MajorDSmythe ;) The problem for me is that while Craven made some pretty solid films, one of which originated my favourite horror icon (the immortal dream demon, the man of my dreams, Mr Freddy Krueger esquire), he also dropped some stinkers in our catalogue, several of which suggest anything but mastery over the horror genre ('The Hills Have Eyes 2, Cursed, ...) Apart from 'Last House', 'The Hills Have Eyes' and 'Nightmare', Craven worked better with other people's material (e.g. Scream, Red Eye).

    John Carpenter would be my preferred 'master of horror'. Halloween is a masterpiece, The Thing possibly one of the scariest films ever made; Prince Of Darkness an underrated jewel; The Fog, Eyes Of Laura Mars, Christine and They Live delicious little gems as well. Carpenter isn't perfect either, but he did manage to build great films from his own scripts, low budgets and unjustifiable attacks from critics.

    There's also a new generation of potential masters of horror ready to claim that title (but not yet getting it due to low quantity of output, rather than quality.) I'm thinking about Ari Aster, Robert Eggers, Benson & Moorhead, Jordan Peele, ...

    Even Rob Zombie and Eli Roth, heavily criticised for their extreme brutality, are better candidates for the Master of Horror title than Craven, at least in my opinion. ;-)

    For me ‘The Master of Horror’ title goes to Dario Argento. I know lately it’s been a rough ride for him, but Argento in the 70’s and 80’s is unbeatable for me. No-one can quite make the horrors on screen look so gorgeous as dear old Dario, the Emperor of Shock Art.

    I’d say Mario Bava comes in second. Carpenter is my number 3.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Kicking: Impossible
    Posts: 6,733
    Johnny Depp was fantastic in The Ninth Gate. Superb performance.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,551
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    In for a penny, in for a pound....


    Steve McQueen was not the King of Cool, his barely saying a word style of acting, was like watching white paint dry.

    I'm inclined to partially agree. I never thought of him as the King of Cool but... he was cool enough for me. (Same with people calling Wes Craven the "Master Of Horror". He wasn't in my opinion, but he did contribute quite a bit to the genre.)

    I wasn't expecting that from you, @DarthDimi. You've really surprised me, there. Coming up with the idea for Freddy, alone, was genius, and would allow Craven to be called a Master Of Horror. Then going on to reinvent the slasher genre for the 90's with Scream (even if I am not a fan of the Scream films).

    I get that, @MajorDSmythe ;) The problem for me is that while Craven made some pretty solid films, one of which originated my favourite horror icon (the immortal dream demon, the man of my dreams, Mr Freddy Krueger esquire), he also dropped some stinkers in our catalogue, several of which suggest anything but mastery over the horror genre ('The Hills Have Eyes 2, Cursed, ...) Apart from 'Last House', 'The Hills Have Eyes' and 'Nightmare', Craven worked better with other people's material (e.g. Scream, Red Eye).

    John Carpenter would be my preferred 'master of horror'. Halloween is a masterpiece, The Thing possibly one of the scariest films ever made; Prince Of Darkness an underrated jewel; The Fog, Eyes Of Laura Mars, Christine and They Live delicious little gems as well. Carpenter isn't perfect either, but he did manage to build great films from his own scripts, low budgets and unjustifiable attacks from critics.

    There's also a new generation of potential masters of horror ready to claim that title (but not yet getting it due to low quantity of output, rather than quality.) I'm thinking about Ari Aster, Robert Eggers, Benson & Moorhead, Jordan Peele, ...

    Even Rob Zombie and Eli Roth, heavily criticised for their extreme brutality, are better candidates for the Master of Horror title than Craven, at least in my opinion. ;-)

    For me ‘The Master of Horror’ title goes to Dario Argento. I know lately it’s been a rough ride for him, but Argento in the 70’s and 80’s is unbeatable for me. No-one can quite make the horrors on screen look so gorgeous as dear old Dario, the Emperor of Shock Art.

    I’d say Mario Bava comes in second. Carpenter is my number 3.

    Yes, Argento, Bava and Fulci for me as well: great filmmakers, great contributors to the genre.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,894
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    I agree partly about Steve McQueen and fully about Bullitt. McQueen was a druggie alcoholic who was full of himself as a bully. Other the car chase, Bullitt is overrated and forgettable. For me, George Clooney and Johnny Depp are often called cool, but one can’t act and the other one’s fans have blown him up into possibly the most overrated actor ever. George Clooney thinks of himself as a liberal brand. He thought that before he made it big. He says that Batman & Robin psychologically scarred him, honestly his acting range hasn’t changed much in 25 years. He’s still playing himself in all roles. Different roles sure, but he thinks of himself as a brand more than a actor.
    Johnny Depp, where do I begin and end with this guy and his fans? He plays the same character in every role, just loads of makeup and thinking he’s British. His fans find no fault in him, and it’s as disgusting as when Tim Burton only used him and Helena Bonham Carter (who is someone else who is overrated) as his only leads. As for his career now, the bigger they rise, the harder they fall. No sympathy from me on his troubles, Amber Heard or not.
    As for Scarlett Johansson, I finally found a video clip that best describes her acting.


    I wrote something similar in my original post, then deleted it. I can't really critisize McQueen for his offscreen behaviour, when I wouldn't do the same for some of my favourite actors.
Sign In or Register to comment.