Last Bond Movie You Watched

1202203205207208331

Comments

  • GBFGBF
    Posts: 3,197
    Diamonds are forever.

    It is strange. I really don't know why but this is the Connery Bond film I watch the most often, even though it is certainly my least favourite Connery Bond film. I still really enjoy this film very much until the climax which is just boring and uninteresting. For me it is the worst in the series. However the scenes in Amsterdam and evereything in Las Vegas before the moon buggy chase as well as the Blofeld reveal is just great. I like all the many characters who are involved in the diamond smuggling ring (this Bond film has probably the highest amount of side characters). It is also one of the Bond films that is very well paced (except for the climax) and is really funny.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,912
    DALTON DOUBLE FEATURE

    It's been a while since I have watched both Dalton Bond films back to back.

    What a great ride. Probably the best two consecutive Bond movies besides FRWL-GF.

    Timothy DALTON RULEZ™

    He is determined, relentless, kicks ass and dangerous when mad. And always convincing. Something his successors leave to be desired on many occasions.

    Both movies together feature what must be the greatest ensemble casts in the franchise.
    Not one character is a miss.

    While LTK is dark, brutal and gritty, it is also full of wonderful humour, incredible stunt work, also by Dalton himself and great action. Q's scenes are just priceless, Carey Lowell is perfect and Robert Davi is the most believable villain of them all.

    TLD is the perfect first Bond movie for a new actor. An achievement that has since been repeated with GoldenEye and Casino Royale.
    Timothy Dalton commands the screen in every scene he's in. His acting is impeccable and he is by far, by far the only Bond that came near Fleming's vision.
    Had MGM not been in trouble after LTK, Dalton would have become the third actor after Connery and Moore to become a beloved icon for generations.

    As it is, his legacy was cut short but at least his two movies are very popular and have many fans.

    TLD has been my No 1 Bond from 1987 to 1995 and since then No 2 up to 2015.
    LTK moves in and out of my Top 10, always somewhere between 8th and 11th rank.

    I always loved and adored Roger Moore, I'm a Brosnan fanboy and I have the deepest respect for Sean Connery, I'm always speechless watching Lazenby in the perfect Bond movie and Daniel Craig managed to be the only actor getting three movies into my Top 10.

    But Timothy DALTON RULEZ™ all the way. No one comes close and I can only hope BB will cast the 007th Bond with Dalton as the blueprint for the perfect cinematic Bond.

    Getting a double barrel dose of Dalton on the big screen was not just the highlight of 2015, but all my years as a Bond fan. When I come to them in my Bondathaon (which I need to get back to), I will have to double-bill them.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    @Mathis1, I am also puzzled by all the love for GE. I blame it on poor taste.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    @Mathis1, I am also puzzled by all the love for GE. I blame it on poor taste.
    @Thunderfinger, forgive us for we don't know what are we doing...
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    I do forgive you.
  • Posts: 6,945
    I do think its a nostalgia thing! After the long gap, fans were so delighted to see Bond back on screen, and GE will always have that mantle, The Movie where 007 returned to Cinema! But really, if you look at the film today, its not very good at all!
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Excactly. It is safe to say it is one of the very worst.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    It's not very good. But, it's not overtly bad as some class it to be.
  • Posts: 6,945
    As I said in my review, not DAD bad, but bad enough! The reason I'm harping on about it is I have an uneasy feeling its going to be in Gustav Graves Big Poll, in the top ten, which it doesn't deserve!
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    edited October 2016 Posts: 15,423
    Too many share different perspective on that matter. It does very well deserve to be in the top ten list.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,335
    It's the definitive Bond movie, A must see, essential viewing. ;)
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 3,985
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    I do think its a nostalgia thing! After the long gap, fans were so delighted to see Bond back on screen, and GE will always have that mantle, The Movie where 007 returned to Cinema! But really, if you look at the film today, its not very good at all!

    I think it was the right Bond film for when it was released.

    It balanced all the familiar elements nicely and didn't stray too far from the format as the misjudged LTK had done several years earlier.

    I like the film, but it hasn't aged well. And with Craig excelling in the Bond role, Brosnan just seems so lightweight now.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    And is lightweight a bad thing? I mean, if it is, then all the actors prior to Craig are lightweight.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,816
    YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE

    Absolutely loved it this time around. Good old fashioned escapism. Might have become my second favourite Connery Bond after FRWL.

    Equally iconic as GF but ups it with a devilish femme fatale (granted, inspired by TB), even better work from Adam and Barry, impressive cinematography and exotic settings in epic widescreen scope.

    Also, this film has two of my favourite allies, Tiger and Henderson.

    I also never understand the critcism towards Connery here. Loved his performance. I think actualiteit he is pretty funny in this one:

    "Request permission to come aboard, Sir?"
    "We corpses have absolutely no sense of time."
    "Siamese wodka?!"
    "Impregnable?"
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 3,985
    And is lightweight a bad thing? I mean, if it is, then all the actors prior to Craig are lightweight.

    I'd hardly call Connery in his early films or Dalton 'lightweight' so there goes that argument right there.

    No, it's not a bad thing and I don't mind Brosnan, but he came before Craig took over and albeit with a meatier script Craig made Bond a flesh and blood character again.

    Not so much a criticism of Brosnan as praise for Craig.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    Had a great time watching The Living Daylights last night. Took me back to my childhood, seeing it for the first time on the big screen. It was my first time witnessing a Bond actor's debut. It was shocking that Roger Moore was gone. I wasn't old enough yet to realize that it was time for Sir Rog to move on. It had been time for a while according to some!

    Anyway, I continue to appreciate what Dalton was trying to do and I feel that, for the most part, he succeeded. He doesn't quite have the screen presence of Connery or Moore, but I love the complexity he brought to the character. He's so expressive with his eyes. He moves well in the action scenes too.

    The film is full of classic moments, but then certain parts tend to drag. Overall, I was quite pleased with it though. Definitely a more positive experience than the last time. As a boy, I remember liking Dalton but still being disappointed that Moore was gone. For those of you who saw TLD in 1987, what were your thoughts?
  • Posts: 6,945
    Well Dalton is top man for me! I didn't know much about him when I heard he was cast! Saw him in 'Wuthering Heights', and 'Agatha', but that was about it! (Oh and 'Flash Gordon') Me being Irish, the media over here were going nuts over Brossa "getting" the role, and I wasn't happy about that at all! When I heard he was out and Dalton in, it was with relief! But I still wasn't sure what Tim was going to like in the role! Pre-publicity interviews had him stating he had gone back to the Fleming books, which gladdened my heart no end! On seeing the movie on a sunny Sunday afternoon, he absolutely blew me away, from that first dramatic shot of him, to the final embrace with Kara, I thought he was outstanding! Still do! LTK was a fantasticfollow up, and his leaving the part after only two movies gutted me!
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Well Dalton is top man for me! I didn't know much about him when I heard he was cast! Saw him in 'Wuthering Heights', and 'Agatha', but that was about it! (Oh and 'Flash Gordon') Me being Irish, the media over here were going nuts over Brossa "getting" the role, and I wasn't happy about that at all! When I heard he was out and Dalton in, it was with relief!
    I can only imagine what a roller coaster of emotions this must have been for you. A temporary respite, as history would have it.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,335
    A Skyfall and Spectre double feature. It was a blast! :-bd
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    pachazo wrote: »
    For those of you who saw TLD in 1987, what were your thoughts?

    The best possible choice for Bond.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    @pachazo

    I was 13 in 1987 and TLD changed my life, I walked out of the cinema and the world looked and felt different.
    The only two times I felt similar was after the first time getting laid a year later and doing my first halo jump with 19.
  • Posts: 15,882
    @pachazo - TLD was the first film I went to by myself. I felt like an adult, actually going downtown to an old style luxury cinema to see it. I was thrilled and loved it, but had a hard time following the plot the first time out. Also it deviated from the Glen formula slightly in that the M/office Money penny sequence didn't follow the titles until much later. It was like Bond was already on assignment from the start.
    I thought Tim was amazing. It remains to this day one of my favorite Bonds. The first "new" Bond actor for me too. At the time I really thought he'd be Bond for at least 12 years like Roger. Oh well. I remember thinking a-ha's theme was a bit in the style of Duran Duran- yet not getting hardly any airplay. Seeing the film was the first time I'd heard it. Also it was strange the end credits had an alternate song.
    I loved it. Dalton was pure Fleming Bond for me.
  • Posts: 6,432
    FRWL Bluray on my new 4K TV the upscale Wow, this TV has a incredible processor and does what it claims. FRWL upscaled is one of the best film experiences I have had this great film looks amazing. I am in shock
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    Great stories, everyone. Thanks for sharing. I was only eight years old, but it was a thrilling experience all the same. Can you believe that TLD is almost 30 years old? Man, how is that even possible?
  • Posts: 6,945
    Thanks for that pachazo! Now I feel really old! Its to its credit though that TLD is still a terrific Bond movie today! Fleming would have loved it!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 3,985
    TLD is top 5 for me.

    Seeing it at the Odeon Leicester Sq when it came out was a fantastic experience.

    It's the film that re-ignited my interest in all things 007.
  • Posts: 15,882
    THE SPY WHO LOVED ME

    Watching this in honor of Sir Roger's birthday. It remains my favorite of his Bonds....though it really is tough to choose. I first saw this one on HBO around the time MR was released. My Dad and I must have watched it 4 or 5 times then. These two films were my introduction to Bond as a wee lad. So many great scenes throughout TSWLM and iconic moments. Hits the spot every time.
  • Posts: 19,339
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    OP.

    Always been a fan of this one, but damn, did I really, really enjoy myself with this viewing, for some reason, particularly the bits with Kamal Khan. I don't know what it was exactly, but his sliminess and scheming worked incredibly well in this viewing.

    Totally agree with this,only rivaled by Zorin for me in the Moore era,and we all love Scaramanga (well Sir Christopher Lee)...

  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,620
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    OP.

    Always been a fan of this one, but damn, did I really, really enjoy myself with this viewing, for some reason, particularly the bits with Kamal Khan. I don't know what it was exactly, but his sliminess and scheming worked incredibly well in this viewing.

    Totally agree with this,only rivaled by Zorin for me in the Moore era,and we all love Scaramanga (well Sir Christopher Lee)...

    I love Zorin, he's even more slimy and twisted than Khan is.

    "Alive and well, I see...and still bungling in the dark." One of my favorite lines of Zorin's, not sure why I always liked it as much as I did.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited October 2016 Posts: 23,883
    @Creasy47, that's a great line, but whenever I watch that particular scene I'm reminded of how cheap the film looks at that specific point in that office. Like a tv movie. A big step down from the lavish & unusual Adam sets of MR or TSWLM.
Sign In or Register to comment.