How many times have you seen/will you see Skyfall

17891113

Comments

  • quantumofsolacequantumofsolace England
    Posts: 279
    Henderson wrote:
    I am now up to 25 viewings at cinema, gets better every time !

    Respect!
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Henderson wrote:
    I am now up to 25 viewings at cinema, gets better every time !

    I would like to thank you on behalf of EON for the 900 mil at the box office.
  • I have seen Skyfall 3 times and i think it simply gets better every time i watch it
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,350
    I may well watch it for a fourth time in January. It will tide me over until the BD. I never thought I'd be saying that!
  • Dr. Metz is NOT a bond fan PERIOD. I saw all 23 bond films and they're ALL great movies despite what anybody says, every single bond film keeps the bond formula which is very hard to maintain due to new genenerations (50 years i might add) and in Skyfall you have lots of REAL action sequence and less gadgets, before anyone protests about the gadget thing, let me remind you that Sean Connery never had so many gadgets like Pierce Brosnan, so in my opinion Daniel Craig's Bond is like an upgraded Connery's Bond, now as Iwas saying, also in Skyfall we have a shocker which is M's death and I'm sure every single bond fan loved that part, and most of all, we knew since Doctor No, that villains are INSANE, and FINALLY a true bond villain in Javier Bardem comes to life. So my conclusion is that every single bond movie is great, is unique and keeps the formula that true fans like us still want to enjoy.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    @rafael007fan, Dr. Metz...the guy who hasn't posted since late October?
  • and speaking of how many times i watched Skyfall? i only had the chance to watch it once in cinemas, for 2 reasons: 1 i couldn't wait to see it and 2 i want to see it again on DVD so i can watch it as many times as possible at home
  • i think so, i dunno is the guy who says that Skyfall is a bad movie and he's not gonna watch it
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    i think so, i dunno is the guy who says that Skyfall is a bad movie and he's not gonna watch it

    I remember one guy who said that he was avoiding it because of "a few bad reviews" - terrible logic - but we persuaded him into seeing it.

    None of us have the right to say who isn't a Bond fan for X reason. Bringing up a conversation I had a few minutes ago, that's like telling someone they aren't a Bond fan because they didn't care for DAD.

    I like women, but I don't care for the cocky, overly competent fat ones who will sleep with any and every guy. Does that remove me as a fan of women?
  • that's different dude we're talking about a movie franchise
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    that's different dude we're talking about a movie franchise

    It's actually not different in the slightest.

    You take a general thing, and then you don't like one part of the entirety of that certain thing, yet you enjoy a majority of the rest of it. Women, Bond films, it's the same exact thing, and it still doesn't give anyone the right to tell someone else that they are or aren't a fan of that.
  • ok ur right but this guy Metz say's THE WHOLE movie is bad not a single part like you say and he says it without watching it so that's my problem.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    I wasn't aware of that. We had a troll on here months ago who literally hated every single section of the entirety of the film. I don't understand.
  • that's what i'm saying, that's because i said that this guy is not a bond fan, i read that he doesn't like a reboot bond, so he didn't like any of Daniel Craig's bond obviously, but in my opinion, Skyfall revives the series entirely and has earned 950 plus million to prove it
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    Even then, it doesn't necessarily negate him as a Bond fan - he just doesn't prefer a certain film, style, or section of the movies throughout the Bond canon.
  • tell that to the people who argued that subject with the guy and also thought he's not a bond fan
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    tell that to the people who argued that subject with the guy and also thought he's not a bond fan

    Uhh, okay then. So a few people with the same thoughts = they're right and everyone else is wrong? Absolutely not. Congratulations on you and the others drawing a serious conclusion on a person you don't know whatsoever based on tiny evidence. Fantastic work.
  • thanks :)
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    thanks :)

    100% sarcasm alert on my part.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 13,936
    Henderson wrote:
    I am now up to 25 viewings at cinema, gets better every time !
    Well done! Don't forget to tally it up here!:

    http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4572/mi6s-contribution-to-skyfalls-profits/p1
  • Posts: 820
    Agent7F wrote:
    I've seen Skyfall on 22 November on Thursday, It was great. I will see again few more times. Like I did with Casino Royale & Quantum of Solacle
    Well I seen a few times more.
    22 November 2012 first day released in Australia ,30 November 2012,
    7th,14th, 17 & 19 December. 5 times my mission completed with Skyfall. I do again if I have to.
  • edited December 2012 Posts: 7
    Tuulia wrote:
    Just listening to the producers talk it's pretty obvious that they are enthusiastic and have a lot of love for Bond both old and new and indeed care a lot.


    Well, that may be surprising, but I do not agree. What you say was true of Albert Broccoli. But whenever I hear Michael Wilson speak about Bond, what he says sounds fake to me. I remember a 1997 interview in which he said about Pierce Brosnan: "He is THE James Bond"; he did not seem to believe it at all - something in his tone, his eyes. To be perfectly honest, there is something I do not like in him: his enthousiasm looks like a 'forgery'... And his cameos in every movie since GoldenEye: Saltzmann or Broccoli would never have done such a thing... It seems as if Wilson wanted people to see him, constantly showing off, some sort of lack of modesty...
    I keep thinking that what he mainly cares about is making money: remember the way he fired John Barry! Barry was contacted to score GoldenEye, but Wilson wanted him to write some kind of modern, commercial music (evidently to make more money by selling more CDs), which was artistically a huge mistake: Barry refused and was fired a few days later (and replaced by Eric Serra: what an enormous mistake again!!). Clearly Wilson did not understand the immense contribution Barry brought to the series (remember: Barry CREATED the Bond music; he wrote 90% of the James Bond Theme, not Monty Norman).
    Albert Broccoli was very skillfully able to combine artistic and commercial aspects of the franchise, and made few mistakes. Michael Wilson is excellent at dealing with commercial aspects of the movies - oh yes, he is! - but some essential artistic aspects are gone since he took over in 1995, and even more since 2006... Where is that bondian look, where is that bondian atmosphere, that were so significant, so pronounced in the 'old' movies? Certain scenes in the new Bond movies ARE bondian, but too many others are NOT, or look like copies of genuine Bond situations. For instance, the torture scene in CR is immensely awkward and embarrassing, NOT bondian at all (despite the fact it directly comes from the Fleming novel - a pity the screenwriters were not able to adapt it correctly), especially the so-called humorous 'one-liners', which fall completely flat and destroy the atmosphere of the scene... And what about the 'defibrillator' scene, which should be nominated as the "worst and most ridiculous movie scene of all times"? And there are so many other examples...


  • I have watched it four times so far (3 of them in IMAX). This may be it for me, though I don't discount the possibility of a fifth time. I agree with all those who have said it gets better with each viewing.
  • quantumofsolacequantumofsolace England
    Posts: 279
    Tonight, two months to the day since I was first enraptured by the finest film of the decade, I saw it for the 15th time. But will it be my last? (At the cinema, that is.) It's not that I've had my fill of it. Heck, I'd be happy to see this masterpiece where it belongs on the big screen from now until doomsday. (Which, if you're barking mad enough to buy into all that Mayan nonsense, I may have just done!) No, it's all down to how much longer it's going to hang around the multiplexes. My local Cineworld is down to just one showing per day. It's hard to believe that there's anyone left here in the UK who hasn't seen it - but there was still a fairly sizeable audience at the performance I attended this evening. Which for a 5:20PM showing just days before Christmas of a film that came out eight weeks ago is pretty good going.
  • BennyBenny In the shadowsAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 14,880
    Been a couple of weeks since my second trip. But I'm happy to say I'm going for a third viewing tomorrow with my in-laws. My father in-law is quite keen to see it, and wanted to drag me along.
    It wasn't hard to twist my arm. I believe it was a case of..."Would you like to go and see Sky..."
    "OK!"
    "...fall?"

    Round the year off with a fourth, as the wife and I have yet to see it together, and one of her friends who is not a Bond fan at all, wants to go and see it. Apparently the hype, and good word of mouth has intrigued them both into watching it. So we're booked in for the 30th of this month.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Benny wrote:
    Been a couple of weeks since my second trip. But I'm happy to say I'm going for a third viewing tomorrow with my in-laws. My father in-law is quite keen to see it, and wanted to drag me along.
    It wasn't hard to twist my arm. I believe it was a case of..."Would you like to go and see Sky..."
    "OK!"
    "...fall?"

    Round the year off with a fourth, as the wife and I have yet to see it together, and one of her friends who is not a Bond fan at all, wants to go and see it. Apparently the hype, and good word of mouth has intrigued them both into watching it. So we're booked in for the 30th of this month.

    That's soon to change, I feel.
    ;)
  • Posts: 8
    Saw Skyfall twice. Great film, excellent camera work. The opening shot of Bond in soft focus then walking into focus was genius! Shows what a great director can do.
    Can't wait to add the dvd to my collection.
  • I have seen Skyfall 5 times already. Excellent film can't wait for it to come out on Blue Ray
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    I'm thinking I may leave it at five. I saw CR three times, QoS five times, and vowed to see every Bond film after that at least five times. But, with the weather getting worse and more and more plans cropping up, including wanting to see 'Django Unchained,' I may not get to see it again. If it's in theaters here at the end of the year/beginning of 2013, I may fit in a sixth viewing.
  • quantumofsolacequantumofsolace England
    Posts: 279
    Made the best possible use of my day off work by spending the afternoon ensconced in Derby's Showcase Cinema De Lux watching a pair of back to back showings of the mighty SF - bringing my total viewings of said masterpiece up to 17.
    Again I find myself wondering how much longer it will stay on our screens here in Blighty. The fact that it came out nine weeks ago plus it's impending (ridiculously early, IMO) DVD/Blu-Ray release makes one think that it's days on the big screen must be numbered.
    However, one also must take into account it's sheer sustained popularity. I honestly expected to be one of maybe half a dozen people watching it today - but to my amazement and delight I found that both matinee performances were absolutely packed. I think that positive word of mouth must be playing it's part.
    And whilst I was waiting to go in for the first performance I heard an elderly couple mention SF, look at their tickets and then wonder aloud where screen 12A was. Helpful soul that I am I pointed out that the film was being shown on screen 10 and that the 12A on their tickets was actually the film's certificate. They laughed and said they were a bit out of touch as this was their first visit to the cinema in many years. I get the feeling that a lot of people who aren't regular cinemagoers are visiting the flicks specially to see SF because of all the praise the film has received not only from the critics but, far more importantly, from friends and family who have seen it and, quite rightly, loved it. I've certainly never had so many people come up to me and say how fantastic they think a Bond film is as they have done with SF.
Sign In or Register to comment.