› ›

What Directors Should Helm A Bond Film?

1…111112113114115117»

Comments

  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,982
    I have to say, let's wait and see what Villeneuve gives us first, though.
  • 007HallY007HallY
    edited October 30 Posts: 6,292
    Berger's a talented director, yes. He's got an interesting perspective on American/British action films too as a German/going from interviews he's given about AQOTWF. Concave was a very stylish and tense film, and I've really enjoyed the dark humour and drama of Patrick Melrose. I know his latest film seems to have had mixed reviews, but I still need to check it out.

    If the stars align and he ever gets another chance at Bond, I'd be very interested. And I think whatever way they just need to get the best director they see fit based on pitches, meetings, prior work etc. (and that's not something I think we can really judge after a point, for all our talk about 'auteurs' or 'workmen').

    Spielberg would be less likely and I'm not sure if he'd even be interested.
    SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ wrote: »
    I have to say, let's wait and see what Villeneuve gives us first, though.

    Yep, agreed. I'm not his biggest fan, but he's an exceptionally talented filmmaker, and even rewatching Blade Runner I could see a lot in there that would suit Bond. Prisoners is an awesome film too. I'm cautious, but looking forward to what we get.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,811
    It’s absolutely nuts to think there’s not even a script for Bond 26 and an individual has already kinda/sorta/has judged an entire $250M film that doesn’t even exist. And that same person is proclaiming a completely different director (whom I loved two out of his last three films— Ballad of a Small Player was a clunker, imo), would be perfect for the film AFTER the film that hasn’t been made!!! That’s absolutely craaaazyyyyyy. And the unconscious entitlement…wait to see what they give us, and move from there. Honestly, I’ve never heard/seen this type of extreme pearl clutching before.

    In the end, these are movies. To entertain and have a little escape. This isn’t Gaza. Or Ukraine. Just live in the moment, and enjoy life, and the unraveling of a film…

    No one has any idea what Villeneuve will do. Will it be Sicario meets BR? The Arrival meets Prisoner? Or something completely off the wall like ENEMY— which is bat shit crazy (and I love it).

    But c’mon Mendes, calm down. Give the passive doom and gloom a rest. Just an utter kill joy.

    The sun comes up every day— enjoy that. Read a Fleming. Do what you said you were going to do: enjoy the Bond films you love. I’d much rather read your thoughts on those films. That’d be a nice change.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,982
    If Villeneuve opens Bond 26 with a big and inventive ski chase, then scuba diving action, he would immediately win Bond fans over. I think from his conversation with Nolan about Bond...few years back, Villeneuve knows what makes Bond work.
  • 007HallY007HallY
    Posts: 6,292
    SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ wrote: »
    If Villeneuve opens Bond 26 with a big and inventive ski chase, then scuba diving action, he would immediately win Bond fans over. I think from his conversation with Nolan about Bond...few years back, Villeneuve knows what makes Bond work.

    Well, a memorable PTS at least should do it, surely? ;)

    I'm sure they'll be thinking about how to hook viewers into a new Bond (or Bond world). I'm sure they'll do it.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,982
    007HallY wrote: »
    SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ wrote: »
    If Villeneuve opens Bond 26 with a big and inventive ski chase, then scuba diving action, he would immediately win Bond fans over. I think from his conversation with Nolan about Bond...few years back, Villeneuve knows what makes Bond work.

    Well, a memorable PTS at least should do it, surely? ;)

    I'm sure they'll be thinking about how to hook viewers into a new Bond (or Bond world). I'm sure they'll do it.

    Yeah. Exactly.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 780
    SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ wrote: »
    I have to say, let's wait and see what Villeneuve gives us first, though.

    Agreed im interested what Villeneuve brings to the table he was good pick.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe Edward Berger for Bond 27
    Posts: 9,378
    Edgar Wright's new movie is recieving huge acclaim from critics, and that is much more of a traditional action film than he's done in the past. seems like he isn't such a bad choice to direct Bond after all.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    edited 2:04pm Posts: 2,982
    Lol @Mendes4Lyfe why do you like torturing yourself. So we take it Bond 26, is going to stay Bond 26 for you, yeah?...because Villeneuve is directing it, right? Also, you're already looking towards Bond 27, that is so far ahead. Another thing is, I wouldn't rule out Villeneuve from directing the next few Bond films, like he did with Dune, if Bond 26 turns out to be the critical darling and commercially successful Bond film, it's gearing up to be.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    Posts: 1,158
    To be fair, this is a thread for suggesting directors that might be a good fit for a Bond film, not a thread limited to talking about the next release. Just because Villeneuve is directing the next film doesn’t mean people should stop suggesting names.

    That said, I think I’d want to actually see Wright’s The Running Man first before declaring him a good choice on the back of a few brief comments. I wasn’t blown away by trailer, but the few comments I’ve read make it sound better than than the impression I got from that trailer.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,811
    sandbagger1 wrote: »
    To be fair, this is a thread for suggesting directors that might be a good fit for a Bond film, not a thread limited to talking about the next release. Just because Villeneuve is directing the next film doesn’t mean people should stop suggesting names.

    That said, I think I’d want to actually see Wright’s The Running Man first before declaring him a good choice on the back of a few brief comments. I wasn’t blown away by trailer, but the few comments I’ve read make it sound better than than the impression I got from that trailer.

    The problem with early reviews is the reviewers are friendly choices who are invited to these early screenings. This is seen as a big privilege, both for the individual writer and their websites. They’re not going to blast films and lose this privilege. That’s the relationship and the mutual understandings the JBlo.coms of the world have with producers (they keep getting invited to early screenings and the writers respond in as mostly favourable terms as they can muster). The early screening reviews aren’t real reviews by any stretch.
Sign In or Register to comment.