Who should/could be a Bond actor?

113191320132113221324

Comments

  • edited October 7 Posts: 6,048
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but honestly, that’s what Fleming’s Bond was meant to look like, and I’m sure he’d prepare physically if cast).
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,247
    007HallY wrote: »
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but I’m sure he’d prepare a bit for Bond).

    Yeah, that's what he needs just a moderate filling out.
  • edited October 7 Posts: 6,048
    007HallY wrote: »
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but I’m sure he’d prepare a bit for Bond).

    Yeah, that's what he needs just a moderate filling out.

    I’m sure if he lifted weights and ate chicken and fish or whatever he’d gain a bit more muscle. But he seems tall, fit, and has a naturally good physique anyway. Don’t know how athletic he is, but I know he was a skateboarder so I’m going to guess he’s somewhat used to exercise. I’m pretty sure he’s trained hard for a number of his roles (he’s pretty much all muscle in Postcards From London - again, he’s not Arnold Schwarzenegger, but if cast I suspect he’d be in better shape anyway than most of the other Bonds. I think he’s got a better physique already than Brosnan and Dalton when they were Bond, and we often forget Connery and Moore were sucking in their guts by film three).
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited October 7 Posts: 19,292
    Didn't Terence Young say it was by film 2? :D
    Yeah a bit of filling out would probably happen: Brosnan and Craig both did it.
  • Posts: 2,434
    I think Dickinson needs broader shoulders, but that happens to all the actors named here.

    I'm sure the next Bond will do his homework.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,247
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but I’m sure he’d prepare a bit for Bond).

    Yeah, that's what he needs just a moderate filling out.

    I’m sure if he lifted weights and ate chicken and fish or whatever he’d gain a bit more muscle. But he seems tall, fit, and has a naturally good physique anyway. Don’t know how athletic he is, but I know he was a skateboarder so I’m going to guess he’s somewhat used to exercise. I’m pretty sure he’s trained hard for a number of his roles (he’s pretty much all muscle in Postcards From London - again, he’s not Arnold Schwarzenegger, but if cast I suspect he’d be in better shape anyway than most of the other Bonds. I think he’s got a better physique already than Brosnan and Dalton when they were Bond, and we often forget Connery and Moore were sucking in their guts by film three).

    I think Dickinson will work, and although nowhere near who I would personally choose, it's slim pickings these days, and I would have nothing against his casting.

    Villeneuve only hires movie stars for his big parts, so I think Dickinson is a prime candidate in that he will have the marketability that Amazon are looking for. Dickinson attracts a big female demographic, and is very informative vogue in the Hollywood circles but he doesn't have a star role yet. The problem is he is scheduled to shoot 4 Beatles movies in the next couple years, so it would certainly mean a delay or holding off on production temporarily for Bond. They can't start filming until their star in available.
  • Posts: 6,048
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but I’m sure he’d prepare a bit for Bond).

    Yeah, that's what he needs just a moderate filling out.

    I’m sure if he lifted weights and ate chicken and fish or whatever he’d gain a bit more muscle. But he seems tall, fit, and has a naturally good physique anyway. Don’t know how athletic he is, but I know he was a skateboarder so I’m going to guess he’s somewhat used to exercise. I’m pretty sure he’s trained hard for a number of his roles (he’s pretty much all muscle in Postcards From London - again, he’s not Arnold Schwarzenegger, but if cast I suspect he’d be in better shape anyway than most of the other Bonds. I think he’s got a better physique already than Brosnan and Dalton when they were Bond, and we often forget Connery and Moore were sucking in their guts by film three).

    I think Dickinson will work, and although nowhere near who I would personally choose, it's slim pickings these days, and I would have nothing against his casting.

    Villeneuve only hires movie stars for his big parts, so I think Dickinson is a prime candidate in that he will have the marketability that Amazon are looking for. Dickinson attracts a big female demographic, and is very informative vogue in the Hollywood circles but he doesn't have a star role yet. The problem is he is scheduled to shoot 4 Beatles movies in the next couple years, so it would certainly mean a delay or holding off on production temporarily for Bond. They can't start filming until their star in available.

    We’ll see. I can understand some being skeptical about him as Bond, and I’m not saying it’ll be him, but he’s a very good actor (one of the best younger British ones about), and has presence. None of us know how he’d approach it in regards to an audition anyway. If it feels right in that context, I think they’ll go for him.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,247
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but I’m sure he’d prepare a bit for Bond).

    Yeah, that's what he needs just a moderate filling out.

    I’m sure if he lifted weights and ate chicken and fish or whatever he’d gain a bit more muscle. But he seems tall, fit, and has a naturally good physique anyway. Don’t know how athletic he is, but I know he was a skateboarder so I’m going to guess he’s somewhat used to exercise. I’m pretty sure he’s trained hard for a number of his roles (he’s pretty much all muscle in Postcards From London - again, he’s not Arnold Schwarzenegger, but if cast I suspect he’d be in better shape anyway than most of the other Bonds. I think he’s got a better physique already than Brosnan and Dalton when they were Bond, and we often forget Connery and Moore were sucking in their guts by film three).

    I think Dickinson will work, and although nowhere near who I would personally choose, it's slim pickings these days, and I would have nothing against his casting.

    Villeneuve only hires movie stars for his big parts, so I think Dickinson is a prime candidate in that he will have the marketability that Amazon are looking for. Dickinson attracts a big female demographic, and is very informative vogue in the Hollywood circles but he doesn't have a star role yet. The problem is he is scheduled to shoot 4 Beatles movies in the next couple years, so it would certainly mean a delay or holding off on production temporarily for Bond. They can't start filming until their star in available.

    We’ll see. I can understand some being skeptical about him as Bond, and I’m not saying it’ll be him, but he’s a very good actor (one of the best younger British ones about), and has presence. None of us know how he’d approach it in regards to an audition anyway. If it feels right in that context, I think they’ll go for him.

    Well, I'm inclined to believe that's the sort of person they're looking for simply because they keep mentioning how they want a bold creative swing and to take big risks. He seems like the kind of guy to want to take it in his own direction. If that's the kind of vision that Villeneuve, Knight and the producers are all in agreement on, then it would appear to be a perfect fit given Dickinsons already huge appeal with the female demographic.

    But, again, the big hiccup I can see is what that would mean for actually getting to film the thing, and getting schedules to line up. So far Amazon have been very patient to allow enough time for the right pieces to fall into place. Question is will they be patient enough to accommodate Dickinson?
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 698
    I would want someone who shines in the audition. Campbell said Cavills audition was tremendous.
  • edited October 7 Posts: 2,434
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but I’m sure he’d prepare a bit for Bond).

    Yeah, that's what he needs just a moderate filling out.

    I’m sure if he lifted weights and ate chicken and fish or whatever he’d gain a bit more muscle. But he seems tall, fit, and has a naturally good physique anyway. Don’t know how athletic he is, but I know he was a skateboarder so I’m going to guess he’s somewhat used to exercise. I’m pretty sure he’s trained hard for a number of his roles (he’s pretty much all muscle in Postcards From London - again, he’s not Arnold Schwarzenegger, but if cast I suspect he’d be in better shape anyway than most of the other Bonds. I think he’s got a better physique already than Brosnan and Dalton when they were Bond, and we often forget Connery and Moore were sucking in their guts by film three).

    I think Dickinson will work, and although nowhere near who I would personally choose, it's slim pickings these days, and I would have nothing against his casting.

    Villeneuve only hires movie stars for his big parts, so I think Dickinson is a prime candidate in that he will have the marketability that Amazon are looking for. Dickinson attracts a big female demographic, and is very informative vogue in the Hollywood circles but he doesn't have a star role yet. The problem is he is scheduled to shoot 4 Beatles movies in the next couple years, so it would certainly mean a delay or holding off on production temporarily for Bond. They can't start filming until their star in available.

    We’ll see. I can understand some being skeptical about him as Bond, and I’m not saying it’ll be him, but he’s a very good actor (one of the best younger British ones about), and has presence. None of us know how he’d approach it in regards to an audition anyway. If it feels right in that context, I think they’ll go for him.

    Well, I'm inclined to believe that's the sort of person they're looking for simply because they keep mentioning how they want a bold creative swing and to take big risks. He seems like the kind of guy to want to take it in his own direction. If that's the kind of vision that Villeneuve, Knight and the producers are all in agreement on, then it would appear to be a perfect fit given Dickinsons already huge appeal with the female demographic.

    But, again, the big hiccup I can see is what that would mean for actually getting to film the thing, and getting schedules to line up. So far Amazon have been very patient to allow enough time for the right pieces to fall into place. Question is will they be patient enough to accommodate Dickinson?

    Amazon has money, it doesn't need to be patient. If they want to have Dickinson badly, they just have to write a check.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,247
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but I’m sure he’d prepare a bit for Bond).

    Yeah, that's what he needs just a moderate filling out.

    I’m sure if he lifted weights and ate chicken and fish or whatever he’d gain a bit more muscle. But he seems tall, fit, and has a naturally good physique anyway. Don’t know how athletic he is, but I know he was a skateboarder so I’m going to guess he’s somewhat used to exercise. I’m pretty sure he’s trained hard for a number of his roles (he’s pretty much all muscle in Postcards From London - again, he’s not Arnold Schwarzenegger, but if cast I suspect he’d be in better shape anyway than most of the other Bonds. I think he’s got a better physique already than Brosnan and Dalton when they were Bond, and we often forget Connery and Moore were sucking in their guts by film three).

    I think Dickinson will work, and although nowhere near who I would personally choose, it's slim pickings these days, and I would have nothing against his casting.

    Villeneuve only hires movie stars for his big parts, so I think Dickinson is a prime candidate in that he will have the marketability that Amazon are looking for. Dickinson attracts a big female demographic, and is very informative vogue in the Hollywood circles but he doesn't have a star role yet. The problem is he is scheduled to shoot 4 Beatles movies in the next couple years, so it would certainly mean a delay or holding off on production temporarily for Bond. They can't start filming until their star in available.

    We’ll see. I can understand some being skeptical about him as Bond, and I’m not saying it’ll be him, but he’s a very good actor (one of the best younger British ones about), and has presence. None of us know how he’d approach it in regards to an audition anyway. If it feels right in that context, I think they’ll go for him.

    Well, I'm inclined to believe that's the sort of person they're looking for simply because they keep mentioning how they want a bold creative swing and to take big risks. He seems like the kind of guy to want to take it in his own direction. If that's the kind of vision that Villeneuve, Knight and the producers are all in agreement on, then it would appear to be a perfect fit given Dickinsons already huge appeal with the female demographic.

    But, again, the big hiccup I can see is what that would mean for actually getting to film the thing, and getting schedules to line up. So far Amazon have been very patient to allow enough time for the right pieces to fall into place. Question is will they be patient enough to accommodate Dickinson?

    Amazon has money, it doesn't need to be patient. If they really want to have Dickinson badly, they just have to write a check.

    But he's already signed to play John Lennon in 4 Beatles films. Are you saying they would pay to get him out?
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    edited October 7 Posts: 8,670
    Delete
  • Posts: 2,434
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but I’m sure he’d prepare a bit for Bond).

    Yeah, that's what he needs just a moderate filling out.

    I’m sure if he lifted weights and ate chicken and fish or whatever he’d gain a bit more muscle. But he seems tall, fit, and has a naturally good physique anyway. Don’t know how athletic he is, but I know he was a skateboarder so I’m going to guess he’s somewhat used to exercise. I’m pretty sure he’s trained hard for a number of his roles (he’s pretty much all muscle in Postcards From London - again, he’s not Arnold Schwarzenegger, but if cast I suspect he’d be in better shape anyway than most of the other Bonds. I think he’s got a better physique already than Brosnan and Dalton when they were Bond, and we often forget Connery and Moore were sucking in their guts by film three).

    I think Dickinson will work, and although nowhere near who I would personally choose, it's slim pickings these days, and I would have nothing against his casting.

    Villeneuve only hires movie stars for his big parts, so I think Dickinson is a prime candidate in that he will have the marketability that Amazon are looking for. Dickinson attracts a big female demographic, and is very informative vogue in the Hollywood circles but he doesn't have a star role yet. The problem is he is scheduled to shoot 4 Beatles movies in the next couple years, so it would certainly mean a delay or holding off on production temporarily for Bond. They can't start filming until their star in available.

    We’ll see. I can understand some being skeptical about him as Bond, and I’m not saying it’ll be him, but he’s a very good actor (one of the best younger British ones about), and has presence. None of us know how he’d approach it in regards to an audition anyway. If it feels right in that context, I think they’ll go for him.

    Well, I'm inclined to believe that's the sort of person they're looking for simply because they keep mentioning how they want a bold creative swing and to take big risks. He seems like the kind of guy to want to take it in his own direction. If that's the kind of vision that Villeneuve, Knight and the producers are all in agreement on, then it would appear to be a perfect fit given Dickinsons already huge appeal with the female demographic.

    But, again, the big hiccup I can see is what that would mean for actually getting to film the thing, and getting schedules to line up. So far Amazon have been very patient to allow enough time for the right pieces to fall into place. Question is will they be patient enough to accommodate Dickinson?

    Amazon has money, it doesn't need to be patient. If they really want to have Dickinson badly, they just have to write a check.

    But he's already signed to play John Lennon in 4 Beatles films. Are you saying they would pay to get him out?

    If it takes too long to start filming, I don't think it's necessary. Actors need to work.

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 19,292
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but I’m sure he’d prepare a bit for Bond).

    Yeah, that's what he needs just a moderate filling out.

    I’m sure if he lifted weights and ate chicken and fish or whatever he’d gain a bit more muscle. But he seems tall, fit, and has a naturally good physique anyway. Don’t know how athletic he is, but I know he was a skateboarder so I’m going to guess he’s somewhat used to exercise. I’m pretty sure he’s trained hard for a number of his roles (he’s pretty much all muscle in Postcards From London - again, he’s not Arnold Schwarzenegger, but if cast I suspect he’d be in better shape anyway than most of the other Bonds. I think he’s got a better physique already than Brosnan and Dalton when they were Bond, and we often forget Connery and Moore were sucking in their guts by film three).

    I think Dickinson will work, and although nowhere near who I would personally choose, it's slim pickings these days, and I would have nothing against his casting.

    Villeneuve only hires movie stars for his big parts, so I think Dickinson is a prime candidate in that he will have the marketability that Amazon are looking for. Dickinson attracts a big female demographic, and is very informative vogue in the Hollywood circles but he doesn't have a star role yet. The problem is he is scheduled to shoot 4 Beatles movies in the next couple years, so it would certainly mean a delay or holding off on production temporarily for Bond. They can't start filming until their star in available.

    We’ll see. I can understand some being skeptical about him as Bond, and I’m not saying it’ll be him, but he’s a very good actor (one of the best younger British ones about), and has presence. None of us know how he’d approach it in regards to an audition anyway. If it feels right in that context, I think they’ll go for him.

    Well, I'm inclined to believe that's the sort of person they're looking for simply because they keep mentioning how they want a bold creative swing and to take big risks. He seems like the kind of guy to want to take it in his own direction. If that's the kind of vision that Villeneuve, Knight and the producers are all in agreement on, then it would appear to be a perfect fit given Dickinsons already huge appeal with the female demographic.

    But, again, the big hiccup I can see is what that would mean for actually getting to film the thing, and getting schedules to line up. So far Amazon have been very patient to allow enough time for the right pieces to fall into place. Question is will they be patient enough to accommodate Dickinson?

    Amazon has money, it doesn't need to be patient. If they really want to have Dickinson badly, they just have to write a check.

    But he's already signed to play John Lennon in 4 Beatles films. Are you saying they would pay to get him out?

    Nah, they're already rehearsing those, it's happening. Personally I don't think they'd wait for him, but who knows.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,992
    mtm wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Dickinson actually has a decent physique anyway (he’s quite lean in Triangle of Sadness - maybe not bulked out and very much a ‘swimmer’s body’, but I’m sure he’d prepare a bit for Bond).

    Yeah, that's what he needs just a moderate filling out.

    I’m sure if he lifted weights and ate chicken and fish or whatever he’d gain a bit more muscle. But he seems tall, fit, and has a naturally good physique anyway. Don’t know how athletic he is, but I know he was a skateboarder so I’m going to guess he’s somewhat used to exercise. I’m pretty sure he’s trained hard for a number of his roles (he’s pretty much all muscle in Postcards From London - again, he’s not Arnold Schwarzenegger, but if cast I suspect he’d be in better shape anyway than most of the other Bonds. I think he’s got a better physique already than Brosnan and Dalton when they were Bond, and we often forget Connery and Moore were sucking in their guts by film three).

    I think Dickinson will work, and although nowhere near who I would personally choose, it's slim pickings these days, and I would have nothing against his casting.

    Villeneuve only hires movie stars for his big parts, so I think Dickinson is a prime candidate in that he will have the marketability that Amazon are looking for. Dickinson attracts a big female demographic, and is very informative vogue in the Hollywood circles but he doesn't have a star role yet. The problem is he is scheduled to shoot 4 Beatles movies in the next couple years, so it would certainly mean a delay or holding off on production temporarily for Bond. They can't start filming until their star in available.

    We’ll see. I can understand some being skeptical about him as Bond, and I’m not saying it’ll be him, but he’s a very good actor (one of the best younger British ones about), and has presence. None of us know how he’d approach it in regards to an audition anyway. If it feels right in that context, I think they’ll go for him.

    Well, I'm inclined to believe that's the sort of person they're looking for simply because they keep mentioning how they want a bold creative swing and to take big risks. He seems like the kind of guy to want to take it in his own direction. If that's the kind of vision that Villeneuve, Knight and the producers are all in agreement on, then it would appear to be a perfect fit given Dickinsons already huge appeal with the female demographic.

    But, again, the big hiccup I can see is what that would mean for actually getting to film the thing, and getting schedules to line up. So far Amazon have been very patient to allow enough time for the right pieces to fall into place. Question is will they be patient enough to accommodate Dickinson?

    Amazon has money, it doesn't need to be patient. If they really want to have Dickinson badly, they just have to write a check.

    But he's already signed to play John Lennon in 4 Beatles films. Are you saying they would pay to get him out?

    Nah, they're already rehearsing those, it's happening. Personally I don't think they'd wait for him, but who knows.

    A good point. I could see Amazon waiting for an actor they have already established as Bond (much as Eon did with Craig), but not necessarily at the beginning of the actor's run.

    It's going to depend more on the writer and director, the vision they are planning for this Bond, or when the script is ready to film. I don't think Villeneuve shoots unfinished scripts (as happened several times with Eon), but I could be wrong.

    The top talent (DiCaprio is one) doesn't shoot unfinished scripts. I'd put Villeneuve in that same category, even moreso if he wins the Oscar for Dune 3 (his Return of the King?).
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,247
    Somehow I can't see Villeneuve and Knight easily meshing their styles. I think Villeneuve will take Knights script and do his own draft of it, to tailor it for the film he wants to make, similar to how P+W would be brought in to rewrite a script.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,670
    It’s so frustrating that for some unknown reason I can no longer post photos, it’s so strange, but if I could I would post side by side photos of Bond from “ 007 First Light” and Leo Suter. Not that it means anything but Suter looks like a slightly older, more rugged version of the Bond featured in the game.

    If the new film is supposed to take place some time after the game having a similar looking Bond would make for a nice sense of continuity.
  • Posts: 277
    I get the vibe that Suter could be a good side character agent.

    Anyway, if anyone was locked in we'd have carpets rolled out by now.
  • edited October 7 Posts: 448
    MSL49 wrote: »
    I would want someone who shines in the audition. Campbell said Cavills audition was tremendous.

    His acting ever since has been quite bad so Campbell might not be the best judge.
  • The Beatles thing that Dickinson is starring in is basically a mini-series, isn't it? I don't see how that would take 4 years to film. They film those kind of things all at once.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,247
    The Beatles thing that Dickinson is starring in is basically a mini-series, isn't it? I don't see how that would take 4 years to film. They film those kind of things all at once.

    Not 4 years, but at least 14 months of solid filming. Basically enough to rule out Bond 26 filming until late spring 2027.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 698
    M_Blaise wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    I would want someone who shines in the audition. Campbell said Cavills audition was tremendous.

    His acting ever since has been quite bad so Campbell might not be the best judge.

    Might not be the best but there was something in Cavills test.
  • Posts: 6,048
    dewiparry wrote: »
    I get the vibe that Suter could be a good side character agent.

    I know! Like, he’s a fellow 00 or British agent who Bond immediately distrusts and at some point is revealed to be working for the villain. He gets a particularly nasty death too.

    That’s very much the vibe I get too, haha.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 19,292
    I always liked that Sam Mendes pictured Damian Lewis as the 009 Bond steals the Aston DB10 from :D
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 698
    007HallY wrote: »
    dewiparry wrote: »
    I get the vibe that Suter could be a good side character agent.

    I know! Like, he’s a fellow 00 or British agent who Bond immediately distrusts and at some point is revealed to be working for the villain. He gets a particularly nasty death too.

    That’s very much the vibe I get too, haha.

    Why not for Bond?
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    Posts: 1,135
    It would have been a fun cameo. It’s very easy to imagine Lewis as a fellow double-0, and because he is an actor of a similar calibre to Craig, he wouldn’t feel so much like an inferior knock-off as a hero who’s adventures hadn’t been documented yet.
  • zebrafishzebrafish <°)))< in Octopussy's garden in the shade
    Posts: 4,477
    mtm wrote: »
    I always liked that Sam Mendes pictured Damian Lewis as the 009 Bond steals the Aston DB10 from :D

    That's a rumor I have never heard of.
  • Posts: 277
    007HallY wrote: »
    dewiparry wrote: »
    I get the vibe that Suter could be a good side character agent.

    I know! Like, he’s a fellow 00 or British agent who Bond immediately distrusts and at some point is revealed to be working for the villain. He gets a particularly nasty death too.

    That’s very much the vibe I get too, haha.

    Haha! "The forum guys never liked you, traitor."
  • Posts: 7,040
    None of the fellas mentioned in these 1324 pages will be Bond.

    Bond will be an unknown, as close as they can get to a mesh of the Bond from the books and the Bond from the films, minus the ten years of age they think will put Bond on their demographics bullseye.
  • zebrafishzebrafish <°)))< in Octopussy's garden in the shade
    Posts: 4,477
    Univex wrote: »
    None of the fellas mentioned in these 1324 pages will be Bond.

    Bond will be an unknown, as close as they can get to a mesh of the Bond from the books and the Bond from the films, minus the ten years of age they think will put Bond on their demographics bullseye.

    Unlikely. You have 100+ Bond-obsessed people on this forum who "waste" their time finding possible candidates. I bet the name of the next Bond actor has or will come up before it's officially announced.
Sign In or Register to comment.