Which actor would make a good Bond villain?

1212223242527»

Comments

  • Posts: 16,017
    Univex wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    I'm watching Oppenheimer at the moment. I think maybe Matthias Schweighöfer could make a good Bond villain, he's got an interesting face. My only reservations: another Germanic actor as a villain might be a cliche and on principle I'd rather have more brutish, physically imposing villains.

    He’d be very interesting, yes. Good call.
    How about Adrien Brody? Wouldn’t that be something?

    I always thought Brody had too nice a face. But I guess his profile is closer to what they have been casting for the later part of the Craig era. Personally, I'd rather have lesser known actors, but maybe this ship has sailed now.

    He was scary as hell in Peaky Blinders ;)

    Haven't seen Peaky Blinders.

    There's a lot of fairly unknown veteran actors in Oppenheimer who I think could make very capable Bond villains. Jefferson Hall for instance. As Chevalier, he looked a bit like the novel's Hugo Drax. He just needed a shorter haircut and a burnt scar.

    You should be a casting agent. Well done ;)

    As for Brody, take a look a this little gem of a scene



    Or this one


    Thanks, will watch them ASAP. I'm sure Brody is capable of playing a villain.

    Watching Oppenheimer, I think about half the cast could make a great villain. I would prefer a fairly unknown veteran, but if they use the same approach as the later half of the Craig era, Cillian Murphy has the most chances of being cast: he's a renowned veteran actor, he's won an Oscar, he's the right age, etc. He wouldn't be my first choice, for the reasons stated before (too famous now, plus I'd rather see a more imposing villain), but I would not be surprised to see him cast.
  • Posts: 162
    Alan Ritchson
  • cwl007cwl007 England
    Posts: 621
    Stanley Tucci. When Blofeld returns he would be a great choice.
    It's a pity he didn't do it in Spectre instead of the awful portrayal we did get. Just my opinion of course.
  • Posts: 16,017
    cwl007 wrote: »
    Stanley Tucci. When Blofeld returns he would be a great choice.
    It's a pity he didn't do it in Spectre instead of the awful portrayal we did get. Just my opinion of course.

    Tucci is okay, but I don't see anything that would make him a great Blofeld.

    Side note: why do so many people mention bald actors as potential Blofeld?
  • cwl007cwl007 England
    Posts: 621
    Good question. I don't necessarily look at baldness as a first criteria, after all that can be dealt with, Nicholas Hoult in Superman.
    But if there is an actor I like and just happens to be bald it allows me to make an easy leap.
    Mark Srong would be another one I could see as Blofeld.
    As for a Blofeld with hair, I just prefer the bald look. It doesn't help that I thought the 2 official Blofelds we have had with hair were rubbish.
  • Posts: 16,017
    In FRWL and TB he has hair. He has hair in the novels. And it's very debatable whether or not Waltz was rubbish, it's certainly not consensus. Be that as it may, it's not Blofeld haircut or baldness that define the character. Or that determines whether or not the character is well interpreted.
  • Posts: 2,330
    In terms of Blofeld, I always thought Werner Herzog would've been great, especially after his villainous performance in Jack Reacher:

    Jack-Reacher-2012-008.jpg?width=465&dpr=1&s=none&crop=none
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,850
    Mark Strong could have been a brilliant villain. He's a brilliant actor, with a great presence and powerful voice. Perhaps him being in the Kingsmen series didn't help
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 456
    cwl007 wrote: »
    Stanley Tucci. When Blofeld returns he would be a great choice.
    It's a pity he didn't do it in Spectre instead of the awful portrayal we did get. Just my opinion of course.
    Agreed Tucci is a good pick.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited 2:48pm Posts: 3,330
    Mallory wrote: »
    In terms of Blofeld, I always thought Werner Herzog would've been great, especially after his villainous performance in Jack Reacher
    Herzog would, indeed, have made an excellent Blofeld. Radiating cold menace and a definite 'otherness.' You'd believe you were in the hands of someone who was capable of anything. So much so that, if written by someone like Paul Haggis, I could even see the potential for Herzog to have been the definitive screen Blofeld.
  • Posts: 16,017
    Mallory wrote: »
    In terms of Blofeld, I always thought Werner Herzog would've been great, especially after his villainous performance in Jack Reacher:

    Jack-Reacher-2012-008.jpg?width=465&dpr=1&s=none&crop=none

    He's too old now, I think. A few years ago I would have said Ciaran Hinds or Brendan Gleeson.
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    Mark Strong could have been a brilliant villain. He's a brilliant actor, with a great presence and powerful voice. Perhaps him being in the Kingsmen series didn't help

    He's a personal friend of Daniel Craig. I'm a tad surprised they don't seem to have thought of him. For Denbigh perhaps? I must confess, I never liked Andrew Scott in anything.
Sign In or Register to comment.