Who should/could be a Bond actor?

1129312941295129612971299»

Comments

  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited 3:19am Posts: 15,309
    I'd be happy with Pattinson, but at the moment I want Callum Turner.

    EDIT: As Bond.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,148
    It'll be Callum Turner or Harris Dickinson. Callum if they want a safer, more smooth edged Bond, Dickinson if they want a live wire. I genuinely believe it's down to those two, and I'm leaning Callum gets it.
  • Posts: 227
    It'll be Callum Turner or Harris Dickinson. Callum if they want a safer, more smooth edged Bond, Dickinson if they want a live wire. I genuinely believe it's down to those two, and I'm leaning Callum gets it.

    Nice theory, but no one knows what Bond is or going to be.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,543
    In several interviews with the new writer, Steven Knight, when asked, who is going to be the next Bond, he frequently replies, “ I can’t give a the answer to that”;
    that doesn’t me he doesn’t know…
  • Posts: 5,718
    Oh, I'm sure they have actors in mind, if not someone they're actively pursuing to audition.

    No idea who it'll be. As I've said I think they'll go a bit more established than unknown, but at the same time I'm prepared for any curveball. I personally like Callum Turner as well and think he'd be a really good Bond.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,740
    007HallY wrote: »
    Oh, I'm sure they have actors in mind, if not someone they're actively pursuing to audition.

    No idea who it'll be. As I've said I think they'll go a bit more established than unknown, but at the same time I'm prepared for any curveball. I personally like Callum Turner as well and think he'd be a really good Bond.

    Agreed they must have some kind of list, but, I truly think the script won’t be written for any one actor at the moment. I have a feeling it will be executed first and foremost on the tone that has been agreed upon by the creatives.

    Establish the tone— which they’ve obviously done and DV’s pitch has hit the mark.

    The script is developed with this tone running through every line, ever piece of dialogue, every motive of all of the characters.

    Then cast the actor that best suits this tone.

    Rewrites after casting will continue to sculpt the script for the chosen man.
  • edited 1:04pm Posts: 5,718
    peter wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Oh, I'm sure they have actors in mind, if not someone they're actively pursuing to audition.

    No idea who it'll be. As I've said I think they'll go a bit more established than unknown, but at the same time I'm prepared for any curveball. I personally like Callum Turner as well and think he'd be a really good Bond.

    Agreed they must have some kind of list, but, I truly think the script won’t be written for any one actor at the moment. I have a feeling it will be executed first and foremost on the tone that has been agreed upon by the creatives.

    Establish the tone— which they’ve obviously done and DV’s pitch has hit the mark.

    The script is developed with this tone running through every line, ever piece of dialogue, every motive of all of the characters.

    Then cast the actor that best suits this tone.

    Rewrites after casting will continue to sculpt the script for the chosen man.

    I suppose you get situations where writers/directors claim they had at least the 'idea' of a specific actor. I'm thinking of Matt Reeves envisioning a sort of Kurt Cobain type Batman as Robert Pattinson, so being drawn to him for the part when writing it. Doesn't mean that example or Bond 26 was/is being written for any specific actor (ultimately casting is casting, and an actor will be found even if it’s not that specific actor the writer may have envisioned). So yeah, I agree, at this stage it's more important to get that script and characterisation of Bond rather than tailoring too specifically for any actor.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,148
    I'm of the strong belief that The Beatles quadrilogy won't be a problem for Dickinson getting the part (should they want him), because they will be long done with that project once cameras start rolling on Bond 26. There's not even a first draft yet, and Villeneuve will probably take a pass at it before they're ready to start filming. It's going to be a long wait still.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited 1:34pm Posts: 18,763
    When is Beatles happening then? They're obviously much further along with that, as you say. I guess the only issue is that it's four movies, so presumably will take a while..?

    I would also say don't forget about Josh O'Connor, I think he's a distinct possibility. Dickinson, Turner and O'Connor are the ones right up there to my mind. I guess Hoult remains a possibility too.
  • Posts: 5,718
    I’m not sure what’s going on with Mendes’ Beatles films. I know it’s four movies but surely there’s some overlap in the material they shoot and how much each lead is needed will vary? It’d be a big ask to only commit to those films for three years, but I guess it’s possible.

    Anyway, I’m just waiting for any surprise (or anti climax). Part of me gets a weird feeling it’ll end up being ATJ, although another part says it definitely won’t!
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    edited 2:05pm Posts: 2,036
    Charlie Higson tweeted that he wants James Norton, which I just think is about as boring and bland as can be. He has no career depth nor the charm of Connery or Brosnan.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,740
    007HallY wrote: »
    I’m not sure what’s going on with Mendes’ Beatles films. I know it’s four movies but surely there’s some overlap in the material they shoot and how much each lead is needed will vary? It’d be a big ask to only commit to those films for three years, but I guess it’s possible.

    Anyway, I’m just waiting for any surprise (or anti climax). Part of me gets a weird feeling it’ll end up being ATJ, although another part says it definitely won’t!

    I would really be surprised if ATJ gets it.

    So far the choices Amazon have made are elite.

    ATJ just doesn’t scream elite talent. Not even close. His name/CV/ talent seemingly isn’t the piece of the puzzle that fits the rest of the creative team.

    I have no idea who it could be, but ATJ doesn’t have the pedigree of the producers and director and writer. All seem to play in the gritty and commercial sandboxes and ATJ isn’t gritty, nor does he have that charisma and charm of a leading man. Craig may’ve played in smaller films, but he always seemingly had the talent of a character actor, with the charisma of a leading man. ATJ, as has been said, is usually exceptional at being forgettable. I’ve never seen him light the screen up, and he’s been plenty of years in this business!

    I could be wrong on him but when I look at what we have thus far, Pascal makes sense, as does Heyman, and combined they make an incredible creative duo. DV makes sense, and combined with his producers, it really is an envious team. And now Knight has been added. It really is mind blowing.

    Does ATJ make sense with the team that’s already been assembled? I don’t think so. And maybe one day soon, I’ll hafta eat my words, but I just don’t see it. Not after all these years of seeing this actor quickly fade from memory.
  • Posts: 227
    It will be either an actor who can pull of a decade long coming of age Bond saga, or it will be me.

  • edited 3:13pm Posts: 2,303
    Univex wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    If at this second I had to choose 5 candidates to screentest they would be , in no particular order,

    1.Theo James
    2. Callum Turner
    3. Leo Suter
    4. Jack Lowden
    5. Sam Claflin

    I'd sign under this list ;)

    Although, must say that the only one in that list that I can see in a Villeneuve film is Callum Turner. And I’m a big Theo James supporter.

    I can see Theo James too.

    I think it's a question of whether the actor can star in a Villeneuve film. I mean, the right level of fame and talent.

  • Posts: 426
    LucknFate wrote: »
    M_Blaise wrote: »
    LucknFate wrote: »
    Just saying, with filming starting in Jan 2026 for The Batman sequel, and release planned for Oct 2027, Pattinson could still film Bond.

    Sounds like you're trying to convince yourself of something you know won't happen.

    Can you relax? Clearly I'm not alone. What did I do to you?

    Huh?
  • Posts: 5,718
    peter wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    I’m not sure what’s going on with Mendes’ Beatles films. I know it’s four movies but surely there’s some overlap in the material they shoot and how much each lead is needed will vary? It’d be a big ask to only commit to those films for three years, but I guess it’s possible.

    Anyway, I’m just waiting for any surprise (or anti climax). Part of me gets a weird feeling it’ll end up being ATJ, although another part says it definitely won’t!

    I would really be surprised if ATJ gets it.

    So far the choices Amazon have made are elite.

    ATJ just doesn’t scream elite talent. Not even close. His name/CV/ talent seemingly isn’t the piece of the puzzle that fits the rest of the creative team.

    I have no idea who it could be, but ATJ doesn’t have the pedigree of the producers and director and writer. All seem to play in the gritty and commercial sandboxes and ATJ isn’t gritty, nor does he have that charisma and charm of a leading man. Craig may’ve played in smaller films, but he always seemingly had the talent of a character actor, with the charisma of a leading man. ATJ, as has been said, is usually exceptional at being forgettable. I’ve never seen him light the screen up, and he’s been plenty of years in this business!

    I could be wrong on him but when I look at what we have thus far, Pascal makes sense, as does Heyman, and combined they make an incredible creative duo. DV makes sense, and combined with his producers, it really is an envious team. And now Knight has been added. It really is mind blowing.

    Does ATJ make sense with the team that’s already been assembled? I don’t think so. And maybe one day soon, I’ll hafta eat my words, but I just don’t see it. Not after all these years of seeing this actor quickly fade from memory.

    Honestly, I agree. Although I do think despite his shortcomings I have an easier time seeing ATJ getting it than other lower profile actors. But ultimately it just comes down to that suspicious voice at the back of my head telling me it’s not impossible, however unlikely!
  • Posts: 7,001
    @peter, I do agree with you, my friend. I think there’s a list, and a general direction/idea, but the script is King, and it will dictate who to look for. Absolutely.

    But I’m curious. Would you see any of the so called candidates with this directorial/writing/producing team?
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,740
    Univex wrote: »
    @peter, I do agree with you, my friend. I think there’s a list, and a general direction/idea, but the script is King, and it will dictate who to look for. Absolutely.

    But I’m curious. Would you see any of the so called candidates with this directorial/writing/producing team?

    @Univex I could definitely see Elordi or Harris Dickinson in a DV vehicle; I like Callum Turner a lot! (shout out to @Denbigh ), but I can’t see him as easily in a DV film.Dunno why.

    Saying that, I am, and have, happily resigned and willingly submit to this creative team on who they will eventually choose... They’re doing a damn fine job thus far, and I have no reason to believe that the casting will be any different!
  • edited 6:29pm Posts: 7,001
    peter wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    @peter, I do agree with you, my friend. I think there’s a list, and a general direction/idea, but the script is King, and it will dictate who to look for. Absolutely.

    But I’m curious. Would you see any of the so called candidates with this directorial/writing/producing team?

    @Univex I could definitely see Elordi or Harris Dickinson in a DV vehicle; I like Callum Turner a lot! (shout out to @Denbigh ), but I can’t see him as easily in a DV film.Dunno why.

    Saying that, I am, and have, happily resigned and willingly submit to this creative team on who they will eventually choose... They’re doing a damn fine job thus far, and I have no reason to believe that the casting will be any different!

    I’m in the same state of mind, my friend. Full trust in this team. And very happy for it. Elated, really. Good to be on the same page, as always ;)
  • Posts: 48
    There's a good interview with James Norton in The Guardian today. This paragraph caught my attention:

    Norton portrayed one of the great villains of British television in Happy Valley’s Tommy Lee Royce. The character he helped create – charming, psychopathic, but in glimpses vulnerable, too – is what he does perfectly. His roles often strike a nerve because they wrestle with the pressures and flaws of modern masculinity.

    And then there's this, about his role in upcoming Netflix drama House of Guinness:

    These days, he thinks he has acquired the age and experience to perform a darkly magnetic character such as Rafferty. “And it felt great,” he says. “Because it taps into that alter ego of who you’d love to be. He’s violent, but he’s romantic, too. There’s a thug in all of us.”

    Imagine him bringing a little of that to Bond...

    Oh, and House of Guinness just so happens to be written by Steven Knight...
  • edited 6:55pm Posts: 7,001
    Never been a fan of Nortons. Well, except for the bikes. Those are cool :)

    Bit tired of the thug Bond, though. Tired of thugs in general. Not a fan of the “bruit in a suit” approach to Bond. I’d rather have the gentleman spy who can do some jujitsu.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,842
    I remember watching McMafia when Norton was rumoured for Bond, I thought he was quite wooden and forgettable in that.
    I think there are better candidates
  • Posts: 15,980
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I remember watching McMafia when Norton was rumoured for Bond, I thought he was quite wooden and forgettable in that.
    I think there are better candidates

    Boy was he wooden in it. I thought he was auditioning for The Apprentice!
Sign In or Register to comment.