Controversial opinions about Bond films

1721722723724725727»

Comments

  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited July 26 Posts: 4,023
    John Gavin would have made a passable Bond. Probably not better than Moore, but certainly an improvement over Lazenby.

    No, he's not Bond, and definitely, an American, so a big no no, he didn't looked the part, not convincing as Bond.

    And Lazenby for me is the closest to Fleming's Bond (moreso than Dalton) as he's the one I've envisioned while reading some of Bond's lines and thoughts in the books: that naivety, boyish nature of his.
    Sure, maybe in CR, it's Dalton, but from GF onwards, I can't help but to see Laz in my mind while reading his inner thoughts and dialogues.

    An unpopular opinion perhaps but Tony Curtis should've been Felix Leiter in LALD, he had shown some great chemistry with Moore in The Persuaders, they had great banter, I think that kinship could've been carried on in LALD.
    David Hedison had no chemistry with Moore whatsoever, he had more chemistry with Dalton in LTK.
    I think that role could've helped Curtis too as by that time, his career had faded out and he was barely getting any roles that he had the time to do drugs.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,784
    echo wrote: »
    John Gavin would have made a passable Bond. Probably not better than Moore, but certainly an improvement over Lazenby.

    Gavin would have been great as the stiff in DAF.

    He could have been Peter Franks, though I'm not sure he would have fought as well in the elevator. ;-)
  • RyanRyan Canada
    Posts: 753
    echo wrote: »
    John Gavin would have made a passable Bond. Probably not better than Moore, but certainly an improvement over Lazenby.

    Gavin would have been great as the stiff in DAF.

    "The stiff... *ahem* deceased back there. Your brother, Mr. Franks?"
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,784
    Ryan wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    John Gavin would have made a passable Bond. Probably not better than Moore, but certainly an improvement over Lazenby.

    Gavin would have been great as the stiff in DAF.

    "The stiff... *ahem* deceased back there. Your brother, Mr. Franks?"

    "I got a brudda."

    sgparb9clly9.jpeg

    I love that moment! Lawrence and Connery give such a memorable facial expression while Haig looks like a simpleton. :-D
  • slide_99slide_99 USA
    Posts: 797
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Am I the only one who doesn't find TB boring?

    It's my favorite Bond film, so I don't find it boring, either. The first third is a bit slow but I find it enjoyable for the Hitchcockian absurdity. TB is also where Connery peaked as Bond, IMO, and combined all the elements of his previous performances.

    DN: Bond is lethal but not that suave or humorous, and also a bit hotheaded- more of a typical 50s/60s tough guy
    FRWL: lethal, still not that humorous, but far less hotheaded and more suave and businesslike- more like Fleming's character
    GF: suave but not as lethal as before, and much more sarcastic and humorous- the start of the popular image of Bond
    TB: lethal, suave, and humorous all at once- Connery's definitive performance as Bond
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,784
    I don't get what could possibly be boring about TB. Connery is awesome, the action is good, the photography is stunning and the score is perfect. I know that people complain about the underwater photography. Well, I admire the technical achievements and marvel, every time, at what they accomplished.

    That said, I don't think any Bond film is boring.
  • Posts: 15,916
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    I don't get what could possibly be boring about TB. Connery is awesome, the action is good, the photography is stunning and the score is perfect. I know that people complain about the underwater photography. Well, I admire the technical achievements and marvel, every time, at what they accomplished.

    That said, I don't think any Bond film is boring.

    I love TB's underwater sequences the way I love Barry Lyndon.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,622
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    David Hedison had no chemistry with Moore whatsoever, he had more chemistry with Dalton in LTK.

    Interesting, I have the opposite reaction to those: LALD is one of the few times I buy that Bond and Felix are actually friends, and I don’t really include LTK in that from the time they spend onscreen together. Hedison is nicely charismatic, but he and Dalton don’t feel like they have much in common to me.
    Still want to see that Best Man speech.
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,546
    A bit of a hot take.

    I think John Terry could've been a really good Felix if he'd actually had something to work with, and he should've come back for LTK even though I really like Hedison in the role.
Sign In or Register to comment.