› ›

Where does Bond go after Craig?

1…749750751752754

Comments

  • CrabKeyCrabKey
    Posts: 2,202
    Let it be.
  • SonofSeanSonofSean
    Posts: 203
    Breaking news: Aaron Taylor Johnson on the red carpet premiere of 28 Years Later said this to a reporter: "I can't tell you anything."
    Anyone else really tired of all this waiting around and silly speculation?
    I think Aaron Taylor Johnson could be amazing, but I'd still love Theo James personally.
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,375
    SonofSean wrote: »
    Breaking news: Aaron Taylor Johnson on the red carpet premiere of 28 Years Later said this to a reporter: "I can't tell you anything."
    Anyone else really tired of all this waiting around and silly speculation?
    I think Aaron Taylor Johnson could be amazing, but I'd still love Theo James personally.

    I'd be pleased with ATJ. I think he's a strong candidate. Obviously there are many good actors who have a right to audition. But personally i'd rather a 'Caucasian' actor. I'd like some semblance of Fleming's character to remain. Although that kind of comment could get you labelled as 'far right' by some on here.. :))
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 1,988
    Let's keep that discussion to just one thread for now. I think we should all always have an open mind to the next Bond, and in this day and age, that could mean somebody less traditional. I think that's fine, and most people can agree that it's fine, and not even that likely to happen.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,675
    Breaking News?!! The guy who looks homeless was asked, “what’s next (after 28 Days…), and he shrugged “can’t talk about it”.

    When an actor is in negotiations for any role (*any*), they won’t discuss the project because it’s not a done deal.

    This literally could be for any role that he’s talking about, and combining this non-breaking news quote that Yahoo.com is trying to make into clickbait, the fact is: the two producers have a slate of projects they’re contracted to finish and haven’t earnestly started pre-production on Bond 26; there isn’t a script and there are no writers (you’re not going to cast an actor before a script has been written, lol); there’s no director, but sure, let’s jump on this carousel for the tenth spin since 2022…

    I can’t imagine this guy will be the face of 007 for the next 10-15 years, but if he will be, there are procedures the producers will apply to pre-production. Pascal and Heyman are far too seasoned to anoint any one actor, especially before hiring writers, overseeing the development of the script, and grabbing their director.
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    edited June 19 Posts: 2,138
    ATJ has a secret. I guess it's more than what Aaron Pierre has. ;)

    Relax. There will be time to get angry later.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    edited June 19 Posts: 9,675
    DEKE_RIVERS wrote: »
    ATJ has a secret. I guess it's more than what Aaron Pierre has. ;)

    Relax. There will be time to get angry later.

    @DEKE_RIVERS , for the thousandth time, what are you talking about? You are the most prolific poster and yet you only make sense once for every 123 posts.

    Do you ever go outside and touch grass?
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    Posts: 2,138
    It's just a rumor...Relax.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,675
    DEKE_RIVERS wrote: »
    It's just a rumor...Relax.

    Uhm... Yah, @DEKE_RIVERS , and I was responding to the breaking news rumour.

    Perhaps you should watch a little less of Never Say Never Again, read a book, hug a family member, and don't reply to post unless you have something to say.

    Thanks, bruh!
  • Scaramanga1974Scaramanga1974
    Posts: 896
    SonofSean wrote: »
    Breaking news: Aaron Taylor Johnson on the red carpet premiere of 28 Years Later said this to a reporter: "I can't tell you anything."
    Anyone else really tired of all this waiting around and silly speculation?
    I think Aaron Taylor Johnson could be amazing, but I'd still love Theo James personally.

    I second that. Theo James looks and sounds the part. Brilliant in The Gentlemen.

  • 007HallY007HallY
    Posts: 5,446
    My issue with ATJ is he's a limited actor. Not a bad one, but a rather dull one. He gets such interesting roles but has made so little impact in them. With Bond you really need to have that extra sense of charisma/something special.

    But as I said, if he's picked it's his chance to prove me wrong, and I'd be happy if he did! I don't think his quote is any indication of anything to do with Bond however.
  • dewiparrydewiparry
    edited June 19 Posts: 174
    Safe choice are fine for small films. But this is the reboot of all reboots.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,755
    dewiparry wrote: »
    Safe choice are fine for small films. But this is the reboot of all reboots.

    OK, film title for B26: Reboot the System
  • StamperStamper
    Posts: 436
    The next Bond will make all you regret the Craig era LOL. The series is dead. Bond is dead. We are entering dark Disney Star Wars like territory. Who cares what they do? It's over.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 14,508
    Reboot the mission.

    The Wallflowers - Reboot the Mission ft. Mick Jones
  • JamesSpectreJamesSpectre
    Posts: 166
    Watch this and tell me you genuinely see James Bond…

  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    edited June 20 Posts: 4,375
    JamesSpectre wrote: »
    Watch this and tell me you genuinely see James Bond…


    Not sure what this is supposed to prove. He's an actor. As in playing a different character to himself...
  • dewiparrydewiparry
    Posts: 174
    What a legend! Super nice guy. He said he's taking a break aftet 28 Years Later.
  • 007HallY007HallY
    Posts: 5,446
    JamesSpectre wrote: »
    Watch this and tell me you genuinely see James Bond…


    About as much as Craig in his pink velvet tuxedo or Connery without his toupee I suppose ;) he's an actor after all. Not a fan, but the guy's just chilling with some dogs. Looks like he's having a great time.
  • JamesSpectreJamesSpectre
    Posts: 166
    007HallY wrote: »
    About as much as Craig in his pink velvet tuxedo or Connery without his toupee I suppose ;) he's an actor after all. Not a fan, but the guy's just chilling with some dogs. Looks like he's having a great time.

    Oh, it must’ve been the pink.
    pierce-brosnan-gettyimages-1434130913-scaled-e1684238029883.jpg

    Relieved it wasn’t the voice, that average Joe vibe with a club bodyguard’s wardrobe. That would’ve been harder to ignore 🙄


  • 007HallY007HallY
    Posts: 5,446
    For the life of me, I'll never understand why some people think pink tuxedos are a good look.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    edited June 20 Posts: 2,691
    007HallY wrote: »
    For the life of me, I'll never understand why some people think pink tuxedos are a good look.

    Yeah. I think pink is usually associated with women. It suits them more. A man's color should be mainly black, blue & white....or any color that isn't illuminating.
  • 007HallY007HallY
    Posts: 5,446
    SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    For the life of me, I'll never understand why some people think pink tuxedos are a good look.

    Yeah. I think pink is usually associated with women. It suits them more. A man's color should be mainly black, blue & white....or any color that isn't illuminating.

    Darker shades of purple I think can look elegant. But something about bright pink to me is a bit garish, on men or women.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,691
    007HallY wrote: »
    SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    For the life of me, I'll never understand why some people think pink tuxedos are a good look.

    Yeah. I think pink is usually associated with women. It suits them more. A man's color should be mainly black, blue & white....or any color that isn't illuminating.

    Darker shades of purple I think can look elegant. But something about bright pink to me is a bit garish, on men or women.

    Yeah. That's right.
  • dewiparrydewiparry
    Posts: 174
    Pink is a gangster colour: In the graffiti art world they use it as a display of power/fearlessness. I think Pierce is wearing fuchsia, a kind of purple-pink.

    I see guys wearing pink shorts on my round. They have no style.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,063
    dewiparry wrote: »
    Pink is a gangster colour: In the graffiti art world they use it as a display of power/fearlessness. I think Pierce is wearing fuchsia, a kind of purple-pink.

    I see guys wearing pink shorts on my round. They have no style.

    Sanchez wore pink.
  • dewiparrydewiparry
    Posts: 174
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    dewiparry wrote: »
    Pink is a gangster colour: In the graffiti art world they use it as a display of power/fearlessness. I think Pierce is wearing fuchsia, a kind of purple-pink.

    I see guys wearing pink shorts on my round. They have no style.

    Sanchez wore pink.

    Yeah he's a gangster. I only have a gripe about pink shorts lol

    I think Bond would rock a pink tie for the office
  • AnotherZorinStoogeAnotherZorinStooge Bramhall (Irish)
    Posts: 709
    mtm wrote: »
    TheSkyfallen06 wrote: »

    Wonder why Bond is trying to light his cigarette with a flower in this thumbnail.

    Genius, mtm!
  • AnotherZorinStoogeAnotherZorinStooge Bramhall (Irish)
    edited June 20 Posts: 709
    007HallY wrote: »
    AnotherZorinStooge wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    TheSkyfallen06 wrote: »

    Bingo.

    If she shays no it meansh yesh

    'You want to shlap a woman with an open palm, not a fist..."

    Anyway, I'm being facetious again. I've only skimmed through the video so I might be way off the guy's analysis, but I'm not sure I fully agree with him when he talks about the Bond not being a 'hedonist' as of late and not engaging with the culture of where he's at (I guess since the Craig films?) You get Bond switching hotels in QOS (which I think is a great joke in a Bond film I'm mixed on), him commenting on the lamb in CR, and even ordering his specific cocktail in both films. One thing I loved about SF was that we saw Bond very easily drinking with locals and doing the scorpion drinking game (it's actually one of those weird things I can't imagine any cinematic Bond doing apart from Craig without looking totally uncomfortable, and yet I can imagine Fleming's Bond, perhaps a bit tipsy, doing the same thing and really applying himself to it in the right circumstance).

    I think the next Bond film has to do a bit better than Bond simply turning his nose up at a certain kind of brandy or immediately knowing the kind of vintage of wine he's drinking. Or having been to Oxford and studied however many languages (unless it's done in a certain way that just comes off as bulls*it nowadays). It's a fine line between making an onscreen Bond look like a pretentious ars*hole and making him out to be cultured, but moreover well travelled and interesting.

    You have to be careful when people want a past they didn't experience, or didn't exist, to return to prominence.

    The 60s Bonds were a product of their time. Remaking them sixty years later to rehash sixty years ago feels illusory, indeed, in some cases, sinister.
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    edited June 20 Posts: 2,138
    AnotherZorinStooge wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    AnotherZorinStooge wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    TheSkyfallen06 wrote: »

    Bingo.

    If she shays no it meansh yesh

    'You want to shlap a woman with an open palm, not a fist..."

    Anyway, I'm being facetious again. I've only skimmed through the video so I might be way off the guy's analysis, but I'm not sure I fully agree with him when he talks about the Bond not being a 'hedonist' as of late and not engaging with the culture of where he's at (I guess since the Craig films?) You get Bond switching hotels in QOS (which I think is a great joke in a Bond film I'm mixed on), him commenting on the lamb in CR, and even ordering his specific cocktail in both films. One thing I loved about SF was that we saw Bond very easily drinking with locals and doing the scorpion drinking game (it's actually one of those weird things I can't imagine any cinematic Bond doing apart from Craig without looking totally uncomfortable, and yet I can imagine Fleming's Bond, perhaps a bit tipsy, doing the same thing and really applying himself to it in the right circumstance).

    I think the next Bond film has to do a bit better than Bond simply turning his nose up at a certain kind of brandy or immediately knowing the kind of vintage of wine he's drinking. Or having been to Oxford and studied however many languages (unless it's done in a certain way that just comes off as bulls*it nowadays). It's a fine line between making an onscreen Bond look like a pretentious ars*hole and making him out to be cultured, but moreover well travelled and interesting.

    You have to be careful when people want a past they didn't experience, or didn't exist, to return to prominence.

    The 60s Bonds were a product of their time. Remaking them sixty years later to rehash sixty years ago feels illusory, indeed, in some cases, sinister.

    If people think James Bond is too posh or too old-fashioned then we have a problem.

    They can stop making movies now.
Sign In or Register to comment.